• Home
  • Search
  • Delay Scheduling of a LQR and PID Controlled Pendubot Using CTCR Method
  • https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2020-24273Copy DOI Icon

Delay Scheduling of a LQR and PID Controlled Pendubot Using CTCR Method

  • Nov 16, 2020
  • Helio S Esteban Villegas +2 more
Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Abstract Delays are a common physic effect that is present in a huge quantity of industrial systems with feedback control. Sometimes the impact of the delay presence in a system is neglected without any difference in the performance of the controller. But in some cases, the Delay quantity reaches levels that increase the overshoot significantly or destabilizes the system. For this system the CTCR method can be used to design a “delayed scheduled” controller able to reject the delays effect. To be able to apply this method it is necessary for both the system and the controller to be Linear or linearized. In this article the study case is an articulated inverted pendulum or also called “Pendubot”. This configuration of pendulum was selected because, in spite of being a simple pendulum, it has four equilibrium points, where two equilibrium points were selected to be controlled, the most unstable which has the maximum potential energy for each link and the most stable with the lowest potential energy. The purpose of work with those equilibrium points is compare the difference between the delay rejection in each point with similar setting times and overshoots from controllers. In order to get an accurate model, the state of the current is added along with the viscous friction terms for each joint in the pendulum. To tune the linear and non-linear model an experimental validation was carry on the physical prototype from the Universidad Industrial de Santander (VIE-5373 UIS). The control laws applied were a classical PID and LQR control. Due the controller sample frequency is extremely high in comparison to the states response, all the controllers and linear models were implemented in continuous space. In the first tuning process it was observed that the PID control gets a significantly lowest performance than the LQR control in the unstable equilibrium point, for that reason the comparison between points only was carried on with the LQR equation of feedback system, this can be done in different ways, but for the PID control the Mason theorems was applied and for LQR control only with matrix operation the equation can be obtained. After applying the “Delay scheduling” it was observed that the tuned LQR get a highest delay rejection that PID. An observer fact was that although the controllers for each point have a similar performance the delay pockets have completely different values due the final poles locations for each point. Also was observed that the system only gets one stability pocket, this could because only one delay in the actuator was induced.

Similar Papers
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

When and why microbial-explicit soil organic carbon models can be unstable

  • Jul 30, 2024
  • Biogeosciences
  • Erik Schwarz +3
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Online Footprint of Uncertainty Tuning Mechanism for Single-Input Interval Type-2 Fuzzy PID Controllers

  • Jul 27, 2025
  • International Journal of Fuzzy Systems
  • İhsan Şahin +1
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations21

LQR and PID Algorithms for Vibration Control of Piezoelectric Composite Plates

  • Nov 08, 2018
  • Mechanics
  • Madjid Ezzraimi +3
  • Supplementary Content

在PC/104+與CAN BUS架構下實現以Linux-RTAI為基礎之分散式即時監控系統

  • Jan 01, 2010
  • 許志源
  • Conference Article
  • Citations15

Hybrid PID-Fuzzy controller for autonomous UAV stabilization

  • Aug 15, 2021
  • Guilherme Carvalho +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

An Efficient Optimal Fractional Emotional Intelligent Controller for an AVR System in Power Systems

  • Jan 01, 2019
  • Journal of AI and Data Mining
  • Majid Moradi Zirkohi
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

Analytical study on the motions around equilibrium points of restricted four-body problem

  • Jun 03, 2015
  • Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation
  • Hanlun Lei +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations3

Comparative study of real time implementation of LabVIEW based MPC controller and PID controller for flow control loop

  • Apr 01, 2017
  • Chetan D Jichkar +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations6

Quadcopter Stabilization using Neural Network Model from Collected Data of PID Controller

  • Sep 29, 2022
  • ICT Focus
  • Bat-Erdene Gotov +3
  • Conference Article
  • Citations1

Fractional order PID control of a motion platform

  • Aug 01, 2017
  • Peng Hui +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations8

Reinforcement Q-learning PID Controller for a Restaurant Mobile Robot with Double Line-Sensors

  • Jan 17, 2020
  • Vo Nhu Thanh +4
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

Low Earth Orbit Satellite Attitude Stabilization Using Linear Quadratic Regulator

  • May 19, 2023
  • European Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
  • Emmanuel U Enejor +3
  • Conference Article
  • Citations1

Characterization of the region of attraction of a power system transient stability model

  • May 08, 1989
  • J.C Lo +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations7

Design and FPGA implementation of 1-degree-of-freedom discrete PID controller for power switching converter

  • Jul 01, 2012
  • Ghulam Abbas +2
  • Conference Article

Design of Fuzzy Controller for Double Inverted Pendulum

  • Jul 27, 2012
  • Yawen Tang +3
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.