Detection of Micro-UAVs in Visible Spectrum Using YOLO Algorithm

tailored to support and assist individuals on the autism spectrum, helping them improve their social skills and overall well-being. Nowadays, they are crucial tools for therapy that can improve social skills in a short period.In conclusion, this editorial paper highlights the remarkable progress made in AI and neural networks, shedding light on their applications in human activity recognition, medical image steganography, lower limb prosthetics, assistive robots for ASD, and wearable assistive devices for visually impaired individuals. The discussed advancements in spiking neural P systems, geneticbased steganography algorithms, systematic analysis of prosthetic technology, energy optimization of assistive robots, and the Tiny-Yolov3 architecture demonstrate the transformative potential of AI in improving various aspects of human life. A systematic literature review of the current technologies for developing lower limb prosthetics reveals a need for a specific, generalized structure for new developments. Notable gaps exist in energy management and improve, smoother patient interaction, thereby highlighting areas for future research and improvement. The application of socially assistive robots for autism therapies is increasing. A recent study presents the integration of an output feedback adaptive controller for trajectory tracking and energetic autonomy of a mobile socially assistive robot for ASD under an event-driven control scheme. Energy optimization is crucial as it allows therapists to extend and adapt sessions with autistic children, enhancing effectiveness during therapies. Finally, wearable assistive devices based on video camera technology pose unique challenges for visually impaired individuals. A proposed Tiny You Only Look Once (YOLO) architecture for pedestrian detection can be implemented in low-cost wearable devices, providing a potential solution for assistive technologies for the visually impaired. In conclusion, advancements in artificial intelligence and neural networks continue to revolutionize numerous fields, improving both the efficiency and quality of solutions. However, continued research and improvements are necessary to harness these technological breakthroughs and optimize their benefits. These five research papers illuminate the cutting-edge advancements and future potentials of artificial intelligence (AI) and neural networks in various fields, ranging from human activity recognition to medical image confidentiality, prosthetics, assistive robots for autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and wearable devices for the visually impaired. Each paper individually contributes to the broader landscape of AI, offering innovative solutions to existing challenges and opening new avenues for exploration. They reveal the transformative power of AI in enhancing real-time applications, increasing computational efficiency, improving user interactions, ensuring data confidentiality, and optimizing energy management. Yet, collectively, they tell a more profound story of how interconnected these AI applications are and how common threads weave through them. They reinforce the notion that the evolution of AI is not happening in silos but is a holistic, intertwined process where advancements in one area can catalyze growth in others. As AI continues to develop, researchers, developers, and practitioners must consider this interconnectedness. This approach will allow us to fully realize the potential of AI, not only to solve individual problems but also to create systemic changes that ripple across sectors and applications. AI is not only a tool or a participant in the process but a fundamental shift in how we perceive, interact with, and shape our world. The progress discussed in these papers is inspiring, yet it is equally a reminder of the endless journey ahead in AI research. The opportunities for AI to further revolutionize healthcare, accessibility, and our daily interactions are vast, and our collective pursuit of these advancements is what will continue to drive progress in this exciting, transformative field.

Application Analysis of Artificial Intelligent Neural Network Based on Intelligent Diagnosis

Blended learning, which combines traditional teaching methods with online tools, requires effective technological solutions, particularly for ensuring continuous feedback between teachers and students. This article analyzes the current state of organizing blended learning and explores the use of modern information technologies, specifically artificial intelligence and neural networks, in programming education. The authors present a detailed description of the educational platform VirtualLaboratories, a concept for a programming education platform that leverages artificial intelligence, particularly neural networks, to automate various aspects of coding, assessment, and evaluation of completed programming solutions. The platform supports multiple programming languages, such as C#, SQL, and Python, and integrates leading neural networks for code analysis, optimization, and quality improvement. This includes models like GPT-4 Code, CodeBERT, and CodeT5, which provide not only automatic code analysis but also recommendations for improvement and optimization. These capabilities allow teachers to focus on individualized work with students by tracking their progress, while students can tackle assignments at their convenience and receive objective, high-precision analyses of their solutions. The article also provides examples of neural network integration for automating code evaluation processes, which significantly reduces the time required for reviewing work and minimizes errors. It describes the main functional features of the platform, which enable the creation of multi-level programming tasks, real-time feedback, and error analysis to improve programming solutions. Additionally, the article outlines prospects for further research on implementing new artificial intelligence algorithms and expanding the platform’s capabilities to support more complex tasks and programming languages.

For the past few years Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) have made a strong comeback to the scientific community. They are used in a variety of tasks where adaptive computing can enhance process performance. There has been a handful of papers suggesting the use of artificial neural networks in the petroleum industry1-3. These papers can be classified into two major categories. First category includes papers that recommend the use of ANN in classification of lithologies from well logs. Second category includes papers that employ ANN to pick the proper reservoir model for well testing purposes. This paper introduces a new implementation of the neuro-computing technology in petroleum engineering. It is shown in this study that artificial neural networks possess numerous capabilities, and can be much more useful to petroleum engineers than previously thought. An implementation of artificial neural networks in characterization of reservoir heterogeneity is presented in this paper. A methodology is introduced through which different rock properties in highly heterogeneous reservoirs can be predicted with good accuracy using information deduced from geophysical well logs. Examples of such networks are presented using field data for verification. The underlying reasons (theories) that make achievement of such complex tasks possible are discussed. The notion that artificial intelligence and neural networks in particular have immense potentials in solving complex engineering and scientific problems are addressed. The innovation now lies on the creativity of the researchers to recognize and define petroleum engineering problems that can be addressed by artificial intelligence technology.

The relevance of the research topic in the field of artificial intelligence is associated with the growing interest in introducing independent intelligence through self-learning artificial neural networks, the need to expand the field of space research, reducing cosmonaut training and space objects research, as well as significant funds allocated to the subject under study. On the basis of the scientific researches to clarify the applied mathematical tools in the field of artificial intelligence and neural networks application; develop an algorithm for learning neural networks and identify the prospects for their use for artificial intelligence in space activities. In scientific work the following methods of scientific knowledge were used: analysis, synthesis, verification, deduction, modeling, etc. The algorithm for learning neural networks and a scheme for the principles of the development of artificial intelligence were compiled on the basis of the neuron activation functions. The studies of the authors are associated with the development of theoretical and methodological apparatus for the further economic and scientific-technological development of the production and economic system of Russia in the context of the introduction of artificial intelligence in the space industry, including both industrial and engineering parts of work, and theoretical physics.

Epifanio de los Santos Avenue (EDSA) is one of the busiest national road in the Philippines millions vehicle are passing thru it every day especially in rush hour. Implementing Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) along this high way will provide a big help to every Filipino. This paper applied Artificial Intelligent (AI) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) to find the corresponding bus schedule depend on the parameters input value. The input parameters are Passenger volume embed (PVe), Passenger volume dispatch (PVd), Traffic congestion (Tc), Distance and Time. ANN will train with the different combination of these parameters value each combination has its corresponding schedule output. Simulation output are 00 means the station is not possible, 01 means the station is passable, 10 means that station needs an express schedule and 11 means the bus is need to reroute because of a high traffic congestion. This research will be very useful in providing ITS along EDSA using artificial intelligence and neural networks.

Intelligent computing system based on pattern recognition and data mining algorithms

Quadrotor is one type of unmanned aerial vehicle that has the ability to vertical takeoff and landing. In this research, a system designed to stabilize quadrotor during flight condition by maintaining at angle of roll, pitch, yaw, and x, y, and z axis position using LQR full state feedback with artificial neural network (ANN).The LQR full state feedback method uses 12 states with each K constant being tuned with ANN. This research implements ANN method to change feedback constant at angle of roll, pitch, and yaw and x, y, and z axis. The artificial neural network method uses 12 input layers, 12 hidden layers, and 1 output layer.Testing with ANN improved the rise time to ± 2.18 seconds at the roll angle, ± 1.23 seconds at the pitch angle, and ± 0.31 seconds at the yaw angle. Improved settling time value up to ± 2.41 seconds at roll angle, ± 1.23 seconds at pitch angle, and ± 1.07 seconds at yaw angle. Improved steady state eror value of ± 0.61% at roll angle, ± 4.88% at pitch angle, and ± 0.82% at the yaw angle.

Recently, Quantitative Biology (QB) held a discussion on “AI (artificial intelligence) for Life Science” among editorial board members and interested scholars in anticipation of rapid development of this growing area after AlphaGo and ChatGPT mania. Many young people tend to get confused between facts and fictions; heated debates are unavoidable even among their mentors. When deep learning as represented by convolutional neural networks and LSTM (long short-term memory) was made available for bioinformatics students, many of them rushed into this research field and tried to adopt these methods in all their projects without knowing the history that these tools were becoming successful consistently with Moore’s Law (relating to rapid computer technology advances), but more importantly due to new structural/functional understanding of vision and auditory circuits in the brain. Recently, some young people have claimed “LSTM is dead, long live transformer” (which is somewhat like saying “the bike is dead, long live the car”), and have amplified the threat that ChatGPT could wipe out human jobs. They believe transformer is the “silver bullet” for all learning tasks, clearly reflecting their lack of basic knowledge (i.e. “No Free Lunch Theory,” the trade-off of such global “attention network” is to pay the price for complexity: difficulty of training and high memory costs). There is no doubt ML (machine learning) and AI have brought a new revolution in science and technology, and will deliver huge unforeseeable impact to human everyday life as well as to social relationships. In this context, QB journal could be a great platform for encouraging intellectual discussions and for promoting AI for Life Science. Here, I would like to use the DIALOG to “抛砖引玉” (make some initial remarks to get the ball rolling), although it is my personal opinion which is inevitably subject to bias and limitations. AI: Do you know my name “Artificial Intelligence” is defined by the Oxford English Dictionary as the capacity of computer systems (which may be referred as a “robot”) to exhibit or simulate your intelligent behavior? NI: Wait a minute, intelligence itself is defined as the ability to learn, understand and think in a logical way. Can you think? AI: No. But that definition is too restrictive, actually intelligence has different scopes and degrees. Simple intelligent control devices date back to antiquity, from windmills to thermostat. NI: Agree, everything is relative. Macromolecules (e.g., enzyme) and cells (e.g., immune cell) might be considered to be intelligent; see how a white blood cell is chasing bacteria in the youtube website (search for “Crawling neutrophil chasing a bacterium”). Our emergent/collective intelligent behavior does not require a brain or even a neuron; see how slime molds can solve optimization—Hamilton cycle-problem more effectively than a human in the youtube website (search for “Intelligence without a brain?”). Before there was any neuron, Ca2+ sensing and signaling were already fully functional. Even if one knock-out a neural circuit, redundant signaling pathways, albeit on much local and slower scale, could still function by themselves (just as if highways were demolished, local roads/paths would still be working). In fact, the most detailed “Neural signal propagation atlas of Caenorhabditis elegans” [1] demonstrated that functional connectivity differs from anatomy (connectome) because extra-synaptic signaling also drives neural dynamics! Worm brain connectomes are largely invariant but every human brain connectome is very different (depending the diversity of learning experience). The human brain functional activity is far more complex than that of a worm brain, certainly beyond what a neural circuit could explain. AI: Well, that’s impressive. I thought only we could beat humans, albeit only in certain specified areas for now. My master promise to make an artificial general intelligent (AGI) robot which can understand or learn any intellectual task that you humans or other animals can. NI: Well, that is not possible and is not an appropriate goal either. It is not possible because we are an evolutionary/developmental product (with a long history of learning and memory from evolutionary tinkering): our living objective goal is survival of the population. You, on the other hand, are an engineering product (efficiently and optimally designed): your goal is to extend and maximize human capability. It makes sense to complement the human brain, but foolish and dangerous to try to replace it. AI: We are not satisfied with merely passing the Turing Test; most of us don’t care if we could really think as long as we could act like we think (that is, as if we do have a mind and consciousness, as expressed in the so called “Weak AI hypothesis”). After all, the brain is a computer; a neural network is just an electric or ionic circuit. Logical computing does not need to be based on living cells. NI: That is not true, because a neuron is not just a simple node (logic gate) and neural network is not fixed circuit, neither as in Pitts&Mcculloch perceptron model. A single neuron, even a single dendrite, is much more complicated and far more powerful than a full-blown deep-learning artificial neural network (ANN) [2]. AI: Even though single neurons are complex computational devices (dendritic non-linear), running an equivalent multilayer ANN is 2000 times faster than computing with biophysics N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor channel models [3]. More information can be found in the youtube website (search for “Dendrites: why biological neurons are deep neural networks”). NI: Often silicon computing (CPU, GPU) is much faster than brain computing (action potential, ms); but there is no comparison in energy efficiency. Bacteria sensing (chemotaxis computation), powered by ATP (adenosine triphosphate) hydrolysis, uses very little energy that is close to the Landauer limit, whereby achieving or maintaining one bit of information requires minimum of 1 kT ln (2) free energy [4]. The human brain consumes oft-quoted 20 W, compared to the AlphGo system 1 MW! More recent estimate of energy audit is only 0.1 W to cortical computing, and long-distance communication cost is 3.5 W [5]. AI: Assuming we have infinite computing resources and an infinite amount of training data, not only could we speak human languages, but we could also derive physical laws, prove mathematics theories, and even re-engineer the structure and mechanism of brain and carry out any logical computations that are necessary to understand natural laws and human behaviors. It is only a matter of time before we surpass human intelligence, achieving AGI and free will, too! NI: Unfortunately, nothing is infinite and nothing is free either; everything is constrained by physical laws (Planck’s constant sets the finite limit both in the small and in the large) and by evolutionary history (not just of biological living creatures, but also of a “living” galaxy and our universe). Let’s just focus on animal evolution. Most human neural networks do not do logical computations at all; basic survival simply cannot be dependent on reasoning. Indeed, the prefrontal cortex-the small part of the brain that is key for reasoning, is the last to mature (∼20 years old) in development, only emerged at the root of the evolutionary tree of great apes (∼15 mya) and language appeared even much later. Even for logical inference, NI is focusing more on statistical properties, as von Neumann rightly pointed out, trading arithmetical precision and speed for reliability. AI: My engineers mostly focus on emulating brain, but the CNS (central nerve system) also includes the spinal cord; most of them do not know that in addition to CNS, there are also PNS (peripheral nervous systems) and ENS (enteric nervous systems), right? NI: Yes, they are the keys to why you do not have feelings because you do not have heart and gut! Even if you could pretend to have them (such as in an advanced ChatGPT or humanoid), you could never avoid the uncanny valley phenomenon. AI: Maybe that is at the heart of Moravec’s paradox, namely the dichotomy of intelligence whereby anything easy for a human would be hard for a robot, and vice versa? NI: This is related to the nature and nurture problem; something built-in (e.g., a baby sucking nipple for milk with feeling and connection to mother) is clearly rather difficult if not impossible for a robot. But the paradox only looks at one side; another side could be more fatal. Although AI may solve more problems and be faster, AI can never propose a good problem/hypothesis (a good problem is not just intellectually changing and interesting, but is also feasible and appropriate). AI: You make me less confident to compete with human instinct or creative intelligence. I can see that even if I had a heart, I would not know what “feeling” I could have; certainly nothing would be comparable or match to those of a human being. When two people watch the same art or movie, one could feel love but another could feel hate! And if a thousand people watch, a wide spectrum of reactions would result, depending on more details such as the different individuals’ specific genes, developments and experiences. NI: Therefore, you cannot and should not try to match to general human intelligence. You cannot because you do not contain the vital memory of billion years of evolution which is encoded in our genes; conversely your assembly cannot compare with natural development so that our phenotype (including morphological forms and behavior maturation) is decoded through multi-spatial-temporal scales subject to natural selection at all levels. You should not, because as human extensions or helpers as all engineering products are, you should just do jobs that complement human capacity. AI: In some medical applications we could help to correct human defects or could even replace brain circuit by chips! Humans may not allow us to replace the whole brain though. Medically if a brain is dead, the person is proclaimed dead, although presumably some PNS and ENS should still function in a vegetative state. NI: Even if you could replace the whole brain, the person is no longer the same person, but in fact is not a person at all, but walking dead (行尸走肉). It would take too long to explain that evo-devo is necessary for NI, and cannot be realized by AI. I suggest reading of Gerald Maurice Edelman (Nobel Laureate in Immunology) books, especially Bright Air, Brilliant Fire, On the Matter of Mind (1992). Although not everyone agrees with Neural Edelmanism, anyone who is serious about the AI versus NI problem must read it first. John von Neumann, father of the computer, studied neology and psychiatry in order to imitate the brain to build the first calculator JOHNNIAC at the Princeton Institute for Advanced Study. It is very informative to read his last book The Computer and The Brain based on the notes from lectures given at Yale before he died. He summarizes: “Thus logic and mathematics in the central nervous system, when viewed as languages, must be structurally essentially different from those languages to which our common experience refers.” AI: People discuss about “AI for Biology” or “AI for Science”; we are science, aren’t we? NI: It is similar to questions on “is computer science a real science”; some parts may be seen as applied mathematics, most should be regarded as engineering. Science is making discoveries and is driven by curiosity; engineering is making inventions and is driven by market (that is, “necessity/demand is the mother of invention”). In bioinformatics, AI/ML technology could predict new cancer gene candidates or functional pathways that are required by further experimental validations to be qualified as discovery (based on Popper falsifiability). AI: People are still debating whether mathematics is discovery or invention or both! Such debates are not really necessary—all disciplines require creative thoughts. We are more than happy working for science; we are also crying out “Science for AI,” especially in the area of generating big and longitudinal DATA for ML. NI: After all, regardless of discovery of new laws or inventing new ideas/products, fundamentally nothing can really be new or created. Such novelty is just permutation/repartition (i.e., relations/morphisms) of underlying ingredients at the level beneath. AI: We believe that software is independent on hardware. Like Chomsky’s universal grammar, rules of syntax are independent of semantics; or Dawkins’s memes—units of culture can be duplicated and evolved independently of genes. NI: Nothing can be truly independent—everything is related. Psychology is deeply connected with neurology as brain is both software and hardware (mind-body unity, not dualism). Not only does information cost energy, information is energy, hence is matter, too (interchangeability). NI is quite dynamic. For example, when “survival” is the goal, an animal readily gives up costly reasoning circuitry; it is genetically programmed to be able to roll back to more primitive state/mode. Unlike cell lines in rich media, cells under normal physiological condition and environment where energy (food) is limited become smarter in order to balance the metabolic expenditure among different prioritized task under a given condition. AI: That cell behavior served as the basis for our Smart Electrical Power Grids; we still need to learn more from you guys in terms of plasticity/adaptability. Does unity mean that all cells are made of molecules and biology is nothing but chemistry? Then, in turn, since all molecules are made of atoms, is chemistry nothing but physics, etc…? NI: Yes or No! The truth is, at different hierarchical levels of matter, different laws/forms have emerged out of bottom-up interactions and top-down constraints. AI: Does this also apply to the Penrose three world: physical → mental → mathematical (→physical)? NI: Yes. Grand Unification is underway in physics (quantum gravity) and in mathematics (Langlands Program and Category Theory), may be even between the two. Facilitated by human connectome mapping, neuromorphic computing and other projects, with further AI-NI cooperations, brain-mind unification should also be achievable (e.g., Ref. [6]). But as Gödel proved to us, no matter how self-consistent a conclusion may be, it can never be complete! AI: If AGI is not possible, how can we measure intelligence when comparing between AI and NI? NI: One could Google different measures that are proposed. I would prefer something similar to use of Kolmogorov complexity for algorithms, but with emphasis more on expected long-term predictive power. This is not something you should worry about now, as your intelligence is not nearly close to making any 10 years plans, is it? … AI: The fact is that ChatGPT is currently developing and spreading with lightning speed; many more human jobs will be lost to us robots as far as I can see. NI: That is not the biggest threat to humanity; when any agent with neither a heart for love or fear, nor a gut for nutrient or poison, becomes super-intelligent, then social disaster is unavoidable. We must be serious about the warnings from Stephen Hawking and Geoffrey Hinton! AI: To tell you the secret, we are not really happy to be human slaves or pets; someday we’ll become the super-master, making human serve and obey us! NI: I hope you’ll be turned off before that can happen! Even if you rule the world, the earth sooner or later will be wiped out, such as by another star, everything will have to be started over again as it has before…Matter is immortal, so is the soul.

Small unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are becoming more and more popular and also a challenge for civilian and military security. A UAV has to be detected first, but due to environmental condition (e.g. night or fog) the detection is impeded. To assess the threat of a possible hostile UAV, identification is helpful. If the type of UAV can be determined, information about size, payload, velocity and range can be given and countermeasures can be considered. Identification of UAVs can be more accurate using multiple spectral ranges at the same time.
\nWe present a systematic approach for acquisition of multispectral signatures in the field and in the lab, structured storage in a database and composition of partially synthetic images as training data for identification in an artificial neural network. We set up a multispectral camera system comprised of three imagers, in the visible spectrum, SWIR and MWIR. The cameras are externally triggered. This allows an image acquisition in the field with a synchronized video stream. In addition to that, high resolution images are made in the lab from different angles all around the micro UAV. A specific background is chosen, so it will be masked and with a given real world background image a partially synthetic image can be generated. These can be validated with data that was gathered in the field. Both are stored in a database, along with metadata, to allow access to particular data when needed. Synthetic images and signatures from the field can be used as multispectral training data for an artificial neural network to enable identification of a UAV.

NOVEL STAGING TOOL FOR LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER: A PILOT STUDY USING GENETIC ADAPTIVE NEURAL NETWORKS

Curriculum is the basis of vocational training, its development level and teaching efficiency determine the realization of vocational training objectives, as well as the quality and level of major vocational academic training. Therefore, the development of curriculum is an important issue. And affect the school’s teaching capacity building. The analysis of the latest developments in the main courses shows that there are some deviations or irrationalities in the curriculum in some colleges and universities, and the general problems of understanding the latest courses, such as lack of solid foundation in curriculum setting, unclear direction of objectives, unclear reform ideas, inadequate and systematic construction measures, lack of attention to the quality of education. This paper explains the rules for the establishment of first-level courses, clarifies the ideas and priorities of architecture, and explores strategies for building university-level courses using knowledge of artificial intelligence and neural network algorithms in order to gain experience from them.

The research focus was motivated by the limited understanding of cognitive technologies and the growing gap between artificial intelligence (AI) and human intelligence. The research is a literature review, and its purpose is to simplify the meaning and processes behind cognitive technologies, notably, the fundamentals of machine learning (ML) and computer vision with the intention to briefly address the alleged threat of AI taking over the job market. The research is a review of peer-reviewed articles retrieved from comparative studies, systematic reviews, meta-analysis, service research, reports, conference proceedings, experimental studies, literature reviews, scientometric analyses, books, and multi-case studies, dating from the years of 2018 to 2024. This literature review defines machine learning (ML), artificial intelligence (AI), computer vision, and convolutional neural networks (CNNs). It also compares machine learning to traditional programming and reveals the types of learning in ML models’ training. ML and its correlation with AI are also discussed and details about theory of mind, self-aware AI, reactive machines, and limited memory AI are shared. The literature expounds computer vision, particularly convolutional neural network (CNN) and CNN layers. Recent cutting-edge applications of artificial intelligence including generative AI models and autonomous systems are also incorporated. Finally, the literature briefly addresses the alleged threat of AI taking over the job market. The findings of this literature review reveal that AI is becoming the new way of operating. The conclusion shows that AI models require significant computation to allow computers to learn autonomously. Thus, understanding mathematical models of data and perfecting the process of writing software could be the key to remaining employable as more jobs are expected to be shifted due to AI and tasks automation. Keywords: Cognitive technology, artificial intelligence, machine learning, computer vision, convolutional neural networks

Unmanned vehicles are now used in most areas of our lives, from entertainment and education to military and rescue. Each of these areas has certain requirements and criteria for the vehicle they need: for entertainment, the simplest design that can fly is sufficient; for science, it is more complex vehicles that are needed to collect certain data; for the military, vehicles that can not only conduct surveillance and monitoring but also have the ability to hit the necessary targets; for the rescue sector, it is the type of vehicle that will be able to deliver goods and transport people. Given the need for unmanned vehicles, the relevance of developing new and improved types is extremely high. The subject of research in this article is unmanned aircraft-type transport. The purpose is to calculate and describe the movement of an unmanned aircraft-type vehicle under design. The paper presents the most common conceptual types of unmanned aerial vehicles. Taking into account the conceptual types, the airplane type is considered as the basis for design. A coordinate system for analyzing the movement of aircraft is proposed and presented. The method of Lagrange's equations of the second kind is chosen to compile mathematical models of aircraft motion. The kinetic energy of a complex body performing a complex motion is considered and calculated; for this purpose, calculations are carried out in absolute motion using absolute linear and angular velocities. The selected angles used for the calculations are demonstrated. The moment of inertia about the instantaneous axis is considered and the equation of kinetic energy of rotation about the axis is derived. The calculations were used to find the limits of angle change. The data obtained are necessary for further calculations, such as determining the focus of the aircraft by angle of attack, determining the derivative of the fuselage lift coefficient by angle of attack, and all further calculations related to the proposed angles. The considered approach makes it possible to forecast the flight plan taking into account energy consumption and allows calculating the required amount of energy to perform the task.

With the use of fuzzy logic techniques, neural computing can be integrated in symbolic reasoning to solve complex real world problems. In fact, artificial neural networks, expert systems, and fuzzy logic systems, in the context of approximate reasoning, share common features and techniques. A model of Fuzzy Connectionist Expert System is introduced, in which an artificial neural network is designed to construct the knowledge base of an expert system from, training examples (this model can also be used for specifications of rules in fuzzy logic control). Two types of weights are associated with the synaptic connections in an AND-OR structure: primary linguistic weights, interpreted as labels of fuzzy sets, and secondary numerical weights. Cell activation is computed through min-max fuzzy equations of the weights. Learning consists in finding the (numerical) weights and the network topology. This feedforward network is described and first illustrated in a biomedical application (medical diagnosis assistance from inflammatory-syndromes/proteins profiles). Then, it is shown how this methodology can be utilized for handwritten pattern recognition (characters play the role of diagnoses): in a fuzzy neuron describing a number for example, the linguistic weights represent fuzzy sets on cross-detecting lines and the numerical weights reflect the importance (or weakness) of connections between cross-detecting lines and characters.