• Home
  • Search
  • Damage detection in guided wave structural health monitoring using Gaussian process regression
  • Cite Icon14
  • https://doi.org/10.1177/14759217231159399Copy DOI Icon

Damage detection in guided wave structural health monitoring using Gaussian process regression

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Damage detection using permanently installed guided wave sensors typically involves identifying changes in A-scan data from a nominally defect-free state. A well-recognised challenge is the influence of changing operational and environmental conditions which can lead to complex evolution of the A-scan data which may mask the presence of damage. This paper is based on the observation that the amplitude at each location within the A-scan has a unique functional dependence with temperature and a unique associated uncertainty in the functional dependence. The uncertainty in the functional dependence is based on both the repeatability of the measurements and the amount of data available for characterisation. The fact that each location in an A-scan has a different uncertainty leads to the concept of an adaptive threshold. In contrast to typical damage detection that utilises a flat threshold for the whole A-scan, an adaptive threshold will be lower in locations of greater predictability and rise in locations of poorer repeatability. To achieve the aim of an adaptive threshold, the amplitude–temperature dependence and associated uncertainty is characterised for each data-point in an A-scan based on a training set of defect-free data. The inverse process can then be performed to generate a new reference A-Scan with associated confidence bounds for a given temperature. The confidence bounds act as the adaptive threshold; if a new measurement passes outside the confidence bounds then it indicates statistically significant difference between the new measurement and the training set. To demonstrate the method, pitch-catch data between two sensors of a pipe-bend over 5 months and a temperature range of approximately 50°C is used. To demonstrate the damage detection capability in a controlled way synthetic damage is added to the A-scans to produce test data. The performance is compared to Optimal baseline subtraction (OBS). In this example, the performance of the Gaussian process regression adaptive threshold method exceeds OBS when the training set exceeds around 40 measurements.

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations21

Guidelines for effective unsupervised guided wave compression and denoising in long-term guided wave structural health monitoring

  • Oct 14, 2022
  • Structural Health Monitoring
  • Kang Yang +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations1

Uncertainty quantification of a guided wave structural health monitoring system for composite bolted joints

  • Apr 17, 2013
  • Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE
  • Colin Haynes +1
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations14

GP-ARX-Based Structural Damage Detection and Localization under Varying Environmental Conditions

  • Sep 08, 2020
  • Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks
  • Konstantinos Tatsis +3
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations2

Model‐Based Statistical Signal Processing for Change and Damage Detection

  • Jan 26, 2008
  • Encyclopedia of Structural Health Monitoring
  • Michèle Basseville
  • Research Article
  • Citations7

Plate-like structures damage detection based on static response and static strain energy using gaussian process regression (GPR)

  • Nov 01, 2017
  • Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering
  • Seyed Sina Kourehli
  • Research Article

Automated segmentation of the primary tumor in nasopharyngeal carcinoma using a deep learning framework in positron emission tomography imaging: a comparative study

  • Oct 23, 2025
  • Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery
  • Meina Liang +9
  • Research Article
  • Citations134

Effects of Elevated Temperature on Guided-wave Structural Health Monitoring

  • May 20, 2008
  • Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures
  • Ajay Raghavan +1
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations87

Gaussian Process Time-Series Models for Structures under Operational Variability

  • Dec 08, 2017
  • Frontiers in Built Environment
  • Luis David Avendaño-Valencia +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations20

Validation of a procedure for the evaluation of the performance of an installed structural health monitoring system

  • Sep 12, 2018
  • Structural Health Monitoring
  • Sebastian Heinlein +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations9

Piezoelectric Transducer Diagnostics via Linear Reciprocity for Guided Wave Structural Health Monitoring

  • Mar 01, 2011
  • AIAA Journal
  • Sang Jun Lee +3
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations1

Architecture for Fault Detection in Sandwich Panel Production Using Visual Analytics

  • Jan 01, 2022
  • Sebastian Lopez Florez +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations11

Early Warning of Abnormal Bridge Frequencies Based on a Local Correlation Model under Multiple Environmental Conditions

  • Feb 01, 2023
  • Journal of Bridge Engineering
  • Zhen Wang +4
  • Research Article

Identifying Polymers that Bind or Reject Proteins with Machine Learning: Handling Categorical Features within a GPR Model.

  • Feb 11, 2026
  • ACS polymers Au
  • Ramindu De Silva +7
  • Research Article
  • Citations7

Comparison of Gaussian process regression, partial least squares, random forest and support vector machines for a near infrared calibration of paracetamol samples

  • Jan 01, 2022
  • Results in Chemistry
  • Aminata Sow +4
  • Conference Article
  • Citations1

Beamsteering of MFC Phased Arrays for Structural Health Monitoring: Analytical and Experimental Investigations

  • May 04, 2009
  • Daewon Kim +1
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.