Estimation of natural streams longitudinal dispersion coefficient using hybrid evolutionary machine learning model

Developing precise soft computing methods for groundwater management, which includes quality and quantity, is crucial for improving water resources planning and management. In the past 20 years, significant progress has been made in groundwater management using hybrid machine learning (ML) models as artificial intelligence (AI). Although various review articles have reported advances in this field, existing literature must cover groundwater management using hybrid ML. This review article aims to understand the current state-of-the-art hybrid ML models used for groundwater management and the achievements made in this domain. It includes the most cited hybrid ML models employed for groundwater management from 2009 to 2022. It summarises the reviewed papers, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses, the performance criteria employed, and the most highly cited models identified. It is worth noting that the accuracy was significantly enhanced, resulting in a substantial improvement and demonstrating a robust outcome. Additionally, this article outlines recommendations for future research directions to enhance the accuracy of groundwater management, including prediction models and enhance related knowledge.

A Web-based automated manufacturability analyzer and recommender for additive manufacturing (MAR-AM) via a hybrid Machine learning model

Prediction and evaluation of plasma arc reforming of naphthalene using a hybrid machine learning model

Determination of the longitudinal dispersion coefficient (LDC) of a river is needed in studies regarding cleaning the water and protecting its quality when nuclear, chemical or biological contaminants are discharged into the river. This study presents the development of an empirical equation for predicting the longitudinal dispersion coefficient in natural streams. Factors affecting the uniformity of the flow directly affect the LDC. Therefore, the hydraulic radius, defined as the ratio of the wetted area to the wetted perimeter, was considered as an important factor in determining the LDC. The presented equation relates the dispersion coefficient to hydraulic and geometric parameters of the flow, and was derived using dimensional and least squares analysis. The comparison of the predictions using 128 field data sets measured in 41 rivers in the USA has indicated that the proposed equation is reliable in predicting longitudinal dispersion coefficients in natural streams.

Purpose. This study is aimed at introducing a new hybrid machine learning model to enhance the accuracy and speed in detecting botnet attacks in Internet of Things networks. The new model is derived from an integration of decision tree algorithm and feature selection algorithms to produce a novel hybrid machine learning for better performance in IoT botnet detection. Methodology. The study adopts a six steps research methodology. It consists of dataset collection, dataset preprocessing, applying machine learning, comparing feature selection algorithms, combining both machine learning and feature selection algorithms, and finally comparing the results. Findings. A novel hybrid machine learning (ML) model called FoSDeT has been obtained as a result of combination of decision tree algorithm and feature selection algorithm called Forward Selection which shows a significant improvement in IoT botnet detection in comparison to standard decision tree model. Originality. The paper proposes a simple yet powerful hybrid approach which integrates Decision Tree algorithm with two pre-defined feature selection algorithms namely, Forward Selection and Backward Elimination. The new hybrid model called FoSDeT shows a significant enhancement in terms of IoT botnet detection. Practical value. The hybrid model obtained from this study might be used by IT security practitioners in developing real intrusion detection system for defending IoT networks from botnet attacks.

Prediction of longitudinal dispersion coefficient in natural streams by prediction map

Gene expression models for prediction of longitudinal dispersion coefficient in streams

The rapid growth of Internet of Things (IoT) devices across industrial and critical sectors requires robust and efficient authentication mechanisms. Traditional authentication systems struggle to balance security, privacy and computational efficiency, particularly in resource-constrained environments such as Industry 4.0. This research presents the SmartIoT Hybrid Machine Learning (ML) Model, a novel integration of Attribute-Based Authentication and a lightweight machine learning algorithm designed to enhance security while minimising computational overhead. The SmartIoT Hybrid ML Model utilises Random Forest classifiers for real-time anomaly detection, dynamically assessing access requests based on user attributes, login patterns and behavioural analysis. The model enhances identity protection while enabling secure authentication without exposing sensitive information by incorporating privacy-preserving Attribute-Based Credentials and Attribute-Based Signatures. Our experimental evaluation demonstrates 86% authentication accuracy, 88% precision and 96% recall, significantly outperforming existing solutions while maintaining an average response time of 112ms, making it suitable for low-power IoT devices. Comparative analysis with state-of-the-art authentication frameworks shows the model's security resilience, computational efficiency and adaptability in real-world IoT applications.

Machine learning (ML) models provide more choices to patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) to more properly manage blood glucose (BG) levels. However, because of numerous types of ML algorithms, choosing an appropriate model is vitally important. In a systematic review and network meta-analysis, this study aimed to comprehensively assess the performance of ML models in predicting BG levels. In addition, we assessed ML models used to detect and predict adverse BG (hypoglycemia) events by calculating pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Explore databases were systematically searched for studies on predicting BG levels and predicting or detecting adverse BG events using ML models, from inception to November 2022. Studies that assessed the performance of different ML models in predicting or detecting BG levels or adverse BG events of patients with DM were included. Studies with no derivation or performance metrics of ML models were excluded. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool was applied to assess the quality of included studies. Primary outcomes were the relative ranking of ML models for predicting BG levels in different prediction horizons (PHs) and pooled estimates of the sensitivity and specificity of ML models in detecting or predicting adverse BG events. In total, 46 eligible studies were included for meta-analysis. Regarding ML models for predicting BG levels, the means of the absolute root mean square error (RMSE) in a PH of 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes were 18.88 (SD 19.71), 21.40 (SD 12.56), 21.27 (SD 5.17), and 30.01 (SD 7.23) mg/dL, respectively. The neural network model (NNM) showed the highest relative performance in different PHs. Furthermore, the pooled estimates of the positive likelihood ratio and the negative likelihood ratio of ML models were 8.3 (95% CI 5.7-12.0) and 0.31 (95% CI 0.22-0.44), respectively, for predicting hypoglycemia and 2.4 (95% CI 1.6-3.7) and 0.37 (95% CI 0.29-0.46), respectively, for detecting hypoglycemia. Statistically significant high heterogeneity was detected in all subgroups, with different sources of heterogeneity. For predicting precise BG levels, the RMSE increases with a rise in the PH, and the NNM shows the highest relative performance among all the ML models. Meanwhile, current ML models have sufficient ability to predict adverse BG events, while their ability to detect adverse BG events needs to be enhanced. PROSPERO CRD42022375250; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=375250.

In recent years, cardiovascular disease (CVD) has emerged as a leading cause of mortality worldwide, highlighting the urgent need for reliable predictive models to support early diagnosis and preventive care. This study conducts a comparative analysis of various machine learning models to assess CVD risk, focusing on their ability to accurately identify individuals at high risk based on clinical and demographic data. We evaluate multiple supervised learning algorithms, including logistic regression, random forests, support vector classifiers, K-nearest neighbors, gradient boosting, and AdaBoost, comparing their predictive performance in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. Additionally, we propose a novel hybrid model that combines Random Forest (RF) for feature selection and Deep Neural Networks (DNN) for classification, aiming to leverage the strengths of both approaches for more accurate CVD prediction. Our findings demonstrate that ensemble models such as random forests and gradient boosting achieve superior performance, with high accuracy (0.99) and balanced precision and recall values, outperforming simpler models like logistic regression and support vector classifiers. The hybrid model further enhances prediction accuracy, achieving 92.4% accuracy, 91.7% precision, 93.0% recall, and an AUC-ROC score of 96.0%. The analysis also underscores the importance of data preprocessing techniques, including normalization and handling of missing values, in optimizing model accuracy and stability. Notably, K-nearest neighbors also performed exceptionally well with a high F1-score across classes, highlighting its robustness for this task. This study provides a detailed examination of each model's strengths and limitations, including the proposed hybrid model, offering valuable insights for healthcare practitioners and data scientists in selecting effective machine learning models for CVD risk prediction. By integrating these models into healthcare systems, real-time risk prediction can be enhanced, ultimately supporting clinical decision-making and advancing personalized care in cardiovascular health. Keywords— cardiovascular disease, machine learning, risk assessment, predictive models, supervised learning, healthcare

This study focuses on using various machine learning (ML) models to evaluate the shear behaviors of ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) beams reinforced with glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars. The main objective of the study is to predict the shear strength of UHPC beams reinforced with GFRP bars using ML models. We use four different ML models: support vector machine (SVM), artificial neural network (ANN), random forest (R.F.), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost). The experimental database used in the study is acquired from various literature sources and comprises 54 test observations with 11 input features. These input features are likely parameters related to the composition, geometry, and properties of the UHPC beams and GFRP bars. To ensure the ML models' generalizability and scalability, random search methods are utilized to tune the hyperparameters of the algorithms. This tuning process helps improve the performance of the models when predicting the shear strength. The study uses the ACI318M-14 and Eurocode 2 standard building codes to predict the shear capacity behavior of GFRP bars-reinforced UHPC I-shaped beams. The ML models' predictions are compared to the results obtained from these building code standards. According to the findings, the XGBoost model demonstrates the highest predictive test performance among the investigated ML models. The study employs the SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis to assess the significance of each input parameter in the ML models' predictive capabilities. A Taylor diagram is used to statistically compare the accuracy of the ML models. This study concludes that ML models, particularly XGBoost, can effectively predict the shear capacity behavior of GFRP bars-reinforced UHPC I-shaped beams.

Systematic literature review of machine learning based software development effort estimation models

Brown Planthopper (BPH) (Nilaparvata lugens) is a major pest impacting rice production in India, often causing severe yield losses across diverse agro-climatic zones. This study evaluates the predictive capabilities of several statistical and machine learning models using weekly BPH incidence data collected over multiple years from five research stations in Andhra Pradesh (Nellore, Maruteru, Bapatla, Ragolu, and Nandyal). The models tested include the Negative Binomial Integer-Valued Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity (NBINGARCH) model in combination with Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Extreme Learning Machines (ELM), as well as their standalone counterparts. Hybrid models, particularly NBINGARCH-SVR and NBINGARCH-ELM, outperformed standalone models based on Mean Squared Error (MSE) and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) across different locations and seasons. Some models, however, demonstrated signs of overfitting, as evident in elevated testing errors. Climatic variables—temperature, relative humidity, and rainfall—were found to significantly influence BPH dynamics. While the Box-Pierce test confirmed model adequacy in most cases, residual autocorrelation remained in a few, indicating room for further refinement. These results highlight the potential of hybrid modeling approaches for climate-informed BPH forecasting and offer actionable insights for Integrated Pest Management (IPM). Future work may enhance forecasting accuracy by incorporating additional environmental and agronomic parameters.

Accurate estimation of reference evapotranspiration (ETo) plays a vital role in irrigation and water resource planning. The Penman–Monteith method recommended by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO PM56) is widely used and considered a standard to calculate ETo. However, FAO PM56 cannot be used with limited meteorological variables, so it is compulsory to choose an alternative model for ETo estimation, which requires fewer variables. This study built ten machine learning (ML) models based on multi-function, neural network, and tree-based structure against the FAO PM56 method. For this purpose, time series temperature data on a monthly scale are only used to train ML models. The developed ML models were applied to estimate ETo at different test stations and the obtained results were compared with the FAO PM56 method to verify and validate their performance in ETo estimation for the selected stations. In addition, multiple statistical indicators, including root-mean-square error (RMSE), coefficient of determination (R2), mean absolute error (MAE), Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), and correlation coefficient (r) were calculated to compare the performance of each ML model on ETo estimation. Among the applied ML models, the ETo tree boost (TB) ML model outperformed the other ML models in estimating ETo in diverse climatic conditions based on statistical indicators (R2, NSE, r, RMSE, and MAE). Moreover, the observed R2, NSE, and r were the highest for the TB ML model, while RMSE and MAE were found to be the lowest at the study sites compared to other applied ML models. Lastly, ETo point data yielded from the TB ML model was used in an interpolation process to create monthly and annual ETo maps. Based on the ETo maps, this study suggests mainly a focus on areas with high ETo values and proper irrigation scheduling of crops to ensure water sustainability.

Aim: The majority of machine learning (ML) models in healthcare are built on retrospective data, much of which is collected without explicit patient consent for use in artificial intelligence (AI) and ML applications. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate whether clinicians and scientific researchers themselves consent to provide their own data for the training of ML models. Materials and Methods: This survey was conducted through an anonymous online survey, utilizing platforms such as Telegram, LinkedIn, and Viber. The target audience comprised specific international groups, primarily Russian, German, and English-speaking, of clinicians and scientific researchers. These participants ranged in their levels of expertise and experience, from beginners to veterans. The survey centered on a singular, pivotal question: “Do You Consent to the Use of Your Biological and Private Data for Training Machine Learning and AI Models?” Respondents had the option to choose from three responses: “Yes” and “No”. Results: The survey was conducted in January 2024. A total of 119 unique and verified individuals participated in the survey. The results revealed that only 50% of respondents (63 persons) expressed consent to provide their own data for the training of ML and AI models. Conclusion: In the development of ML and AI models, particularly open-source ones, it is crucial to ascertain whether participants are willing to provide their private data. While ML algorithms can transform the nature of data, it is important to remember that the primary owner of this data is the individual. Our findings show that in 50% of the cases, even participants from scientific research and clinical backgrounds – individuals typically accountable for ensuring data quality in AI and ML model development – do not consent to the use of their data in AI and ML settings. This highlights the need for more stringent consent processes and ethical considerations in the utilization of personal data in AI and ML research.