- Research Article
35
- 10.1148/radiol.221425
Multicenter Evaluation of AI-generated DIR and PSIR for Cortical andJuxtacortical Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Detection
- Feb 07, 2023
- Radiology
- Piet M Bouman + 25 more +25
BackgroundCortical multiple sclerosis lesions are clinically relevant butinconspicuous at conventional clinical MRI. Double inversion recovery(DIR) and phase-sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) are more sensitivebut often unavailable. In the past 2 years, artificial intelligence (AI)was used to generate DIR and PSIR from standard clinical sequences (eg,T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and fluid-attenuated inversion-recoverysequences), but multicenter validation is crucial for furtherimplementation.PurposeTo evaluate cortical and juxtacortical multiple sclerosis lesiondetection for diagnostic and disease monitoring purposes on AI-generatedDIR and PSIR images compared with MRI-acquired DIR and PSIR images in amulticenter setting.Materials and MethodsGenerative adversarial networks were used to generate AI-based DIR(n = 50) and PSIR (n = 43) images.The number of detected lesions between AI-generated images andMRI-acquired (reference) images was compared by randomized blindedscoring by seven readers (all with >10 years of experience inlesion assessment). Reliability was expressed as the intraclasscorrelation coefficient (ICC). Differences in lesion subtype weredetermined using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.ResultsMRI scans of 202 patients with multiple sclerosis (mean age, 46 years± 11 [SD]; 127 women) were retrospectively collected from sevencenters (February 2020 to January 2021). In total, 1154 lesions weredetected on AI-generated DIR images versus 855 on MRI-acquired DIRimages (mean difference per reader, 35.0% ± 22.8;P < .001). On AI-generated PSIR images, 803lesions were detected versus 814 on MRI-acquired PSIR images (98.9%± 19.4; P = .87). Reliability was good for bothDIR (ICC, 0.81) and PSIR (ICC, 0.75) across centers. Regionally, morejuxtacortical lesions were detected on AI-generated DIR images than onMRI-acquired DIR images (495 [42.9%] vs 338 [39.5%]; P< .001). On AI-generated PSIR images, fewer juxtacortical lesionswere detected than on MRI-acquired PSIR images (232 [28.9%] vs 282[34.6%]; P = .02).ConclusionArtificial intelligence–generated double inversion-recovery andphase-sensitive inversion-recovery images performed well compared withtheir MRI-acquired counterparts and can be considered reliable in amulticenter setting, with good between-reader and between-centerinterpretative agreement.Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.Supplemental material is available for thisarticle.See also the editorial by Zivadinov and Dwyer in this issue.
Read more