Discretely sampled variance and volatility swaps versus their continuous approximations

In this paper, we consider volatility swap and variance swap when the underlying asset is described by a process with multiple stochastic volatility models. The model considered in this paper is the multi-factor Heston stochastic volatility model. We obtain pricing formulas for the weighted variance swap and approximate expressions for the weighted volatility swap. The bounds of the arbitrage-free variance swap price are also found. The proposed pricing formulas are easy to compute in real time and can be applied efficiently for practical applications. We study the problem of hedging volatility swap with variance swap. We also determined the optimal amount of the underlying asset that has to be held for minimizing the hedging error by taking positions in options and weighted variance swap. From the numerical analysis, a couple of important features of the usefulness of the multi-factor Heston stochastic volatility model are discussed.

This paper presents a robust methodology for the valuation of options on variance swaps and volatility swaps. While existing literature has often focused on the pricing of the swaps themselves under stochastic volatility models, the valuation of options on these second-order derivative products remains a challenge, particularly within a framework that captures empirical market properties such as volatility clustering and long memory. Our approach addresses this problem by relying on the precise calculation of the optimal exercise prices (or strike rates) for variance and volatility swaps. To achieve this, we introduce and utilize a multifractional extension of the classic SABR model. This enhanced version of the model incorporates a deterministic and time-varying Hurst function, h(t), which allows for the modeling of a richer and more flexible volatility dynamics, capable of replicating the varying persistence phenomena observed in real markets. The proposed methodology is detailed comprehensively. We derive the theoretical formulas for the swap prices, which form the basis for calculating the optimal exercise prices. The valuation of options (call and put) on these swaps is then performed by employing advanced numerical techniques, adapted to the complexity of the multifractional process.

In this chapter, we give an overview on applications of change of time methods considered in this book in Chapters 4–8 These applications include yet another (among many) derivation of the Black-Scholes formula; the derivation of option pricing formula for a mean-reverting asset in energy finance; pricing of variance, volatility, covariance, and correlation swaps for the classical Heston model; pricing of variance and volatility swaps in energy markets; pricing of financial and energy derivatives with multifactor Levy models; and pricing of variance and volatility swaps and hedging of volatility swaps for the delayed Heston model. This chapter not only describes the applications of the change of time method but also constitutes the ultimate difference between Barndorff-Nielsen-Shiryaev’s book (2010) and present book.

Stochastic volatility (SV) models take a very important role in financial market, while there still exist some difficulties in estimating parameters in SV models. In this paper, a unified parameter estimation algorithm is proposed to estimate continuous-time SV model. Parameters in equity prices and volatilities stochastic processes are estimated separately after orthogonalization of Brownian motion in SV models. A closed-form of Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) and moment estimation results for four parameters in SV models are deducted. Five typical SV models are simulated to reveal the characteristics in empirical volatilities data. Parameter estimation results are presented to prove the convergence of estimation algorithm. We also compare our algorithm with Least Square (LS) estimations and numerical solutions of all the parameters in with MLE method, respectively. LS can only work in a specific form of SV models and the convergence speed is limited. Numerical solutions of the likelihood function with four parameters are unstable and can not converge to true values of all the parameters. Thus our algorithm works more efficiently than other methods.

Pricing forward-start variance swaps with stochastic volatility

Term Structure and Volatility: Lessons from the Eurodollar Markets

This thesis presents our study on using the hybrid stochastic-local volatility model for option pricing. Many researchers have demonstrated that stochastic volatility models cannot capture the whole volatility surface accurately, although the model parameters have been calibrated to replicate the market implied volatility data for near at-the-money strikes. On the other hand, the local volatility model can reproduce the implied volatility surface, whereas it does not consider the stochastic behaviour of the volatility. To combine the advantages of stochastic volatility (SV) and local volatility (LV) models, a class of stochastic-local volatility (SLV) models has been developed. The SLV model contains a stochastic volatility component represented by a volatility process and a local volatility component represented by a so-called leverage function. The leverage function can be roughly seen as a ratio between local volatility and conditional expectation of stochastic volatility. The difficulty of implementing the SLV model lies in the calibration of the leverage function. In the thesis, we first review the fundamental theories of stochastic differential equations and the classic option pricing models, and study the behaviour of the volatility in the context of FX market. We then introduce the SLV model and illustrate our implementation of the calibration and pricing procedure. We apply the SLV model to exotic option pricing in the FX market and compare pricing results of the SLV model with pure local volatility and pure stochastic volatility models. Numerical results show that the SLV model can match the implied volatility surface very well as well as improve the pricing performance for barrier options. In addition, we further discuss some extensions of the SLV project, such as parallelization potential for accelerating option pricing and pricing techniques for window barrier options. Although the SLV model we use in the thesis is not entirely new, we contribute to the research in the following aspects: 1) we investigate the hybrid volatility modeling thoroughly from theoretical backgrounds to practical implementations; 2) we resolve some critical issues in implementing the SLV model such as developing a fast and stable numerical method to derive the leverage function; and 3) we build a robust calibration and pricing platform under the SLV model, which can be extended for practical uses.

This thesis presents our study on using the hybrid stochastic-local volatility model for option pricing. Many researchers have demonstrated that stochastic volatility models cannot capture the whole volatility surface accurately, although the model parameters have been calibrated to replicate the market implied volatility data for near at-the-money strikes. On the other hand, the local volatility model can reproduce the implied volatility surface, whereas it does not consider the stochastic behaviour of the volatility. To combine the advantages of stochastic volatility (SV) and local volatility (LV) models, a class of stochastic-local volatility (SLV) models has been developed. The SLV model contains a stochastic volatility component represented by a volatility process and a local volatility component represented by a so-called leverage function. The leverage function can be roughly seen as a ratio between local volatility and conditional expectation of stochastic volatility. The difficulty of implementing the SLV model lies in the calibration of the leverage function. In the thesis, we first review the fundamental theories of stochastic differential equations and the classic option pricing models, and study the behaviour of the volatility in the context of FX market. We then introduce the SLV model and illustrate our implementation of the calibration and pricing procedure. We apply the SLV model to exotic option pricing in the FX market and compare pricing results of the SLV model with pure local volatility and pure stochastic volatility models. Numerical results show that the SLV model can match the implied volatility surface very well as well as improve the pricing performance for barrier options. In addition, we further discuss some extensions of the SLV project, such as parallelization potential for accelerating option pricing and pricing techniques for window barrier options. Although the SLV model we use in the thesis is not entirely new, we contribute to the research in the following aspects: 1) we investigate the hybrid volatility modeling thoroughly from theoretical backgrounds to practical implementations; 2) we resolve some critical issues in implementing the SLV model such as developing a fast and stable numerical method to derive the leverage function; and 3) we build a robust calibration and pricing platform under the SLV model, which can be extended for practical uses.

This study performs a comparative analysis of various GARCH and stochastic volatility (SV) models using the BIST 100 index. The models we examine include traditional GARCH (1,1) models and SV models with an AR (1) log-volatility process. Additionally, we consider more flexible models that incorporate jump components, volatility-in-mean, leverage effects, and innovations following a t-distribution or a moving average. The empirical findings reveal the following findings: (1) Stochastic Volatility (SV) models generally demonstrate better performance when compared to their GARCH counterparts. (2) The inclusion of a jump component and innovations following a tdistribution notably enhances the performance of the standard GARCH model while having less impact on the SV model. (3) The presence of a

In this paper, we will explain how to perfectly hedge under Heston's stochastic volatility model with jump-to-default, which is in itself a generalization of the Merton jump-to-default model and a special case of the Heston model with jumps. The hedging instruments we use to build the hedge will be as usual the stock and the bond, but also the Variance Swap (VS) and a Credit Default Swap (CDS). These instruments are very natural choices in this setting as the VS hedges against changes in the instantaneous variance rate, while the CDS protects against the occurrence of the default event. First, we explain how to perfectly hedge a power payoff under the Heston model with jump-to-default. These theoretical payoffs play an important role later on in the hedging of payoffs which are more liquid in practice such as vanilla options. After showing how to hedge the power payoffs, we show how to hedge newly introduced Gamma payoffs and Dirac payoffs, before turning to the hedge for the vanillas. The approach is inspired by the Post–Widder formula for real inversion of Laplace transforms. Finally, we will also show how power payoffs can readily be used to approximate any payoff only depending on the value of the underlier at maturity. Here, the theory of orthogonal polynomials comes into play and the technique is illustrated by replicating the payoff of a vanilla call option.

In this work we study the effects by including threshold, constant and time-dependent correlation in stochastic volatility (SV) models to capture the asymmetry relationship between stock returns and volatility. We develop SV models which include only time-dependent correlated innovations and both threshold and time-dependent correlation, respectively. It has been shown in literature that the SV model with only constant correlation does a better job of capturing asymmetry than threshold stochastic volatility (TSV) model. We show here that the SV model with time-dependent correlation performs better than the model with constant correlation on capturing asymmetry, and the comprehensive model with both threshold and time-dependently correlated innovations dominates models with pure threshold, constant and time-dependent correlation, and both threshold and constant correlation as well. In our comprehensive model, volatility and returns are time-dependently correlated, where the time-varying correlation is negative, and the volatility is more persistent, less volatile and higher following negative returns as expected. An empirical study is provided to illustrate our findings.

We introduce a discrete Barndorff-Nielsen and Shephard (BNS) stochastic volatility model, where the non-Gaussian Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process governs the instantaneous variance of an underlying asset. A closed-form solution for pricing variance swaps in financial markets driven by a BN-S type Levy process is derived. Additionally, we propose a discrete-time framework for arbitrage-free pricing of variance swaps, supported by simulations that provide numerical validation of our results. The model fitting and parameter estimation processes are also discussed in detail.

This paper introduces a general class of stochastic volatility models that can serve as a basis for modeling and estimating simultaneous equation systems involving multivariate volatility processes. The class consists of processes obtained as monotone polynomial transformations of so-called stochastic autoregressive volatility (SARV) models. The class permits a flexible modeling of volatility and avoids strong distributional assumptions. Most of the standard stochastic volatility models are incorporated in the framework, including the lognormal autoregressive model and stochastic volatility generalizations of GARCH and EGARCH. General conditions for strict statinarity, ergodicity, and the existence of finite lower-order unconditional moments for SARV are established. Closed-form expressions for the lowerorder moments constitute the basis for the proposed generalized method of moments estimation procedure. As an illustration we consider an informationdriven model of the return volatility–trading volume system for financial assets. Parameters with structural interpretation are estimated and an extended Kalmanfilter procedure allows for the construction of volatility forecasts based on the bivariate return-volume series. Empirical results are based on daily NYSE data for IBM over 1973–1991.

This article introduces a discrete‐time fractional stochastic volatility model (FSV) based on fractional Gaussian noise. The new model includes the standard stochastic volatility model as a special case and has the same limit as the fractional integrated stochastic volatility (FISV) model, which is the continuous‐time fractional Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process. A simulated maximum likelihood method, which maximizes the time‐domain log‐likelihood function calculated by the importance sampling technique, and a frequency‐domain quasi maximum likelihood method (or quasi Whittle) are employed to estimate the model parameters. Simulation studies suggest that, while both estimation methods can accurately estimate the model, the simulated maximum likelihood method outperforms the quasi Whittle method. As an illustration, we fit the FSV and FISV models with the proposed estimation techniques to the S&P 500 composite index over a sample period spanning 45 years.

Modeling Energy Price Dynamics: GARCH Versus Stochastic Volatility