• Home
  • Search
  • Effect of high variation in transcript expression on identifying differentially expressed genes in RNA-seq analysis.
  • Cite Icon10
  • https://doi.org/10.1111/ahg.12441Copy DOI Icon

Effect of high variation in transcript expression on identifying differentially expressed genes in RNA-seq analysis.

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Great efforts have been made on the algorithms that deal with RNA-seq data to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of differential expression (DE) analysis. However, no consensus has been reached on the proper threshold values of fold change and adjusted p-value for filtering differentially expressed genes (DEGs). It is generally believed that the more stringent the filtering threshold, the more reliable the result of a DE analysis. Nevertheless, by analyzing the impact of both adjusted p-value and fold change thresholds on DE analyses, with RNA-seq data obtained for three different cancer types from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database, we found that, for a given sample size, the reproducibility of DE results became poorer when more stringent thresholds were applied. No matter which threshold level was applied, the overlap rates of DEGs were generally lower for small sample sizes than for large sample sizes. The raw read count analysis demonstrated that the transcript expression of the same gene in different samples, whether in tumor groups or in normal groups, showed high variations, which resulted in a drastic fluctuation in fold change values and adjustedp-values when different sets of samples were used. Overall, more stringent thresholds did not yield more reliable DEGs due to high variations in transcript expression; the reliability of DEGs obtained with small sample sizes was more susceptible to these variations. Therefore, less stringent thresholds are recommended for screening DEGs. Moreover, large sample sizes should be considered in RNA-seq experimental designs to reduce the interfering effect of variations in transcript expression on DEG identification.

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

Five-hub genes identify potential mechanisms for the progression of asthma to lung cancer.

  • Feb 10, 2023
  • Medicine
  • Weichang Yang +4
  • Research Article

Abstract B050: Identification of differentially expressed and spliced genes between breast, colon, lung, and prostate cancer from African American and white patients

  • Jun 01, 2020
  • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
  • Muthana Al Abo +3
  • Abstract

A significantly different transcriptome is found between sperm samples from patients undergoing homologous intrauterine insemination (IUI) achieving or not pregnancy

  • Sep 01, 2008
  • Fertility and Sterility
  • S García-Herrero +3
  • Research Article

Construction and identification of differential expression genes of peripheral blood cells in radon-exposed mice

  • Feb 25, 2009
  • Zhonghua fangshe yixue yu fanghu zazhi
  • Rui Chen +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations10

Identification of Methylation Markers and Differentially Expressed Genes with Prognostic Value in Breast Cancer.

  • Jul 10, 2019
  • Journal of Computational Biology
  • Jie Wu +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations7

Long read isoform sequencing reveals hidden transcriptional complexity between cattle subspecies

  • Mar 13, 2023
  • BMC Genomics
  • Yan Ren +5
  • Research Article

Abstract 3372: Differential exon usage in the HER2 subtype of breast cancer identified with RNA-seq and proteomic data

  • Jul 01, 2017
  • Cancer Research
  • Praveen Kumar +30
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations32

Decreased Expression of NUSAP1 Predicts Poor Overall Survival in Cervical Cancer

  • Jan 01, 2020
  • Journal of Cancer
  • Qiqi Xie +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations54

KRT15, INHBA, MATN3, and AGT are aberrantly methylated and differentially expressed in gastric cancer and associated with prognosis

  • Jan 28, 2019
  • Pathology - Research and Practice
  • Cheng Zhang +4
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations13

Identification of Key Differentially Expressed Transcription Factors in Glioblastoma.

  • Jun 15, 2020
  • Journal of Oncology
  • Gang Qin +7
  • Research Article
  • Citations44

SPP1 and AGER as potential prognostic biomarkers for lung adenocarcinoma.

  • Mar 12, 2018
  • Oncology Letters
  • Weiguo Zhang +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations10

Phytohormones and Transcriptome Analyses Revealed the Dynamics Involved in Spikelet Abortion and Inflorescence Development in Rice.

  • Jul 17, 2022
  • International journal of molecular sciences
  • Asif Ali +14
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Abstract P3-08-10: A unique coding and non-coding benign breast transcriptome in post-menopausal ER+ breast cancer

  • Feb 15, 2019
  • Cancer Research
  • Jm Carter +8
  • Research Article

Integrating differential gene expression and Mendelian randomization analyses reveal novel gene for prognosis, immune response, and drug sensitivity in lung cancer

  • Dec 19, 2025
  • Discover Oncology
  • Ming Li +7
  • Research Article

THU0029 IDENTIFICATION AND COMPARING OF HUB GENES IN SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS T AND B CELLS BY BIOINFORMATIC ANALYSIS

  • Jun 01, 2020
  • Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
  • Q Zhou +1
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.