• Home
  • Search
  • Evaluation and Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Effective Image Classification with Fault-Tolerance
  • https://doi.org/10.54364/aaiml.2024.44174Copy DOI Icon

Evaluation and Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Effective Image Classification with Fault-Tolerance

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Image classification is critical in computer vision, with numerous applications ranging from e-commerce to medical imaging. This study provides a comprehensive evaluation of traditional machine learning algorithms for image classification, implementing and analysing novel fault tolerance mechanisms amongst these algorithms. The authors compared the performance of K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Decision Trees, Random Forest, and XGBoost on both Fashion MNIST and CIFAR-10 datasets. The comparison was extended to include Support Vector Machine (SVM), Logistic Regression, and Naive Bayes classifiers in order to expand the evaluation of these models on the indicated datasets. Key findings demonstrated the superiority of ensemble methods, particularly XGBoost, which achieved 89.31% of accuracy on Fashion MNIST and 54.93% on CIFAR-10, consistently outperforming other models across various configurations. Random Forest exhibited robust performance as the secondbest model, reaching 87.42% and 51.64% of accuracy on the respective datasets. The significant performance gap between datasets demonstrated the challenges that traditional machine learning models face with complex image data. Implementing the fault tolerance framework in this study has also shown a remarkable effectiveness, achieved a 94.6% recovery rate while maintaining model accuracy within 0.1% of standard implementations. This was achieved with minimal computational overhead (2.3% of training time and 1.8% of memory usage), making it highly practical for production deployments. The system significantly reduced operational failures, decreasing crashes from 5.2 to 0.3 per day and increasing average uptime from 4.3 to 12.0 hours. The study also reveals important insights regarding model scalability and resource requirements, with memory usage varying significantly across models (325MB to 8,923MB). These findings provide valuable guidance for practitioners in selecting and implementing machine learning models for image classification tasks, particularly in scenarios where both performance and system reliability are critical. This research contributes to the field by demonstrating the feasibility of implementing robust fault tolerance in machine learning systems without compromising accuracy while also providing comprehensive performance comparisons across different model architectures and dataset complexities. The developed framework serves as a foundation for building more reliable machine-learning systems for real-world applications.

Similar Papers
  • Conference Article
  • Citations35

Machine Learning Algorithms for Classification Geology Data from Well Logging

  • Nov 01, 2018
  • Timur Merembayev +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations17

Efficacy of machine learning image classification for automated occupancy‐based monitoring

  • Jul 10, 2023
  • Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
  • Robert C Lonsinger +3
  • Conference Article
  • Citations1

Machine Learning Classifiers Based on HoG Features Extracted from Locomotive Neutral Section Images

  • Oct 27, 2022
  • Christopher Thembinkosi Mcineka +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations5

An Evaluation of Rule-Based Classification Models Induced by a Fuzzy Method and Two Classic Learning Algorithms

  • Oct 01, 2010
  • M E Cintra +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations14

Machine learning on quantum experimental data toward solving quantum many-body problems

  • Aug 30, 2024
  • Nature Communications
  • Gyungmin Cho +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

A comparative study of machine learning algorithms for thyroid disease classification

  • Feb 28, 2025
  • International Journal of Science and Research Archive
  • Komal
  • Research Article
  • Citations18

Machine Learning Algorithms for Stratigraphy Classification on Uranium Deposits

  • Jan 01, 2019
  • Procedia Computer Science
  • Timur Merembayev +2
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations11

Implementation and Performance Evaluation of Quantum Machine Learning Algorithms for Binary Classification

  • Nov 28, 2024
  • Software
  • Surajudeen Shina Ajibosin +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations67

Feature Extraction Based on Deep Learning for Some Traditional Machine Learning Methods

  • Sep 01, 2018
  • Aykut Cayir +2
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations37

Evaluation of Machine Learning Algorithms for Classification of EEG Signals

  • Jun 30, 2022
  • Technologies
  • Francisco Javier Ramírez-Arias +7
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations7

Anomaly Detection for Consortium Blockchains Based on Machine Learning Classification Algorithm

  • Jan 01, 2020
  • Dongyan Huang +3
  • Book Chapter

Practical Implications of Dequantization on Machine Learning Algorithms: A Survey

  • Jan 01, 2023
  • Vinooth Rao Kulkarni +4
  • Conference Article
  • Citations1

An Investigation on Epileptic Seizure Classification Using Machine Learning and Multiple Feature Selection Strategies

  • May 27, 2022
  • Mohammad Asif Raibag +2
  • Research Article

An Efficient IOT-Malware Classification Model Using Ensemble Machine Learning

  • Mar 31, 2025
  • International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology
  • Mrs K Harini
  • Research Article
  • Citations41

Objective Phenotyping of Root System Architecture Using Image Augmentation and Machine Learning in Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.).

  • Jan 01, 2022
  • Plant Phenomics
  • Zhanyou Xu +5
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.