Evaluating virtual reality experience and performance

Extended-Reality Technologies: An Overview of Emerging Applications in Medical Education and Clinical Care.

Immersive technologies such as augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) are increasingly used in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education, yet their effects on student engagement, cognitive load, and transfer of learning remain fragmented. This systematic review synthesized empirical research on AR and VR in STEM learning environments to examine how these technologies influence behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement; intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load; and near- and far-transfer outcomes. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we searched major education and psychology databases for studies involving AR/VR STEM interventions with quantified engagement, cognitive load, or transfer measures. Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria. Across the sample, immersive technologies consistently enhanced student engagement, particularly by increasing interest, enjoyment, and time-on-task, although effects on deeper cognitive engagement were more variable. Augmented reality frequently reduced extraneous cognitive load by integrating digital information directly into physical learning tasks, whereas fully immersive virtual reality sometimes increased overall mental effort when environments were perceptually rich or navigation demands were high. Transfer of learning outcomes was generally positive but modest: most studies reported gains in near transfer, defined here as applying what was learned to tasks or problems that closely resemble the original learning context, while evidence for far transfer, defined as applying learning to novel, more complex, or substantially different situations, was limited and inconsistently assessed. Taken together, the findings indicate that immersive technologies most reliably improve student engagement and near-transfer learning in STEM when instructional design deliberately manages cognitive load, rather than relying on immersion alone to produce learning gains. These results underscore the importance of aligning immersive features with targeted learning goals and providing structured guidance and reflection to support meaningful transfer of learning.

The article presents the outcomes of the research of virtual and augmented reality technologies percularities and the possibility of their implementation in the educational process. The main reasons and technologies of virtual reality in the field of information technologies are determined. The analysis of virtual reality programs has been carried out. To determine the relevance of the implementation of virtual, augmented reality and game simulator technologies into the educational process the survey was created by the authors and conducted remotely among the population of Khmelnytskyi region on the Google Forms. The results of the conducted survey suggest the answers to a number of questions, including whether our society is ready to implement virtual, augmented reality and game simulators into the educational process of future specialists’ training, as the field of virtual reality research continues to expand relentlessly, the integration of VR (Virtual Reality) with various areas of human life continues. In addition to the survey in Google Forms, a survey was also conducted to collect information about currently existing virtual environments, programs and game simulators that can be added to educational components or integrated into other educational systems not only in the field of education (Minecraft, Cooking Simulator, PC Building Simulator 1-2, Google Arts & Culture). It is quite possible to integrate these simulators under the educational components of certain specialized subject areas. The conducted survey makes it possible to assume that users are already ready not only for the integration of virtual environments in the game sphere, but also for the full involvement of virtual technologies and game environments in the application of educational components. VR (Virtual Reality) and AR (Augmented Reality) technologies are gaining popularity in cultural, educational, gaming, business environments and more. The disturbed issues are studied in education, which encourages a deeper insight into the essence of the processes that take place under the influence of the latest information and communication developments.

The perceptual behavior of consumers on a product displayed in the market has a vital role in analyzing the importance given to that product. Therefore, various strategies have been developed to understand this consumer behavior in the selection of products. Immersive technologies like virtual, augmented, and mixed reality are among them. With the foremost feature of immersion in the virtual world and interaction of users with virtual objects, virtual reality, and augmented reality have unlocked their potential in research and a user-friendly tool for analyzing consumer behavior. In addition to these technologies, mixed reality also has a significant role in investigating consumer behavior. Studies on immersive technologies in food applications are vast, hence this review focuses on the applications of virtual, augmented, and mixed reality in the food selection behavior of consumers. The behavioral studies are elicited to develop new products based on consumer needs, to understand the shopping behavior in supermarkets for real-time usage, and to know the influence of emotions in a selection of products. The findings suggest that virtual, augmented, and mixed reality induce immersion of the users in food selection behavioral studies. Information on the technological advancements in the tools used for bringing immersion and interaction are discussed for its futuristic applications in food. Though immersive technology gives users a realistic virtual environment experience, its application in food systems is in the budding stage. More research on human response studies would contribute to its innovative and inevitable application in the future.

Virtual and Augmented reality has established itself in many sectors including education. The virtual is progressively entering the classrooms. MOOCs (Massive Open Online Course), those online interactive lessons available for all, are useful tools to complete the traditional school system. There are also more and more e-learning platforms that propose online lessons and follow-up for any student. Immersive contents appear as playful alternatives to traditional lectures. But, the integration of VR/AR equipment in classrooms raises questions. What is the place of augmented and virtual reality in education and teaching? In order to be able to answer this important question, our article takes place as the result of a literature review on the field of virtual and augmented reality in education. Our objective, first of all, to deepen our knowledge domain in order to provide the necessary answers to « the question », and, secondly, to identify principles that can guide the design of educational artefacts in virtual and augmented reality. The methodology of the literature review is based on the EPPI method (Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and Co-ordinating). Results will be presented by themes such as motivation, immersion, collaboration, and design.

Virtual and Augmented reality has established itself in many sectors including education. The virtual is progressively entering the classrooms. MOOCs (Massive Open Online Course), those online interactive lessons available for all, are useful tools to complete the traditional school system. There are also more and more e-learning platforms that propose online lessons and follow-up for any student. Immersive contents appear as playful alternatives to traditional lectures. However, the integration of VR/AR equipment in classrooms raises questions. What place takes the augmented (AR) and virtual reality (VR) in the modern educational and teaching system? In order to be able to answer this important question, our article takes place as the result of a literature review on the field of virtual and augmented reality in education. Our objective, first of all, to deepen our knowledge domain in order to provide the necessary answers to « the main question », and, secondly, to identify principles that can guide the design of educational artifacts in virtual and augmented reality. The methodology of the literature review is based on the EPPI method (Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and Co-ordinating). Results will be presented by themes such as motivation, immersion, collaboration, and design.

Technologies such as Virtual and Augmented Reality have gained popularity lately. Because of their convenience and accessibility, these technologies have been adopted in various domains. Virtual reality and augmented reality create an immersive experience, enabling 3D visualization of the content. This technology lets you visualize data from different sensors at the same time, overlaying relevant and helpful information over your environment through a headset. In this article, we give a perspective on these technologies from a biomedical engineering standpoint. In this article, we discuss the various technologies of current biomedical engineering. These technologies allow us to move beyond traditional 2D images towards 3D models that can be made visible and manipulated with Augmented and Virtual Reality. The basic applications of biomedical engineering include representation of mechanisms in space and time dimensions and three-dimensional visualizations of difficult structures in anatomy. The article is an attempt to bring the latest results on the benefits of virtual and augmented reality in biomedical engineering.

BackgroundExtended reality, which encompasses virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), and mixed reality (MR), is increasingly used in medical education. Studies assessing the effectiveness of these new educational modalities should measure relevant outcomes using outcome measurement tools with validity evidence.ObjectiveOur aim is to determine the choice of outcomes, measurement instruments, and the use of measurement instruments with validity evidence in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effectiveness of VR, AR, and MR in medical student education.MethodsWe conducted a systematic mapping review. We searched 7 major bibliographic databases from January 1990 to April 2020, and 2 reviewers screened the citations and extracted data independently from the included studies. We report our findings in line with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines.ResultsOf the 126 retrieved RCTs, 115 (91.3%) were on VR and 11 (8.7%) were on AR. No RCT on MR in medical student education was found. Of the 115 studies on VR, 64 (55.6%) were on VR simulators, 30 (26.1%) on screen-based VR, 9 (7.8%) on VR patient simulations, and 12 (10.4%) on VR serious games. Most studies reported only a single outcome and immediate postintervention assessment data. Skills outcome was the most common outcome reported in studies on VR simulators (97%), VR patient simulations (100%), and AR (73%). Knowledge was the most common outcome reported in studies on screen-based VR (80%) and VR serious games (58%). Less common outcomes included participants’ attitudes, satisfaction, cognitive or mental load, learning efficacy, engagement or self-efficacy beliefs, emotional state, competency developed, and patient outcomes. At least one form of validity evidence was found in approximately half of the studies on VR simulators (55%), VR patient simulations (56%), VR serious games (58%), and AR (55%) and in a quarter of the studies on screen-based VR (27%). Most studies used assessment methods that were implemented in a nondigital format, such as paper-based written exercises or in-person assessments where examiners observed performance (72%).ConclusionsRCTs on VR and AR in medical education report a restricted range of outcomes, mostly skills and knowledge. The studies largely report immediate postintervention outcome data and use assessment methods that are in a nondigital format. Future RCTs should include a broader set of outcomes, report on the validity evidence of the measurement instruments used, and explore the use of assessments that are implemented digitally.

Immersive technologies offer an alternative means of presenting and communicating data derived from BIM modeling. Augmented, virtual, and mixed reality technologies allow architects to visualize and interact with digital data, providing a simulation of their physical presence in an architectural structure, and thus a more realistic and interactive approach to various stages of project activities. In fact, immersive technologies can be used throughout the entire life cycle of an architectural project: planning, design, construction, and operation. The aim of research is to identify and systematize data on computer tools using immersive technologies and the prospects for its development in architectural activities. The scientific paper describes three groups of software products based on immersive technologies with BIM modeling support. Each of the groups is based on a particular immersive technology: augmented reality (AR), virtual reality (VR), or mixed reality (MR). The main difference between these technologies is the level of immersion in the virtual environment: AR overlays computer-generated content on the real world; VR content is 100% digital; MR is a digital overlay that allows virtual 3D elements to interact with the real environment. Each group contains different software products: the first group is mostly characterized by mobile applications, since the physical world is supplemented with digital content through the screens of smartphones, tablets, and other compact equipment; the second group includes various plug-ins that integrate into professional tools and improve them in terms of visualization in a virtual environment and the possibility of its research; The third group with mixed reality support is smaller in number of programs, but it is the most promising for the future development of the architectural profession, as it provides an integrated approach to architectural activity by expanding the professional tools.

PT. SPU Palembang is an industrial company that produces Hospital Furniture and Rehabilitation products with the trademark SHIMA. This study aims to reduce the physical and mental workload received by workers in the Machine Shop Department. This research is focused on the production process .Measurement of physical workload uses the calculation of the worker's heart rate by calculating the percentage of Cardiovascular Load (CVL). Measurement of mental workload using the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) score calculation method. The results obtained based on the aspect of NASA-TLX before the proposal almost all workers receive a mental workload with a value of > 80 that is included in the category of heavy mental workloads except Milling-Drilling Workers (4) have a score < 80 in the category of moderate mental workload. After the proposal all workers have a score < 80 so that the mental workload received falls into the medium category. Based on the proposals applied to the Lathe Worker (1) and the Milling-Drilling Worker (4) namely the improvement of work methods in the process of turning, punching, and the proposed holding of a reminder as a tool to remember, the results obtained %CVL from both workers < 30%. Three other workers, although experiencing a decline, remained at > 30%. The category of mental workload received by workers from previously included in the category of heavy mental workload dropped to moderate

Technologies such as (AR) Augmented Reality &(VR) Virtual Reality, which provide immersive digital experiences, interactive environments, simulation, and engagement, have completely changed how we approach learning. However, in order to meet the huge demand in education, these technologies which are still in the emerging stage need to be heavily customized and heavily invested in. This thorough analysis seeks to contextualize the last few years of development of Virtual and Augmented Reality in the Education. For additional study, a total one thousand five hundred and thirty-six articles are chosen using text mining and theme analysis techniques. Based on earlier research on AR and VR in education, hypotheses were developed and are currently being processed and analysed to reveal the current development in literature via Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality, applications, benefits, and future directions. The findings show that wearable technology has contributed significantly to the exponential expansion in the use of Virtual and Augmented Reality in education in recent years. Results also highlight the need for faster adoption and customization of these technologies in educational institutions, based on secondary data. An increasing number of educational applications for the learning process are emerging as Virtual and Augmented Realityexp and quickly. It is advised that researchers stay up to date on the gaps in AR and VR’s Changeover to education &develop practical adaptation strategies to maximize the benefits of these technological development with significant developments in high-speed transmission and processing, AR &VR are developing as Display Platforms for Next Generation for more intimate human-digital interactions. Nonetheless, matching the extraordinary Human Vision Performance while keeping Near the Eye Display module tiny and lightweight presents unprecedented hurdles for optical engineering. Fortunately, new advances in Holographic Optical Elements HOEs and Lithography Enable Devices present novel approaches to overcoming these challenges in Virtual and Augmented Reality which would otherwise be problematic with traditional optics

Taking virtual reality out of the game and into healthcare.

Computational thinking (CT) skills are increasingly important in education to prepare students for the challenges of the digital age. Augmented Reality (AR) and Virtual Reality (VR) have been introduced as immersive technologies that have the potential to enhance CT skills through more interactive learning experiences. However, there is still a gap in understanding the effectiveness of these technologies in supporting the development of CT, particularly in different levels of education and disciplines. Although several studies have highlighted the benefits of AR and VR in education, no systematic review integrates these findings to identify advantages, challenges, and opportunities for further implementation. Therefore, this study conducted a systematic review based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines by analyzing 25 empirical studies (AR=17, VR=8) obtained from the Scopus database (2008-2024). The analysis addresses four key research questions: (1) the current state of AR/VR in CT development, (2) their advantages, (3) implementation challenges, and (4) future research directions. The results show that AR is more widespread than VR at various levels of education, with dominance in higher education followed by secondary and primary schools. Computer science is the main field of application of AR and VR, while AR is also widely applied in mathematics to increase interest and problem-solving. A total of 11 studies reported significant impacts of these technologies on CT, with AR being superior in increasing student motivation and engagement, as well as aiding in problem-solving and debugging. In contrast, VR provides a more immersive learning experience by strengthening concept understanding, especially in programming and recursion. However, several obstacles in the application of AR and VR, such as hardware limitations, costs, and user skills, affect the effectiveness of these technologies in the learning environment. This study also identified potential future research, including the exploration of VR in primary and kindergarten education, the application of VR in non-computer science fields, and the efficient use of these technologies in supporting the CT process. This study provides more precise insights into the optimal ways of utilizing AR and VR in developing CT skills. It is a reference for educators, policymakers, and researchers in supporting CT learning.

Today, virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) are widely used in various fields, especially in computer systems, engineering and medicine. However, it remains one of the main barriers to education due to the high cost of conducting experimental research. This interactive virtual learning is very convenient and effective. Nowadays, it offers great opportunities to improve the quality of education by creating new methods and techniques. Traditionalist methods of substance introduction (fixed video, sound, contents) need personalization and communication. In addition to create a private virtual education environment which allows the students and researchers to get enough learning that is interactive and more visual, where students can learn through experimentation and interactions in the virtual world. There is a requirement for MOOC to grasp propelled learning strategies to give all the more captivating experience to its students. Finally, we create internal avatar model while using in virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) interfaces.KeywordsVirtual reality for educationVirtual reality (VR)Augmented reality (AR)Passive and active learning activity3D primitives3D avatars

This study provides an in-depth analysis of the impact, effectiveness, and future prospects of Augmented Reality (AR) and Virtual Reality (VR) in educational settings. The primary objective was to explore how these immersive technologies are reshaping learning and teaching landscapes. Employing a systematic literature review and content analysis methodology, the research analyzed recent scholarly articles and reports from 2014 to 2024, focusing on AR/VR applications in education. The findings reveal that AR and VR significantly enhance learning experiences by offering immersive, interactive, and engaging environments. These technologies have been shown to improve student engagement, knowledge retention, and skill development. AR enriches traditional educational materials by overlaying digital information onto the real world, while VR facilitates experiential learning in virtual environments. However, challenges such as high costs, technical infrastructure requirements, and content development complexities were identified as barriers to widespread adoption. The study predicts a future where AR and VR technologies will continue to evolve, focusing on enhancing user experience, improving accessibility, and integrating seamlessly into educational curricula. Recommendations for stakeholders, including educators, administrators, and policymakers, emphasize the need for investment in infrastructure, educator training, content development, and collaboration with technology companies. Lastly, AR and VR technologies hold great promise for transforming educational practices. Addressing current challenges and leveraging opportunities will be key to realizing their full potential in enhancing teaching and learning experiences. Continued research and innovation in this field are essential for the effective integration of AR and VR in education. Keywords: Augmented Reality (AR), Virtual Reality (VR), Educational Technology, Immersive Learning.