• Home
  • Search
  • Drizzle in Stratiform Boundary Layer Clouds. Part I: Vertical and Horizontal Structure
  • Cite Icon253
  • https://doi.org/10.1175/jas3529.1Copy DOI Icon

Drizzle in Stratiform Boundary Layer Clouds. Part I: Vertical and Horizontal Structure

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Abstract Detailed observations of stratiform boundary layer clouds on 12 days are examined with specific reference to drizzle formation processes. The clouds differ considerably in mean thickness, liquid water path (LWP), and droplet concentration. Cloud-base precipitation rates differ by a factor of 20 between cases. The lowest precipitation rate is found in the case with the highest droplet concentration even though this case had by far the highest LWP, suggesting that drizzle can be severely suppressed in polluted clouds. The vertical and horizontal structure of cloud and drizzle liquid water and bulk microphysical parameters are examined in detail. In general, the highest concentration of r > 20 μm drizzle drops is found toward the top of the cloud, and the mean volume radius of the drizzle drops increases monotonically from cloud top to base. The resulting precipitation rates are largest at the cloud base but decrease markedly only in the upper third of the cloud. Below cloud, precipitation rates decrease markedly with distance below base due to evaporation, and are broadly consistent in most cases with the results from a simple sedimentation–evaporation model. Evidence is presented that suggests evaporating drizzle is cooling regions of the subcloud layer, which could result in dynamical feedbacks. A composite power spectrum of the horizontal spatial series of precipitation rate is found to exhibit a power-law scaling from the smallest observable scales to close to the maximum observable scale (∼30 km). The exponent is considerably lower (1.1–1.2) than corresponding exponents for LWP variability obtained in other studies (∼1.5–2), demonstrating that there is relatively more variability of drizzle on small scales. Singular measures analysis shows that drizzle fields are much more intermittent than the cloud liquid water content fields, consistent with a drizzle production process that depends strongly upon liquid water content. The adiabaticity of the clouds, which can be modeled as a simple balance between drizzle loss and turbulent replenishment, is found to decrease if the time scale for drizzle loss is shorter than roughly 5–10 eddy turnover time scales. Finally, the data are compared with three simple scalings derived from recent observations of drizzle in subtropical stratocumulus clouds.

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations9

Application of aircraft observations over Beijing in cloud microphysical property retrievals from CloudSat

  • May 15, 2014
  • Advances in Atmospheric Sciences
  • Lei Wang +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations86

Effect of Aerosol on the Susceptibility and Efficiency of Precipitation in Warm Trade Cumulus Clouds

  • Nov 01, 2010
  • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
  • Hongli Jiang +2
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations5

An optimal estimation algorithm for the retrieval of fog and low cloud thermodynamic and micro-physical properties

  • Sep 26, 2022
  • Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
  • Alistair Bell +7
  • Research Article
  • Citations68

Studying the vertical variation of cloud droplet effective radius using ship and space‐borne remote sensing data

  • Apr 27, 2008
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
  • Ruiyue Chen +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations58

Ground-Based Millimeter- and Submillimeter-Wave Observations of Low Vapor and Liquid Water Contents

  • Jul 01, 2007
  • IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
  • Domenico Cimini +5
  • PDF
  • Peer Review Report

Reply on RC1

  • Jul 06, 2022
  • Alistair Bell
  • Research Article
  • Citations7

Parameterization of the Effect of Cloud Condensation Nuclei on Optical Properties of a Non-precipitating Water Layer Cloud

  • Jan 01, 2003
  • Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan. Ser. II
  • Naomi Kuba +5
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations25

Wind speed response of marine non-precipitating stratocumulus clouds over a diurnal cycle in cloud-system resolving simulations

  • May 12, 2016
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • Jan Kazil +2
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations30

The effects of aerosols on water cloud microphysics and macrophysics based on satellite-retrieved data over East Asia and the North Pacific

  • Nov 13, 2014
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • T Michibata +2
  • Research Article

A New Machine Learning Retrieval of Liquid Water Path Optimized for Mixed-Phase Cold-Air Outbreaks Using Radiometer and Radar Observations

  • Sep 22, 2025
  • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
  • S Daniel Ephraim +8
  • Research Article
  • Citations10

Thermodynamical and cloud microphysical response during the transition from southwest to northeast monsoon

  • Jul 02, 2015
  • Atmospheric Research
  • Sathy Nair +5
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations22

Evaluating the diurnal cycle of South Atlantic stratocumulus clouds as observed by MSG SEVIRI

  • Sep 14, 2018
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • Chellappan Seethala +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations63

The Temperature Dependence of the Liquid Water Path of Low Clouds in the Southern Great Plains

  • Oct 01, 2000
  • Journal of Climate
  • Anthony D Del Genio +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations144

Cloud microphysical and radiative properties for parameterization and satellite monitoring of the indirect effect of aerosol on climate

  • Aug 07, 2003
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
  • Jean‐Louis Brenguier +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations18

3D cloud reconstructions: Evaluation of scanning radar scan strategy with a view to surface shortwave radiation closure

  • Aug 26, 2013
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
  • Mark D Fielding +3
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.