COVID-19 and the Brain

Herpes zoster (HZ) has been observed to occur after COVID-19 infection and vaccination; however, knowledge regarding the demographic data, clinical presentations, and treatment outcomes of HZ is limited. To compare the demographic data, clinical manifestations, treatments, and outcomes of patients with and without HZ within 14 days of COVID-19 infection or vaccination. This prospective cohort study involving patients diagnosed with cutaneous HZ was conducted at a dermatology clinic from October 2021 to January 2023. Among a total of 232 patients with HZ, the median age was 62.0 years and 59.1% were female. HZ developed in 23 (9.9%) and four (1.7%) patients after COVID-19 vaccination and infection, respectively. The mean duration from vaccination and the median duration from infection to HZ onset were 5.7 and 8.5 days, respectively. The proportion of female patients was significantly higher in the group of patients with COVID-19 vaccination or infection than in those without such a history (P = 0.035). Patients who developed HZ following the recent COVID-19 infection had a median age of 42.5 years, which was lower than that of the other groups. Dissemination occurred in 8.7% of the patients after COVID-19 vaccination. HZ recurrence was reported in five cases, of which 80% had been vaccinated or infected with COVID-19 during the previous 21 days. All patients had similar durations of antiviral treatment, crust-off time, and duration of neuralgia. HZ after COVID-19 vaccination is more frequently observed in females, while HZ after COVID-19 infection tends to occur in younger patients. Disseminated HZ is more common in patients recently vaccinated against COVID-19. COVID-19 vaccination or infection may trigger recurrent HZ infection.

Background and Aims In the Phase 2 placebo-controlled ENVISION trial, the APRIL (A Proliferation Inducing Ligand) inhibitor sibeprenlimab significantly decreased proteinuria and stabilized estimated glomerular filtration rate decline in patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) [1]. A substudy was conducted to evaluate the humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination and infection. Here, we report the unblinded analysis of COVID outcomes in the overall and substudy populations of ENVISION. Method Patients enrolled in ENVISION (NCT04287985) received 12 monthly intravenous infusions of sibeprenlimab (2, 4, or 8 mg/kg) or placebo and were followed for 16 months after the first dose of study drug. Recognized COVID infection (reported as an adverse event [AE]) and vaccination data were recorded for all patients. For patients in the substudy, serum antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 spike and nucleocapsid proteins were measured monthly using a validated Meso Scale Discovery V-PLEX SARS-CoV-2 Panel 24 multiplex assay. Vaccine responses among those who received a primary two-dose mRNA COVID vaccine series, with no recent or concurrent COVID infection, were evaluated. Peak post-vaccine serum SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain (RBD) immunoglobulin G (IgG) titers were reported in World Health Organization binding antibody units (BAU)/mL. Slopes of RBD IgG decline curves were used to generate estimates of time above a protective threshold of 300 BAU/mL. Welch's two-sample t-test was applied to log-transformed peak RBD titers for significance testing. COVID infection–induced antibody responses and severity of COVID symptoms were also assessed. In substudy patients, retrospective serologic diagnosis of COVID infection was established when simultaneous elevation of nucleocapsid and spike antibody titers, unexplained by vaccine history, was observed. Results Among 155 patients who received sibeprenlimab (n = 117) or placebo (n = 38), 56 (36.1%) had COVID infection reported as an AE during the study (Table 1). Overall, proportionally fewer sibeprenlimab recipients (33.3%) had a reported COVID AE compared with placebo recipients (44.7%). Two patients (one each in the sibeprenlimab and placebo groups) were hospitalized with serious COVID AEs in accordance with local management protocols; none were admitted to intensive care or mechanically ventilated and there were no COVID-related deaths. The majority of COVID AEs were of mild severity, regardless of treatment/dosing arm. In the serology substudy (n = 74), symptomatic COVID (reported as an AE) occurred in 47.3% of all patients. With the addition of serologic diagnoses (in the absence of AEs), the overall rate of COVID infection increased to 68.9%. Asymptomatic COVID was identified in 1 of 15 (6.7%) placebo recipients versus 15 of 36 (41.7%) sibeprenlimab recipients, raising the possibility that patients treated with sibeprenlimab may have had attenuated symptom presentation compared with patients who received placebo. COVID seroconversion rates were 100% and peak RBD IgG antibody titers following primary mRNA vaccination exceeded the protective threshold of 300 BAU/mL in all patients (Fig. 1a), with higher geometric mean peak titers in placebo (4670 BAU/mL) compared with sibeprenlimab (1700 BAU/mL) recipients (p = 0.005). The rate of decline of peak RBD IgG titers after mRNA vaccination (in patients with ≥1 dose without confounding subsequent vaccination or infection) was similar between groups (Fig. 1b), with modeled time above the 300 BAU/mL threshold of 192 and 174 days in the sibeprenlimab and placebo groups, respectively. Conclusion COVID-specific antibody responses to vaccination or infection were preserved in patients with IgAN treated with sibeprenlimab. The possibility that COVID symptom presentation may have been modulated by sibeprenlimab warrants further investigation.

EPH20 Does a Mother's Previous Experience with COVID-19 Infection Change Her Intention to Vaccinate Her Children

To examine the literature on Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) used in the treatment, prevention and supportive care in patients with COVID-19. A narrative review was performed. A systematic and comprehensive search was conducted on both Chinese and English electronic databases: China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane, PubMed, PsycINFO. Articles published from 1 December 2019 -1 April 2020 were included in this review. Studies reporting on the treatment and prevention of COVID-19 using TCM regardless of study designs were included. In addition, grey literatures, including media reports on Chinese government websites or official media websites and treatment guidelines were searched for TCM treatment and prevention on COVID-19. Limited research has been published on the use of TCM for COVID-19. We qualitatively described and synthesized the published research and current clinical practice on the use of TCM for COVID-19, and focused on the following areas: TCM treatment used in SARS, MERS, H1N1; TCM treatment plan for COVID-19; TCM in Prevention and Treatment at Early Stage of COVID-19; TCM emotional therapy; and personalized TCM treatment plan. The combination of western medicine and TCM in treatment, and treatment based on the local condition, isolation, personal protective measures are of great significance for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19. Relevant laboratory research and clinical evaluation should be continued to collect scientific evidences on the efficacy of TCM. TCM has been used in the treatment and prevention of COVID-19 in China, and the clinical evidences indicated that TCM regulates immunity and exerts anti-viral effect simultaneously. This review provides practical recommendation for the policymakers in the selection process of the treatment and preventive measures for the global pandemic of COVID-19.

The current study examined the effects of specific COVID-19 stressors (i.e., family member’s death due to COVID-19, COVID-19 infection, and school/financial stressors) on stress, anxiety, and depression and the potential buffering roles of resilience and perceived social support in the association between COVID-19 stressors and psychological symptoms in a Hispanic university student sample (n = 664). Participants were classified in three stressor groups: those reporting a family member’s death due to COVID-19 (15.7%), those reporting their own or a family member’s COVID-19 infection but no COVID-19 death (35.5%), and those reporting only school and/or financial stressors due to the pandemic (48.8%). Participants completed self-report measures online. Over 50% of participants with a COVID-19 death or infection in the family reported clinical levels of depression symptoms and over 40% endorsed clinically elevated anxiety symptoms. A series of moderation analyses with multi-categorical predictors found that among relatively highly resilient people, the magnitudes of the impact of COVID-19 infection or death on stress, anxiety, and depression were similar to the effect of a financial/school stressor alone, suggesting the buffering role of resilience. Perceived social support did not play a buffering role in the associations. Family member death due to COVID-19 and COVID-19 infection had significant negative psychological impacts on Hispanic young adults. Internal personal resources such as resilience, rather than external personal resources such as perceived social support, appear to be a critical factor that may help protect Hispanic individuals’ mental health from the worst stressors of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Over the past three years, humanity faced the abrupt spread of COVID-19, responsible for a worldwide health crisis. Initially, it was believed that individuals with chronic disorders, including multiple sclerosis, were more likely to be infected and suffer a worse degree of COVID-19 disease. Therefore, data with regard to COVID-19 disease outcomes in these populations may provide additional insight with regard to the management of chronic diseases during viral pandemics. The objective of this study is to evaluate COVID-19 disease course in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) during the COVID-19 pandemic in Greece and explore the impact of vaccination in the outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection in this population. Anonymized data, extracted from nationwide administrative records between February 2020 and December 2021, were retrospectively analyzed in order to identify PwMS with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Demographic data, as well as data regarding COVID-19 infection and vaccination, were additionally collected. The study sample included 2351 PwMS (65.1% females, 51.2% unvaccinated at the time of infection). A total of 260 PwMS were hospitalized, while 25 PwMS died from COVID-19 disease and its complications. Older age, male sex and the presence of comorbidities were independently associated with a higher probability of hospitalization. The risk of hospitalization was decreased in PwMS receiving some disease-modifying treatments. Anti-CD20s demonstrated high odds ratios without reaching statistical significance. Regarding fatal outcome, only age reached statistical significance. Vaccination provided a significant protective effect against hospitalization but did not exhibit a statistically significant effect on mortality.

The impact of former COVID-19 infection on the performance of athletes is not fully understood. We aimed to identify differences in athletes with and without former COVID-19 infections. Competitive athletes who presented for preparticipation screening between April 2020 and October 2021 were included in this study, stratified for former COVID-19 infection, and compared. Overall, 1200 athletes (mean age 21.9 ± 11.6 years; 34.3% females) were included in this study from April 2020 to October 2021. Among these, 158 (13.1%) athletes previously had COVID-19 infection. Athletes with COVID-19 infection were older (23.4 ± 7.1 vs. 21.7 ± 12.1 years, p < 0.001) and more often of male sex (87.7% vs. 64.0%, p < 0.001). While systolic/diastolic blood pressure at rest was comparable between both groups, maximum systolic (190.0 [170.0/210.0] vs. 180.0 [160.0/205.0] mmHg, p = 0.007) and diastolic blood pressure (70.0 [65.0/75.0] vs. 70.0 [60.0/75.0] mmHg, p = 0.012) during the exercise test and frequency of exercise hypertension (54.2% vs. 37.8%, p < 0.001) were higher in athletes with COVID-19 infection. While former COVID-19 infection was not independently associated with higher blood pressure at rest and maximum blood pressure during exercise, former COVID-19 infection was related to exercise hypertension (OR 2.13 [95%CI 1.39-3.28], p < 0.001). VO2 peak was lower in athletes with compared to those without COVID-19 infection (43.4 [38.3/48.0] vs. 45.3 [39.1/50.6] mL/min/kg, p = 0.010). SARS-CoV-2 infection affected VO2 peak negatively (OR 0.94 [95%CI 0.91-0.97], p < 0.0019). In conclusion, former COVID-19 infection in athletes was accompanied by a higher frequency of exercise hypertension and reduced VO2 peak.

COVID-19 vaccinations and infections among individuals with systemic sclerosis: A Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network (SPIN) Cohort study

COVID-19 INFECTION AS A CAUSE FOR PROGRESSION OF PREVIOUSLY ASYMPTOMATIC SARCOIDOSIS TO SYMPTOMATIC SARCOIDOSIS

Early in the pandemic, due to the novelty of SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19), herd immunity did not exist, placing all populations at risk, with pregnant women at higher risk. The aim of this study is to evaluate previous COVID-19 infection and vaccination status among Libyan pregnant women to inform evidence-based maternal health interventions and public health planning. In this observational cross-sectional study, 840 pregnant women were enrolled at five tertiary hospitals in three major cities in Libya from March 2023 to February 2024. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Sociodemographic information, history of COVID-19 infection and vaccination were collected from all participants. Mean age of pregnant women was 31.1 ± 6.2 years. 191 (22.7%) women reported infection with COVID-19, most of them had mild disease (62.3%). Of those, 75 women (39.2%) had repeated COVID-19 infection. 219 women were vaccinated (26.1%), 68 of them had received vaccine booster (31.1%) and 22 vaccinated women (10%) had breakthrough infection. Occupation was an independent predictor of both infection and vaccination status (P-value < 0.001 for both). On the other hand, age and education level were not significant predictors for both infection and vaccination status. In this study, most pregnant women in Libya were unvaccinated against COVID-19. These findings emphasize the need for targeted strategies to increase vaccine uptake in antenatal care settings and to address barriers among this vulnerable population.

Feasibility and Implementation of the ASH Research Collaborative's COVID-19 Outcomes in Myeloma and the Impact of Vaccines (COSMIC): A Decentralized, Real-World Evidence Study for Patients with Multiple Myeloma to Monitor Outcomes Related to COVID-19 Vaccines and Infections

Variants of COVID-19 are responsible for 700 million infections and 7 million deaths worldwide. Vaccinations have high efficiency in preventing infection and secondary benefits of reducing COVID-19 hospital admissions, attenuating disease severity and duration of illness. Conflicting reports were published regarding COVID-19 among PLWH. The aim of this study was to evaluate COVID-19 morbidity, hospitalization, and the magnitude of immunological response to sequential BNT 162b2 mRNA vaccines in PLWH regarding demographic and clinical factors. Our retrospective study included 784 PLWH who had at least one anti- SARS-CoV-2 antibody test between March 2021 and October 2021. Half of our patients (392) had CD4 cell counts above 500 cells/µL, 40.2% (315) had 200 < CD4 < 500 cells/µL and only 9.8% (77) had CD4 < 200 cells/µL at their last laboratory workup. The mean age was 50.2 ± 12.2 years. About 90% of our patients were given at least two doses of the BNT 162b2 Pfizer vaccines; about 60% received three doses of the vaccine. About a quarter of our patients (27.6%) had COVID-19 infection. Only six patients required hospital admission. All six patients recovered from COVID-19 infection. Titers of COVID-19 antibodies were lower for patients with CD4 cell counts of less than 200 cells/µL in the first, second, and third serological tests with statistical significance. In a multinomial logistic regression, the influence of other factors such as age, sex, and previous COVID-19 infection on first COVID-19 antibody titers was not significant. PLWH are responsive to COVID-19 vaccines. As was expected, patients with higher CD4 cell counts had higher titers of COVID-19 antibodies and lower hospitalization rate. Age, sex, and previous COVID-19 infection did not significantly affect antibody titers according to our study. Larger prospective studies with control groups are needed to further characterize immunologic response to COVID-19 vaccination among PLWH.

Enteric involvement in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 outside Wuhan

ObjectivesAmong people receiving opioid-agonist treatment (OAT), the risk of COVID-19 infection and disease may be higher owing to underlying health problems and vulnerable social circumstances. We aimed to determine whether recent OAT, when compared with past exposure, affected the risk of (i) testing for SARS-CoV-2, (ii) testing positive for SARS-CoV-2, and (iii) being hospitalized or dying with COVID-19 disease. MethodsWe included individuals prescribed OAT in Scotland from 2015 to 2020. We performed record linkage to SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing, vaccination, hospitalization, and mortality data, and followed up from March 2020 to December 2021. We used proportional hazards analysis and multivariate logistic regression to estimate associations between recent OAT prescription (in the previous 2 months), compared with past exposure (off treatment for over a year), and COVID-19 outcomes. Models were adjusted for confounders. ResultsAmong 36 093 individuals prescribed OAT, 19 071 (52.9%) were tested for SARS-CoV-2; 2896 (8.3%) tested positive; and 552 (1.5%) were hospitalized or died with COVID-19. Recent OAT, compared with past exposure, was associated with lower odds of testing positive among those tested (aOR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.57–0.69). However, among those testing positive, recent OAT was associated with two-fold higher odds of hospitalization or death (aOR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.60–2.59). DiscussionWe found that recent OAT was associated with lower odds of SARS-CoV-2 infection, but with higher odds of disease once diagnosed. Clinical studies are needed to unravel the role of OAT in these associations. An enhanced effort is warranted to increase vaccine coverage among OAT patients to mitigate the severe consequences of COVID-19.

IntroductionCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) surveillance can be enhanced by collecting population-level data on individual prevention measures. We described the use of a state-based, population-level surveillance system on COVID-19 prevention and information-seeking behaviors in Florida during the first month of survey administration.MethodsBeginning in April 2020, respondents of the Florida Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System were asked a series of 8 questions about sources of COVID-19 information and prevention behaviors. We analyzed the prevalence of information-seeking and prevention behaviors among respondents who answered at least 1 of the 8 questions (N = 1,004) overall, by demographic characteristics, and by the presence of chronic conditions.ResultsMost respondents reported engaging in prevention behaviors, including handwashing (98.2%), reducing or avoiding travel (96.6%), avoiding crowds and public events (96.5%), and keeping household members at home (87.5%); however, the prevalence of prevention behaviors varied significantly by age, sex, and education. The most frequently reported source of COVID-19 information was the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s website (40.8%) followed by the Florida Department of Health’s website (32.9%). We found significant differences in information sources across all demographic and chronic condition subgroups. A larger proportion of respondents with chronic conditions (vs without chronic conditions) reported consulting their personal doctor for COVID-19 information.ConclusionUnderstanding the uptake and characteristics associated with individual prevention and information-seeking behaviors at the population level facilitates COVID-19 response efforts. The rapid implementation of COVID-19–related questions in the Florida BRFSS provides a useful model for other population-based surveillance systems.