Dimensioning a product in preliminary design through different exploration techniques

Rapid turn-around time for investigating new design concepts is a primary force driving design productivity initiatives across the industry. An integration framework focusing on the collaborative nature of rapid design automation at the preliminary and detailed design stage would ensure higher quality designs from the beginning of the product design cycle. As a result, producing reliable, robust optimum designs from the preliminary design phase would enable companies to reduce the overal design cycle time.

Multilevel optimization including progressive failure analysis and robust design optimization for composite stiffened panels, in which the ultimate load that a post-buckled panel can bear is maximized for a chosen weight, is presented for the first time. This method is a novel robust multiobjective approach for structural sizing of composite stiffened panels at different design stages. The approach is integrated at two design stages labelled as preliminary design and detailed design. The robust multilevel design methodology integrates the structural sizing to minimize the variance of the structural response. This method improves the product quality by minimizing variability of the output performance function. This innovative approach simulates the sequence of actions taken during design and structural sizing in industry where the manufacture of the final product uses an industrial organization that goes from the material characterization up to trade constraints, through preliminary analysis and detailed design. The developed methodology is validated with an example in which the initial architecture is conceived at the preliminary design stage by generating a Pareto front for competing objectives that is used to choose a design with a required weight. Then a robust solution is sought in the neighbourhood of this solution to finally find the layup for the panel capable of bearing the highest load for the given geometry and boundary conditions.

The design process of new air- and rotorcraft is commonly separated into three different consecutive phases. In the conceptual design phase, the viability of different designs is investigated with respect to customer requirements and/or the market situation. It usually ends with the identification of a basic aircraft lay-out. In the subsequent preliminary design stage the various disciplines are introduced, thus redefining the design process as a multidisciplinary optimization (MDO) task. The objective of this design stage is to enhance the initial aircraft configuration by establishing an advanced design comprising a loft provided with primary structure. This updated aircraft configuration represents a global optimum solution for the specified requirements which will then be optimized on a local level in the concluding detailed design phase with particular regard to manufacturing aspects. The investigations in the preliminary design phase comprise the generation of numerous similar but still different analytical and finite element (FE) models. Even though computational power is constantly increasing the model generation process is still a time-consuming task. Moreover, it is also a potential source of errors which — in the worst case — may lead to time- and cost-intensive redesign activities during the detailed design. As the preliminary design stage, therefore, is of particular importance during the overall design process the model generation process benefits from parametric models and automated process chains. The presented paper overviews the tools used for the automated generation of FE models developed and used at the Institute of Structures and Design (BT) of the German Aerospace Center (DLR) for the subsequent use in numerical simulations. Furthermore, basic requirements for the effective use of parametrization and automation like a common data format and infrastructure will be introduced. Exemplary models and applications will be presented to illustrate the positive impact on efficiency in aircraft design. Concluding, future development steps and possible applications will be discussed.

This paper describes the development and current status of a fully automated aircraft model integration and preliminary control law design process for use in aircraft over-all design. This process allows addressing flight control algorithms as a prime design variable from the earliest design stages, and facilitates multi-disciplinary aircraft over-all dynamic design analyses in for example Multi-disciplinary Design Optimization. 
\nThe approach taken in this work is to address the flight control algorithms at a specification level (e.g. dynamic response parameters) and newly synthesize according algorithms adapted to the current aircraft design configuration by means of a rapid-prototyping process. This in turn enables the use of dynamic analyses in all disciplines involved (flight loads, systems, performance) from the earliest design stages, increasing accuracy, reducing conservativeness in multidisciplinary optimization, and reducing risk by increasing compatibility with dynamic analyses performed in detailed design stages. In order to ensure the latter, the proposed control law prototyping process has been developed to naturally evolve into detailed design of the flight control system.

In this paper, the basic concepts and methods of multidisciplinary design optimization, uncertainty analysis and robust design have been introduced. According to the features of a multi-functional open-air hydraulic drill, a new design theory called multidisciplinary robust optimization design was discussed. This theory can undertake uncertainty analysis and robust design in multidisciplinary design optimization. It fully considers both the synergy among each disciplinary or subsystem in the multi-functional open-air hydraulic drill to get the optimal solution to the whole system and the effect of the uncertainty factors upon the drill quality, and adopts the parallel design to improve the quality, robustness and reliability of the drill, to shorten the market cycles of products, to reduce product cost. Finally, the design points were discussed in detail in the paper.

Preliminary designs with deterministic approaches used to solve the uncertainty related information from a ship design results preliminary design of conventional. In order to overcome the imbalance of optimization in the design process, the preliminary design is equipped with a method Collaborative Optimization (CO), which is part of the Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (MDO). Process design optimization in preliminary design with a deterministic approach based on the value subsystem optimization required by the vessel (d). Ship design requirements of this study are deadweigth requirements, volume cargo requirements and speed/resistance requirements. The preliminary design hull form general cargo for shipping Jakarta to Makassar by using deterministic approach is expected to provide an alternative principal dimension and design variations of the optimal hull form based on information dock and owner reqiurement. In addition, this study is also expected to be an alternative method used in the preliminary process design of modern ships because in the preliminary designs have efforts to optimize an element ship design.

This paper proposes an integrated design and optimization approach for radial inflow turbines consisting of an automated preliminary design module and a flexible three-dimensional multidisciplinary optimization module. The latter was constructed by an evolution algorithm, a genetic algorithm-assisted self-learning artificial neural network and a dynamic sampling database. The 3-D multidisciplinary optimization approach was validated by the original T-100 turbine and the T-100re turbine obtained from the automated preliminary design approach, for maximizing the total-to-static efficiency and minimizing the rotor weight while keeping the mass flow rate constant and stress limitation satisfied. The validation results indicate that the total-to-static efficiency is 89.6%, increased by 1.3%, and the rotor weight is reduced by 0.14 kg (14.6%) based on the T-100re turbine, while the efficiency is 88.2%, increased by 2.2% and the weight is reduced by 0.49 kg (37.4%) based on the original T-100 turbine. Moreover, the T-100re turbine shows better performance at the preliminary design stage and conserves this advantage to the end, though both the aerodynamic performance of the T-100 and the T-100re turbine are improved after 3-D optimization. At the same time, it is implied that the preliminary design plays an essential role in the radial inflow turbine design process, and it is hard for only 3-D optimization to get a further performance improvement.

The main goal of the paper is to develop automatic control design methods for flexible aircraft. The motivation for the research is that such automatic control generation enables the inclusion of the control design algorithms into the multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) of aircraft design. In such an extended MDO framework, called co-design, the sizing, structural dynamics, aerodynamics and the controllers of the aircraft are optimized in one single step. This way control technologies can be included early-on in the preliminary design stage of aircraft design. Since the control design is model based, first a control oriented aeroservoelastic (ASE) model needs to be developed. The modeling is done via the bottom-up modelling approach. The model generation also needs to be automatic due to parameter changes resulting from the MDO process. The research focuses on flexible aircraft, therefore, the control algorithms include baseline, manoeuvre load alleviation, gust load alleviation and flutter suppression controllers. All of these algorithms needs to be developed in such way that they can automatically executed in the MDO process. The overall MDO framework is implemented in the Remote Component Environment (RCE) and the aircraft investigated is the T-Flex demonstrator of the FLIPASED project. The paper presents the main concepts of the modeling and control synthesis, analysis for the above mentioned four controllers and the most important aspects of integrating such automatic control design methods into the RCE environment.

Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) supports the system-level design of complex products effectively. Currently, system design and optimization for complex products are two distinct processes that must be executed using different software or platforms, involving intricate data conversion processes. Applying multidisciplinary optimization to validate system optimization often necessitates remodeling the optimization objects, which is time-consuming, labor-intensive, and highly error-prone. A critical activity in systems engineering is identifying the optimal design solution for the entire system. Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (MDO) and reliability analysis are essential methods for achieving this. This paper proposes a SysML-based multidisciplinary reliability design optimization modeling method. First, by analyzing the definitions and mathematical models of multidisciplinary reliability design optimization, the SysML extension mechanism is employed to represent the optimization model based on SysML. Next, model transformation techniques are used to convert the SysML optimization model generated in the first stage into an XML description model readable by optimization solvers. Finally, the proposed method’s effectiveness is validated through an engineering case study of an in-vehicle environmental control integration system. The results demonstrate that this method fully utilizes SysML to express MDO problems, enhancing the efficiency of design optimization for complex systems. Engineers and system designers working on complex, multidisciplinary projects can particularly benefit from these advancements, as they simplify the integration of design and optimization processes, facilitating more reliable and efficient product development.

A hierarchical optimization approach to robust design of energy supply systems based on a mixed-integer linear model

In this paper, we develop an easy-to-implement approximate method to take uncertainties into account during a multidisciplinary optimization. Multidisciplinary robust design usually involves setting up a full uncertainty propagation within the system, requiring major modifications in every discipline and on the shared variables. Uncertainty propagation is an expensive process, but robust solutions can be obtained more easily when the disciplines affected by uncertainties have a significant effect on the objectives of the problem. A heuristic method based on local uncertainty processing (LOUP) is presented here, allowing approximate solving of specific robust optimization problems with minor changes in the initial multidisciplinary system. Uncertainty is processed within the disciplines that it impacts directly, without propagation to the other disciplines. A criterion to verify a posteriori the applicability of the method to a given multidisciplinary system is provided. The LOUP method is applied to an aircraft preliminary design industrial test case, in which it allowed to obtain robust designs whose performance is more stable than the one of deterministic solutions, relatively to uncertain parameter variations.

The purpose of robust design optimization is to minimize variations in design performances and therefore to make the design insensitive to uncertainties. Current robust design methods fall into two types — probabilistic robust design and worst-case (interval) robust design. The former method is used when random variables are involved. In this method, robustness is measure by standard deviations of design performances. The later method is used when uncertainties are represented by intervals. The widths of design performances are then used to measure robustness. In many engineering application, both random variables and interval variables may exist simultaneously. In this paper, a general approach to robust design optimization is proposed. The generality comes from the ability to handle both random and interval variables. To alleviate the computational burden, we employ a previously developed general robustness assessment method — semi-second-order Taylor expansion method, to evaluate the maximum and minimum standard deviations of a design performance. An efficient integration strategy of the general robustness assessment and optimization is proposed. With the integration strategy, the number of function calls can be reduced while good accuracy is maintained. A robust shaft design problem is given for demonstration.

Design engineers and decision-makers across various fields are constantly working to make optimal design decisions for multidisciplinary engineering systems in an effort to improve performance and reduce costs. The multiple disciplines that decision-makers are forced to consider can range from different physical components of a system, to competing physical phenomena influencing a component (e.g. flow forces and structural strength), to completely separate models of interest to a system (e.g. engineering performance and lifecycle cost). The common element that all these decision-making scenarios share is the presence of couplings between the considered disciplines (or subsystems). How the values for these coupling parameters are determined within a decision-making or optimization framework is the subject of countless research efforts. At present the multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) community has settled on a few proven techniques such Collaborative Optimization (CO) and Analytic Target Cascading (ATC). However, current MDO techniques have issues that limit their effectiveness in solving various MDO problems. Many of these strategies require close coordination between subsystem optimization solvers, require significant effort by decision-makers to pose their problems in a suitable format, and/or can have large computational efficiency problems due to the fact that they involve solving nested optimization problems. In an effort to alleviate some of these issues and make MDO easier to implement and more computationally efficient, a new sequential MDO algorithm called Cooperative Design Optimization (CDO) is proposed. The CDO approach functions through a series of subsystem optimizations using a successively smaller cooperation space. The cooperation space is analogous to the design space of a traditional optimization problem, but includes only the coupling parameters that are a factor in multiple subsystems. A single iteration of the approach can be thought of as a negotiation between all of the subsystems regarding the boundaries of the cooperation space. To facilitate this cooperation, each subsystem optimization problem is restructured as a multi-objective optimization problem so that a Pareto set of optimal solutions, or agreeable design alternatives, are produced. As a result, after all subsystem optimizations are accomplished, each subsystem’s obtained Pareto optimal solution sets are compared with respect to the coupling parameters and new bounds in the cooperation space are determined for the next iteration. This process allows each subsystem to be optimized completely independently within the boundaries of the agreed upon cooperation space while coordination is achieved through an analysis of obtained optimal solutions for each subsystem. Iterations, or negotiations, are repeated until an acceptable solution or set of solutions is obtained for all included subsystems through this cooperative process.

Robust multi-objective optimization for sustainable design of distributed energy supply systems

A number of game strategies have been developed in past decades and used in the fields of economics, engineering, computer science, and biology due to their efficiency in solving design optimization problems. In addition, research in multiobjective and multidisciplinary design optimization has focused on developing a robust and efficient optimization method so it can produce a set of high quality solutions with less computational time. In this paper, two optimization techniques are considered; the first optimization method uses multifidelity hierarchical Pareto-optimality. The second optimization method uses the combination of game strategies Nash-equilibrium and Pareto-optimality. This paper shows how game strategies can be coupled to multiobjective evolutionary algorithms and robust design techniques to produce a set of high quality solutions. Numerical results obtained from both optimization methods are compared in terms of computational expense and model quality. The benefits of using Hybrid and non-Hybrid-Game strategies are demonstrated.