- Supplementary Content
38
- 10.1074/jbc.r300020200
Gene-altered Mice and Metabolic Flux Control
- Aug 01, 2003
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Mark A Magnuson + 2 more +2
The regulation of metabolic flux is essential for life, yet our understanding of it remains incomplete. The ability to determine the role of specific enzymes in regulating metabolic flux rapidly becomes a nearly overwhelming challenge due to the various interacting pathways, multiple enzyme isoforms, and many different substrates that are involved. This complexity is further compounded by the fact that the enzymes themselves are regulated by multiple mechanisms. Moreover, the amount of an enzyme in a particular cell may be modulated by a variety of transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms. Thus, it has long been apparent that an understanding of how metabolic flux through specific pathways is regulated requires detailed measurements within the context of model systems. In mammals, the opposing processes of glycolysis and gluconeogenesis are both essential for glucose homeostasis. As previously reviewed by Granner and Pilkis (1Granner D. Pilkis S. J. Biol. Chem. 1990; 265: 10173-10176Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar), the regulation of three substrate cycles (glucokinase (GK)/glucose-6-phosphatase, pyruvate kinase/pyruvate carboxylase/phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK), 1The abbreviations used are: PEPCK, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase; GK, glucokinase; KO, knock-out; CREB, cAMP response element-binding protein. and phosphofructokinase/fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase) play an important role in hepatic glucose metabolism. Of these, two have garnered most of the attention: GK and the cytosolic isoform of PEPCK. Both are widely thought to play key roles in determining flux through the glycolytic and gluconeogenic pathways, respectively, in the liver. Since a variety of genetically altered mouse models have been generated and characterized to determine the role of these two enzymes in regulating metabolic flux they now serve as excellent examples for highlighting the indispensable role that genetically manipulated mice have played in assessing metabolic flux control within the intact animal. Moreover, the findings obtained illustrate that surprises are still possible despite decades of previous studies and that additional studies are still required. In this Minireview we compare and contrast the findings obtained for both GK and PEPCK, because, by doing so, some important points about the concept of metabolic control are reinforced. GK and PEPCK are both expressed and regulated in a manner that reflects their vastly different functions. The two enzymes can be generally thought of as being expressed in a largely non-overlapping set of cell types, as is illustrated in Fig. 1. While they are co-expressed in the liver, periportal and perivenous hepatocytes possess different amounts of these and other glycolytic and gluconeogenic enzymes, and consequently different metabolic capacities, due to gradients in oxygen, substrate, hormone, and mediator levels, as well as different cell-to-cell interactions (2Jungermann K. Diabetes Metab. 1992; 18: 81-86PubMed Google Scholar, 3Jungermann K. Kietzmann T. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 1996; 16: 179-203Crossref PubMed Scopus (422) Google Scholar). Two kinetically similar but structurally distinct isoforms of GK are made due to alternate promoters in the GK gene and the alternate RNA processing (4Jetton T.L. Liang Y. Pettepher C.C. Zimmerman E.C. Cox F.G. Horvath K. Matschinsky F.M. Magnuson M.A. J. Biol. Chem. 1994; 269: 3641-3654Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar, 5Schuit F.C. Huypens P. Heimberg H. Pipeleers D.G. Diabetes. 2001; 50: 1-11Crossref PubMed Scopus (319) Google Scholar, 6Corbett J.A. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2001; 12: 140-142Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (12) Google Scholar). One isoform is made in the liver, whereas the other is found in the pancreatic islet, enteroendocrine cells of the gut, and in certain parts of the brain. Studies of the role of GK in determining glycolytic flux have been limited largely to the liver and pancreatic β-cell, where the enzyme is regulated in a vastly different manner. Besides the use of alternate cell type-specific promoters, the liver expresses a regulatory protein that binds GK and sequesters it in the nucleus under certain metabolic conditions (7de la Iglesia N. Mukhtar M. Seoane J. Guinovart J.J. Agius L. J. Biol. Chem. 2000; 275: 10597-10603Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (87) Google Scholar, 8Grimsby J. Coffey J.W. Dvorozniak M.T. Magram J. Li G. Matschinsky F.M. Shiota C. Kaur S. Magnuson M.A. Grippo J.F. J. Biol. Chem. 2000; 275: 7826-7831Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (109) Google Scholar). Due to an S0.5 for glucose of about 8 mm and the lack of significant end product inhibition by glucose 6-phosphate, GK functions to regulate intracellular glycolytic flux in a manner that parallels changes in the blood glucose concentration (9Matschinsky F.M. Diabetes. 2002; 51: S394-S404Crossref PubMed Google Scholar). In the case of PEPCK, there are two different genes that encode either a mitochondrial or cytoplasmic isoform of the enzyme (10Hanson R.W. Reshef L. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1997; 66: 581-611Crossref PubMed Scopus (634) Google Scholar). The cytoplasmic PEPCK isoform is found in the proximal tubule of the kidney, adipose, and intestine, in addition to hepatocytes (10Hanson R.W. Reshef L. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1997; 66: 581-611Crossref PubMed Scopus (634) Google Scholar). In both the liver and kidney this enzyme has long been thought to play a role in determining gluconeogenic flux, although the gene is regulated differently in these two sites (10Hanson R.W. Reshef L. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1997; 66: 581-611Crossref PubMed Scopus (634) Google Scholar, 11Drewnowsk K.D. Craig M.R. Digiovanni S.R. McCarty J.M. Moorman A.F. Lamers W.H. Schoolwerth A.C. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2002; 53: 3-20PubMed Google Scholar). Intestinal PEPCK may also contribute to the endogenous glucose production during diabetes (12Rajas F. Croset M. Zitoun C. Montano S. Mithieux G. Diabetes. 2000; 49: 1165-1168Crossref PubMed Scopus (89) Google Scholar). In contrast, in adipose tissues, PEPCK expression is thought to play an important role in glyceroneogenesis (10Hanson R.W. Reshef L. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1997; 66: 581-611Crossref PubMed Scopus (634) Google Scholar, 13Beale E.G. Hammer R.E. Antoine B. Forest C. FASEB J. 2002; 16: 1695-1696Crossref PubMed Scopus (55) Google Scholar). Indeed, transgene-directed overexpression of PEPCK in adipose tissue causes increased glyceroneogenesis, free fatty acid re-esterification, and adipose mass, without any changes in insulin sensitivity, findings that provide direct support for this notion (14Franckhauser S. Munoz S. Pujol A. Casellas A. Riu E. Otaegui P. Su B. Bosch F. Diabetes. 2002; 51: 624-630Crossref PubMed Scopus (180) Google Scholar). The physiological regulation of glucose homeostasis involves multiple tissue-tissue interactions, mediated by a variety of hormones, the nervous system, as well as changes in the concentrations of specific nutrients. For instance, glycolytic flux in the liver is stimulated by insulin and inhibited by glucagon, two hormones secreted by the pancreatic islet. The secretion of both of these hormones is modulated by sympathetic, parasympathetic, and sensory innervation of the pancreas (15Ahren B. Diabetologia. 2000; 43: 393-410Crossref PubMed Scopus (701) Google Scholar). Centers regulating the neuronal input into hormone secretion are thought largely to reside in the hypothalamus and brain stem, two other sites where GK is found. Moreover, incretins, such as glucagon-like peptide-1 or glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide that affect insulin secretion are secreted by enteroendocrine cells of the gut, cells that are also known to express GK (16Doyle M.E. Egan J.M. Recent Prog. Horm. Res. 2001; 56: 377-399Crossref PubMed Scopus (89) Google Scholar, 17Drucker D.J. Endocrinology. 2001; 142: 521-527Crossref PubMed Scopus (310) Google Scholar, 18Pamir N. Lynn F.C. Buchan A.M. Ehses J. Hinke S.A. Pospisilik J.A. Miyawaki K. Yamada Y. Seino Y. McIntosh C.H. Pederson R.A. Am. J. Physiol. 2003; 284: E931-E939Crossref PubMed Scopus (103) Google Scholar). Thus, there exists a highly dispersed yet integrated system of GK-containing cells that interact with each other in a complex manner to maintain glucose homeostasis. Similarly, the regulation of gluconeogenic flux, which varies under different metabolic conditions, also depends on a variety of different tissue-tissue interactions. Although the liver, kidney, and intestine all contain the enzymatic machinery necessary to make glucose, changes in the hormonal milieu have a significant impact on where glucose is made, as well as the substrates that are used as precursors. For instance, the liver primarily utilizes lactate and alanine, and to a smaller extent glycerol, for gluconeogenesis. However, alanine is less important as a substrate in the kidney, with both glycerol and glutamine being more important for glucose production from this site (19Gerich J.E. Meyer C. Woerle H.J. Stumvoll M. Diabetes Care. 2001; 24: 382-391Crossref PubMed Scopus (457) Google Scholar, 20Cersosimo E. Garlick P. Ferretti J. Diabetes. 2000; 49: 1186-1193Crossref PubMed Scopus (80) Google Scholar). Moreover, the small intestine is beginning to be viewed as playing a substantial role during certain metabolic states. During the postabsorptive state systemic glucose release occurs primarily from the liver and kidney, with no glucose release from the small intestine (12Rajas F. Croset M. Zitoun C. Montano S. Mithieux G. Diabetes. 2000; 49: 1165-1168Crossref PubMed Scopus (89) Google Scholar, 19Gerich J.E. Meyer C. Woerle H.J. Stumvoll M. Diabetes Care. 2001; 24: 382-391Crossref PubMed Scopus (457) Google Scholar). However, glucose production by the small intestine rises to 25% of that made in the whole body during insulinopenic states, such as during a 48-h fast or in streptozotocin-induced diabetes (21Croset M. Rajas F. Zitoun C. Hurot J.M. Montano S. Mithieux G. Diabetes. 2001; 50: 740-746Crossref PubMed Scopus (160) Google Scholar). The relative contributions of the kidney and liver may also change during an extended fast, with renal gluconeogenesis becoming somewhat more important (22Ekberg K. Landau B.R. Wajngot A. Chandramouli V. Efendic S. Brunengraber H. Wahren J. Diabetes. 1999; 48: 292-298Crossref PubMed Scopus (198) Google Scholar). For many years a predominant view pertaining to the regulation of metabolic flux was the presence of a rate-limiting step at or near the start of a pathway. However, this view began to give way in the late 1970s to the concept of variable metabolic control strength. Fundamental to this concept was the idea that control over a metabolic pathway might be distributed over a number of enzymes in a pathway, and the flux control strength of each enzyme could be quantified by metabolic control analysis in an isolated system (23Kacser H. Burns J.A. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 1979; 7: 1149-1160Crossref PubMed Scopus (326) Google Scholar, 24Groen A.K. van Roermund C.W. Vervoorn R.C. Tager J.M. Biochem. J. 1986; 237: 379-389Crossref PubMed Scopus (146) Google Scholar). This concept has had significant impact on how the regulation of metabolic flux is both viewed and studied. However, as this concept evolved, it also became clear that the control exerted by any particular enzyme might also vary under different states and thus in some cases might be virtually impossible to determine without a detailed empirical analysis (25Rognstad R. J. Biol. Chem. 1979; 254: 1875-1878Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). It is now well recognized that, only by being able to precisely alter the expression of an enzyme in a graded manner, can the role of specific enzymes in regulating metabolic flux in a pathway be accurately assessed. Even so, it remains a frequent practice to attempt to infer the function of an enzyme using knowledge of its kinetics, location, or regulation. However, there is no guarantee that such inferences are correct. Fortunately it is no longer necessary to simply guess given the increasing ease and precision for performing genetic manipulations in the mouse, especially given the ability both to overexpress enzymes in specific tissues and to eliminate their expression in selected sites via the Cre/loxP system (26Le Y. Sauer B. Methods Mol. Biol. 2000; 136: 477-485PubMed Google Scholar). Both overexpression and conditional gene knock-out (KO) strategies proved to be valuable for determining the effects changing the expression of GK on an important metabolic marker, the blood glucose concentration (27Niswender K.D. Postic C. Jetton T.L. Bennett B.D. Piston D.W. Efrat S. Magnuson M.A. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 22564-22569Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (45) Google Scholar, 28Niswender K.D. Shiota M. Postic C. Cherrington A.D. Magnuson M.A. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 22570-22575Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (128) Google Scholar, 29Postic C. Shiota M. Niswender K.D. Jetton T.L. Chen Y. Moates J.M. Shelton K.D. Lindner J. Cherrington A.D. Magnuson M.A. J. Biol. Chem. 1999; 274: 305-315Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1032) Google Scholar). As shown in Fig. 2A, a 50% reduction in GK gene expression leads to pronounced hyperglycemia. The total elimination of GK is incompatible with life because pups die within a week of birth from the effects of uncontrolled hyperglycemia. In contrast, a 50% increase in the amount of GK causes hypoglycemia, and doubling the amount of GK (via introduction of two extra copies of the entire GK gene locus) lowers the blood glucose concentration even more. When plotted, as shown in Fig. 2A, a curvilinear relationship between GK gene expression and the blood glucose concentration becomes readily apparent. These data clearly illustrate that small changes in the expression of GK are sufficient to have a major impact on the plasma glucose concentration, although they do not reveal which tissues are involved or precisely how they each contribute to this relationship. To determine the role of GK in particular tissues and to further explore the functional relationship between tissues that express this enzyme, both liver- and pancreatic β-cell-specific GK-KO mice have been generated and characterized (29Postic C. Shiota M. Niswender K.D. Jetton T.L. Chen Y. Moates J.M. Shelton K.D. Lindner J. Cherrington A.D. Magnuson M.A. J. Biol. Chem. 1999; 274: 305-315Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1032) Google Scholar). Liver-specific GK-KO mice exhibit nearly a 40% increase in blood glucose levels without a simultaneous increase in the plasma insulin levels. Hyperglycemic clamp experiments revealed that, although the basal glucose turnover rates are nearly normal, the rate of new hepatic glycogen synthesis and glucose turnover in response to hyperglycemia is only 10 and 40% that of animals that make normal amounts of hepatic GK, respectively. The effect of glucose on several glucose-responsive genes was also abnormal, further demonstrating a key role for GK in carbohydrate-induced responses by the liver (30Towle H.C. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2001; 98: 13476-13478Crossref PubMed Scopus (38) Google Scholar). Although these functional impairments might have been predicted using in vitro systems, one observation simply could not have been anticipated. Namely, the liver-specific GK-KO mice exhibited profoundly impaired insulin secretion. Mice lacking hepatic GK did not exhibit any increase in their plasma insulin levels under basal condition, despite the 40% increase in blood glucose levels, and the increase in insulin secretion in response to hyperglycemia was only 30% of normal. These a between rates of hepatic glycolysis and insulin secretion that is not The hyperglycemia that occurs in these mice be sufficient to insulin secretion because it has also been shown that small but changes in the blood glucose concentration have effects on insulin secretion H. S. A. Diabetes. 2001; 50: PubMed Google Scholar, A. J. S. J. Biol. Chem. 2002; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). performing a pancreatic β-cell-specific of GK different was it was that mice without any GK in die birth of Thus, this clearly that GK a role in regulating metabolic flux in Although this was long thought to be the this and a in isolated no for (29Postic C. Shiota M. Niswender K.D. Jetton T.L. Chen Y. Moates J.M. Shelton K.D. Lindner J. Cherrington A.D. Magnuson M.A. J. Biol. Chem. 1999; 274: 305-315Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1032) Google Scholar, D.W. Postic C. Shelton K.D. Magnuson M.A. J. Biol. Chem. 1999; 274: Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). Mice that lack one functional of GK only in the exhibit a metabolic similar to that of the liver-specific GK-KO hyperglycemia and normal basal glucose turnover but more they exhibit impaired glucose turnover and insulin secretion during hyperglycemia due to the between GK in and insulin secretion (9Matschinsky F.M. Diabetes. 2002; 51: S394-S404Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, F.M. Diabetes. 1996; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, F.M. B. Magnuson M.A. Diabetes. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). Mice that make an increased amount of GK are to the of both hyperglycemia and with the of a M. Postic C. Y. Jetton T.L. K. D. J. Grippo J.F. Magnuson M.A. Cherrington A.D. Diabetes. 2001; 50: PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). This to of is thought to be due to increased hepatic GK which causes increased hepatic glucose via increased hepatic glucose and increased glycogen in response to hyperglycemia K.D. Shiota M. Postic C. Cherrington A.D. Magnuson M.A. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 22570-22575Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (128) Google Scholar). T. Riu E. Bosch F. A. FASEB J. 1996; PubMed Scopus Google have also that the streptozotocin-induced increase in the concentrations of glucose, and free fatty is smaller in GK between GK and glycolysis is clearly as a of the genetic studies that have to the of over of GK and serve as a for assessing the control strength of that the function of GK a in known as diabetes of the P. L. E. A. Niswender K. Magnuson M.A. Matschinsky F.M. Biochem. J. 1997; PubMed Scopus (45) Google Scholar, A. M. C. Moates M. Magnuson M.A. Matschinsky F.M. Diabetologia. 1999; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). several have been that increase the of the enzyme and that are with the of of S. C. A. T. K. Magnuson M.A. Shiota C. Matschinsky F.M. F. Diabetes. 2002; 51: PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, B. P. M. E. A. A. M.A. Matschinsky F.M. N. J. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). Thus, genetic studies in with analysis of the the experiments in mice with both of clearly that the changes in the of GK changes in the blood glucose concentration, an effect due to the metabolic control strength that GK on glycolysis in cells that express the The metabolic effects of the amount of PEPCK in mice have also been As for GK, the of several have been important in being able to the impact of changes in the expression of the gene and its role in determining metabolic flux and in the blood glucose concentration A. Pujol A. M. Bosch F. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1994; PubMed Scopus Google generated mice that overexpress a PEPCK via a of PEPCK that leads to increased expression in all normal sites of expression adipose In these PEPCK gene expression in the liver was and the blood glucose concentration during was 50% normal. Y. S. S. L. P. J.E. J. Biol. Chem. 2002; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google made a mouse, also under control of a in which hepatic PEPCK gene expression in the liver was about that of The blood glucose concentration a fast in these animals was P. Shiota M. Shelton K.D. R. Postic C. Magnuson M.A. Mol. Biol. 2000; PubMed Scopus Google three distinct that made by gene using a Cre/loxP One was was normal but could be to via whereas the was mice these different animals with in PEPCK gene expression from to of normal to the analysis for GK, the blood glucose concentration in mice with variable amounts of PEPCK gene expression to was and is shown in Fig. This is on data from animals for the PEPCK which was at 30% because this reflects the blood glucose concentration in pups to P. Shiota M. Shelton K.D. R. Postic C. Magnuson M.A. Mol. Biol. 2000; PubMed Scopus Google found that mice with a and reduction in PEPCK gene expression and a normal blood glucose concentration a The points at and PEPCK are on the of Y. S. S. L. P. J.E. J. Biol. Chem. 2002; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google and A. Pujol A. M. Bosch F. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1994; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). When the of all three different are it is clear that the relationship between PEPCK gene expression and the blood glucose concentration is different from the curvilinear relationship for the expression of GK and the blood glucose there is a through the of GK the through the PEPCK is These clearly that PEPCK is essential for life but also that only a small amount of PEPCK is necessary for a normal blood glucose concentration in an animal. Indeed, the blood glucose concentration is by a of changes in PEPCK gene Even mice with a reduction in PEPCK are not only but they have nearly normal blood glucose concentrations a Although these findings to that PEPCK control over the blood glucose concentration, at the of expression or the normal they be with in PEPCK may not accurately changes in PEPCK and multiple may be there is an amount of PEPCK that serve to the from the of P. Shiota M. Shelton K.D. R. Postic C. Magnuson M.A. Mol. Biol. 2000; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, P. Shiota M. P. A.D. Magnuson M.A. Diabetes. 2003; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). Thus, the plasma glucose concentration may be a of metabolic that in the of in PEPCK gene For instance, changes in the expression of other genes in the liver and the rate of hepatic glucose production in mice with only a increase in hepatic PEPCK gene expression Y. S. S. L. P. J.E. J. Biol. Chem. 2002; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). These mice had a increase in both their plasma insulin concentration and impaired glucose with insulin Y. S. S. L. P. J.E. J. Biol. Chem. 2002; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). metabolic of these animals revealed increased rates of hepatic glucose production but normal glucose during clamp Thus, a increase in hepatic PEPCK may be to insulin with Y. S. S. L. P. J.E. J. Biol. Chem. 2002; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google there was a in the amount of both insulin and in the liver. Mice that lack PEPCK only in the liver are also able to maintain although at the of hepatic a that also both the notion of the role of the liver in gluconeogenesis and the role of PEPCK in this In a of the liver-specific P. Shiota M. P. A.D. Magnuson M.A. Diabetes. 2003; PubMed Scopus Google have that from animals that lack hepatic PEPCK do not glucose from either lactate or This that the mitochondrial isoform of PEPCK, which is still in these not play any role in determining flux, which not be given that this isoform for only of in the liver of using both and metabolic P. Shiota M. P. A.D. Magnuson M.A. Diabetes. 2003; PubMed Scopus Google have also shown that mice lacking PEPCK in the liver have impaired gluconeogenesis from but not from glycerol, and that there is a increase in acid even pyruvate and is experiments using and that total body gluconeogenic flux from phosphoenolpyruvate is still of that in a normal mouse, despite the of hepatic PEPCK. These that tissues may be of the in gluconeogenesis by more the amount of As both the kidney and intestine, two other sites of PEPCK gene may contribute to systemic glucose production during certain metabolic states (12Rajas F. Croset M. Zitoun C. Montano S. Mithieux G. Diabetes. 2000; 49: 1165-1168Crossref PubMed Scopus (89) Google Scholar, 19Gerich J.E. Meyer C. Woerle H.J. Stumvoll M. Diabetes Care. 2001; 24: 382-391Crossref PubMed Scopus (457) Google Scholar). Indeed, renal gluconeogenesis has long been known to be sufficient to maintain nearly normal blood glucose levels in Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). it has been shown that, in endogenous glucose production only by about 50% of the liver T.L. N. A. B. J. 2002; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, N. D. A. M.A. S.A. Diabetes. 2000; 49: PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). Thus, glucose be made by the liver, in either the kidney intestine to be that whole body glucose production to It is to that the plasma glutamine concentration is increased in mice without PEPCK in the liver, that the kidney intestine may be of using glutamine as a substrate to glucose E. Garlick P. Ferretti J. Diabetes. 2000; 49: 1186-1193Crossref PubMed Scopus (80) Google Scholar, M. Meyer C. G. M. S. J. Am. J. Physiol. 274: Google Scholar, M. G. Meyer C. J. 1999; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). The gene expression levels blood glucose in Fig. illustrate that there are in how in either GK or PEPCK gene expression affect the blood glucose These different glucose response in the control that GK and PEPCK over glycolytic and gluconeogenic flux, respectively. GK near total control over glycolysis in tissues that express the enzyme, the is different for PEPCK, because changes in PEPCK gene expression within mice do not However, as as these data may it remains important to view it with some because a analysis of gluconeogenic flux in animals with different amounts of PEPCK has not yet been the obtained to are on their to that PEPCK determine gluconeogenic it is that control is distributed other enzymes in this pathway. it has been shown that a that gene expression by to is in the liver by and by insulin overexpression of in via use of a causes increased hepatic glucose production P. Chen G. J. J. G. J. Granner 2001; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). PEPCK gene also leads to an increase in and two other key enzymes in the gluconeogenic pathway. Moreover, mice that a of the cAMP response element-binding protein gene or that express a exhibited both and a in pyruvate and PEPCK S. F. S. R. A. D. G. C. P. B. M. 2001; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). These studies provide both additional support and a the control of gluconeogenesis may the regulation of a set of Thus, the control of gluconeogenic flux be a more with the findings of have this in the R.C. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 1999; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, Annu. Rev. Nutr. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, N. G. J. 1999; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, M.R. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). This is also with metabolic control that a the regulation of metabolic flux can be distributed over multiple enzymatic It is that the glucose homeostasis in the mouse are similar to in the and that genetic can now be readily that the mouse to serve as a model system for assessing the role of specific enzymes in determining metabolic use of conditional gene strategies that make use of as well as other In the overexpression of enzymes via the of mice by to because, as by the studies we have it is to be able to increase the expression of specific enzymes as to from
Read more