Enhancing Performance and Reliability of Network File System

This paper describes a simple distributed mechanism for caching files among a networked collection of workstations. We have implemented it as part of Sprite, a new operating system being implemented at the University of California at Berkeley. A preliminary version of Sprite is currently running on Sun-2 and Sun-3 workstations, which have about 1-2 MIPS processing power and 4-16 Mbytes of main memory. The system is targeted for workstations like these and newer models likely to become available in the near future; we expect the future machines to have at least five to ten times the processing power and main memory of our current machines, as well as small degrees of multiprocessing. We hope that Sprite will be suitable for networks of up to a few hundred of these workstations. Because of economic and environmental factors, most workstations will not have local disks; instead, large fast disks will be concentrated on a few server machines.

Peer-to-peer (P2P) systems are, in contrast to client-server (C/S) systems, fault-tolerant, robust, and scalable. While C/S distributed file systems, such as NFS (network file system) or SMB (server message block), do not scale with respect to the number of clients and exhibit a single point of failure, P2P file systems have the potential to cope with an increasing number of participants. Thus, this paper presents DRFS (distributed reliable file system), a P2P file system for cooperative environments. DRFS uses random, content-independent identifiers for data storage, while maintaining high performance and low overhead with many concurrent reads and writes. A dynamic replication mechanism ensures data availability, even under high churn. The application scenario considers an office environment, where DRFS is installed on employees' machines, who store and request files. DRFS has been implemented using the Filesystem in Userspace (FUSE) interface, in order to provide users with transparent read and write operations. Experiments show the benefits of such a peer-to-peer architecture, when a small number of peers reads or writes in parallel: DRFS performs better than NFS, as soon as 6 peers read or write in parallel a 32 MB file. For unpopular files, it is also more reliable than IgorFS.

Users rarely consider running network file systems over slow or wide-area networks, as the performance would be unacceptable and the bandwidth consumption too high. Nonetheless, efficient remote file access would often be desirable over such networks---particularly when high latency makes remote login sessions unresponsive. Rather than run interactive programs such as editors remotely, users could run the programs locally and manipulate remote files through the file system. To do so, however, would require a network file system that consumes less bandwidth than most current file systems.This paper presents LBFS, a network file system designed for low-bandwidth networks. LBFS exploits similarities between files or versions of the same file to save bandwidth. It avoids sending data over the network when the same data can already be found in the server's file system or the client's cache. Using this technique in conjunction with conventional compression and caching, LBFS consumes over an order of magnitude less bandwidth than traditional network file systems on common workloads.

This paper presents Kosha, a peer-to-peer (p2p) enhancement for the widely-used Network File System (NFS). Kosha harvests redundant storage space on cluster nodes and user desktops to provide a reliable, shared file system that acts as a large storage with normal NFS semantics. P2p storage systems provide location transparency, mobility transparency, load balancing, and file replication - features that are not available in NFS. On the other hand, NFS provides hierarchical file organization, directory listings, and file permissions, which are missing from p2p storage systems. By blending the strengths of NFS and p2p storage systems, Kosha provides a low overhead storage solution. Our experiments show that compared to unmodified NFS, Kosha introduces a 4.1% fixed overhead and 1.5% additional overhead as nodes are increased from one to eight. For larger number of nodes, the additional overhead increases slowly. Kosha achieves load balancing in distributed directories, and guarantees 99.99% or better file availability.

We develop a holistic framework for adaptively scheduling asynchronous requests in distributed file systems. The system is holistic in that it manages all resources, including network bandwidth, server I/O, server CPU, and client and server memory utilization. It accelerates, defers, or cancels asynchronous requests in order to improve application-perceived performance directly. We employ congestion pricing via online auctions to coordinate the use of system resources by the file system clients so that they can detect shortages and adapt their resource usage. We implement our modifications in the Congestion-Aware Network File System (CA-NFS), an extension to the ubiquitous network file system (NFS). Our experimental result shows that CA-NFS results in a 20% improvement in execution times when compared with NFS for a variety of workloads.

The ubiquitous wireless networks make it become possible for people to access a variety of services anytime and anywhere through mobile devices such as smartphone and tablet. However, due to the diversity and complexity of services, the requirement for storage and computing capacity for mobile devices is becoming higher and higher. Mobile transparent computing is a fit for this scenario. In mobile transparent computing, the client terminal is rather simple and light-weighted, and the operating systems, applications and user data are all regarded as software resources and stored in the server. The resources required in the user services are dynamically scheduled from the server to run on the client terminal in a streaming-block way via wireless network. In mobile transparent computing, we use the NFS (Network File System) protocol to realize the dynamic scheduling of resources. However, the wireless network environment is complex and unstable, and the wireless packet loss rate is high and the retransmission interval of lost packet is long in mobile transparent computing. In order to improve the scheduling efficiency of users' resources and the NFS performance, we analyze the factors that affect the NFS performance, including NFS read/write block size, wireless bandwidth and so on. We study the effect of bandwidth for the NFS performance when several mobile terminals schedule their resources at the same time. Finally, we improve the NFS performance by setting the optimal block size for read/write, and use TCP as our NFS transmission protocol in mobile transparent computing.

Analysis of NGS (Next Generation Sequencing) data is a computationally demanding task requiring large amounts of CPU, memory, and disk space. There is also a requirement for high performance data storage systems, resilient to hardware failure, to be connected directly to the computing infrastructure (typically a multi-node cluster) to store large quantities of NGS data reliably. Traditional shared file systems such as NFS (Network File System) do not offer the performance, scalability or cache coherence required by modern NGS data analysis, so alternatives including GlusterFS, Ceph, and Lustre have been developed. However, there is a trade-off between data safety on replicated local storage and degradation of performance across distributed storage. Resilience to hardware failure is typically provided by RAID (Redundant Array of Independent Disks) and redundant storage nodes. Here we describe the evaluation of an alternative file system, RozoFS ( https://github.com/rozofs/rozofs ) for use with demanding NGS data analysis workloads. We used a synthetic data set (DREAM-TCGA data set 3) to run a complete tumor-normal analysis pipeline (“bcbio”, https://github.com/chapmanb/bcbio-nextgen ), including base quality recalibration, local indel realignment, somatic variant calling, and structural variants as a benchmark to compare RozoFS with a traditional shared file system (NFS) on two different HPC (High Performance Computing; Cloud4CaRE project) clusters. Our results show high reliability and good performance of RozoFS compared to NFS, in particular, during heavy I/O workloads. These findings indicate that the reliability and robustness of RozoFS's make it a good candidate for demanding NGS analysis workloads.

Building a Portable File System for Heterogeneous Clusters

Distributed file systems (DFSs) play important roles in datacenters. Recent advances in persistent memory (PM) and remote direct memory access (RDMA) technologies provide opportunities in enhancing distributed file systems. However, state-of-the-art distributed PM file systems (DPMFSs) still suffer from a duplication problem and a fixed transmission problem, leading to high network latency and low transmission throughput. To tackle these two problems, we propose Zebra, an efficient RDMA-enabled distributed PM file system—Zebra uses a replication group design for alleviating the heavy replication overhead, and leverages a novel transmission protocol for adaptively transmitting file replications among nodes, eliminating the fixed transmission problem. We implement Zebra and evaluate its performance against state-of-the-art distributed file systems on an Intel Optane DC PM platform. The evaluation results show that Zebra outperforms CephFS, GlusterFS, and NFS by 4.38\(\times \), 5.61\(\times \), and 2.71\(\times \) on average in throughput, respectively. KeywordsRDMAAdaptive transmissionPersistent memoryDistributed file system

In this paper, we propose a new paradigm for network file system design, serverless network file systems. While traditional network file systems rely on a central server machine, a serverless system utilizes workstations cooperating as peers to provide all file system services. Any machine in the system can store, cache, or control any block of data. Our approach uses this location independence, in combination with fast local area networks, to provide better performance and scalability than traditional file systems. Further, because any machine in the system can assume the responsibilities of a failed component, our serverless design also provides high availability via redundant data storage. To demonstrate our approach, we have implemented a prototype serverless network file system called xFS. Preliminary performance measurements suggest that our architecture achieves its goal of scalability. For instance, in a 32-node xFS system with 32 active clients, each client receives nearly as much read or write throughput as it would see if it were the only active client.

In the HDFS cloud storage environment, the existing replica strategy is not able to adopt the optimal replica according to the current system environment dynamically, which affects the performance of the Cloud Storage system. This paper aims at the replica selection strategies in the load balancing problem, proposes a Replica Strategy based on grey prediction theory in Cloud Storage and predicts the node load rate of different replicas at a moment, selecting the minimum load node dynamically, eventually to load balance.

Distributed file systems have become popular in recent years. However, they still lack functions for doing fast arbitrary data insertion and truncation. To solve the problem, we present Wofs, an object-based distributed network file system which supports fast arbitrary data insertion and truncation. Wofs splits a file into many small objects, stores these objects in remote file servers, and uses a special B+tree to manage the metadata of these objects. Besides, Wofs uses the object-range locking policy to avoid data incoherence and improve performance.

The performance of a network based computing system that consists of a number of clients and a server, interconnected by a local area network, is studied. Each client represents a diskless or swapful workstation, or an X terminal, and generates application workload using either a conventional UNIX file system or the Network File System (NFS). To characterize the application workload and the effect of the protocol (login, rlogin, NFS), the user interface (workstation, X terminal) and its configuration (memory size, disk storage), a series of measurement experiments was performed in a controlled environment. During each experiment the traffic on the network and the activity on the various system resources were monitored. The measurements obtained are used to parameterize a queuing network model of the system, which is then used to project the performance of the system under various load conditions, to identify system bottlenecks, and to compare design alternatives. >

The issues that must be considered in structuring file storage for very large distributed systems are discussed. The authors describe the distributed file system they are developing, which is called FACE (file system for ACE). The first prototype of FACE consists of a series of enhancements to Sun's network file system (NFS) in order to add a stashing capability. User processes interact with the system call interface to perform file and stashing operations. These operations may be invoked directly by user processes or by the FACE user-level routines. The FACE user-level routines implement diverse facilities to allow users to select the files that will be stashed (or dropped from the stash). The first FACE prototype is being implemented on a Sun 3/50 computer running Suri's Unix 4.2 release 3.3. >

This research paper is a survey of the present state of design and implementation of distributed file systems. In a distributed file system, one or more central servers store files that can be accessed, with proper authorization rights. It consists of four parts: an Introduction of Distributed file system, implementation, architecture and component of distributed file system and their design goals for good distributed file system i.e. transparency – the main goal of good DFS. In this paper we also discuss some distributed file systems like NFS, CIFS, OwFS and HDFS. We explain features, architecture of above file system. This paper also include the criteria for choosing right Distributed file system of our need and recommendation foe right Distributed File System .The above file systems are also compared on the basis of File size, Analytic functionality, TCO and their selection criteria. This research also included the future aspect of distributed file systems like the problem we based in current DFS like transparency and at last the conclusion of the whole paper on the basis of above survey.