• Home
  • Search
  • DIPS Organic Rankine Cycle Heat Rejection System
  • https://doi.org/10.4271/871418Copy DOI Icon

DIPS Organic Rankine Cycle Heat Rejection System

  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

<div class="htmlview paragraph">The increasing need for higher electrical power levels for military and scientific space purposes has spurred development of energy conversion systems with higher efficiencies than the traditional solar array. Numerous nuclear options are currently under development. These fuels eliminate the need for large deployable solar arrays or concentrators, allow unrestricted pointing and maneuvering, and are inherently less susceptible to natural and threat environments; they are the only viable energy source for outer planetary exploration. Fission reactors are the most desirable nuclear source for electric power levels above 10 kW. Radioisotope sources have been used in conjunction with thermoelectrics up to 1 kWe for planetary exploration. However, for radioisotope systems in the 1 to 10 kWe range, a much higher conversion efficiency is required. For over 15 years, NASA and the Department of Energy (DOE) have been developing closed cycle turbo-alternator (dynamic) power conversion systems for space use. The Air Force and DOE are jointly developing such a system under the Dynamic Isotope Power System (DIPS) program.</div> <div class="htmlview paragraph">Two closed dynamic cycles are being evaluated for use as part of the DIPS system. They are the Closed Brayton Cycle (CBC) which uses an inert (single phase) gas as the working fluid. The other system is the Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) which utilizes the phase change properties of the working fluid. Each has a significantly different effect on the design of a radiative heat rejection system, primarily because of the temperature variation of the CBC single phase heat rejection versus the nearly constant temperature two-phase (condensing) ORC heat rejection. The heat rejection system plays an important role, since the power conversion efficiency is strongly dependent on the heat rejection temperature. The lower the rejection temperature, the higher the efficiency. However, the radiator area requirement increases as the rejection temperature is reduced. On a weight optimization basis both systems are comparable, however, the ORC system requires more radiator area for the same cycle efficiency. With the design requirement that the radiator be mounted around the circumference of the vehicle, available area is limited. Therefore, the heat rejection system design may not be a clear-cut weight optimization but rather a matter of area reduction at minimum penalty to efficiency and weight.</div> <div class="htmlview paragraph">The paper presents the results of an optimization study performed on the heat rejection system for a space based ORC power system using an isotope heat source. The radiator sizing depends on the heat rejection temperature, radiator configuration, and radiator properties such as the fin effectiveness, emissivity, and absorptivity. The optimization analysis to evaluate the effect of each of these parameters on the system weight and area is presented.</div>

Similar Papers
  • Conference Article

Dynamic Isotope Power System Design Considerations for Human Exploration of the Moon and Mars

  • Aug 03, 1992
  • SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series
  • D J Bents +4
  • Conference Article

SUNTRACKER

  • Nov 13, 2015
  • Jon W Teets +1
  • Conference Article

Thermionic Cascade Converter Concept for High-Efficiency Space Power

  • Nov 16, 1997
  • Lester L Begg +2
  • Conference Article

Waste Heat Recovery Evaluation in FCEV Truck on Different Drive-Cycles

  • Jan 16, 2026
  • SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series
  • Navaneeth P V
  • Conference Article
  • Citations1

Solar Dynamic Organic Rankine Cycle Heat Rejection System Simulation

  • Jun 05, 1987
  • V N Havens +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations1

An Experiment on a Condensing Device for a Two-Phase Flow Loop System

  • Jul 01, 1989
  • SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series
  • S Andre +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

Modelling and optimization of a forced convection heat exchanger for Mars waste heat rejection for power cycle and cryocooling applications

  • Jan 18, 2024
  • Applied Thermal Engineering
  • Nathan Colgan +2
  • Conference Article

Thermal System Design for a Fuel Cell Electric Truck

  • Sep 14, 2023
  • SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series
  • N Kiran +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations2

Optimization of Closed Brayton Cycles for Space Power Generation

  • Aug 03, 1992
  • SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series
  • James Casey Hanlon
  • Research Article
  • Citations6

Heat rejection design for zero liquid discharge Shand coal-fired power station integrated with CO2 capture and storage

  • Jan 12, 2019
  • International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
  • Wayuta Srisang +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations10

Heat rejection with mechanical pumped cooling loop for lunar surface nuclear reactor power system

  • Oct 28, 2017
  • Nuclear Engineering and Design
  • Senqing Fan +5
  • Conference Article
  • Citations46

Lunar Dust on Heat Rejection System Surfaces: Problems and Prospects

  • Jan 01, 2007
  • AIP conference proceedings
  • James R Gaier +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Advancements in automated design methods for NICFD turbomachinery

  • Nov 30, 2018
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)
  • Salvo Vitale
  • Conference Article
  • Citations2

Thermal Vacuum Testing of the Orbiting Carbon Observatory Instrument

  • Jun 29, 2008
  • SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series
  • Jose G Rivera +6
  • Conference Article
  • Citations10

Waste Heat Recovery System for a Turbocharged Diesel Generator at Full and Part Load Operating Conditions Using Rankine and Organic Rankine Cycles

  • Apr 03, 2018
  • SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series
  • Shreyas Joshi +2
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.