• Home
  • Search
  • Dynamic Soil Properties for Construction Site Investigation Using Geophysical Methods
  • https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2602608/v1Copy DOI Icon

Dynamic Soil Properties for Construction Site Investigation Using Geophysical Methods

Show More
  • Abstract
  • PDF
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Abstract Geophysical approaches are used for site characterization to determine the dynamic behaviour of soil. Structures built on a site without sufficient assessment are prone to collapse or failure. Thus, before beginning any building activity, it is critical to assess the soil dynamic qualities. This is significant because buildings are constructed on top of the ground surface, supported by the underlying soil and rock. This work aimed to determine a competent layer for building foundations. This study was conducted to evaluate the dynamic soil behaviour of Paya Terubong on Penang Island. Resistivity, Young's modulus, shear modulus, Poisson's ratio, bulk modulus, bulk density, rippability, and material bearing capacity are among the parameters utilised for the characterization. This will be obtained from the electrical resistivity, seismic refraction, and MASW methods. Three layers were detected by these methods. Results from the study indicate that the area is mostly composed of highly dense silty sand and granitic bedrock, which makes it competent for foundation construction since higher compaction raises the ultimate and allowable bearing capacities of the third layer to very high levels. In addition, soil and rock layers identified using geophysical methods match well with the borehole data showing that material stiffness increases with depth. Rippable layers extend from the ground surface to a depth of 3 meters. The calculated values gotten from the soil dynamic properties and material bearing capacity show that the second and third layers have good geotechnical qualities. The ultimate bearing capacities calculated for the first layer range from 453 to 731 kPa, while the second layer capacities range from 1041 to 1691 kPa, and capacities for the third layer range from 2013 to 3650 kPa. For setting up structures, the second layer can support building foundations at a depth of 4 meters from the existing ground level. This approach is cost-effective, saves time, and is non-destructive for site characterization.

Loading PDF

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations24

Mechanical properties of yttria-stabilized zirconia: A study by ReaxFF molecular dynamics simulations

  • Jul 17, 2020
  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Jianli Zhou +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Determination of Mechanical Moduli of Polymeric Materials by Biaxial Tensile Testing

  • Jan 01, 1969
  • Journal of the Society of Materials Science, Japan
  • Kazuhiko Sakaguchi +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations94

New models for effective Young's modulus of particulate composites

  • Jan 01, 2005
  • Composites Part B: Engineering
  • Rajinder Pal
  • Research Article
  • Citations10

Influences of changes in mechanical properties of an overcored sample on the far-field stress calculation

  • Jul 02, 2004
  • International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences
  • R Guo +1
  • Research Article

MP66-11 COMPARISON OF THE BIO-MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF HUMAN AND BABOON’s TUNICA ALBUGINEA

  • May 01, 2024
  • The Journal of Urology
  • Alberto Colombo +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations35

Effects of Heat Exposure and Volumetric Compression on Poisson's Ratios, Young's Moduli, and Polymeric Composition During Thermo‐Mechanical Conversion of Auxetic Open Cell Polyurethane Foam

  • Nov 25, 2018
  • physica status solidi (b)
  • Olly Duncan +6
  • Conference Article
  • Citations3

Measurement of material properties for polysilicon thin films by an electrostatic force method

  • Oct 01, 2012
  • Wei-Qing Zhang +5
  • Conference Article
  • Citations19

Integrated Prediction of Shale Oil Reservoir Using Pre-Stack Algorithms for Brittleness and Fracture Detection

  • Mar 26, 2013
  • S.Z Sun +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Toughening Mechanism and Mechanical Properties Simulation of Rubber-Toughened Polymers

  • Dec 01, 2016
  • Key Engineering Materials
  • Hong Tu Song
  • Conference Article
  • Citations4

Comparison of finite elements model elastograms and IVUS elastograms acquired from phantoms and arteries

  • Oct 08, 2002
  • R.A Baldewsing +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations14

Time-dependent behavior of porcine periodontal ligament: A combined experimental, numeric in-vitro study.

  • Dec 26, 2017
  • American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
  • Thomas Johannes Knaup +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations58

Elastic Dispersion and Attenuation in Fully Saturated Sandstones: Role of Mineral Content, Porosity, and Pressures

  • Dec 01, 2017
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
  • Lucas Pimienta +3
  • Conference Article

ANALYSIS OF BORED PILE FOUNDATION IN POTENTIALLY LIQUEFIED SOIL (CASE STUDY: ANUTAPURA MEDICAL CENTER BUILDING)

  • Jan 01, 2023
  • D R Septiadi +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations1

Pile Response To Dynamic Lateral Loading

  • May 07, 1978
  • Sam T Hwong +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations10

Geophysical analysis of the soils for civil (Geotechnical) engineering and urban planning purposes: Some case histories from Turkey

  • Mar 04, 2011
  • International Journal of the Physical Sciences
  • Ferhat Özçep +1
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.