Considerations in the Deployment of Machine Learning Algorithms on Spaceflight Hardware

The aim of this paper is to review machine learning (ML) algorithms and techniques for hate speech detection in social media (SM). Hate speech problem is normally model as a text classification task. In this study, we examined the basic baseline components of hate speech classification using ML algorithms. There are five basic baseline components – data collection and exploration, feature extraction, dimensionality reduction, classifier selection and training, and model evaluation, were reviewed. There have been improvements in ML algorithms that were employed for hate speech detection over time. New datasets and different performance metrics have been proposed in the literature. To keep the researchers informed regarding these trends in the automatic detection of hate speech, it calls for a comprehensive and an updated state-of-the-art. The contributions of this study are three-fold. First to equip the readers with the necessary information on the critical steps involved in hate speech detection using ML algorithms. Secondly, the weaknesses and strengths of each method is critically evaluated to guide researchers in the algorithm choice dilemma. Lastly, some research gaps and open challenges were identified. The different variants of ML techniques were reviewed which include classical ML, ensemble approach and deep learning methods. Researchers and professionals alike will benefit immensely from this study.

ObjectiveEnhanced technology in computer and internet has driven scale and quality of data to be improved in various areas including healthcare sectors. Machine Learning (ML) has played a pivotal role in efficiently analyzing those big data, but a general misunderstanding of ML algorithms still exists in applying them (e.g., ML techniques can settle a problem of small sample size, or deep learning is the ML algorithm). This paper reviewed the research of diagnosing mental illness using ML algorithm and suggests how ML techniques can be employed and worked in practice.MethodsResearches about mental illness diagnostic using ML techniques were carefully reviewed. Five traditional ML algorithms-Support Vector Machines (SVM), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Random Forest, Naïve Bayes, and K-Nearest Neighborhood (KNN)-frequently used for mental health area researches were systematically organized and summarized.ResultsBased on literature review, it turned out that Support Vector Machines (SVM), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Random Forest, Naïve Bayes, and K-Nearest Neighborhood (KNN) were frequently employed in mental health area, but many researchers did not clarify the reason for using their ML algorithm though every ML algorithm has its own advantages. In addition, there were several studies to apply ML algorithms without fully understanding the data characteristics.ConclusionResearchers using ML algorithms should be aware of the properties of their ML algorithms and the limitation of the results they obtained under restricted data conditions. This paper provides useful information of the properties and limitation of each ML algorithm in the practice of mental health.

The aging and multimorbid population and health personnel shortages pose a substantial burden on primary health care. While predictive machine learning (ML) algorithms have the potential to address these challenges, concerns include transparency and insufficient reporting of model validation and effectiveness of the implementation in the clinical workflow. To systematically identify predictive ML algorithms implemented in primary care from peer-reviewed literature and US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Conformité Européene (CE) registration databases and to ascertain the public availability of evidence, including peer-reviewed literature, gray literature, and technical reports across the artificial intelligence (AI) life cycle. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Emcare, Academic Search Premier, IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, MathSciNet, AAAI.org (Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence), arXiv, Epistemonikos, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar were searched for studies published between January 2000 and July 2023, with search terms that were related to AI, primary care, and implementation. The search extended to CE-marked or FDA-approved predictive ML algorithms obtained from relevant registration databases. Three reviewers gathered subsequent evidence involving strategies such as product searches, exploration of references, manufacturer website visits, and direct inquiries to authors and product owners. The extent to which the evidence for each predictive ML algorithm aligned with the Dutch AI predictive algorithm (AIPA) guideline requirements was assessed per AI life cycle phase, producing evidence availability scores. The systematic search identified 43 predictive ML algorithms, of which 25 were commercially available and CE-marked or FDA-approved. The predictive ML algorithms spanned multiple clinical domains, but most (27 [63%]) focused on cardiovascular diseases and diabetes. Most (35 [81%]) were published within the past 5 years. The availability of evidence varied across different phases of the predictive ML algorithm life cycle, with evidence being reported the least for phase 1 (preparation) and phase 5 (impact assessment) (19% and 30%, respectively). Twelve (28%) predictive ML algorithms achieved approximately half of their maximum individual evidence availability score. Overall, predictive ML algorithms from peer-reviewed literature showed higher evidence availability compared with those from FDA-approved or CE-marked databases (45% vs 29%). The findings indicate an urgent need to improve the availability of evidence regarding the predictive ML algorithms' quality criteria. Adopting the Dutch AIPA guideline could facilitate transparent and consistent reporting of the quality criteria that could foster trust among end users and facilitating large-scale implementation.

Orthopedic patients have been increasing in hospital because of road traffic accidents, advanced age, a lack of exercise, inadequate nutrition, and other factors. The suggested article uses Machine Learning (ML) techniques to examine the patient reports. The ability to mimic the human actions is called ML. It is a subclass of AI that solves a number of healthcare-related issues. Here ML algorithms are used for health-related data. It solves a number of healthcare-related issues. ML is the process of a machine imitating intelligent human activities. It belongs to the Artificial Intelligence (AI) subclass. ML algorithms are used for medical data such as Logistic Regression, Support vector machine, K-Nearest Neighbor, Random Forest, Decision Tree, Artificial Neural Network to predict orthopedic illnesses such as Normal, Hernia and Spondylolisthesis orthopedic. ML techniques have increased the speed and accuracy for diagnosis. The most serious and urgent cases require rapid care. It improves patient care by lowering human error and stress on medical staff. Our primary objective is to improve machine performance and decrease incorrect categorization.

Air quality, both indoors and outdoors, is crucial for public health as it affects respiratory conditions and overall well-being. Machine learning (ML) techniques offer innovative solutions for monitoring and predicting air quality. However, choosing the right ML algorithms and evaluation metrics is essential for creating accurate air quality prediction models, as these choices directly impact the accuracy and reliability of the results. This study aims to explore and summarize the literature on the use of ML techniques in predicting and optimizing air quality, addressing the urgent issue of air pollution. The review analyzed papers from two electronic databases, namely Scopus and Science Direct. Information on ML techniques for predicting air quality and identifying the main sources of pollution was extracted from 26 studies. The study focuses on common ML techniques employed in air quality prediction, including classification, deep learning, regression, ensemble learning, and combinations of regression and deep learning. It also identifies the evaluation metrics used to assess the performance of these models, such as recall, root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and coefficient of determination (R2). By synthesizing existing knowledge, this study provides a comprehensive understanding of the metrics researchers use to measure the overall effectiveness of ML algorithms. It serves as a benchmark for future research and guides the selection of appropriate evaluation metrics in the field of air quality prediction.

This comprehensive review explores the design and applications of machine learning (ML) techniques to acoustic metamaterials (AMs) and phononic crystals (PnCs), with a particular focus on deep learning (DL). AMs and PnCs, characterized by artificially designed microstructures and geometries, offer unique acoustic properties for precise control and manipulation of sound waves. ML, including DL, in combination with traditional artificial design have promoted the design process, enabling data-driven approaches for feature identification, design optimization, and intelligent parameter search. ML algorithms process extensive AM data to discover novel structures and properties, enhancing overall acoustic performance. This review presents an in-depth exploration of applications associated with ML techniques in AMs and PnCs, highlighting specific advantages, challenges and potential solutions of applying of using ML algorithms associated with ML techniques. By bridging acoustic engineering and ML, this review paves the way for future breakthroughs in acoustic research and engineering.

ABSTRACTThis paper reviews the activity-travel behaviour literature that employs Machine Learning (ML) techniques for empirical analysis and modelling. Machine Learning algorithms, which attempt to build intelligence utilizing the availability of large amounts of data, have emerged as powerful tools in the fields of pattern recognition and big data analysis. These techniques have been applied in activity-travel behaviour studies since the early ’90s when Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) were employed to model mode choice decisions. AMOS, an activity-based modelling system developed in the mid-’90s, has ANN at its core to model and predict individual responses to travel demand management measures. In the dawn of 2000, ALBATROSS, a comprehensive activity-based travel demand modelling system, was proposed by Arentze and Timmermans using Decision Trees. Since then researchers have been exploring ML techniques like Support Vector Machines (SVM), Decision Trees (DT), Neural Networks (NN), Bayes Classifiers, and more recently, Ensemble Learners to model and predict activity-travel behaviour. A large number of publications over the years and an upward trend in the number of published articles over time indicate that Machine Learning is a promising tool for activity-travel behaviour analysis and prediction. This article, first of its kind in the literature, reviews these studies and explores the trends in activity-travel behaviour research that apply ML techniques. The review finds that mode choice decisions have received wide attention in the literature on ML applications. It was observed that most of the studies identify the lack of interpretability as a serious shortcoming in ML techniques. However, very few studies have attempted to improve the interpretability of the models. Further, some studies report the importance of feature engineering in ML-based studies, but very few studies adopt feature engineering before model development. Spatiotemporal transferability of models is another issue that has received minimal attention in the literature. In the end, the paper discusses possible directions for future research in the area of activity-travel behaviour modelling using ML techniques.

Background/aimsTo investigate the feasibility and accuracy of using machine learning (ML) techniques on self-reported questionnaire data to predict the 10-year risk of cataract surgery, and to identify meaningful predictors of...

Key challenges for 5G and Beyond networks relate with the requirements for exceptionally low latency, high reliability, and extremely high data rates. The Ultra-Reliable Low Latency Communication (URLLC) use case is the trickiest to support and current research is focused on physical or MAC layer solutions, while proposals focused on the network layer using Machine Learning (ML) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms running on base stations and User Equipment (UE) or Internet of Things (IoT) devices are in early stages. In this paper, we describe the operation rationale of the most recent relevant ML algorithms and techniques, and we propose and validate ML algorithms running on both cells (base stations/gNBs) and UEs or IoT devices to handle URLLC service control. One ML algorithm runs on base stations to evaluate latency demands and offload traffic in case of need, while another lightweight algorithm runs on UEs and IoT devices to rank cells with the best URLLC service in real-time to indicate the best one cell for a UE or IoT device to camp. We show that the interplay of these algorithms leads to good service control and eventually optimal load allocation, under slow load mobility.

Machine learning-driven prediction of tensile strength in 3D-printed PLA parts

Biogas plant operators often face huge challenges in the monitoring, controlling and optimisation of the anaerobic digestion (AD) process, as it is very sensitive to surrounding changes, which often leads to process failure and adversely affects biogas production. Conventional implemented methods and mechanistic models are impractical and find it difficult to model the nonlinear and intricate interactions of the AD process. Thus, the development of machine learning (ML) algorithms has attracted considerable interest in the areas of process optimization, real-time monitoring, perturbation detection and parameter prediction. This paper provides a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of different machine learning algorithms, including artificial neural network (ANN), fuzzy logic (FL), adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), support vector machine (SVM), genetic algorithm (GA) and particle swarm optimization (PSO) in terms of working mechanism, structure, advantages and disadvantages, as well as their prediction performances in modelling the biogas production. A few recent case studies of their applications and limitations are also critically reviewed and compared, providing useful information and recommendation in the selection and application of different ML algorithms. This review shows that the prediction efficiency of different ML algorithms is greatly impacted by variations in the reactor configurations, operating conditions, influent characteristics, selection of input parameters and network architectures. It is recommended to incorporate mixed liquor volatile suspended solids (MLVSS) concentration of the anaerobic digester (ranging from 16,500 to 46,700mg/L) as one of the input parameters to improve the prediction efficiency of ML modelling. This review also shows that the combination of different ML algorithms (i.e. hybrid GA-ANN model) could yield better accuracy with higher R2 (0.9986) than conventional algorithms and could improve the optimization model of AD. Besides, future works could be focused on the incorporation of an integrated digital twin system coupled with ML techniques into the existing Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system of any biogas plant to detect any operational abnormalities and prevent digester upsets.

A comprehensive review on detection of plant disease using machine learning and deep learning approaches

This paper presents a systematic review of studies related to Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) applications in Supply Chain Management (SCM). Our systematic search studied 109 journal articles published between 2007 and 2025. It was presented definitions for AI, ML, and SCM and a bibliometric analysis was carried out to examine trends and patterns in the existing literature. The 109 articles were grouped into five clusters based on keywords and abstracts, identifying promising research areas and proposes directions for future investigations. The current literature on AI and ML in SCM is expanding, with an increasing number of publications and growing diversity in applications, although significant gaps remain warranting attention. Various AI and ML techniques, including supervised learning algorithms, neural networks, and optimization techniques, have been studied in scenarios such as demand forecasting, inventory management, and risk analysis. Additionally, AI and ML methods are expected to gain broader acceptance in SCM scenarios, such as, application of Generative AI (GenAI) and Large Multimodal Models (LMMs); Quantum ML techniques to handle with large SCM data; to implement SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) for demand forecasting and fraud detection; and to use Generative AI models (like, GPT-4) to generate synthetic supply chain scenarios.

e17570 Background: Ovarian cancer(OC) is the leading cause of death from gynecologic malignancy. Current challenges include lack of diagnostic tools, predictive biomarkers, and identifying appropriate surgical candidates. Machine learning(ML) is an emerging field that can make accurate projections by making inferences on data and may play a crucial role in OC.The objective of the current study was to review the literature on application of ML in OC and report the most commonly used algorithms and their performance in comparison to existing prediction tools and traditional regression models. Methods: This is a systematic review of published literature from January 1985 to March 2021 on the use of ML in OC. An extensive search of electronic library databases was conducted. Four independent reviewers screened the articles initially by title then full text. Quality was assessed using the MINORS criteria. P-values were generated using the Pearson’s Chi-squared(x2) test to compare performance of ML models with traditional statistics. No p-values were reported if only one study was available. Results: Among 4,295 articles screened, 88 studies on ML in OC were included. The mean age of OC patients was 54.7 years(11-90) and the most common stages at diagnosis were:Stage III (39.9%) and IV (34%). Applications of ML were in clinical datasets(33%, n = 29), preoperative diagnostics(30.7%, n = 27), serum biomarkers (21.6%, n = 19), genomics (12.5%, n = 11), and prediction of cytoreductive outcomes (2.3%, n = 2). The most commonly applied algorithms were Support Vector Machine [SVM](28%, n = 33)and Neural Networks[NN] (25.28%). Over the past decades, the number of publications on ML in OC increased three-fold from 20(1994-2010) to 67 (2011–2021). Only 9 (10%) studies compared ML techniques with existing prediction tools, or traditional regression models. Among 29 clinical dataset studies, 4 compared ML with traditional logistic regression(LR). Two studies reported better performance with ML compared to LR but not significant(accuracy: 0.88 vs 0.84, p = 0.15), one study performed comparably(accuracy: 0.1 vs 0.1) while one study performed worse(accuracy: 0.1 vs 0.97). Only one preoperative diagnostic study compared ML techniques with LR. SVM classifiers outperformed LR in classifying ovarian masses as benign or malignant(sensitivity: 0.88 vs. 0.70). One serum biomarker study compared LR with ML algorithms; LR performed better using two biomarkers for predicting OC(accuracy: 0.97 vs. 0.94). Among five studies reporting overall survival outcomes, only one study compared survival ML techniques using NN with LR and showed that NN classifiers outperformed LR in predicting overall survival(AUC: 0.72 vs. 0.62). Conclusions: This is the first systematic review exploring the literature on ML algorithms in OC. Most ML models outperformed traditional models. However, larger datasets would be required to validate findings.

This survey paper explores the application of machine learning (ML) techniques in the domain of workplace injuries, focusing on three key areas: risk prediction, return to work (RTW) strategies, and demographic analysis. Through an extensive review of literature from January 2015 to July 2024, this paper examines the latest advancements in ML-driven approaches to workplace safety and identifies important research gaps. This paper highlights how classical ML techniques, such as ensemble models and decision trees, have become essential tools for identifying workplace injury risks, enabling more accurate interventions. It emphasizes the importance of leveraging ML in personalized RTW programs, which use data-driven insights to improve recovery outcomes and reduce economic demands. In the context of demographic analysis, this paper explores how ML algorithms can uncover disparities in injury rates across various age groups, industries, and occupations, underscoring the need for targeted safety measures. Moreover, research gaps are identified, particularly regarding the emerging potential of advanced ML techniques, such as deep learning and large language models (LLMs), for analyzing structured and unstructured safety data, methods that have not yet been widely applied in workplace injury research. As such, future research should apply recent advances in ML, integrating these approaches with comprehensive and accessible datasets to enhance the prediction and prevention of workplace injuries, provide more detailed analytics and insights, and improve safety protocols across all industries. This comprehensive survey is an invaluable resource for researchers and practitioners leveraging ML to address complex challenges in workplace safety.