• Home
  • Search
  • Counterpoint: "Streamlined" Does Not Mean Simple
  • Cite Icon1
  • https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kws417Copy DOI Icon

Counterpoint: "Streamlined" Does Not Mean Simple

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

We agree with Dr. Kuller (1) that large-scale epidemiologic studies require substantial input from innovative, committed investigators across a range of disciplines—as in the UK Biobank—in deciding what questions to ask, what measurements to make, and what samples to collect, so that a wide range of hypotheses about many different conditions may be addressed (2). Given the scientific potential of the UK Biobank and the controversies surrounding its initiation (3), it is hard to imagine a stronger vested interest in its success for the investigators involved. We also agree that detailed phenotyping in large prospective cohort studies can allow more specific questions to be addressed (4). We disagree, however, that large-scale studies are easy to conduct or that data collection in the measures used is necessarily simple. For example, in the UK Biobank, touch-screen systems were developed to increase the precision and breadth of information that could be collected on such a large scale. Food frequency questions have been supplemented by Web-based diet diary information, and physical activity questions have been supplemented by wrist-worn activity monitors. Through careful design and in the context of specific hypotheses, retinal imaging has been obtained for 100,000 UK Biobank participants, and magnetic resonance imaging, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and 3-dimensional carotid ultrasonography are being planned for 100,000 of them. All of these measures are designed by dedicated groups of actively involved experts, and data are collected using the same centralized approach to which Dr. Kuller objects. No one is paid on the basis of how many pieces of data they submit or per paper published. If there is a “top-down” (centralized?) approach, it is limited to the mechanics of establishing and running assessment centers and ensuring high-quality data collection. Few imaginative scientists have either an interest or expertise in the large-scale industrial processes needed to make such efforts successful; indeed, the most effective cohort investigators are often those who find capable managers to conduct such procedures for them. The successful merging of academic and management disciplines has been a major, and possibly unique, factor in the success of the UK Biobank. Common diseases may be caused by many exposures that interact with each other in complex ways. To study the effects of numerous different exposures, large studies involving many thousands of cases of a specific disease are likely to be required (5). One area of phenotyping that does not typically receive sufficient focus is ascertainment of a wide range of health outcomes that occur during follow-up. Misclassification of disease cases can substantially reduce statistical power to assess associations. Hence, in the UK Biobank, as in many other cohort studies, diagnostic accuracy is increased by using innovative methods (e.g., retrieval of imaging data and tissue samples) for the classification of outcomes. Establishing such epidemiologic resources requires more—not less—thought than would a study with a narrow focus on a few specific hypotheses. Prospective studies typically collect either large amounts of data on relatively few participants (“data depth”) or small amounts of data on many participants (“data breadth”). The centralized model we espoused (6), exemplified by Sweden's LifeGene, the UK Biobank, and other efforts, can achieve both data depth and data breadth in an efficient manner. In contrast with Dr. Kuller's assertion, “streamlined” does not mean simple, and “centralized” does not mean excluding scientists from the process. Rather, it means allowing scientists to focus on being innovative instead of distracting them with process. The most serious challenge to epidemiology today is the need for very large cohort studies which produce high-quality data that are widely available to the scientific community, for a broad range of uses, at an affordable cost. The centralized model is one proven way of achieving this, to help identify the “big winners” we all seek.

Similar Papers
  • Research Article

Association of early-life tobacco smoke exposure with chronic gastrointestinal diseases in adulthood and trajectory of chronic gastrointestinal multi-morbidity: A large prospective cohort study.

  • Jan 01, 2026
  • Public health
  • Haojie Lu +11
  • Research Article
  • Citations13

Magnesium intake and risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Results from five large cohort studies

  • Jun 18, 2013
  • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration
  • Elinor Fondell +7
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

The Importance of Cancer Registry Linkage for Studying Rare Cancers in Prospective Cohorts.

  • Nov 25, 2020
  • Journal of Cancer Epidemiology
  • Emily Maplethorpe +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations5

Effect of bilirubin and Gilbert syndrome on health: cohort analysis of observational, genetic, and Mendelian randomisation associations

  • Jul 01, 2023
  • BMJ Medicine
  • Fergus W Hamilton +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations37

Genetic and Phenotypic Features of Schizophrenia in the UK Biobank

  • Mar 27, 2024
  • JAMA Psychiatry
  • Sophie E Legge +10
  • Research Article

The associations of unsweetened, sugar-sweetened, and artificially sweetened tea consumption with all-cause and cause-specific mortality in 195,361 UK Biobank participants: a large prospective cohort study.

  • Jul 31, 2025
  • Frontiers in nutrition
  • Hao Huang +14
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations70

Diet and Risk of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease, Cirrhosis, and Liver Cancer: A Large Prospective Cohort Study in UK Biobank

  • Dec 15, 2022
  • Nutrients
  • Wen Guo +8
  • Research Article
  • Citations6

Association of accelerated aging with the incidence risk of Cardiometabolic diseases in people with severe mental illnesses: A prospective analysis in UK Biobank

  • Apr 30, 2024
  • Psychiatry Research
  • Chengcheng Zhang +8
  • Front Matter
  • Citations6

The human genome project and medical genetics.

  • Jan 01, 1992
  • Journal of medical genetics
  • P S Harper
  • Abstract

9 Identification of thirty novel loci for cardiovascular magnetic resonance derived aortic distensibility in the UK Biobank

  • Nov 01, 2021
  • Heart
  • Kenneth Fung +14
  • Discussion
  • Citations3

Response to: ‘Correspondence to ‘Associations of regular glucosamine use with all-cause and cause-specific mortality: a large prospective cohort study’ by Li et al’ by Yueh et al

  • Aug 04, 2020
  • Annals of the rheumatic diseases
  • Zhi-Hao Li +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

A population-based recalibration method for updating survival neural networks models for cardiovascular risk prediction in United Kingdom and China.

  • Sep 01, 2025
  • Journal of clinical epidemiology
  • Xiaofei Liu +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations19

Relationship of Fat Mass Ratio, a Biomarker for Lipodystrophy, With Cardiometabolic Traits.

  • Feb 12, 2024
  • Diabetes..
  • Saaket Agrawal +5
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations175

Calculating Polygenic Risk Scores (PRS) in UK Biobank: A Practical Guide for Epidemiologists

  • Feb 18, 2022
  • Frontiers in Genetics
  • Jennifer A Collister +2
  • Research Article

Risk factors and outcomes associated with right ventricular mass: exploring causality using Mendelian randomisation and cardiac MRI in UK Biobank

  • Nov 01, 2025
  • European Heart Journal
  • Russell Thomson +13
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.