Construction of a Pushdown Automaton Accepting a Postfix Notation of a Tree Language Given by a Regular Tree Expression

Closure properties of linear context-free tree languages with an application to optimality theory

We propose a quasi-equational sound axiomatization of regular tree languages, called monodic tree Kleene algebra. The algebra is weaker than Kleene algebra introduced by Kozen. We find a subclass of regular tree languages, for which monodic tree Kleene algebra is complete. While regular tree expressions may have two or more kinds of place holders, the subclass can be equipped with only one kind of them. Along the lines of the original proof by Kozen, we prove the completeness theorem based on determinization and minimization of tree automata represented by matrices on monodic tree Kleene algebra.

We study the problem of learning regular tree languages from text. We show that the framework of function distinguishability as introduced in our ALT 2000 paper is generalizable from the case of string languages towards tree languages, hence providing a large source of identifiable classes of regular tree languages. Each of these classes can be characterized in various ways. Moreover, we present a generic inference algorithm with polynomial update time and prove its correctness. In this way, we generalize previous works of Angluin, Sakakibara and ourselves. Moreover, we show that this way all regular tree languages can be identified approximately.

We present effective criteria for first-order definability of regular tree languages. It is known that over words the absence of modulo counting (the “noncounting property”) characterizes the expressive power of first-order logic (McNaughton, Schutzenberger), whereas non-counting regular tree languages exist which are not first-order definable. We present new conditions on regular tree languages (more precisely, on tree automata) which imply nondefinability in first-order logic. One method is based on tree homomorphisms which allow to deduce nondefinability of one tree language from nondefinability of another tree language. Additionly we introduce a structural property of tree automata (the socalled Λ-∨-patterns) which also causes tree languages to be undefinable in first-order logic. Finally, it is shown that this notion does not yet give a complete characterization of first-order logic over trees. The proofs rely on the method of Ehrenfeucht-Fraisse games.

The generative capacity of combinatory categorial grammars as acceptors of tree languages is investigated. It is demonstrated that the such obtained tree languages can also be generated by simple monadic context-free tree grammars. However, the subclass of pure combinatory categorial grammars cannot even accept all regular tree languages. Additionally, the tree languages accepted by combinatory categorial grammars with limited rule degrees are characterized: If only application rules are allowed, then they can accept only a proper subset of the regular tree languages, whereas they can accept exactly the regular tree languages once first degree composition rules are permitted.

We consider the framework of regular tree model checking where sets of configurations of a system are represented by regular tree languages and its dynamics is modeled by a term rewriting system (or a regular tree transducer). We focus on the computation of the reachability set R*(L) where R is a regular tree transducer and L is a regular tree language. The construction of this set is not possible in general. Therefore, we present a general acceleration technique, called regular tree widening which allows to speed up the convergence of iterative fixpoint computations in regular tree model checking. This technique can be applied uniformly to various kinds of transformations. We show the application of our framework to different analysis contexts: verification of parameterized tree networks and data-flow analysis of multithreaded programs. Parametrized networks are modeled by relabeling tree transducers, and multithreaded programs are modeled by term rewriting rules encoding transformations on control structures. We prove that our widening technique can emulate many existing algorithms for special classes of transformations and we show that it can deal with transformations beyond the scope of these algorithms.

Recently, the question has been raised whether the derivation tree languages of Minimalist grammars (MGs; [14, 16]) are closed under intersection with regular tree languages [4, 5]. Using a variation of a proof technique devised by Thatcher [17], I show that even though closure under intersection does not obtain, it holds for every MG and regular tree language that their intersection is identical to the derivation tree language of some MG modulo category labels. It immediately follows that the same closure property holds with respect to union, relative complement, and certain kinds of linear transductions. Moreover, enriching MGs with the ability to put regular constraints on the shape of their derivation trees does not increase the formalism’s weak generative capacity. This makes it straightforward to implement numerous linguistically motivated constraints on the Move operation.KeywordsMinimalist GrammarsDerivation Tree LanguagesClosure PropertiesRegular Tree LanguagesDerivational Constraints

We investigate regular tree languages exact learning from positive examples and membership queries. Input data are trees of the language to infer. The learner computes new trees from the inputs and asks to the oracle whether or not they belong to the language. From the answers, the learner may ask further membership queries until he finds the correct grammar that generates the target language. This paradigm was introduced by Angluin in the seminal work [1] for the case of regular word language. Neither negative examples, equivalence queries nor counter examples are allowed in this paradigm. We describe an efficient algorithm which is polynomial in the size of the examples for learning the whole class of regular tree languages. The convergence is insured when the set of examples contains a representative sample of the language to guess. A finite subset e of a regular tree language £ is representative for L if every transition of the minimal tree automaton for L is used at least once for the derivation of an element of the set e.

In this paper we address the problem of the automatic generation of visual languages from a sample set of visual sentences. We present an improvement of the inference module of the VLG system which was originally conceived for the generation of iconic languages [11]. With this extension any kind of visual languages, like diagrams and forms, can be considered. To this aim, we present an inference algorithm for the class of Boundary SR grammars. These grammars are a subclass of the SR grammars with the interesting property of confluence, which extends the concept of context-freeness to the case of nonlinear grammars. Moreover, in spite of the simplicity and naturalness of the formalism, the generative power of this class is sufficient to specify interesting visual languages. The inference algorithm exploits an elegant characterization of Boundary SR languages in terms of tree and string languages. More precisely, we show that a visual language is a Boundary SR language if and only if it can be defined as a regular tree language and a set of properly associated string languages. Based on this result, the problem of identifying structural properties in a diagrammatic visual sentence is brought back to the detection of structural properties in tree and string languages. The main advantage coming from the use of a grammatical inference technique in visual language specification is that the designer only needs to specify a set of visual sentences that he/she feels to sufficiently exemplify the intended target language.

Abstracting cryptographic protocols with tree automata

Tree-automatic scattered linear orders

We study query rewriting using views (QRV) for XML. Our queries and views are regular tree languages (RTLs) represented by tree automata over marked alphabets, where the markers serve as “node selectors”. We formally define query rewriting using views for RTLs and give an automata-based algorithm to compute the maximally contained rewriting. The formalism we use is equal in power with Monadic Second Order (MSO) logic, and our algorithm for computing QRV is the first to target this expressive class. Furthermore we prove a tight lower bound, thus showing that our algorithm is optimal. Another strength of our automata-based approach is that we are able to cast computing QRV into executing a sequence of intuitive operations on automata, thus rendering our approach practical as it can be easily implemented utilizing off-the-shelf automata toolboxes. Finally, we generalize our framework to account for more complex queries in the spirit of the FOR clause in XQuery. For this generalization as well, we give an optimal algorithm for computing the maximally contained rewriting of queries using views.KeywordsXMLView-Based RewritingTree Automata

Regular tree languages are a popular device for reachability analysis over term rewrite systems, with many applications like analysis of cryptographic protocols, or confluence and termination analysis. At the heart of this approach lies tree automata completion, first introduced by Genet for left-linear rewrite systems. Korp and Middeldorp introduced so-called quasi-deterministic automata to extend the technique to non-left-linear systems. In this paper, we introduce the simpler notion of quasi-compatible automata, which are slightly more general than quasi-deterministic, compatible automata. This notion also allows us to decide whether a regular tree language is closed under rewriting, a problem which was not known to be decidable before. Several of our results have been formalized in the theorem prover Isabelle/HOL. This allows to certify automatically generated non-confluence and termination proofs that are using tree automata techniques.

Computing the relative entropy between regular tree languages

Union-free expressions are regular expressions without using the union operation. Consequently, (nondeterministic) union-free languages are described by regular expressions using only concatenation and Kleene star. The language class is also characterised by a special class of finite automata: 1CFPAs have exactly one cycle-free accepting path from each of their states. Obviously such an automaton has exactly one accepting state. The deterministic counterpart of such class of automata defines the deterministic union-free (d-union-free, for short) languages. In this paper [Formula: see text]-free nondeterministic variants of 1CFPAs are used to define n-union-free languages. The defined language class is shown to be properly between the classes of (nondeterministic) union-free and d-union-free languages (in case of at least binary alphabet). In case of unary alphabet the class of n-union-free languages coincides with the class of union-free languages. Some properties of the new subregular class of languages are discussed, e.g., closure properties. On the other hand, a regular expression is in union normal form if it is a finite union of union-free expressions. It is well known that every regular expression can be written in union normal form, i.e., all regular languages can be described as finite unions of (nondeterministic) union-free languages. It is also known that the same fact does not hold for deterministic union-free languages, that is, there are regular languages that cannot be written as finite unions of d-union-free languages. As an important result here we show that every regular language can be defined by a finite union of n-union-free languages. This fact also allows to define n-union-complexity of regular languages.