• Home
  • Search
  • Enhancement of prostate cancer diagnosis by machine learning techniques: an algorithm development and validation study.
  • Cite Icon52
  • https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-021-00429-xCopy DOI Icon

Enhancement of prostate cancer diagnosis by machine learning techniques: an algorithm development and validation study.

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

To investigate the value of machine learning(ML) in enhancing prostate cancer(PCa) diagnosis. Consecutive systematic prostate biopsies performed from Jan 2003-June 2017 were used as the training cohort, and prospective biopsies performed from July 2017-November 2019 were used as validation cohort. Men were included if PSA was 0.4-50 ng/mL, and information of digital rectal examination (DRE), Transrectal ultrasound(TRUS) prostate volume, TRUS abnormality were known. Clinically significant PCa(csPCa) was defined as Gleason 3 + 4 or above cancers. Area-under-curve (AUC) of receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) was compared between PSA, PSA density, European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) risk calculator (ERSPC-RC), and various ML techniques using PSA, DRE and TRUS information. ML techniques used included XGBoost, LightGBM, Catboost, Support vector machine (SVM), Logistic regression (LR), and Random Forest (RF), where cost sensitive learning was applied. Training and validation cohorts included 3881 and 778 consecutive men, respectively. RF model performed better than other ML techniques and PSA, PSA density and ERSPC-RC for prediction of PCa or csPCa in the validation cohort. In csPCa prediction, AUC of PSA, PSA density, ERSPC-RC and RF was 0.71, 0.80, 0.83 and 0.88 respectively. At 90-95% sensitivity for csPCa, RF model achieved a negative predictive value (NPV) of 97.5-98.0% and avoided 38.3-52.2% unnecessary biopsies. Decision curve analyses (DCA) showed RF model provided net clinical benefit over PSA, PSA density and ERSPC-RC. By using the same clinical parameters, ML techniques performed better than ERSPC-RC or PSA density in csPCa predictions, and could avoid up to 50% unnecessary biopsies.

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations52

Detection of prostate carcinoma using prostate specific antigen, its density, and the density of the transition zone in Japanese men with intermediate serum prostate specific antigen concentrations.

  • May 15, 1997
  • Cancer
  • Kazuo Gohji +7
  • Research Article
  • Citations9

Risk Factors for Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

  • Jan 30, 2025
  • Journal of medical Internet research
  • Yanqi Kou +18
  • Research Article
  • Citations18

Development and Validation of Machine Learning Models to Predict Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multi-Center Retrospective Radiomics Study.

  • Apr 13, 2022
  • Cancer Control
  • Yafeng Liu +12
  • Research Article
  • Citations6

Prediction of additional hospital days in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery with machine learning methods

  • Jun 11, 2024
  • Computer Assisted Surgery
  • Bin Zhang +10
  • Research Article
  • Citations280

Comparison of Prostate Specific Antigen Concentration Versus Prostate Specific Antigen Density in the Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves

  • Dec 01, 1994
  • Journal of Urology
  • William J Catalona +8
  • Research Article

Predicting Cardiovascular Risk in Patients with Prostate Cancer Receiving Abiraterone or Enzalutamide by Using Machine Learning

  • Nov 01, 2025
  • European Heart Journal
  • D Y Chen +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations40

Prostate specific antigen density in patients with histologically proven prostate carcinoma.

  • Dec 01, 1994
  • Cancer
  • Mark Nishiya +3
  • Research Article

Machine learning–based risk stratification for gastrointestinal bleeding in ICU patients with cirrhosis: evidence from the MIMIC database

  • Jan 01, 2025
  • Frontiers in Medicine
  • Yuxin Duan +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations16

Machine learning predicts portal vein thrombosis after splenectomy in patients with portal hypertension: Comparative analysis of three practical models

  • Aug 28, 2022
  • World Journal of Gastroenterology
  • Jian Li +8
  • Research Article
  • Citations16

Machine Learning to Predict Fascial Dehiscence after Exploratory Laparotomy Surgery

  • Aug 26, 2021
  • Journal of Surgical Research
  • Jacob Cole +5
  • Research Article

A new model for patients with PSA ranging from 4 to 10 ng/ml to reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies and developing a follow-up strategy

  • Apr 15, 2016
  • Chinese Journal of Urology
  • Jie Wu +10
  • Research Article
  • Citations38

Multi-institutional analysis of clinical and imaging risk factors for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in men with PI-RADS 3 lesions.

  • Jul 12, 2022
  • Cancer
  • Andrew M Fang +14
  • Research Article

Detection of prostate cancer--experience of seven years in KMUH and review of literature.

  • Jun 01, 2002
  • The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences
  • Chun-Hsiung Huang +3
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations30

Machine Learning to Predict Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction.

  • Nov 13, 2020
  • Frontiers in Medicine
  • Ling Sun +10
  • Research Article
  • Citations14

Utility of Volume Adjusted Prostate Specific Antigen Density in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in Arab Men

  • Dec 01, 2005
  • International Urology and Nephrology
  • M Sheikh +5
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.