Manapan muḻkurr (joining heads): negotiating Yolŋu and Western biocultural conservation in northern Australia
Globally, losses in biodiversity, cultural and linguistic diversity are interdependent, and accelerating, requiring the design of holistic biological and cultural or ‘biocultural’ conservation practice. Biocultural conservation attempts to reconcile Western conservation intervention with Indigenous stewardship of Country, that inherently includes cultural and linguistic values. In doing so, biocultural conservation aims to safeguard biocultural diversity, protecting ecological systems whilst supporting Indigenous rights and livelihoods. As colonial land management and conservation policies and practices have perpetuated injustices on Indigenous peoples globally, restoration of Indigenous approaches requires shifts in, or devolution of Western hegemony towards collaborative and Indigenous-led approaches, to achieve responsible, mutually beneficial, ethical practice that responds to corresponding directives in contemporary international conservation, development and human rights policies.This thesis details a project aimed at negotiating Western scientific and Indigenous Yolŋu priorities and approaches in a biocultural project that centred on on-Country fauna monitoring in the Laynhapuy Indigenous Protected Area (IPA), north east Arnhem Land, northern Australia. The research was conducted in collaboration with the Yolŋu Yirralka Rangers who manage the Laynhapuy IPA, guided by Yolŋu governance and direction from Ŋaḻapaḻmi (senior Yolŋu rights and knowledge holders). Each chapter represents a key step in negotiating Yolŋu and Western values, priorities, approaches, recording and communicating project outcomes. After the introduction, the second chapter describes the process of Yolŋu-led prioritisation of fauna and places for the Laynhapuy IPA managers. The following (third) chapter built on co-adapting cross-cultural fauna survey methods, to investigate how we could enhance Yolŋu knowledge and aspirations in on-ground fauna monitoring and mesh them with Northern Territory government (Western) standardised approaches. The fourth chapter highlights the application of genetic analyses to improve the biological data of on-ground surveys and explore landscape connectivity. Chapter 5 documents a cross-cultural discussion of the genetics results, including identification and negotiation of Western and Yolŋu key concepts and creation of culturally grounded communication outputs.This research identified 30 Ŋaḻapaḻmi-nominated priority animals for future management and research collaboration in the Laynhapuy IPA. It recorded and enacted aspirations of Ŋaḻapaḻmi for cross-cultural ‘both-ways’ fauna surveys and provides recommendations for future work. Genetic analyses confirmed the species and/or lineage level identities of 13 species from three genera of morphologically ambiguous small lizards (<i>Carlia</i>, <i>Ctenotus </i>and <i>Diporiphora</i>) that were difficult to identify during field surveys. It also provided the first evidence to suggest a landscape barrier is causing north-south genetic differentiation in populations of these species in east Arnhem Land. Iterative and interlocutive discussions using locally developed Indigenous research approach <i>dhawurrpunaramirri </i>(both-ways discussion and negotiation) identified key Yolŋu metaphors that were culturally relevant for conceptual communication of genetics results in Yolŋu Matha. These metaphors helped bridge understanding between Yolŋu and Western knowledge systems, aiding the development of bilingual project communication outputs. In this thesis I demonstrate how the processes of prioritising (chapter 2), gathering (chapter 3), interpreting and sharing (chapter 5, 6) conservation research and data can ‘reconnect people and places’, opportunities often neglected by Western scientists. This project moves beyond previous attempts to record and apply ‘Indigenous knowledge’ in Western conservation practice, towards collaborative, Indigenous-led and mutually beneficial biocultural conservation practice, spanning ecological, genetic, social science and Indigenous research methodologies disciplines.
Read more