• Home
  • Search
  • Correcting Coarse-Resolution Weather and Climate Models by Machine Learning from Global Storm-Resolving Simulations
  • Cite Icon1
  • https://doi.org/10.1002/essoar.10509493.1Copy DOI Icon

Correcting Coarse-Resolution Weather and Climate Models by Machine Learning from Global Storm-Resolving Simulations

  • Dec 13, 2021
  • Christopher Bretherton +7 more
Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Global atmospheric ‘storm-resolving’ models with horizontal grid spacing of less than 5~km resolve deep cumulus convection and flow in complex terrain. They promise to be reference models that could be used to improve computationally affordable coarse-grid global climate models across a range of climates, reducing uncertainties in regional precipitation and temperature trends. Here, machine learning of nudging tendencies as functions of column state is used to correct the physical parameterization tendencies of temperature, humidity, and optionally winds, in a real-geography coarse-grid model (FV3GFS with a 200 km grid) to be closer to those of a 40-day reference simulation using X-SHiELD, a modified version of FV3GFS with a 3 km grid. Both simulations specify the same historical sea-surface temperature fields. This methodology builds on a prior study using a global observational analysis as the reference. The coarse-grid model without machine learning corrections has too little cloud, causing too much daytime heating of land surfaces that creates excessive surface latent heat flux and rainfall. This bias is avoided by learning downwelling radiative flux from the fine-grid model. The best configuration uses learned nudging tendencies for temperature and humidity but not winds. Neural nets slightly outperform random forests. Forecasts of 850 hPa temperature gain 18 hours of skill at 3-7 day leads and time-mean precipitation patterns are improved 30% by applying the ML correction. Adding machine-learned wind tendencies improves 500 hPa height skill for the first five days of forecasts but degrades time-mean upper tropospheric temperature and zonal wind patterns thereafter. The figure shows maps of 30-day time-mean precipitation pattern difference from the fine-grid reference for prognostic simulations: (a) 200 km baseline(no machine learning correction) (b) Using random forest correction and (c) neural net correction for temperature. humidity and surface radiation corrections. RMSE is the root mean squared precipitation difference from the reference, which is 30% less for the two machine-learning corrected simulations compared to the baseline. (d) Bar charts of the land-mean, ocean-mean and global-mean precipitation biases for these three configurations, showing the machine-learning corrected simulations remove a high bias of land surface precipitation in the baseline simulation.

Similar Papers
  • Conference Article
  • Citations5

A New Simulation Layer Optimization and Permeability Upscaling Method for Preserving Critical Reservoir Heterogeneity

  • Oct 05, 2021
  • Dachang Li +4
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Modeling radial groundwater flow in fractured media using fracture continuum approach

  • Feb 01, 2022
  • Arabian Journal of Geosciences
  • Mohamed M El-Kharakany +2
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations5

Distinguishing Time Scales of Katabatic Flow in Complex Terrain

  • Dec 09, 2021
  • Atmosphere
  • Stephen Drake +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations146

A new wake model and comparison of eight algorithms for layout optimization of wind farms in complex terrain

  • Nov 30, 2019
  • Applied Energy
  • Roberto Brogna +4
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations33

Remote Sensing of Atmospheric Processes over Complex Terrain

  • Jan 01, 1990
  • W D Neff
  • Research Article
  • Citations36

Thermo-mechanical modelling of solar central receivers: Effect of incident solar flux resolution

  • Mar 20, 2018
  • Solar Energy
  • M.R Rodríguez-Sánchez +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations33

Relationship of Synoptic Winds and Complex Terrain Flows during the MISTRAL Field Experiment

  • Nov 01, 1998
  • Journal of Applied Meteorology
  • Rudolf O Weber +1
  • Preprint Article

Lake-land interactions in complex terrain

  • Mar 13, 2026
  • Aldo Brandi +3
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations8

Application of Different Turbulence Models Simulating Wind Flow in Complex Terrain: A Case Study for the WindForS Test Site

  • Jul 27, 2018
  • Computation
  • Hermann Knaus +3
  • Research Article

The Alaiz Experiment (ALEX17): visualizing the flow in complex terrain with multi scanning lidars

  • Apr 01, 2019
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Pedro Santos
  • Research Article
  • Citations25

Analyzing the basic features of different complex terrain flows by means of a Doppler Sodar and a numerical model: Some implications for air pollution problems

  • Dec 10, 2003
  • Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics
  • M R Soler +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations9

Compositional upscaling in fractured reservoirs during gas recycling

  • Dec 29, 2004
  • Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering
  • Damilola O Ogunlana +1
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations82

Seasonal and elevational contrasts in temperature trends in Central Chile between 1979 and 2015

  • Jan 17, 2018
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • F Burger +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations4

Upscaling for Unconventional Simulation Modelling: Barik Tight Gas Formation, Khazzan Field, Block 61, Sultanate of Oman

  • Nov 07, 2016
  • Olubunmi Owolabi +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations166

A Machine Learning‐Based Global Atmospheric Forecast Model

  • May 09, 2020
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Troy Arcomano +5
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.