• Home
  • Search
  • Distributed landmark placement in P2P networks
  • Cite Icon3
  • https://doi.org/10.1109/siu.2018.8404781Copy DOI Icon

Distributed landmark placement in P2P networks

  • May 1, 2018
  • Sanaz Taheri Boshrooyeh +2 more
Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Peer-to-peer (P2P) paradigm is a promising way to provide services to the masses for a very low cost, and hence, P2P services have been gaining significant attention. Since P2P services usually operate over their users' resources, without using central servers, their performance is becoming of interest to researchers. Several existing solutions rely on supernodes, called landmarks, to enhance system performance. The landmarks are placed manually based on the density and the distribution of the nodes in the corresponding P2P network, and landmark locations are presumed to be determined before system setup. However, this assumption is not realistic since, in a P2P system, no global view about the peers' locations exists. Hence, the best landmark locations would not be known a priori. We propose a family of distributed landmark placement algorithms, called DLP, to address this issue. We implement four versions of the DLP family and evaluate their landmark placements in a simulation environment. We define two performance metrics to assess their performance as compared to manually placed landmarks. Our results show that the DLP algorithms can generate landmark locations that are on par with the manual placement and significantly reduce the landmark-to-peer latencies.

Similar Papers
  • Conference Article
  • Citations34

Minimizing Average Finish Time in P2P Networks

  • Apr 01, 2009
  • G M Ezovski +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations9

Di-jest: Autonomic neighbour management for worm resilience in p2p systems

  • Jun 01, 2008
  • Douglas Mcilwraith +2
  • Supplementary Content
  • Citations2

Evolutionary methods for self-organizing cooperation in peer-to-peer networks

  • Jan 01, 2008
  • AMS Dottorato Institutional Doctoral Theses Repository (University of Bologna)
  • Stefano Arteconi
  • Conference Article
  • Citations11

Optimized landmark arrangement for absolute localization-a practical approach

  • Oct 31, 2000
  • T Rupp +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations51

The effect of automated landmark identification on morphometric analyses.

  • Mar 22, 2019
  • Journal of Anatomy
  • Christopher J Percival +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations5

A New Benchmark and Low Computational Cost Localization Method for Cephalometric Analysis

  • Sep 01, 2024
  • IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology
  • Xianglong Wang +6
  • Conference Article
  • Citations4

Active Peer to Peer

  • Apr 01, 2007
  • Xuelian Lin +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations30

P2P collaborative filtering with privacy

  • Jan 01, 2010
  • Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences
  • Ci̇han Kaleli̇ +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations10

Choosing partners based on availability in P2P networks

  • Jul 01, 2012
  • ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems
  • Stevens Le Blond +2
  • Conference Article

Stabilizing the performance and fairness in dynamic p2p system using Do or Die incentive mechanism

  • Dec 01, 2014
  • D.P Evangeline +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations20

Enhancing peer-to-peer live multicast quality using helpers

  • Jan 01, 2008
  • Jiajun Wang +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Landmark and Measurement-Based Data Assistant (LAMbDA)

  • Feb 03, 2023
  • Forensic Anthropology
  • Amber Plemons +3
  • Conference Article
  • Citations4

FairTrust: Toward secure and high performance P2P networks

  • Dec 01, 2007
  • Haiying Shen +1
  • Conference Article

PWO: Peer-To-Peer Worm Evolution Observer

  • Oct 01, 2006
  • Qiang Li +3
  • Conference Article

Ciphertext Retrieval in Super-Peer P2P Network

  • Dec 01, 2015
  • Kai Fan +4
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.