• Home
  • Search
  • Constructing and Evaluating Machine-Learned Interatomic Potentials for Li-Based Disordered Rocksalts.
  • Open Access IconOpen Access
  • Cite Icon18
  • https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00039Copy DOI Icon

Constructing and Evaluating Machine-Learned Interatomic Potentials for Li-Based Disordered Rocksalts.

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Lithium-based disordered rocksalts (LDRs), which are an important class of positive electrode materials that can increase the energy density of current Li-ion batteries, represent a significantly complex chemical and configurational space for conventional density functional theory (DFT)-based high-throughput screening approaches. Notably, atom-centered machine-learned interatomic potentials (MLIPs) are a promising pathway to accurately model the potential energy surface of highly disordered chemical spaces, such as LDRs, where the performance of such MLIPs has not been rigorously explored yet. Here, we represent a comprehensive evaluation of the accuracy, transferability, and ease of training of five atom-centered MLIPs, including the artificial neural network potentials developed by the atomic energy network (AENET), the Gaussian approximation potential (GAP), the spectral neighbor analysis potential (SNAP) and its quadratic extension (qSNAP), and the moment tensor potential (MTP), in modeling a 11-component LDR chemical space. Specifically, we generate a DFT-calculated data set of 10,842 configurations of disordered LiTMO2 and TMO2 compositions, where TM = Sc, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, and/or Cu. To provide a point-of-comparison on the performance of atom-centered MLIPs, we also trained the neural equivariant interatomic potential (NequIP) on a subset of our data. Importantly, we find AENET to be the best potential in terms of accuracy and transferability for energy predictions, while MTP is the best for atomic forces. While AENET is the fastest to train among the MLIPs considered at low number of epochs (300), the training time increases significantly as epochs increase (3300), with a corresponding reduction in training errors (∼60%). Note that AENET and GAP tend to overfit in small data sets, with the extent of overfitting reducing with larger data sets. Finally, we observe AENET to provide reasonable predictions of average Li-intercalation voltages in layered, single-TM LiTMO2 frameworks, compared to DFT (∼10% error on average). Our study should pave the way both for discovering novel disordered rocksalt electrodes and for modeling other configurationally complex systems, such as high-entropy ceramics and alloys.

Similar Papers
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations80

Chemist versus Machine: Traditional Knowledge versus Machine Learning Techniques

  • Nov 09, 2020
  • Trends in Chemistry
  • Janine George +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations35

Machine Learning of First-Principles Force-Fields for Alkane and Polyene Hydrocarbons.

  • Oct 18, 2021
  • The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
  • Amir Hajibabaei +4
  • Research Article

Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials Enable Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Doped MoS2.

  • Feb 24, 2026
  • Journal of chemical theory and computation
  • Abrar Faiyad +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations7

Does Hessian Data Improve the Performance of MachineLearning Potentials?

  • Jul 02, 2025
  • Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
  • Austin Rodriguez +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations19

Accurate Crystal Structure Prediction of New 2D Hybrid Organic-Inorganic Perovskites.

  • Sep 30, 2024
  • Journal of the American Chemical Society
  • Nima Karimitari +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations28

Enhancing the Quality and Reliability of Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials through Better Reporting Practices

  • Mar 20, 2024
  • The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
  • Tristan Maxson +3
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations45

Uncertainty-biased molecular dynamics for learning uniformly accurate interatomic potentials

  • Apr 29, 2024
  • npj Computational Materials
  • Viktor Zaverkin +7
  • Research Article
  • Citations9

Online test-time adaptation for better generalization of interatomic potentials to out-of-distribution data

  • Feb 22, 2025
  • Nature Communications
  • Taoyong Cui +7
  • Research Article

Machine-Learning Interatomic Potentials Achieving CCSD(T) Accuracy for Systems with Extended Covalent Networks and van der Waals Interactions.

  • Mar 03, 2026
  • Journal of chemical theory and computation
  • Yuji Ikeda +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations209

Exploring phononic properties of two-dimensional materials using machine learning interatomic potentials

  • May 13, 2020
  • Applied Materials Today
  • Bohayra Mortazavi +6
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations12

Thermoelectric properties of lead-free anti-perovskites X3BN (B = Bi, Sb, X = Mg, Ca, Sr): A theoretical study based on first-principles calculations and machine learning interatomic potential

  • Apr 01, 2024
  • AIP Advances
  • Tao Hu +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations32

Machine learning interatomic potentials as efficient tools for obtaining reasonable phonon dispersions and accurate thermal conductivity: A case study of typical two-dimensional materials

  • Oct 09, 2023
  • Applied Physics Letters
  • Chunfeng Cui +7
  • Supplementary Content

Extrapolation of Machine-Learning Interatomic Potentials for Organic and Polymeric Systems

  • Oct 27, 2025
  • Research Square
  • Natalie E Hooven +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations8

Fast proper orthogonal descriptors for many-body interatomic potentials

  • Apr 12, 2023
  • Physical Review B
  • Ngoc-Cuong Nguyen
  • Research Article

(Invited) Are Pre-Trained Universal Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials Ready for Solid Electrolyte Discovery?

  • Nov 24, 2025
  • Electrochemical Society Meeting Abstracts
  • Ji Qi +2
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.