• Home
  • Search
  • Distributed Pressure Sensing for Production Data Analysis
  • Cite Icon2
  • https://doi.org/10.2118/194799-msCopy DOI Icon

Distributed Pressure Sensing for Production Data Analysis

  • Mar 15, 2019
  • Wisam Assiri +2 more
Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Abstract Well testing is an essential tool to estimate reserves and forecast production. The assessment depends on the analytical solution of the continuity and diffusivity equations which results in average reservoir properties. The key challenge is to acquire real-time data of pressure pulse signatures as they propagate and reach the boundaries. A potential solution is to use a permanent downhole pressure gauge or an array of distributed pressure sensors (DPS) placed at each hydraulic fracture cluster to characterize the flow. This work presents the elements of an innovative analytical model that uses this data to derive formation properties, visualize averaged flow dynamics, and evaluate the Stimulated Reservoir Volume (SRV). The real-time distributed pressure data, together with flow rate history, provides information that can be used to characterize the flow and estimate the boundary effect of hydraulic fractures and fissures. First, the numerically generated synthetic data is analyzed at each cluster to eliminate pressure drops due to friction. Next, analytical solutions of the continuity equation as well as trilinear models are used to invert reservoir properties to verify the proposed model. Based on the results, an advance statistical analysis is used to characterize the contribution of each variable to the flow rate. The numerical results suggest that there are key variables to identify different flow regimes. Numerical simulations are used to gauge the accuracy of the analytical model at predicting reservoir properties and flow patterns. Statistical analysis evinces that there are key parameters of the formation, fractures, and fissures that control the well productivity. The numerical analysis showed that for every reservoir type there are different combination of fracture parameters that can optimize the flow. Moreover, the results describe a method to obtain hydraulic fracture properties around each pressure sensor (DPS) and forecast their productivity. Finally, statistical learning was investigated as a potential solution to derive reservoir properties, including hydraulic and natural fractures, using the pressure pulse signature data without the need of inversion. The results show that there are key parameters that determine flow patterns. The importance of the accurate recognition and analysis of the multiple linear flow regimes at each cluster is in the potential to estimate the size of the SRV around hydraulic fractures during the transient life of the well. Moreover, this paper explains the procedure used for analyzing the change in the flow rate to obtain reservoir properties.

Similar Papers
  • Conference Article

Numerical Simulation on Fracture Propagation Behaviors in Grid-like Fractured Carbonate Reservoirs in Shunbei

  • Jun 23, 2024
  • Xiongwei Liu +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations17

Modeling and Economic Analyses of Graded Particle Injections in Conjunction with Hydraulic Fracturing of Coal Seam Gas Reservoirs

  • Feb 16, 2022
  • SPE Journal
  • Vanessa Santiago +4
  • Conference Article

On the Analysis of Production Data: Practical Approaches for Hydraulically Fractured Wells in Unconventional Reservoirs

  • Feb 04, 2014
  • Gorgonio Fuentes-Cruz +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations207

Development of a Coupled Dual Continuum and Discrete Fracture Model for the Simulation of Unconventional Reservoirs

  • Feb 18, 2013
  • Ali Moinfar +3
  • Conference Article
  • Citations31

Rate-Transient Analysis for Multistage Fractured Horizontal Wells in Conventional and Un-Conventional Homogeneous and Naturally Fractured Reservoirs

  • Sep 26, 2016
  • Fikri Kuchuk +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations54

Shale Gas Modeling Workflow: From Microseismic to Simulation -- A Horn River Case Study

  • Nov 15, 2011
  • Alex Novlesky +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations33

Effect of Well Interference on Shale Gas Well SRV Interpretation

  • Nov 09, 2015
  • Wei Pang +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations6

Stage-by-Stage Hydraulic Fracture and Reservoir Characterization through Integration of Post-Fracture Pressure Decay Analysis and the Flowback Diagnostic Fracture Injection Test Method

  • Apr 05, 2023
  • SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
  • D Zeinabady +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations14

Modifying the orientation of hydraulically fractured wells in tight reservoirs: The effect of in-situ stresses and natural fracture toughness

  • Oct 05, 2023
  • Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment
  • Joseph Sherratt +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations22

History Matching of Stimulated Reservoir Volume of Shale-Gas Reservoirs Using an Iterative Ensemble Smoother

  • Nov 10, 2017
  • SPE Journal
  • Haibin Chang +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations14

Investigation of the Effect of Cemented Fractures on Fracturing Network Propagation in Model Block with Discrete Orthogonal Fractures

  • Mar 28, 2017
  • Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering
  • Y Wang +1
  • Conference Article

Modeling Near-Wellbore Hydraulic Fracture Behaviors Under Combined Impacts of Wellbore Perforation and Natural Fractures

  • Jun 23, 2024
  • W Fu +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations77

Optimization of horizontal well fracturing in shale gas reservoir based on stimulated reservoir volume

  • Feb 13, 2020
  • Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering
  • Hao Zhang +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations11

Integrated analysis of pressure response using pressure-rate convolution and deconvolution techniques for varied flow rate production in fractured formations

  • Feb 13, 2018
  • Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering
  • Salam Al-Rbeawi
  • Research Article

다단계 수압파쇄균열 전파 모델링 연구

  • Oct 30, 2015
  • Journal of the Korean Institute of Gas
  • Youngho Jang +1
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.