- Conference Article
6
- 10.1115/dscc2012-movic2012-8653
Performance of Linear Control Methods for Wind Turbines Dealing With Unmodeled Structural Modes
- Oct 17, 2012
- Irving Paul Girsang + 1 more +1
Irving Paul Girsang Jaspreet Singh Dhupia School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Nanyang Technological University Singapore, 639798 irving1@e.ntu.edu.sg , djaspreet@ntu.edu.sg ABSTRACT Wind turbine s commonly operat e in an uncertain and noisy environment . Disturbance accommodating controller (DAC) has shown promis ing results in dealing with changing wind speed to regulate generator speed at its rated speed in above rated wind speed condition . However, it has been reported that the number of considered system modes (or degrees of freedom) in design of DAC affects th e system performance. Simulation using high order model, higher than that is considered in the control design, showed unstable response due to effect from the unmodeled structural dynamic s. In this study, DAC with Kalman estimator is designed for variable pitch wind turbines to take into account the unmodeled dynamics and noise measurement . The control performance is simulated using high order FAST model that ha s active generator, drive -train, blade, and tower dynamics in Simulink environment. Simulation re sults show that DAC with Kalman estimator gives best performance in terms of speed regulation and control cost, compared to two other linear controllers: Gain Scheduled Proportional Integral (GSPI) controlle r and DAC with linear estimator . INTRODUCTION Var iable speed variable pitch w ind turbine operates in four major operating regions. Region 1 lies below the cut -in wind speed, below which the wind speed is too low for energy production. Region 2 lies between the cut -in wind speed and the rated wind speed. In this region, the turbine operates to capture as much wind energy as possible. Region 3 , which is considered in this paper, lies between the rated wind speed and the cut -out wind speed. In this region, the turbine operates to produce constant power outpu t at its rated power. This constant rated power can be achieved by operating the turbine at constant generator torque and constant generator speed through feedback control and pitchable blades. The last region, Region 4, lies above the cut -out wind speed , above which the turbine is parked to prevent damage on wind turbine structure due to enormous loads coming from the extremely high wind speed . The p redominant methods of regulating constant generator speed in Region 3 are linear control methods utilizing blade pitch actuation. Common controller types are the model -based Proportional ±Integral -Derivative (PID) controller and Disturbance Accommodating Controller (DAC) [1 -6]. DAC using linear estimator approach has been shown to be effective in attenuating win d disturbances that act as the process noise on wind turbine s [3 -7]. However, this approach is sensitive to mode ling error s, as reported by Wright [6] , that DAC simulation with the activated unmodeled turbine ¶VV WUXFWXUDO dynamics, i.e. turbine with higher order dynamics, can le ad to unstable system response . Moreover, when measurement noise is present, which is not considered in the controller design, additional low pass filter is required to prevent noisy control signal , which can cause problems such as c hattering and controller saturation . This paper presents a robust control approach based on disturbance accommodating control concept for variable pitch wind turbines that compensates for both unmodel ed dynamics, i.e. model ing errors, and external disturba nces , i.e. wind speed input and measurement noise. This approach utilizes Kalman estimation in the feedback loop to estimate both system and disturbance states from noisy measurement signal. Comprehensive formulation and analysis of disturbance accommodati ng controllers using Kalman estimat or can be found in [ 8]. S ome practical advantages of implementing the Kalman estimator in DAC include easy tuning of the estimator parameters, i.e. the noise covariance ASME 2012 5th Annual Dynamic Systems and Control Conference joint with theJSME 2012 11th Motion and Vibration ConferenceDSCC2012-MOVIC20121 Copyright © 2012 by ASME
Read more