Deep learning-based inverse mapping for fluence map prediction

To investigate the feasibility of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) and to compare dual- arc VMAT treatment plans to helical tomotherapy (HT) plans on the basis of dosimetric quality, radiobiological calculations and delivery efficiency. Dual-arc VMAT and HT treatment plans were created for fifteen patients previously treated at our clinic. Planning target volumes (PTV) included the chest wall (CW) and regional lymph nodes. The following metrics were used to compare treatment plans for each patient: dose homogeneity index (DHI) and conformity index (CI); coverage of the PTV; dose to organs at risk (OAR); tumor control probability (TCP), normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) and secondary cancer complication probability (SCCP); and treatment delivery time. Differences between treatment plans were tested for significance using the paired Student's t-test. Both modalities produced clinically acceptable PMRT plans. VMAT plans showed better CI (p < 0.01), and better OAR sparing at low doses than HT plans. For example, VMAT plans showed a 26% (p < 0.01) and 9% (p < 0.01) decrease in V5Gy in the lungs and heart respectively. On the other hand, HT plans showed better DHI (p < 0.01) and PTV coverage (p < 0.01). HT plans also showed slightly better OAR sparing at higher doses, including 8% (p < 0.01) and 9% (p < 0.01) lower maximum doses to the lungs and heart, respectively. Both modalities achieved nearly 100% tumor control and approximately 1% NTCP in the lungs and heart, with VMAT showing lower SCCP (p < 0.01). VMAT plans also required 66.2% less time to deliver. Both VMAT and HT are suitable treatment options for PMRT. Our study showed that VMAT"'in addition to being significantly faster'"achieved better CI and low dose OAR sparing while HT achieved better DHI. This work was supported in part by a research support from Elekta, Ltd. However, Elekta, Ltd., did not participate in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to submit.

Purpose:The 4π non‐coplanar radiotherapy delivery technique has demonstrated significantly better normal tissue sparing and dose conformality than the clinically used volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). It is unclear whether this is a fundamental limitation of VMAT delivery or the coplanar nature of its typical clinical plans. The non‐coplanar basis of 4π is incorporated into VMAT treatment planning to compare its effect on plan quality.Methods:Clinical stereotactic body radiation therapy plans for 9 liver patients treated with 30–60 Gy using coplanar VMAT (cVMAT) were re‐planned using non‐coplanar VMAT (nVMAT) with 3 arcs and 4 π with 20 intensity‐modulated non‐coplanar fields. All plans were optimized to deliver 100% of the prescribed dose to 95% of the planning target volume (PTV), and nVMAT and 4π plans were tailored to match the maximum and mean PTV dose from the clinical plan. The conformality index (CI), 50% dose spillage volume (R50), normal liver volume receiving &gt;15 Gy (VL&gt;15), and doses to organs at risk (OARs) were compared for all three treatment plans.Results:Compared to cVMAT, the nVMAT and 4π plans reduced VL&gt;15 by an average of 30.6 cm3 and 96.3 cm3, respectively. The average CI was also reduced from 1.22 (cVMAT) to 1.17 (nVMAT) and 1.14 (4π), indicating higher conformality in the same order. Similarly, R50 was reduced from 3.87 (cVMAT) to 3.58 (nVMAT) and 2.74 (4π). With the exception of the mean right kidney dose, which increased by an average of only 0.6 Gy for nVMAT, the dose differences to OARs were not statistically significant between the two VMAT plans. 4π plans either significantly decreased or maintained OAR doses.Conclusion:While the manual selection of intuitive non‐coplanar arcs does show some improvement over coplanar VMAT, the automated beam selection for 4π still results in superior plan quality.This project is supported in part by Varian Medical Systems and NIH R43 CA183390.

Single Arc VMAT of H&N Cancer

The aim of this study was to compare various dosimetric parameters of dynamic mlc intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans for sino-nasal cancers, which are rare and complex tumors to treat with radiotherapy. IMRT using five fields, coplanar in the sagittal plane and VMAT employing two coplanar arc plans were created for five patients. The plans were assessed by comparing Conformity Index and Sigma Index (dose homogeneity) in the Planning Target Volume (PTV) and through comparison of dose-volume characteristics to the following organs at risk (OARs): Spinal cord, brainstem, eye, ipsilateral and contralateral optic nerve and the volume of brain receiving 10% of the prescribed dose (V10%). The total monitor units required to deliver the plan were also compared. Conformity Index was found to be superior in VMAT plans for three patients and in IMRT plans for two patients. Dose homogeneity within the PTV was better with VMAT plans for all five cases. The mean difference in Sigma Index was 0.68%. There was no significant difference in dose between IMRT and VMAT plans for any of the OARs assessed in these patients. The monitor units were significantly reduced in the VMAT plan in comparison to the IMRT plan for four out of five patients, with mean reduction of 66%. It was found in this study that for the treatment of sino-nasal cancer, VMAT produced minimal, and statistically insignificant improvement in dose homogeneity within the PTV when compared with IMRT. VMAT plans were delivered using significantly fewer monitor units. We conclude in this study that VMAT does not offer significant improvement of treatment for sino-nasal cancer over the existing IMRT techniques, but the findings may change with a larger sample of patients in this rare condition.

Introduction Esophageal cancer is a significant global health concern, with high incidence and mortality rates, particularly in India, where it ranks among the top causes of cancer-related deaths. Radiotherapy plays a critical role in the treatment of advanced-stage esophageal cancer. This study aims to compare the dosimetric outcomes of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) to evaluate their efficacy and safety in managing mid-esophageal carcinoma. Materials and methods A retrospective study was carried out on thirty patients with middle-third esophageal cancer who received treatment at Rohilkhand Medical College and Hospital, Bareilly, India.The patients, aged between 50 and 70 years (mean age of 66.5 years), were in stages II to III of cancer according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 2018 guidelines.All patients had histologically confirmed cases of moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma. The treatment procedure included immobilization using a thoracic mold, CT simulation with intravenous and oral contrast, and contouring of the gross tumor volume (GTV), clinical target volume (CTV), planning target volume (PTV), and organs at risk (OARs) following the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0436 protocol. VMAT planning was done using the Varian Eclipse™Treatment Planning System, while IMRT planning employed a seven-field non-coplanar beam setup. Comparative virtual IMRT plans were generated for these patients. Both VMAT and IMRT plans were evaluated based on dosimetric parameters for the PTV and OARs. Results Both VMAT and IMRT achieved sufficient PTV coverage, with no statistically significant differences in dosimetric parameters (dose to 99 % volume of PTV, dose to 95 %volume of PTV, maximum dose to PTV, minimum dose to PTV). VMAT demonstrated reduced lung and heart doses compared to IMRT; however, the observed differences were not statistically significant.There was a reduction in lung dose with VMAT when evaluating the dose-volume constraints: volume receiving 15 Gy dose (V15) by 11%, volume receiving 20 Gy dose (V20) by 20%, and volume receiving 25 Gy dose (V25) by 41%, though these differences were not statistically significant. Themeanmaximum spinal cord dose was significantly lower with VMAT (19.69 Gy) compared to IMRT (30.80 Gy, p=0.01). Heart dosimetry showed slight improvements with VMAT, particularly in volume receiving 30 Gy dose (V30), volume receiving 40 Gy dose (V40), and mean heart dose, though these differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion Both VMAT and IMRT provided similar PTV coverage. VMAT showed a reduction in spinal cord dose, which was statistically significant, and a trend toward lower lung and heart doses, though these differences were not statistically significant. VMAT appears to be an effective option for treating mid-esophageal carcinomawhile reducing exposure to critical organs.

Purpose: To evaluate the impact of complexity indices on the plan quality and deliverability of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and to determine the most significant parameters in the generation of an ideal VMAT plan. Methods: A multi-dimensional exploratory statistical method, canonical correlation analysis (CCA) was adopted to study the correlations between VMAT parameters of complexity, quality and deliverability, as well as their contribution weights with 32 two-arc VMAT nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) patients and 31 one-arc VMAT prostate cancer patients. Results: The MU per arc (MU/Arc) and MU per control point (MU/CP) of NPC were 337.8±25.2 and 3.7±0.3, respectively, which were significantly lower than those of prostate cancer patients (MU/Arc : 506.9±95.4, MU/CP : 5.6±1.1). The plan complexity indices indicated that two-arc VMAT plans were more complex than one-arc VMAT plans. Plan quality comparison confirmed that one-arc VMAT plans had a high quality than two-arc VMAT plans. CCA results implied that plan complexity parameters were highly correlated with plan quality with the first two canonical correlations of 0.96, 0.88 (both p<0.001) and significantly correlated with deliverability with the first canonical correlation of 0.79 (p<0.001), plan quality and deliverability was also correlated with the first canonical correlation of 0.71 (p=0.02). Complexity parameters of MU/CP, segment area (SA) per CP, percent of MU/CP less 3 and planning target volume (PTV) were weighted heavily in correlation with plan quality and deliveability . Similar results obtained from individual NPC and prostate CCA analysis. Conclusion: Relationship between complexity, quality, and deliverability parameters were investigated with CCA. MU, SA related parameters and PTV volume were found to have strong effect on the plan quality and deliverability. The presented correlation among different quantified parameters could be used to improve the plan quality and the efficiency of the radiotherapy process when creating a complex VMAT plan.

Dosimetric study of volumetric modulated arc therapy fields for total marrow irradiation

This study investigated the possibility to include the pacemaker in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan optimization for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to reduce the pacemaker dose. Moreover, dose distributions of the planning target volume (PTV) and organs-atrisk (OARs) with and without lowering the pacemaker dose in VMAT plans were compared with the PTV close to and far away from the pacemaker. Patients with PTVs in their left and right lung were selected in their lung SBRT. VMAT plans with pacemaker regarded as an OAR or not in the plan optimization were created. Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of PTVs and OARs were determined and compared. Our results showed that it is possible to achieve an acceptable PTV coverage by lowering the pacemaker dose in the VMAT plan, though larger dose-volume deviation of PTV can be found when it is closer to the pacemaker. In addition, DVH deviations for OARs were not significant when the pacemaker was regarded as an OAR in the plan. We also found that the dosimetric change is sensitive to the OARs namely, trachea, bronchus, esophagus and cord when the pacemaker was included in the plan optimization. We concluded that it is possible to reduce the pacemaker dose by regarding the pacemaker as an OAR in the VMAT plan for lung SBRT. This is especially important for patient depending seriously on the pacemaker, as the VMAT beam for SBRT is directly on the device with a very high dose per fraction.

This study aimed to compare the dosimetric parameters of the simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) guided by 99mTc-labeled diethylenetriamine pentaacetate-galactosyl human serum albumin (99mTc-GSA) single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) image with those of conventional three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT). Five patients with diffuse liver metastases underwent 99mTc-GSA SPECT and computed tomography (CT) imaging before RT planning. A SPECT threshold was used for determining the functional liver structure (FLS). The 3D-CRT plan included anterior-posterior opposed beams. The prescribed dose was 8 Gy in one fraction, with a goal of 95% of the planning target volume (PTV), D95, receiving at least 95% of the prescribed dose. The absorbed dose received by 2 cm3 of organ at risk (OAR) volume (D2cc) was below 10 Gy. The VMAT plan comprised two or three arcs. The goals for the PTV and OARs matched those of 3D-CRT. The PTV dose in SIB (PTVboost) defined according to FLS was optimized at an isodose line [~80% of the maximum dose (Dmax)] received at D95 of PTVboost. Two plans were compared using the dose-volume histogram parameters of PTV, PTVboost, FLS, and OARs. Dosimetric parameters including Dmean, Dmax, V110%, and V120% for PTV were significantly higher in the VMAT plan than in the 3D-CRT plan. Likewise, for PTVboost, the VMAT plan had significantly higher values of dosimetric parameters (D95, Dmean, Dmax, V110%, and V120%) than the 3D-CRT plan. The FLS and OAR parameters did not significantly differ between the two plans, except for the spinal cord. 99mTc-GSA SPECT image-guided VMAT planning using SIB allows selective target dose increase in palliative radiotherapy for diffuse liver metastases.

Background: Dosimetric parameters of the planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs) were compared among 3 different radiotherapy (RT) modalities in left breast cancer patients after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Methods: Eleven patients with left breast cancer after BCS were enrolled and underwent CT simulation in the free breathing (FB) and deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) position. Three-dimensional conformal RT (3DCRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were generated for each patient in the DIBH positions. A 3DCRT plan was also created in the FB position. A dose-volume histogram (DVH) was used to analyze each evaluation index of PTV and OARs. The principal outcomes were PTV dose, heart dose, right breast dose, left anterior descending coronary artery (LADCA) dose, and left lung dose. Results: For 3DCRT plans, significant dose reductions were demonstrated in all evaluation parameters of the heart, LADCA, and left lung doses in the DIBH position compared with those in the FB position (P < 0.05). In the DIBH position, significant dose reductions were found in the heart and LADCA in VMAT plans compared to those in 3DCRT plans (P < 0.05). For the right breast, VMAT reduced Dmean significantly (0.32 Gy vs 0.08 Gy, P < 0.01). There were no significant differences between 3DCRT and VMAT plans for the left lung dose in the DIBH position. The indicators of PTV had no significant difference between the 3 plans. Conclusion: DIBH and VMAT could reduce dosimetric parameters of the OARs in left breast cancer patients after BCS. RT plans for left breast cancer after BCS can be optimized by DIBH and VMAT techniques to minimize radiation-induced toxicity.

This study compared dosimetric indices of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) accounting for cold spots in prostate cancer plans. IMRT plans were retrospectively generated from 30 prostate cancer patients with ten cases for each risk group, who received VMAT plans. The mean, maximum, and minimum doses, and conformity and homogeneity indexes were evaluated for planning target volume (PTV) and the mean dose and V20-V70 for organs at risk (OAR) including the rectum, bladder, right and left femoral heads, and rectum overlapped with PTV (ROP) regions. The numbers and volume percentages of cold spots within PTVs and ROP regions were measured using in-house software. Three-dimensional probabilistic distributions of the probability and distributions of cold spots were generated using a centroid matching technique for visualization and analysis. There was a statistically better dose conformity in the PTV, rectum, and bladder dose-sparing in VMAT compared to that in the IMRT plans, whereas VMAT had statistically worse target dose homogeneity, and right and left femoral head dose-sparing than those of the IMRT plans. The average volume percentage of cold spots per PTV for the VMAT was 4.37 ± 2.68%, which was smaller than the 5.72 ± 1.84% observed for IMRT plans (P = 0.007). The volume percentage of cold spots per ROP for the VMAT did not significantly differ from those for the IMRT plans. Compared with IMRT, the VMAT plans achieved better PTV dose conformity, OAR dose-sparing, and smaller cold spots in the treatment of prostate cancer.

The aim of this work is to determine the out-of-field survival of cells irradiated with either the primary field or scattered radiation in the presence and absence of intercellular communication following delivery of conformal, IMRT and VMAT treatment plans. Single beam, conformal, IMRT and VMAT plans were created to deliver 3 Gy to half the area of a T80 flask containing either DU-145 or AGO-1522 cells allowing intercellular communication between the in- and out-of-field cell populations. The same plans were delivered to a similar custom made phantom used to hold two T25 culture flasks, one flask in-field and one out-of-field to allow comparison of cell survival responses when intercellular communication is physically inhibited. Plans were created for the delivery of 8 Gy to the more radio-resistant DU-145 cells only in the presence and absence of intercellular communication. Cell survival was determined by clonogenic assay. In both cell lines, the out-of-field survival was not statistically different between delivery techniques for either cell line or dose. There was however, a statistically significant difference between survival out-of-field when intercellular communication was intact (single T80 culture flask) or inhibited (multiple T25 culture flasks) to in-field for all plans. No statistically significant difference was observed in-field with or without cellular communication to out-of-field for all plans. These data demonstrate out-of-field effects as important determinants of cell survival following exposure to modulated irradiation fields when cellular communication between differentially irradiated cell populations is present. This data is further evidence that refinement of existing radiobiological models to include indirect cell killing effects is required.

A treatment planning system (TPS) produces volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans by applying an optimization process to an objective function, followed by an accurate calculation of the final, deliverable dose. However, during the optimization step, a rapid dose calculation algorithm is required, which reduces its accuracy and its representation of the objective function space. Monte Carlo (MC) routines, considered the gold standard in accuracy, are currently too slow for practical comprehensive VMAT optimization. Therefore, we propose a novel approach called enhanced optimization (EO), which employs the TPS VMAT plan as a starting point, and applies small perturbations to nudge the solution closer to a true objective minimum. The perturbations consist of beamlet dose matrices, calculated using MC routines on a distributed-computing framework. DICOM files for clinical VMAT plans files are exported from the TPS and used to generate input files for the EGSnrc MC toolkit. Beamlet doses are calculated using the MC routines, each corresponding to a single multileaf collimator leaf from a single control point traveling 0.5cm in or out of the field. A typical VMAT plan requires 5000 to 10000 beamlets, which may be calculated overnight. This results in a ternary-valued objective function, which may use the same clinical objectives as the original VMAT plan. A simple greedy search algorithm is applied to minimize this function and determine the optimal set of ternary variables. The resulting modified control point parameters are imported into the TPS to calculate the final, deliverable dose, and to compare the EO plan with the original. EO was evaluated retrospectively on seven VMAT plans (two adult brain, one pediatric brain, two head and neck, and two prostate). Additionally, the use of stricter objectives was investigated for two of the cases: the left cochlea planning organ at risk (OAR) volume objective for the pediatric brain case, and the rectum objective for a prostate case. EO produced improved objective scores (by 6% to 60%) and dose-volume histograms (DVH) for the brain plans and the head and neck plans. For each of these plans, the target dose minimum and homogeneity were preserved, while one or more of the OAR DVH's was reduced. Although EO also reduced the objective scores for the prostate plans (by 46% and 79%), their absolute score and DVH improvements were not substantial. The stricter objective on the pediatric brain case resulted in lower dose to the OAR without compromising the target dose. However, the rectum dose in the prostate case could not be improved without reducing dose homogeneity to the planning target volume, suggesting that VMAT prostate cases may already be highly optimized by the TPS. We have developed a novel approach to improving the dose distribution of VMAT plans, which relies on MC calculations to provide small modifications to the control points. This method may be particularly useful for complex treatments in which a certain OAR is of concern and it is difficult for the treatment planner to obtain an acceptable solution with the TPS. Further development will reduce the beamlet computation time and result in more sophisticated EO treatment planning methods.

To investigate whether an overlap volume histogram (OVH)-driven planning application using an intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) database can guide and automate volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) planning for head-and-neck cancer. Based on comparable head-and-neck dosimetric results between planner-generated VMAT and IMRT plans, an inhouse developed, OVH-driven automated planning application containing a database of prior clinical head-and-neck IMRT plans is built into Pinnacle(3) SmartArc for VMAT planning. Double-arc VMAT plans of four oropharynx, four nasopharynx, and four larynx patients are generated and compared with corresponding clinical IMRT plans. Each VMAT plan is automatically generated in two optimization rounds, while the average number of optimization rounds in generating a clinical IMRT plan is 43. In VMAT plans, statistical superiority (p < 0.01) in sparing of the cord+4 mm, brainstem, brachial plexus, larynx, and inner ear is observed with a slight degradation in low-dose-level planning target volume (PTV) coverage. On average, D(0.1 cc) to the cord+4 mm, brainstem and brachial plexus is reduced by 3.7, 4.9, and 1.6 Gy, respectively; V(50 Gy) to the larynx is reduced by 5.3%; mean dose to the inner ear is reduced by 4.4 Gy; V(95) of low-dose-level PTV coverage is reduced by 0.3% with p = 0.25. IMRT-data-driven VMAT planning offers a potential method for generating VMAT plans that are comparable to IMRT plans in terms of dosimetric quality.

Correlation of Integral Dose, White Blood Cell Counts, and Radiation Therapy Techniques for Head and Neck Cancer Patients Under Radiation Therapy