Electromagnetically tracked partial nephrectomy navigation: demonstration of concept

MP72-20 DIFFERENTIAL HEMODYNAMIC AND ANTIHYPERTENSIVE CHANGES AFTER PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY VERSUS RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY

Guideline for Management of the Clinical T1 Renal Mass

A comparison of hospital-based charges following partial and radical nephrectomy

Commentary on “Long-term survival following partial vs. radical nephrectomy among older patients with early-stage kidney cancer.” Tan HJ, Norton, EC, Ye Z, Hafez KS, Gore JL, Miller DC, Dow Division of Health Services Research, Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI: JAMA 2012;307(15):1629–35

Compensatory Hypertrophy after Partial and Radical Nephrectomy in Adults

Study Type - Prognosis (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? At present, many studies have been executed to identify predictors for chronic kidney disease or renal insufficiency after radical nephrectomy or partial nephrectomy. We examined whether preoperative kidney volume is a predictor for renal function after radical or partial nephrectomies in RCC patients. To our knowledge, this is the first study to report on the relationship between preoperative kidney volume and changes in renal function in RCC patients who underwent radical nephrectomy or partial nephrectomy performed by one surgeon. To investigate whether preoperative kidney volume is a prognostic factor for predicting the postoperative glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients. We included 133 patients who underwent radical (n= 83) or partial (n= 50) nephrectomy for RCC. Kidney parenchymal volume was measured using personal computer-based software and GFR was estimated before and after surgery at 6 and 12 months. We evaluated the change in kidney volume after radical and partial nephrectomy and used regression analysis to identify predictors of lower post-surgical GFR at 12 months. The mean volume of the normal side kidney for the radical nephrectomy group increased from 142.4 mL to 166.0 mL (17.2%) and 171.5 mL (21.2%) after surgery at 6 and 12 months, respectively. In the partial nephrectomy group, the volume of the normal side kidney increased from 127.2 mL to 138.8 mL (9.1%) and 140.6 mL (10.9%) after surgery at 6 and 12 months, respectively. The volume of the operated side kidney decreased from 128.5 mL to 102.3 mL (20.1%) and 101.8 (20.6%) after surgery at 6 and 12 months, respectively. In the radical nephrectomy group, older age (P < 0.001), preoperative volume of the normal kidney (P= 0.022) and preoperative GFR for the normal side kidney (P= 0.045) were significant predictors of lower post-surgical GFR at 12 months. In the partial nephrectomy group, older age (P= 0.001) and preoperative volume for both kidneys (P= 0.037) were significant predictors of lower post-surgical GFR at 12 months. Preoperative kidney volume is an independent predictor of GFR in RCC patients who underwent radical or partial nephrectomy.

Trends in Renal Surgery: Robotic Technology is Associated with Increased Use of Partial Nephrectomy

Contemporary Trends in Nephrectomy for Renal Cell Carcinoma in the United States: Results From a Population Based Cohort

Complications After Radical and Partial Nephrectomy as a Function of Age

Re: Prediction of Significant Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Decline after Renal Unit Removal to Aid in the Clinical Choice between Radical and Partial Nephrectomy in Patients with a Renal Mass and Normal Renal Function.

Over the past 20 years, the utility of partial nephrectomy (PN), compared to radical nephrectomy (RN), for the management of localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has progressively increased, particularly for larger and more complex masses. We sought to compare the recurrence-free survival (RFS) outcomes of PN versus RN in a single-institution cohort. Between 2002 and 2017, 228 patients underwent RN or PN for lcT1a-T2b, N0M0 RCC at a single tertiary referral center, performed by five surgeons. The clinical end point result was (local or distant) RFS. Univariate and multivariate (cox regression) models were used to evaluate the association between type of surgery (PN vs. RN) and RFS, in the overall cohort and in a subgroup of patients with cT1b. The median age was 59 (interquartile range [IQR] 48-66), and the median tumor size was 4.5 cm (IQR 3-7). There were 128 PN and 100 RN. Over a median follow-up of 4.2 years (IQR 2.2-6.9), the Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant RFS difference between PN and RN (logrank P = 0.53). On multivariate analysis, pathologic stage ≥T2a, Fuhrman Grade ≥3, and chromophobe histology were associated with a worse RFS. PN was not significantly associated with diminished RFS (Hazard ratio [HR] 1.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-4.3, P = 0.199) in the overall cohort compared to RN. However, in the cT1b subgroup, PN was associated with a significant increase in recurrence compared to RN (HR = 12.4, 95% CI 1.45-133.4, P = 0.038). Our institutional data highlight the possibility of compromise in RFS for clinically localized RCC treated with PN compared to RN, particularly for larger and more complex masses. These data raise concern, especially in light of the nonproven association of survival benefit of PN over RN, warranting future randomized prospective studies for further evaluation.

The R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Score: A Comprehensive Standardized System for Quantitating Renal Tumor Size, Location and Depth

Collaborative Review of Risk Benefit Trade-offs Between Partial and Radical Nephrectomy in the Management of Anatomically Complex Renal Masses

Cytoreductive nephrectomy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is a standard of care. Partial nephrectomy (PN) in the setting of metastatic disease is an uncommon occurrence, and we aimed to characterize its utilization in a modern cohort. The National Cancer Database was reviewed for patients with mRCC from 2010 to 2017. Patients with cTanyNanyM1 who underwent cytoreductive surgery in the form of PN or radical nephrectomy (RN) were compiled. Our primary outcome was survival outcome for patients who underwent PN compared to RN. Secondary outcomes included 30-day readmission, length of stay, and survival outcomes. A total of 13,896 patients with mRCC who underwent cytoreductive surgery were identified. In total, 13,242 underwent RN and 654 underwent PN. The RN population was more likely to have cN positive disease, while the PN population was more likely to have cT1 disease. Length of stay, readmission and 30-day mortality were not significantly different between PN and RN, but overall mortality and 90-day mortality favored PN (p < 0.001). Cox regression for death showed PN with improved overall survival (HR 0.782, p < 0.001). Logistic regression for predictors of cytoreductive PN revealed cT1 and cN0 as significant factors. Overall survival, as seen on KM analysis, identified that PN exhibited improved 2-year (67.1% vs. 52.0%) and 5-year (40.7% vs. 29.2%) overall survival relative to RN (p < 0.001). PN is an infrequent treatment with mRCC and its utilization is stable from 2010 to 2017. Overall survival is significantly better for those undergoing PN, likely due to their favorable oncologic disease characteristics.

MP03-20 ONCOLOGIC OUTCOME AFTER PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY COMPARED WITH RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY FOR PRIMARY RENAL TUMORS IN STAGE T3A