Abstract 11 Monitoring Cord Blood Inventory Reliability by Key Quality Indicators At and After Release
IntroductionAs per FACT standards, Cord Blood Banks (CBB) have to verify that they provide a safe and effective product for transplant. Validated processing methods and storage conditions are the first steps towards this goal, but what are the final steps to monitor the quality of the cord blood units (CBU) released for transplant?ObjectivesWe present here a retrospective analysis of our Program’s final verification process to meet this FACT requirement.MethodsCBU shipped between January 2018 and December 2022 were reviewed for out of specification events. The following Quality Control (QC) parameters were measured on attached segments before shipment: total nucleated cells (TNC), viable CD34 cells (vCD34), and colony forming units (CFU). Confirmed date of infusion and engraftment data were obtained from CIBMTR.ResultsA total of 619 CBU were shipped during the study period. 550 had a segment analyzed at the time of shipment. Average post-thaw CD34 viability on the segments was 93.5% (Table 1). Average recoveries for TNC, viable CD34 and CFU were 83.3%, 64.90% and 60.86%, respectively (Table 1). 6 (1%) CBUs were found to have CD34 viability lower than FACT requirement (≥70%) (Table 1). Investigations were performed for each CBU, concluding that these were technical issues with no repercussion on the final product. No segments demonstrated absence of CFU growth. 544 CBUs had an infusion date recorded by CIBMTR (Table 1). 250 of the CBU infused had engraftment data, and 242 engrafted. 8 (3%) CBU transplants resulted in non-engraftment. All had QC results within expected range (Table 1).Table 1.Quality control testing and outcome dataQuality control testingValues and Results Post-thaw segment CD34 viability (average, range, n)95.27% (37.75 – 100), n=777a Post-thaw segment TNC recovery (average, range, n)83.35% (42.6 – 128.6), n=550 Post-thaw segment viable CD34 recovery (average, range, n)64.90% (14.5 – 134.7), n=550 Post-thaw segment CFU recovery (average, range, n)60.94% (10.6 – 155.8), n=516b Outside of acceptance criteria CD34 viability <70%n=6c 3 CBU, each cryopreserved in 2 bags, second bag within expected rangeAll infused2 patients engrafted1 patient had no outcome data 3 CBU, each cryopreserved in one bag1 infused, no outcome data1 infusion pending1 non infused (back up CBU infused) No CFU growthn=0Outcome data,d units infused (n=544) Adults321 (59%) Children223 (41%) Diagnosis Malignant disease472 (87%) Nonmalignant disease72 (13%) Single331 (61%) Multiple Double CBU 184 (34%) CBU + PBSC26 (4%) >3 CBU3 (1%) Match 3/62 (0.4%) 4/6316 (58.1%) 5/6184 (33.8%) 6/642 (7.7%) CBU storage time, average (range)7.5 years (7 months – 19.5 years) Cell doses TNC x10e7/kg (median, range)3.4 (0.7 – 56.7) CD34 x10e3/kg (median, range)205 (16 – 4856) Engraftment analysis (n=250) Engraftment242 (96.8%) Non engraftment8 (3.2%)a777 segments were assessed for CD34 viability (227 CBU were preserved into 2 bags, 323 CBU into one bag)b516 CBU were assessed for CFU recovery (34 CBU had not post-processing CFU testing)cLow viability events trigger an extensive review of manufacturing and distribution data of the CBU, as well as repeat testing of the flow cytometry. For all 6 CBU, repeat testing resulted in similar values; no issues were identified during data review and investigation pointed towards a technical problem at the time of thaw, with no root cause identified.d7 CBU had QC at shipment within acceptable range. 1 CBU had QC 4 years prior (at HLA confirmation) within acceptable range.DiscussionOur QC results confirm the continued stability of the CBU until shipment. The small subset of CBU with out of specification results were linked to technical issues and did not affect the outcome of transplant. Outcome data is another way of assessing the quality of the CBUs, even though it may be influenced by many factors out of the CBB’s responsibility (such as diagnosis, conditioning, multiple transplants, etc…). The combined analysis of the two datasets is a good way for a CBB to ensure processes are performing as expected over time and monitor the quality of the final product.
Read more