Efficient Working of Signature Based Intrusion Detection Technique in Computer Networks

Malware authors are continuously developing crime toolkits. This has led to the situation of zero-day attacks, where malware harm computer systems despite the protection from existing Intrusion Detection Systems (IDSs). We propose an Intelligent Intrusion Detection and Prevention System (IIDPS) approach that combines the Signature based Intrusion Detection system (SIDS), Anomaly based Intrusion Detection System (AIDS) and Response Intrusion Detection System (RIDS). We used a risk assessment approach to determine an appropriate response action against each attack event. We also demonstrated the IIDPS make the detection and prevention of malware more effective.

Chapter 5 - Intrusion Prevention and Detection Systems

Blockchain and federated learning-based intrusion detection approaches for edge-enabled industrial IoT networks: a survey

With the rapid development of machine learning and Internet technology, the combination of the two methods is well appreciated recently.An anomaly and intrusion detection system is a mechanism that monitors network or system activities for malicious activities.Intrusion detection and prevention systems are primarily focused on identifying possible incidents, logging information about them and reporting attempts.As far as other usages of Intrusion detection and prevention systems are concerned, such as identifying problems with security policies and deterring individuals from violating security policies.Anomaly detection systems are becoming an important addition to the security infrastructure of nearly every organization.In this paper, we propose a novel mechanism for real-world traffic and research there cases with theoretical analysis.

The novelty and growing sophistication of cyber threats mean that high accuracy and interpretable machine learning models are needed more than ever before for Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems. This study aims to solve this challenge by applying Explainable AI techniques, including Shapley Additive explanations feature selection, to improve model performance, robustness, and transparency. The method systematically employs different classifiers and proposes a new hybrid method called Hybrid Bagging-Boosting and Boosting on Residuals. Then, performance is taken in four steps: the multistep evaluation of hybrid ensemble learning methods for binary classification and fine-tuning of performance; feature selection using Shapley Additive explanations values retraining the hybrid model for better performance and reducing overfitting; the generalization of the proposed model for multiclass classification; and the evaluation using standard information metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. Key results indicate that the proposed methods outperform state-of-the-art algorithms, achieving a peak accuracy of 98.47% and an F1 score of 96.19%. These improvements stem from advanced feature selection and resampling techniques, enhancing model accuracy and balancing precision and recall. Integrating Shapley Additive explanations-based feature selection with hybrid ensemble methods significantly boosts the predictive and explanatory power of Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems, addressing common pitfalls in traditional cybersecurity models. This study paves the way for further research on statistical innovations to enhance Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems performance.

This paper presents an overview of the technologies and the methodologies used in Network Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems (NIDPS). Intrusion Detection and Prevention System (IDPS) technologies are differentiated by types of events that IDPSs can recognize, by types of devices that IDPSs monitor and by activity. NIDPSs monitor and analyze the streams of network packets in order to detect security incidents. The main methodology used by NIDPSs is protocol analysis. Protocol analysis requires good knowledge of the theory of the main protocols, their definition, how each protocol works.Keywords: Intrusion Detection and Prevention System, Protocol Analysis, Sensor, Signature, State(ProQuest: ... denotes formulae omitted.)1 IntroductionIncreasing size and complexity of the Internet and Intranet networks have led to increasing number of vulnerabilities that could be exploited. Thus, the internal and external attacks on the information systems are increasing at an alarming rate. Also, these are becoming more severe and sophisticated. The attackers find ingenious ways to bypass the security controls and to compromise the security and the well functioning of the information systems. They are motivated by financial, political, and military objectives. In this context, defending wide area networks from malicious traffic, unauthorized access to systems involves many problems.In security information systems Network Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems (NIDPS) are important tools to detect possible incidents and also, to attempt to stop them in real time. Due to changing attacks, intrusion detection methodologies and technologies continuously evolve, adding new detection capabilities, to avoid detection. They must adapt to new forms of malware, to the public networks, increased traffic.2 Concepts of Intrusion DetectionAn intrusion is a successful action to gain access to an information system, to compromise it or to make it unavailable. This is possible due to the presence of vulnerability in the target system that can be exploited by a motivated intruder.Intrusion Detection and Prevention is the process of monitoring the information systems by sensors or agents and analyzing the collected information to detect and to attempt to stop the attacks in real time, identifying vulnerabilities, the violation of security policies or standard security practices.An Intrusion Detection and Prevention System (IDPS) is a tool that monitors information systems, collects, analyzes information, and initiates responses when an intrusion is detected.Intrusion Detection Systems (IDSs) mainly work as defensive mechanisms. They only alert the system administrators that an incident has occurred. Intrusion Prevention Systems (IPSs) can take some actions to attempt to stop the attack, such as breaking the connection or modifying the firewall rules to deny access to the intruder. The response of the classic IDS can be slow if the system administrator is busy while the response of the IPS is automatic. An architecture that uses together IPS and IDS technologies is the best solution for defense in depth.Conceptually, a generic IDPS consists of modular components. It mainly has the following components: monitoring system, storage, analyzer, and responder.* Monitoring system - monitors and logs the events in a computer system or network;* Storage - stores information, called audit record, about suspicious activities or intrusions; also, the security policies used in analysis are stored;* Analyzer - uses different analysis methodologies to detect the incidents;* Responder - the response mechanism of incidents.The IDPSs could be classified as:* By detection methodology [12], [18]:- misuse-based detection- anomaly-based detection- stateful protocol analysis* By activity [12]:- network-based- wireless-based- network behavior analysis- host-based* By behavior on detection:- passive- active* By collection and analysis frequency:- continuous- periodicThe detection methodologies describe the characteristics of the analyzer. …

Systems employing the Internet and Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) are alternative to the legacy landline telephony system. The services offered by these systems allow users to communicate with their family members, friends, banks and business partners whenever they are online. Particularly, the VoIP service is popular with the Internet users because charges are bound into usually fixed access costs making the price of the long distance calls themselves appear economical and even free. However, VoIP services have several disadvantages. One of the disadvantages of VoIP is, it is exposed to Internet security vulnerabilities, threats and attacks. The attacks come in many forms. One of the methods to attack the VoIP service, is by sending a Spam over Internet Telephony (SPIT). SPIT is normally executed by malicious parties initiating automated, unsolicited, and unwanted communications that used VoIP or video conferencing services, just like an email SPAM. Solutions to mitigate SPIT are still lacking. To defense a VoIP system from SPIT, we have come out with the idea of Automated Intrusion Detection and Prevention System over SPIT (AIDPoS) that can detect and prevent SPIT from external parties to enter the VoIP network. AIDPoS is a combination system of Intrusion Detection System (IDS) and Intrusion Prevention System (IPS) on Voice over IP (VoIP) server. This is an experimental research to find a solution to combat SPIT if it happens in the future. Our result shows that an automated Intrusion detection and Prevention system over SPIT attack is feasible. Our work is on an open source VoIP network. Other vulnerabilities and threats are important, but beyond our research scope and is not covered in this paper.

The accelerated digital transformation of the banking sector has enhanced the delivery of financial services but simultaneously expanded the cyberattack surface, exposing institutions to advanced persistent threat (APT), zero-day exploit, and obfuscated malware. Conventional perimeter defenses, primarily Layer 3 and 4 firewalls and signature-based intrusion detection systems (IDS), offer insufficient protection against encrypted, evasive, and previously unknown cyberattacks, and frequently generate high false-positive rates that burden Security Operations Center (SOC). This study proposes a multilayered adaptive cybersecurity framework that integrates Layer 7 Next Generation Firewall (NGFW), hybrid Network and Host-based Intrusion Detection and Prevention System (NIDPS/HIDPS), and an AI-driven analysis engine. The framework employs a dual-stage detection architecture, combining Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) for spatial representation learning and Random Forest (RF) classifiers for anomaly decisioning. The model was evaluated using a strategically consolidated dataset derived from CIC-IDS-2017 and UNSW-NB15, specifically isolating cyberattack vectors prevalent in financial infrastructures (e.g., SQL Injection, DDoS, and Brute Force). The model achieves 99.65% detection accuracy and a reduced false-positive rate of 0.35%, significantly outperforming classical SVM and standalone signature-based systems. The results demonstrate that the proposed architecture aligned with NIST and PCI-DSS standard as well as defense-in-depth mechanism suitable for real-time, high-frequency financial environments.

This paper presents Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS), Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems (IDPS) and their classification emphasizing on the use of neural networks in IDS. Contemporary IDS usually include both signature verification and anomaly detection approaches realized by rule-based expert system and statistical module correspondingly. Neural networks may be used mainly as additional module to the statistical module to better recognize the user behavior. User behavior may be represented as frequency pattern of users command history. The paper presents an example of user profile vector for Unix-based platforms.

Intrusion detection and prevention systems (IDPS) are security systems that are used to detect and prevent security threats to computer systems and computer networks. These systems are configured to detect and respond to security threats automatically there by reducing the risk to monitored computers and networks. Intrusion detection and prevention systems use different methodologies such as signature based, anomaly based, stateful protocol analysis, and a hybrid system that combines some or all of the other systems to detect and respond to security threats. The growth of systems that use a combination of methods creates some confusion when trying to choose a methodology and system to deploy. This paper seeks to offer a clear explanation of each methodology and then offer a way to compare these methodologies.

With the rapid expansion of digital networks and the increasing complexity of cyber threats, network security has emerged as a crucial field within information and communications technology (ICT). Modern organizations face growing risks from sophisticated cyber-attacks that threaten the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of critical systems. Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) have become a foundational tool for identifying and mitigating unauthorized access and suspicious activities within networks. These systems are broadly categorized into Signature-Based Intrusion Detection Systems (SIDS), which rely on known threat patterns, and Anomaly-Based Intrusion Detection Systems (AIDS), which detect deviations from normal behavior to identify unknown attacks. Despite their strengths, both types face significant limitations, including high false-positive rates and challenges in real-time detection. This study explores the evolving landscape of network security threats and critically analyzes existing intrusion detection techniques. It highlights the integration of alert correlation and prediction mechanisms that enhance early detection and response capabilities. Furthermore, the study addresses key limitations and challenges in IDS implementation and identifies emerging trends aimed at improving scalability, intelligence, and adaptability of detection mechanisms. By evaluating current systems and proposing directions for future research, this work contributes to the development of more robust and proactive network defense strategies in an increasingly interconnected digital world.

In the context of a computer system, computer security is the prevention of an illicit action against the system. For this purpose, computer security must determine the difference between normal and harmful activities. These activities can come from outside or from inside the system to be protected. In a similar manner, the role of the Human Immune System (HIS) is to detect and defend against harm. This similarity has inspired approaches in the area of computer security, including the use of immune-based approaches to build Intrusion Detection and Response Systems (IDRSs). As a concrete example, this chapter introduces a new approach for Intrusion Detection (ID) and Intrusion Response (IR) to build a completely distributed and decentralised IDRS for use in computer networks. This approach is called Intrusion Detection and Response extended with Agent Mobility, or IDReAM for short. IDReAM combines Mobile Agents (MAs) with two self-organising paradigms inspired by natural life systems. The Intrusion Detection System (IDS) is inspired by the metaphor of the immune system that protects the human body from external threats. Specialised cells of the immune system, called the T cells, travel around the body to detect possible threats by eliminating the proteins that they do not recognise as safe proteins—referred to as non-self proteins. Intrusion Detection Agents (IDAs) roam the network to detect suspicious behaviours in a manner that mimics the behaviour of T cells. The Intrusion Response System (IRS) also borrows mechanisms from the stigmergic paradigm of a colony of ants. At the time of foraging, the ants use the environment to diffuse a chemical substance called the pheromone which traces the route for the other ants from the nest to the source of food. Intrusion Response Agents (IRAs) roam the network to respond to the IDAs’ alerts, mimicking the behaviour of the ants to trace the route to the alert and give the response. The two natural systems exhibit a social behaviour by the organisation of their entities, T cells and ants, which is not possible without the functionality of mobility.KeywordsIntrusion DetectionAgent MobilityIntrusion Detection SystemComputer SecurityHuman Immune SystemThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Attack-aware Security Function Management

Signature-based intrusion detection systems use a set of attack descriptions to analyze event streams, looking for evidence of malicious behavior. If the signatures are expressed in a well-defined language, it is possible to analyze the attack signatures and automatically generate events or series of events that conform to the attack descriptions. This approach has been used in tools whose goal is to force intrusion detection systems to generate a large number of detection alerts. The resulting "alert storm" is used to desensitize intrusion detection system administrators and hide attacks in the event stream. We apply a similar technique to perform testing of intrusion detection systems. Signatures from one intrusion detection system are used as input to an event stream generator that produces randomized synthetic events that match the input signatures. The resulting event stream is then fed to a number of different intrusion detection systems and the results are analyzed. This paper presents the general testing approach and describes the first prototype of a tool, called Mucus, that automatically generates network traffic using the signatures of the Snort network-based intrusion detection system. The paper describes preliminary cross-testing experiments with both an open-source and a commercial tool and reports the results. An evasion attack that was discovered as a result of analyzing the test results is also presented.

Conventional methods of intrusion prevention like firewalls, cryptography techniques or access management schemes, have not provided complete protection to computer systems and networks from refined malwares and attacks. Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) are giving the right solution to the current issues and became an important part of any security management system to detect these threats and will not generate widespread harm. The basic goal of IDS is to detect attacks and their nature that may harm the computer system. Several different approaches for intrusion detection have been reported in the literature. The signature based concept using genetic algorithm as features selection and, J48 as classifier to detect attack is proposed in this paper. The system was evaluated on KDD Cup 99, NSL-KDD and Kyoto 2006+ datasets.