The topic of this thesis work is free probability theory. The main goal is to understand asymptotic eigenvalue distributions of large classes of random matrices. For the models discussed in [SpVa12], we obtain a quite general algorithm to plot their distributions. We also apply the tools from [BSTV14] to give a general numerical algorithm to compute the asymptotic distribution of some other types of matrix models, such as the block-linearly modified models which have been considered in [Au12,BaNe12,BaNe12b].\n\nClassical, free and non-commutative probability can be jointly understood through the combinatorics of multiplicative functions with respect to different lattices of set partitions. The second goal of this thesis is to survey on the basic topics on the combinatorics of free probability. Our basic reference is [NiSp06]. We present new results which allow to compute cumulants of products of free and Boolean independent random variables in terms of the posets of k-divisible set partitions [ArVa12]. We also find formulas relating the different types of cumulants in non-commutative probability [AHLV14].\n\nIn connection to random matrix theory, we make particular use of the combinatorial approach to operator-valued free probability ([NSS02]) to compute Cauchy-Stieljes transforms of the asymptotic eigenvalue distributions of the matrix ensembles introduced in [SpVa12]. We do this to show that our definition of a free deterministic equivalent as a concrete operator, introduced in [SpVa12], agrees with the more widespread notion of deterministic equivalents which are being used, for example, to describe recent matrix models for wireless communications [CoDe11].\n\nVoiculescu introduced free probability in 1985 in the context of operator algebras. In 1991, he found realizations of his free circular, semi-circular and Haar-unitary operators through limits of eigenvalue distributions of quite remarkable random matrix models, such as independent (self-adjoint and non-self-adjoint) Wigner and Haar-unitary random matrices. This allowed to understand Wigner's semicircle law as a special, single-variable case of a very general phenomenon on joint non-commutative distributions of large random matrices.\n\nIn 1995 he introduced operator-valued free probability, where the limiting behaviors of much more general random matrix models can be realized. A rich class of random matrix models arises from considering a polynomial P(x_1,...,x_n) in non-commutative indeterminates x_1,...,x_n,x_1^*,...,x_n^* and evaluating it on random and deterministic matrices. In this work we are specially concerned about these kind of models. We refer to them as polynomial models''.\n\nIf the inputs are (self-adjoint or non-self-adjoint) Wigner matrices, Wishart matrices, and deterministic matrices, we may consider a deterministic operator Q by evaluating P on certain operators (y_1,...,y_n) in the context of Voiculescu's free probability theory. Provided that the size of the matrices is large (but not necessarily too large), the spectral measure of the simplified model Q becomes a good approximation of the averaged eigenvalue distribution of P. The dimensions of the matrices can also be different. The free deterministic equivalent Q of P was defined in [SpVa12], based on the generalizations of [Vo91] to rectangular spaces [BG09,BG09b], and using mostly combinatorial tools from [NSS02].\n\nThe method of deterministic equivalents (DE) was introduced by Girko at the level of Cauchy-Stieltjes transforms of the considered matrix models. In contrast to DE, the simplification from P to Q can be explained very easily and does not require the polynomial to have a specific form. It will turn out that our definitions from [SpVa12] can be very effectively combined with all the elements of method described in [BMS13] for the distributions of polynomials on self-adjoint, square, asymptotically free random matrices.\n\nThroughout this work, we comment on how the different assumptions on the distributions that we input to the random matrix models affect the quality and the type of convergence of the model to its FDE. In particular, we discuss this at the combinatorial level: The different assumptions on the model determine the classes of partitions (or cumulants) that show up on the matrix sums, and hence the moments and the nature of the fixed point equations that we will get for its FDE.\n\nTo be numerically efficient one needs to understand how freeness restricts and extends to different operator-valued levels. For this, the combinatorial methods from [NSS02] are quite important.
Read more