• Home
  • Search
  • Debates in local economic development policy and practice
  • Cite Icon35
  • https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-003-0008-7Copy DOI Icon

Debates in local economic development policy and practice

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

A NEW PARADIGM FOR LED? Local Economic Development (LED) is a discipline still coming into its own, with competing strands of argumentation still generating conflict. At the root of the conflict is debate over whether traditional types of local strategies a) are working, and b) are generating ‘pro-poor’ economic development, or simply more ‘uneven development’. The latter term refers to a structured, systematic mode of capital accumulation at one pole, and the ‘development of underdevelopment’ at another. Although it was once associated with ‘dependency theory’, it is a far more subtle conceptual approach to understanding ingrained poverty and inequality (Bond, 1998, 1999, 2000a, 2000b). The past two decades have, after all, witnessed extraordinary pressure on local authorities, especially formal municipalities, to become more entrepreneurial. These pressures have accompanied the overall slow-down in growth in the international economy that began during the late 1970s, and reflect shifting power relations. In short, urban entrepreneurialism became a feature of virtually all LED strategies as competition for investment intensified. The term ‘smokestack chasing’ emerged to characterise the most ambitious attempts to ‘place-market’ a given municipality. The tide has probably turned on this epoch, which was called the period of the ‘Washington Consensus’ because it entailed rigid nation-state adherence to ‘neoliberal’ (free-market) dictates, often enforced by the International Monetary Fund, World Bank, and the discipline of international financial markets. These included:  government budget cuts, increases in user-fees for public services and privatisation of state enterprises;  the lifting of price controls, subsidies and any other distortions of market forces;  liberalisation of currency controls and currency devaluation;  higher interest rates and deregulation of local finance;  removal of import barriers (trade tariffs and quotas); and  an emphasis on promotion of exports, above all other economic priorities.

Similar Papers
  • Dissertation

A normative stage model for youth development in selected areas on the Cape Flats

  • Jan 01, 2019
  • Ivan Henry Meyer
  • Single Book
  • Citations2

Neoliberalism and Its Critics

  • Dec 22, 2017
  • Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies
  • Patrick Bond
  • Research Article
  • Citations7

An Analysis of Infrastructure Provision and Local Economic Development Policy

  • Mar 01, 1990
  • Community Development Society. Journal
  • Donald N Steinnes
  • Research Article
  • Citations6

Place-based policies for the periphery? Policies for local development in sparsely populated areas in northern Sweden

  • Dec 01, 2023
  • Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit
  • Josefina Syssner +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations52

What Works Best?: Values and the Evaluation of Local Economic Development Policy

  • Aug 01, 1997
  • Economic Development Quarterly
  • Laura A Reese +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations23

Working it out: Labour geographies of the poor in Soweto, South Africa

  • Oct 01, 2010
  • Development Southern Africa
  • Richard Grant
  • PDF
  • Research Article

Inequality in the Context Development Theories: Dependencia Theory and Washington Consensus

  • Oct 20, 2013
  • Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies
  • Jorge A Charles-Coll
  • Research Article
  • Citations48

Electricity market reform in Argentina: assessing the impact for the poor in Buenos Aires

  • May 25, 2004
  • Utilities Policy
  • James Haselip +2
  • Single Book
  • Citations19

Cost-Benefit Analysis in Urban & Regional Planning

  • May 20, 2018
  • J Schofield
  • Research Article
  • Citations10

Evaluation of Local Economic Development: A Challenge for Policy Research

  • Dec 01, 1991
  • Urban Studies
  • J.T Hughes
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Cities: Unlocking Future Local Economic Growth and Fiscal Capacity

  • Mar 04, 2012
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Darrene Hackler
  • Research Article
  • Citations67

Initiating 'Developmental Local Government' in South Africa: Evolving Local Economic Development Policy

  • Jun 01, 2001
  • Regional Studies
  • Etienne Nel +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations30

The Future of State and Local Economic Development Policy: What Research Is Needed

  • Nov 23, 2012
  • Growth and Change
  • Timothy J Bartik
  • Research Article

The Rise of the Entrepreneurial State: State and Local Economic Development Policies in the United States. By Peter K. Eisinger. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1988. 336p. $40.00 cloth, $17.50 paper. - The Politics of Plant Closings. By John Portz. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1990. 214p. $29.95 cloth, $12.95 paper.

  • Jun 01, 1991
  • American Political Science Review
  • Mark Schneider
  • Dissertation

Local perceptions on the impact of tourism development on Bai culture in Dali old town of Dali Bai autonomous prefecture, Yunnan, China

  • Jan 01, 2005
  • Cai, Li
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.