Development and Operation of Longitudinal Integrated Clerkship

This toolkit brings together those with first-hand experience of designing, delivering, evaluating and participating in a Longitudinal Integrated Clerkship (LIC) within a UK Higher Education Institution and those working closely on programmes focussing on Health Education England (HEE)'s and NHS England's national priorities. In August 2022, a collaborative workshop was held for students and tutors participating in a London-based LIC in 2021–2022, faculty with prior experience in running LICs, and HEE representatives. The aim of the workshop was to co-produce a toolkit to guide undergraduate institutions, who may wish to introduce an LIC within their medical school curriculum that aligns to these national priorities. Although this toolkit primarily focuses on a UK audience, we anticipate that other health systems facing a need for similar educational reform may also find use for this toolkit. The NHS Long Term Plan,1 the HEE Future Doctor Report2 and The Enhance Programme3 have outlined key national priorities for the future of health and social care (Figure 1), including how we can train our workforce to deliver these aims. These priorities include embedding generalist skills in early career doctors, so they can better provide person-centred care in the context of complex multi-morbidity, while considering the impact of deep-rooted health inequity and social determinants of health. They can better provide person-centred care in the context of complex multi-morbidity, while considering the impact of deep-rooted health inequity and social determinants of health. This toolkit has been written for medical schools but may also be beneficial for other undergraduate and postgraduate health educators, who are considering setting up longitudinal educational programmes to meet their local and national health and workforce priorities. This document may also enable health and social care providers and third sector organisations, who are partnering up to support educational programmes, to better understand how longitudinal courses may benefit their health priorities. Currently, undergraduate and postgraduate training is fragmented in its provision of educational supervision and patient care. The lack of continuity of relationships with patients, supervisors and peers, can make it harder to effectively address the increasing complexity of multi-morbidity at an individual and population level. Because this fragmentation continues in the educational experience of postgraduates, it has a domino effect on undergraduates placed within those fragmented clinical settings—it becomes easy to see how this cyclical lack of continuity could perpetuate workforce burnout and poor retention.4, 5 This cyclical lack of continuity could perpetuate workforce burnout and poor retention. There is also a need for the future workforce to better understand the effects of health inequity, both at an individual and community level. It is well-recognised that certain groups of patients have poorer health outcomes than others.6 However, a deeper understanding of local population health priorities is difficult to achieve within our current, fragmented teaching and training programmes and instead requires being embedded into a community over a period of time. A deeper understanding of local population health priorities is difficult to achieve within our current, fragmented teaching and training programmes and instead requires being embedded into a community over a period of time. LICs (Figure 2) are an ideal educational model to address the issues of fragmentation of the student experience, and the need for students to have a better grasp of local population health. LICs place a greater emphasis on continuity for students and patients,7 greater responsibility for patient care, with more rewarding outcomes for students/trainees, and their patients and communities.8 Furthermore, many of the LICs in the United Kingdom are based in primary care,9 which provides a fertile ground for students to develop meaningful longitudinal patient relationships, and allows students to be embedded within a local community. The discussions within our workshop were informed by the existing literature on LICs which provides an international lens on how to develop LICs, what benefit they can provide, and their pitfalls.10-12 This toolkit builds on this literature with our lived experience within a UK health care and higher education environment, and aims to re-frame the importance of LICs as an educational model that better aligns to new integrated care priorities in the United Kingdom. For consistency in this toolkit, we use the term 'Longitudinal Integrated Clerkship' as it is most commonly known within the literature. However, there is debate about whether this term is relevant to the UK context and whether a more general term such as 'longitudinal placement' would better capture what currently exists and is achievable within the UK landscape.13 Design & Development of an LIC Evaluation and Research of an LIC To ensure an LIC that is sustainable, it is important to identify and consult with key stakeholders from the outset. Consideration of your institution's culture will also be important to ensure the success of an LIC, particularly with regard to the assessment process and how the LIC will be perceived within the hidden curriculum.14 A co-created mission statement for your LIC can help to ensure that all stakeholders are on the same trajectory. The overarching aim of your LIC is likely to depend on your local context. For example, in your local area, a main driver may be the need to address workforce recruitment and retention. Alternatively, addressing health inequity within underserved communities in the local area may be your main driver. When considering learning outcomes for your LIC, these can be considered under the headings of educational and health outcomes to ensure mutual benefit for those served by health systems and educational institutions. Similarly to a programme's mission statement, LIC outcomes are best defined with input from educational, health and community stakeholders. Investment at this stage from all stakeholders will be important as there may be conflicting priorities that will need to be worked through. Educational outcomes should align with the broader priorities and values of your institution, as well as national priorities, such as the Medical Licencing Assessment and those from HEE. Creation of a curriculum blueprint will be useful at this stage. Health outcomes would consider NHS policy documents (such as the Five Year Forward view), as well as local policies relevant to health context. The success of an LIC will depend on how the principles of the longitudinal model are adapted to fit with existing educational and service delivery models in your institution and local area. While there are existing frameworks of what an LIC might look like, these are based on the international literature, and local context should be considered for the successful delivery of an LIC. For example, from current literature, an LIC should be long enough for students to establish meaningful relationships, and Worley et al. suggest that an appropriate length of time should be from 6 to 12 months.15 We would suggest the length of time should be conducive to students having repeated encounters with the same patients, educators and peers to maximise relationships. There is no formal consensus on how 'repeated encounters' should be defined but the aim is for students to experience patient care over time in different settings with different health care practitioners. Facilitating sustained patient–student partnerships across the course of an LIC lies at the heart of this educational model. It is through these partnerships that mutual benefit can be garnered. The aim is for students to experience patient care over time in different settings with different health care practitioners. Table 1 outlines some important factors to consider during the design of your LIC. Consider the overarching outcomes of your LIC. Use this to decide what stage of medical school it is best delivered in. Early years E.g., Key LIC outcome = deeper understanding of the health inequity and preventative care for your population. You may wish to introduce these foundational concepts via an LIC at an early stage of clinical training, when there may be more curriculum space to dedicate to these concepts, and students are establishing their values around health equity. Later years E.g., Key LIC outcome = enhancing preparation for practice in line with national priorities In this case, the LIC may be better suited for those who are about to graduate New medical schools or those undergoing curriculum review may wish to implement an LIC for an entire cohort Medical schools with an established curriculum could pilot an LIC with a small group of students, with a phased roll-out in future years, allowing for improvements in your model if you fully roll out. Or there are many LICs that are small cohort student-selected programmes. If do you choose to run a pilot LIC, consider how you will advertise and recruit prospective students. The format of an LIC can vary internationally. Within the United Kingdom, LIC structure can range from a full time LIC to 1 day a week. Also consider the balance between Consider if your original LIC outcomes can be achieved in your chosen format and whether you can evaluate and assess these outcomes (see below for evaluation and assessment) within the constraints of your given structure. LICs can take place in a variety of settings with one setting usually acting as the main base for student learning Adequate supervision ensures clinical and educational safety for students and the patients they care for. This is an important consideration across all clinical settings. Also consider how undergraduates and postgraduates, and students from different health professions within the same learning environment can be brought together to enhance learning for both groups, e.g., through group supervision, tutorials or patient care. Assessment should be considered from the outset of LIC planning to ensure there is alignment with learning outcomes, as well as medical school and national assessments. Consider How and when these assessments will be reviewed should also be factored into the timetable for students and supervisors. LICs are likely to require a shift in mindset and logistics from the existing culture of learning at your institution, not only from the perspective of students, but also placement supervisors and central faculty. Adequate support for all relevant groups will help to identify early teething problems and ensure smoother transitions during implementation (see Table 2). With any educational intervention, particularly one that is new to an institution, there will be multiple reasons to collect data. For future iterations of the course, it is important to establish what worked well and what could be improved. Broadly, this type of data would be regarded as evaluation. Additionally, different stakeholder groups will have particular outcomes they are interested in, and these data might fall under the category of research. When deciding what data to collect, it is worth looking back at the primary LIC objectives, and planning from the outset how evaluation will be conducted and data collected, alongside the design and development of the overall LIC. This will help make early decisions regarding why the data are being collected, when and from whom, and ensures timely ethics and funding applications. Reviewing the existing literature at this stage will help shape both the LIC and your evaluation and research questions. Kirkpatrick's hierarchy can be a useful heuristic when considering what type of data to collect—for example, collecting qualitative data from different stakeholders on their perceptions and experience of the LIC. You may also choose to collect specific quantitative student or patient outcome data. When deciding who to collect data from, consider the whole range of stakeholders. For example, if a key aim of your LIC is to improve patient access to health care in your local area, it would be important to hear from patients themselves on their experiences. When deciding who to collect data from, consider the whole range of stakeholders. While data are often collected to look at what additional value an intervention provided, it is equally important to ensure no harm has inadvertently been inflicted on stakeholder groups in the process. This is also something to consider when deciding what parameters should be evaluated. The timeframe of data collection is also an important consideration. In keeping with a longitudinal process, some research questions may be better answered by looking at different points across the course, to capture how data change over time. When writing up and presenting data, consider involving all stakeholders in this process. It would be worth looking at presenting and publishing avenues that reach a broad audience—for example, health care arenas, patient and community facing publications, and medical educators. The future health workforce will require new complex skills to manage increasingly complex population needs. Current undergraduate training needs to consider how it is preparing future graduates to develop the skills needed to adapt to the rapidly changing health care landscape. An LIC places continuity and integration at its core and is an ideal educational model to embed these key skills within the curriculum. This, in turn, could help prepare our future workforce in providing person-centred integrated care that meets population need. This toolkit can be used to guide those considering educational reform in line with population need. Finally, it is the collaborative partnerships with students, policy makers, educators, and health and social care providers that will help ensure alignment between population priorities, workforce needs and medical education. Current undergraduate training needs to consider how it is preparing future graduates to develop the skills needed to adapt to the rapidly changing health care landscape. We would like to thank Mohammed-Hareef Asunramu, one of our LIC students, and Monika Gupta from Health Education England's London Enhancing Generalist Skills Team for their contribution to this work. The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose. No data have been used in this submission that would require formal ethical approval. All participants of our workshop have been listed as authors and have contributed and consented to the work.

Longitudinal integrated clerkships (LIC) in the first major clinical year in medical student training have been demonstrated to be at least equivalent to and in some areas superior to the "traditional block rotation" (TBR). Flinders University School of Medicine is starting a pilot changing the traditional teaching at the major Academic Medical Centre from TBR to LIC (50% of students in other locations in the medical school already have a partial or full LIC programme). This paper summarises the expected challenges presented at the "Rendez-Vous" Conference in October 2012: (a) creating urgency, (b) training to be a clinician rather than imparting knowledge, (c) resistance to change. We discuss the unexpected challenges that have evolved since then: (a) difficulty finalising the precise schedule, (b) underestimating time requirements, (c) managing the change process inclusively. Transformation of a "block rotation" to "LIC" medical student education in a tertiary academic teaching hospital has many challenges, many of which can be anticipated, but some are unexpected.

The future of health professions education: Emerging trends in the United States.

Progress Notes: One Year in the Future of MedicineAbraham M. NussbaumJohns Hopkins University Press, 2024It was in 1896, not long after his arrival at the new Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, that Sir William Osler introduced the modern clinical clerkship. Until then, clinical instruction often occurred in amphitheaters in which students might outnumber patients by 20 or even 100 to 1. Believing that active, intimate work with patients was necessary to master clinical medicine, Osler imposed a new system in which students rotated among the hospital wards, participating in patient care under the supervision of more experienced physicians.1 When Abraham Flexner catalogued the state of American medical education in 1910, he held up the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine as the ideal for other schools to emulate,2 thus ensuring the primacy of the rotating block clerkship model for the next century.In Progress Notes: One Year in the Future of Medicine, Dr. Abraham Nussbaum, a psychiatrist and Chief Education Officer at Denver Health, describes an alternative to the Oslerian clerkship model: the longitudinal integrated clerkship (LIC). Rather than beginning (and ending) their specialty training every 4-8 weeks, LIC students selectpatients, then follow them wherever they receive care. A laboring mother met on the obstetric ward might then be followed through subsequent visits to the emergency department or her psychiatrist. As Nussbaum explains, LICs aim to overcome the erosion in altruism that occurs over the clinical (“cynical”) years of medical education by teaching students not only from “the textbook of the body,” but also the “textbook of the community.”The setting for Progress Notes is the University of Colorado. The protagonists are 7 third-year medical students embarking upon their LIC. The students’ backgrounds are varied—from native Coloradans to international students, from former schoolteachers to former soccer players. So too are their aspirations: the LIC cohort includes both aspiring internists and ophthalmologists. Yet in Nussbaum's hands, the characterization of the LIC participants is uniformly sympathetic, almost always engaging, and occasionally truly captivating. The author casts a discerning eye on the students, through their small wins and big losses, and conveys the sense of becoming nearly as well as the best first-person accounts in the ‘becoming a physician’ genre. The prose is lively and vivid. For readers who have not personally experienced the everyday drama of clinical clerkships, Nussbaum provides a bird's eye view of what it takes to become a doctor. For readers who have, the authenticity and universality of the students’ experiences will resonate.What is less clear is whether the LIC truly represents the future of medical education. It does at the University of Colorado, where the pilot described in Progress Notes has since been expanded to include all third-year students.3 Yet the LIC concept is not new: some schools have utilized such curricula for over 30 years.4 Despite favorable educational outcomes,5,6 fewer than 1 in 3 MD-granting medical schools even offer LICs, and growth in LICs appeared to have plateaued when last assessed in 2016.7 Readers of Progress Notes will have no difficulty identifying some of the barriers to scalability and sustainability noted in the literature8,9 (eg, both tireless, compassionate preceptors and community-focused students and settings are scarce resources in modern medical education). Yet after completing Progress Notes, readers might also wonder whether the LIC model is really so different than the ideal model for clerkship education that Osler envisioned.Nussbaum conveys that, more than anything else, LICs are intended to promote a patient-centered approach to care. From that standpoint, the LIC seems perfectly aligned with Osler's “natural method of teaching,” in which “the student begins with the patient, continues with the patient, and ends his studies with the patient, using books and lectures as tools, as means to an end.”10

Background: Traditionally, clinical learning for medical students consists of short-term and opportunistic encounters with primarily acute-care patients, supervised by an array of clinician preceptors. In response to educational concerns, some medical schools have developed longitudinal placements rather than short-term rotations. Many of these longitudinal placements are also integrated across the core clinical disciplines, are commonly termed longitudinal integrated clerkships (LICs) and often situated in rural locations. This review aimed to explore, analyse and synthesise evidence relating to the effectiveness of longitudinal placements, for medical students in particular to determine which aspects are most critical to successful outcomes.Method: Extensive search of the literature resulted in 1679 papers and abstracts being considered, with 53 papers ultimately being included for review. The review group coded these 53 papers according to standard BEME review guidelines. Specific information extracted included: data relating to effectiveness, the location of the study, number of students involved, format, length and description of placement, the learning outcomes, research design, the impact level for evaluation and the main evaluation methods and findings. We applied a realist approach to consider what works well for whom and under what circumstances.Findings: The early LICs were all community-based immersion programs, situated in general practice and predominantly in rural settings. More recent LIC innovations were situated in tertiary-level specialist ambulatory care in urban settings. Not all placements were integrated across medical disciplines but were longitudinal in relation to location, patient base and/or supervision. Twenty-four papers focussed on one of four programs from different viewpoints. Most evaluations were student opinion (survey, interview, focus group) and/or student assessment results. Placements varied from one half day per week for six months through to full time immersion for more than 12 months.The predominant mechanism relating to factors influencing effectiveness was continuity of one or more of: patient care, supervision and mentorship, peer group and location. The success of LICs and participation satisfaction depended on the preparation of both students and clinical supervisors, and the level of support each received from their academic institutions.Conclusion: Longitudinal placements, including longitudinal integrated placements, are gaining in popularity as an alternative to traditional block rotations. Although relatively few established LICs currently exist, medical schools may look for ways to incorporate some of the principles of LICs more generally in their clinical education programmes. Further research is required to ascertain the optimum length of time for placements depending on the defined learning outcomes and timing within the programme, which students are most likely to benefit and the effects of context such as location and type of integration.

Longitudinal integrated clerkships (LICs) have been implemented worldwide to increase authentic student participation in patient care over time. Studies have shown benefits of the model include the ability of LICs to attract future practitioners to underserved areas, student engagement in advocacy, and development of an "ethic of caring." Less is known, however, about how LICs impart their benefits, although LICs may strengthen professional identity. As such, this study aimed to explore medical student professional identity construction through time within LICs internationally. This was a longitudinal qualitative study from 2019 to 2020, involving 33 students across 4 medical schools in the United Kingdom, Ireland, and the United States. The authors explored participating students' identity construction during LICs. Data collection involved 3 stages: individual, semistructured interviews at entry (n = 33) and exit of the LIC (n = 29), and audio diaries throughout. Data were analyzed inductively using a reflexive thematic approach. Three themes were identified. Longitudinal relationships with patients and preceptors encouraged patient care ownership and responsibility; LIC students identified as patient advocates; and longitudinal relationships shaped students' social consciences. Themes were underpinned by continuity of relationships between students and patients, and students and tutors. Though continuity is lauded as the cornerstone of LICs, these findings suggest that this is too broad a way of understanding the benefits of LICs. Instead, continuity should be seen as facilitating the development of important relationships within diverse communities of practice, which leads medical students to construct professional identities as responsible, compassionate advocates for underserved populations. This was the case across the institutions, nations, and LIC types in this study. By highlighting the ways in which LICs influence identity, these findings offer important insight relating to the future development and delivery of LICs.

Access to medical services for rural communities is poorer than for metropolitan communities in many parts of the world. One of the strategies to improve rural medical workforce has been rural clinical placements for undergraduate medical students. This study explores the workforce outcomes of one model of such placements - the longitudinal integrated clerkship (LIC) - delivered in year 4, the penultimate year of the medical course, as part of the rural programs delivered by a medical school in Victoria, Australia. The LIC involved student supervision under a parallel consulting model with experienced rural generalist doctors for a whole year in small community rural general practices. This study aimed to compare the work locations (regional or more rural), following registration as a medical practitioner, of medical students who had completed 1 year of the LIC, with, first, students who had other types of rural training of comparable duration elsewhere, and second, students who had no rural training. Study participants commenced their medical degree after 2004 and had graduated between 2008 and 2016 and thus were in postgraduate year 1-9 in 2017 when evaluated. Information about the student training location(s), and duration, type and timing of training, was prospectively collected from university administrative systems. The outcome of interest was the main work location in 2017, obtained from the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency's public website. Students who had undertaken the year 4 LIC along with additional rural training in years 3 and/or 5 were more likely than all other groups to be working in smaller regional or rural towns, where workforce need is greatest (relative risk ratio (RRR) 5.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.81-11.20, compared with those having metropolitan training only). Non-LIC training of similar duration in rural areas was also significantly associated, but more weakly, with smaller regional work location (RRR 2.99, 95%CI 1.87-4.77). Students whose only rural training was the year 4 LIC were not significantly associated with smaller regional work location (RRR 1.72, 95%CI 0.59-5.04). Overall, after accounting for both LIC and non-LIC rural training exposure, rural work after graduation was also consistently positively associated with rural background, being an international student and having a return of service obligation under a bonded program as a student. This study demonstrates the value of rural LICs, coupled with additional rural training, in contributing to improving Australia's medical workforce distribution. Whilst other evidence has already demonstrated positive educational outcomes for doctors who participate in rural LIC placements, this is the first known study of work location outcomes. The study provides evidence that expanding this model of rural undergraduate education may lead to a better geographically distributed medical workforce.

This study explored exposure to, and attitudes toward, interprofessional (IP) teams between third-year longitudinal integrated clerkship (LIC) and traditional rotation-based clerkship (RBC) students at the University of Calgary medical school. Students completed a survey pre-post 32-week LIC or 6-week rural, regional or urban RBC family medicine rotations. Pre and post rotation surveys were completed by 213 (48%) students (LIC = 33/34; rural = 76/152; regional = 24/46; urban = 80/208). More LIC students (76%) reported participating on six or more IP teams than RBC students (rural = 38%; regional = 25%; urban = 21%). At pre rotation, the mean attitude to IP teams score of LIC and rural RBC students was high and did not differ. At post rotation, the mean attitude score of LIC students was significantly greater than the mean reported by rural RBC students. Only LIC students reported a significant pre-post rotation increase in attitude. Exposure to IP teams, possibly facilitated by a longer duration of rotation, appears to be an important factor in affecting attitude to IP teams.

Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine.

Background:Medical schools in Africa are responding to the call to increase numbers of medical graduates by up-scaling decentralized clinical training. One approach to decentralized clinical training is the longitudinal integrated clerkship (LIC), where students benefit from continuity of setting and supervision. The ability of family physician supervisors to take responsibility for the clinical training of medical students over a longer period than the usual, in addition to managing their extensive role on the district health platform, is central to the success of such training.Objective:This study investigated the teaching experiences of family physicians as clinical supervisors in a newly introduced LIC model in a rural sub-district in the Western Cape, South Africa.Method:Nine semi-structured interviews were conducted with six family physicians as part of the Stellenbosch University Rural Medical Education Partnership Initiative (SURMEPI) five-year longitudinal study. Code lists were developed inductively using Atlas.ti v7, they were compared, integrated, and categories were identified. Emerging common themes were developed.Findings:Three overarching themes emerged from the data, each containing subthemes. The rural platform was seen to be an enabling learning space for the LIC students. The family physicians’ experienced their new teaching role in the LIC as empowering, but also challenging. Lack of time for teaching and the unstructured nature of the work emerged as constraints. Despite being uncertain about the new LIC model, the family physicians felt that it was easier to manage than anticipated.Conclusion:The centrality of the rural context framed the teaching experiences of the family physicians in the new LIC, forming the pivot around which constraints and opportunities for teaching arose. The African family physician is well positioned to make an important contribution to the upscaling of decentralized medical training, but would need to be supported by academic institutions and health service managers in their teaching role.

Longitudinal Integrated Clerkships (LICs) have a growing presence as a model of educational delivery on the stage of UK medical education, where they are most frequently based within primary care. Yet, despite both local and internationally reported benefits, significant challenges to programme implementation and student engagement remain. Although perhaps initially challenges could be explained by the novelty of LICs, UK LICs have aged, yet challenges remain, leading to the marginalisation of LICs within UK medical schools. This leading article suggests institutional hidden curricula may be an important vehicle for this marginalisation and explores how the dominant fact-based paradigm of UK medical education could act to dissuade student engagement with LICs. So long as the hidden curricula messages we transmit to early-stage medical students revolve around the disproportionate importance of cognitive knowledge acquisition, UK-based LICs are unlikely to realise their full impact or benefit, in comparison to successfully running LICs internationally. Alternatively, refocusing early medical education on patient interaction, encouraging students to take an active role in their care, would send a different hidden curricula message more aligned with the ethos of LICs, and so would likely increase uptake to later stage comprehensive programmes.

Hailed by supporters as the answer to many challenges facing medical schools and the wider health care system, longitudinal integrated clerkships (LICs) offer a practical and sustainable alternative to more traditional block rotational models. Given this, their popularity as a curricular measure is increasing, although such clerkships remain relatively novel within the United Kingdom. This narrative literature review of international work provides a comprehensive introduction to developing and implementing LICs within medical education. This review generates a practical guide for medical educators with a focus on the development and implementation of LICs within the United Kingdom, on which there is little work. Using illustrated examples and with reference to contemporary literature, it outlines the rationale for considering an LIC within a curriculum, the different types of LIC, barriers and enabling factors to LIC implementation and considers the contemporary application of LIC models within the United Kingdom. The practical guide details key questions educators must consider when developing and implementing an LIC, particularly within the landscape of UK medical education.

INTRODUCTION: Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) have been proposed for use in undergraduate medical education. The ability of faculty to entrust students with EPAs may differ between Longitudinal Integrated Clerkships (LICs) and traditional block clerkships. METHODS: Participants were core clerkship faculty, 64 in a LIC and 31 in a sequential block clerkship. We administered a web-based survey at the end of the core clerkship year to measure preceptors’ typical entrustment (on a scale of 0–10) in students for the 13 American Association of Medical Colleges Core EPAs. We compared entrustment between LIC and block faculty using a Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS:LIC faculty were more entrusting of students than block faculty in 12 out of 13 Core EPAs (p DISCUSSION: LIC faculty were more likely than block clerkship faculty to entrust core clerkship students with performance of most EPAs. This finding is likely the result of LIC faculty having increased familiarity with student abilities because of the continuity of supervision and education inherent to LIC. More research is needed to ascertain the specific features of longitudinal clerkships that increase faculty entrustment of students. CONCLUSIONS: Longitudinal educational experiences may facilitate the assessment of medical students with EPAs.

Longitudinal integrated clerkships (LICs) are increasingly available within the United Kingdom, but gaps in knowledge remain regarding their efficacy and the influence of local context. In 2019–20, the Hull York Medical School ran a pilot LIC for 6 fourth-year medical students. This work describes the longitudinal qualitative programme evaluation. LIC students participated in two focus groups, one after four months, and another at the end of the programme. In total, 16 faculty were also interviewed regarding their experiences in developing, implementing and running the LIC. Students’ GP supervisors were difficult to engage in detailed evaluation due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and so were briefly surveyed at the end of the LIC. All data were pooled and analysed together using reflexive thematic analysis. Two major themes were identified: ‘Trajectory of the LIC’, describing the learning curve students and faculty encounter, and ‘Institutional decision making’, describing the need for clarity regarding the programme’s purpose. The programme was largely positively received, but areas for improvement locally, and transferrable recommendations, were identified. Aligning assessment to programme aims is an important area for future development, alongside balancing structured with unstructured time, and supporting students as they navigate a J-shaped learning curve.

A traditional clerkship consists of a series of short rotations in specialty disciplines and is usually based in tertiary, urban teaching hospitals. Shortened inpatient stays and the shift toward ambulatory management have had a negative impact on student learning. There have been growing concerns that the traditional specialty-based clerkship in fragmented and highly specialized clinical environments may not be the optimal choice for basic clinical education. As a result, a new model of clinical clerkship called longitudinal integrated clerkships (LICs) has emerged. There is increased interest in LICs due to the growing evidence of positive outcomes for students, patients, and supervising clinicians. Emphasizing continuity as one of the main organizing principles of an LIC, this article reviews the introduction of LICs into medical education, the key concepts and educational theories which underpin LICs, and the typology of LICs. The author also offers some personal suggestions for contemplation before clerkship programs in Korea adopt LICs.