Evaluation of an adaptation to the Oxford Cognitive Screen for reduced visual acuity: a cohort study

To report the refractive and visual outcomes after implantation of a trifocal, diffractive, hydrophobic intraocular lens (IOL) in Japanese eyes following cataract surgery. A total of 45 eyes implanted with FineVision HP IOLs (Beaver-Visitec International, Inc. USA) were enrolled in this retrospective study. The clinical outcomes assessed after 3-months were refraction and monocular logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (LogMAR) uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA), distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA) at 80 and 66 cm, uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), and distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA) at 40 cm. 97.78% of the eyes were within ±0.50D of spherical equivalent and all of them were within ±1.00D (mean: -0.00±0.22 D, with 75.56% within ±0.13D), while 91.11% of the eyes had ≤0.50D residual astigmatism and all of them had ≤1.00D (mean: -0.08±0.24D, with 88.89% ≤0.25D). UDVA and CDVA showed mean values of -0.05±0.07 logMAR and -0.07±0.06 logMAR, respectively. 86.67% and 95.56% of the eyes had ≥20/20 UDVA and CDVA, respectively, with 100% achieving ≥20/25 for both UDVA and CDVA. At 80 cm, the mean monocular logMAR UIVA and DCIVA were 0.18±0.14 and 0.14±0.14, and at 66 cm the values were 0.20±0.15 and 0.19±0.15, respectively. At 80 cm 20% of the eyes had ≥20/25 DCIVA and 60% had ≥20/32 DCIVA. These values changed to 15.56% and 40% of the eyes at 66 cm. In terms of near vision, the mean monocular logMAR UNVA and DCNVA were 0.04±0.10 and 0.03±0.10, respectively. 53.33% of the eyes had ≥20/20 UNVA and DCNVA, with 86.67% achieving ≥20/25 UNVA and DCNVA. The FineVision HP trifocal diffractive IOL provided accurate refractive outcomes with good visual acuity at different distances in Japanese eyes.

BackgroundCataract and neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) often co-exist and both contribute to impaired vision. It has been debated whether cataract surgery can increase nAMD activity. The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the impact of cataract surgery on visual acuity, treatment intensity for nAMD and macular morphology in patients with on-going treatment for nAMD.MethodsData was obtained from the Swedish Macular Register, the Swedish National Cataract Register, optical coherence tomography (OCT) images and patient charts. All eyes were treated at the Department of Ophthalmology at the County Hospital of Västmanland, Västerås, Sweden. Follow-up was 6 months after surgery. The study was approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority.ResultsIn total, 156 patients (168 eyes) were included. The mean age at cataract surgery was 82 (standard deviation, SD 6) years. Both distance and near visual acuity improved after surgery. Distance visual acuity increased from 59 (SD 12) to 66 (SD 15) letters ETDRS (P < 0.001). Proportion of eyes with normal near visual acuity increased from 12 to 41%. The anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment intensity remained unchanged: mean of 3.4 (SD 1.9) and 3.3 (SD 1.7) treatments were given 6 months pre- and postoperatively, respectively. The prevalence of intraretinal fluid (IRF) in the macula increased from 22 to 31% postoperatively, while subretinal fluid, fluid under the pigment epithelium (sub-RPE fluid) and central retinal thickness were unaltered. In eyes with new IRF, improvement in visual acuity and number of anti-VEGF treatments were similar to eyes without new IRF.ConclusionCataract surgery improved visual acuity in patients with on-going treatment for nAMD and did not affect anti-VEGF treatment intensity. Macular morphology remained unchanged. The slight increase in intraretinal fluid after surgery was not found to affect visual acuity or anti-VEGF treatment intensity. It is hypothesized that this might indicate that it represents degenerative intraretinal cystic fluid.

Evaluation of 3D tablet-based stereoacuity test ASTEROID in children with normal and abnormal visual acuity

Purpose:To compare four different types of intra ocular lenses (IOLs), namely, AT LISA, Eyecryl SERT trifocal, Eyhance, Eyecryl SERT extended depth of focus (EDOF) with respect to their clinical outcomes.Methods:This is a retrospective comparative study in which patients who underwent surgery and one of the four types of IOL were implanted. Postoperative evaluation was recorded at one month, postoperatively. The monocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) (6 m), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) (60 cm), distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (CIVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) (40 cm), and corrected near visual acuity (CNVA) were assessed postoperatively on post operative day 30, for all four IOL groups. Defocus curve and contrast sensitivity were also compared.Results:With regards to UDVA and CDVA, P value was not statistically significant. (P = 0.534 and 0.421, respectively). EDOF group of IOLs had statistically significant better UIVA and CIVA than trifocal IOL group. (P < 0.001, 0.012, <0.001) and EDOF group had statistically significant worse P value pertaining to UNVA and CNVA (P < 0.001, 0.070, <0.001, 0.190). Pertaining to contrast sensitivity, EDOF group had better contrast sensitivity than Trifocal IOL group (P < 0.001).Conclusion:All four IOLs compared in this study had good comparable distant visual acuity. Near visual acuity was better with AT LISA and Eyecryl SERT trifocal IOL while intermediate vision was better with Eyhance and Eyecryl SERT EDOF IOL. Contrast sensitivity was better in EDOF IOLs than in both trifocal IOLs.

Objective: This study aims to characterise the visual acuity and stereoacuity of a sample of Indigenous (Orang Asli) primary schoolchildren. Additionally, the study investigates the relationship between these visual functions and their respective classroom-based assessment. Method: This cross-sectional study was carried out at one indigenous primary school in Petaling District, Selangor. The distance and near visual acuity were measured at 6 meters and 40 cm, using the Snellen Chart and N-notation chart, respectively. The stereoacuity level was measured using the Fly Stereo Acuity Test with Lea Symbols. The continuous Classroom-Based Assessment (Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah) was obtained retrospectively from the school teachers evaluating the mastery level (Tahap Penguasaan) of the schoolchildren. Results and Discussion: In a sample of 44 indigenous primary schoolchildren aged 9 ± 0.1 years from the Suku Temuan, 68.2% achieved habitual binocular distance visual acuity (DVA) of 6/6 or better, while 31.8% had reduced DVA (6/9 or worse). The majority of the students (97.7%, n=43) achieved habitual near visual acuity of N6 or better, with only 2.3% (n=1) achieving N8. In terms of stereoacuity, 52.3% demonstrated good stereoacuity (better than 40 seconds of arc), while 47.7% showed reduced stereoacuity (worse than 40 seconds of arc). Further analysis revealed no significant association between visual acuity or stereoacuity and classroom-based assessment. While the majority of children acquire optimum binocular and near visual acuity, almost one-third (31.8%) exhibit reduced binocular visual acuity, and nearly half (47.7%) have reduced stereoacuity. This indicates the need for routine vision screening programmes to detect and manage visual problems as early as possible. Although no significant link was found between visual function and classroom-based assessment, integrating vision care with educational support can help optimize learning outcomes. Research Implications: Increased community awareness and outreach are essential to promote regular eye examinations and access to corrective measures. Additionally, future research should explore the long-term effects of visual health interventions on academic success, guiding policy development and resource allocation for Indigenous communities. Originality/Value: This study provides valuable insights into the visual status of Indigenous schoolchildren and its potential impact on classroom-based assessment, which had not been reported elsewhere in Malaysia.

Low Luminance Visual Dysfunction as a Predictor of Subsequent Visual Acuity Loss from Geographic Atrophy in Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Impact de l’instillation de collyres mydriatiques sur la mesure d’acuité visuelle de loin chez des patients présentant une DMLA exsudative

Purpose: Maintaining visual acuity in glaucoma patients is an important part of preventing the deterioration of quality of vision. We identified specific areas of the papillomacular bundle (PMB) that were strongly associated with visual acuity, based on en-face images derived from optical coherence topography (OCT) wide scans. Methods: The study recruited 23 eyes of 21 glaucoma patients (age: 61.3 ± 13.0 years, M: F = 9:12, Humphrey field analyzer-measured mean deviation: -19.9 ± 6.5 dB) with good best-corrected visual acuity (20/20 or more) and a remaining PMB with a maximum width no more than half that of the vertical disc diameter. En-face images were derived from 12 × 9 mm wide-scan images made with DRI-OCT (Triton, Topcon). Averaged en-face images were created by identifying the disc center and fovea line (DFL) and aligning it between images. We then measured the frequency of remaining PMB at 10 µm intervals along a vertical line intersecting the DFL at its midpoint. Finally, we used a logistic analysis in a much larger group of patients to identify cases of glaucoma with low BCVA (<20/20). Results: In the averaged en-face image, the residual PMB area appeared as a high-intensity region above the DFL. Analysis showed that residual PMB was most common in an area 830–870 µm above the DFL. The correlation coefficient of residual PMB in this area to BCVA was -0.57 (p < .01), and among OCT parameters in this residual PMB area, the AUC to identify decreased BCVA was highest for ganglion cell complex thickness (0.85, p < .01), with a cutoff of 87.5 µm. Conclusions: This study identified specific areas of the PMB that were associated with BCVA in wide-scan, en-face OCT images from glaucoma patients. This suggests that it may be possible to identify visual impairment during glaucoma treatment by measuring this area.

Relevance: We may encounter cases in which superior knowledge in contactology is necessary. It is not usual, but that does not mean we should forget or stop learning in this branch of optics. Rigid contact lenses will help improve the patient's quality of life, causing as little damage as possible. In addition to the satisfaction obtained, when you restore good visual acuity to a post-LASIK or reduce daytime myopia for a teenager upset by her glasses.Purpose: Good training in the use of contact lenses is essential to be able to deal with slightly more complicated cases that require our help. Being updated on this topic will make us better professionals than we are now and will give us greater prestige.Case reports: The first clinical case is about a middle-aged man who, tired of wearing glasses and at the beginning of presbyopia, no longer wants to wear them, which is why he had surgery. Since the simple solution, soft contact lenses, does not work, rigid contact lenses are placed. Visual acuity improves considerably although carrying comfort is reduced. It is interesting how with the rigid lens we are able to provide good visual acuity in distance and near vision to our patient. In the second case, we can be proud that a teenager can do without her glasses at home and be happy again with their use outside the home, in addition to trying to slow down the growth of her ametropia, which, as we will see, can increase the probability of suffering from some ocular pathologies.Conclusions: We can see two clear examples in which rigid contact lenses open up a large number of options to improve visual acuity and thus the quality of life of our patients. Not recycling ourselves on the subject of contactology may not provide the best solution to our patients' problems.

Background Multifocal lens has become popular in cataract surgery. Short-term outcome after AcrySof ReSTOR Lens implantation had been reported by many studies, but long-term visual performance and the effect of posterior capsular opacification (PCO) on visual performance need further investigation. Methods This retrospective study involved 54 eyes from 41 cataract patients implanted with ReSTOR lens, with a follow-up period of 12 to 31 months. Manifest refraction spherical equivalence (MRSE), monocular uncorrected and best-corrected distance visual acuity, uncorrected and distance-corrected near and intermediate visual acuity, contrast sensitivity were assessed. The effect of PCO on visual performance was evaluated by comparing visual parameters between pre and post-capsulotomy. Results Uncorrected distance visual acuity of eyes with MRSE within ±0.5 diopter (D) was better than those with MRSE greater than ±0.5 D (P &lt;0.05). Uncorrected distance and near visual acuity (LogMAR) was 0.10 and 0.17 respectively. Best corrected distance visual acuity and best distance-corrected near visual acuity (LogMAR) was 0.00 and 0.16, a significant improvement was noted after correction (P=0.000, P=0.001, respectively). Contrast sensitivity logarithm was comparable with the normal value at difference spatial frequencies except at 12 cpd. In 5 eyes with mild PCO, post-capsulotomy visual parameters were better than pre-capsulotomy (P &lt;0.05). Conclusion ReSTOR lens provides a good long-term distance and near vision, functional intermediate vision and contrast sensitivity. Mild PCO significantly affects visual performance and needs early intervention.

To evaluate visual quality of patients implanted with the AcrySof IQ ReSTOR multifocal aspheric intraocular lens. Retrospective study of patients who had implantation of an AcrySof IQ ReSTOR SN6AD3 IOL (Group test) or an AcrySof ReSTOR SN60D3 IOL (Group control). Group test comprised 30 patients (35 eyes) and Group control, 40 patients (56 eyes). Three months postoperatively, uncorrected and best corrected distance visual acuity, uncorrected and best corrected near visual acuity, best corrected intermediate visual acuity, the focus depth, higher order aberration, contrast sensitivity and glare sensitivity were measured in both IOL groups. Patients were orally administered a visual function questionnaire including questions about glare, halos, and other visual discomfort. The percentage of patients with uncorrected near, far and intermediate visual acuity > or = 0.5 in test group was 80% (20/35), 82.9% (29/35) and 45.7% (16/35) respectively, and that of the control group was 76.8% (43/56), 80.4% (45/56) and 39.3% (22/56) respectively. There was no statistical difference of uncorrected visual acuity between two groups (P > 0.05). When compare the best distance corrected near, far and intermediate visual acuity between two groups, we can get the same results (P > 0.05). The contrast sensitivity and glare sensitivity in all frequency sect of group test have been more obviously improved postoperatively than that of group control (P < 0.05). The Z(4, 0), Z(4, 2), S3 + S4 and total S of Zernike coefficients was statistically different (P < 0.05). The other Zernike coefficients and higher order aberration did not differ significantly between the two groups (P > 0.05). There were no statistical difference between two groups in focus depth (P > 0.05). Both groups had no serious glare. Though three eyes felt discomfort of halos in group control, only one eye felt the same phenomenon in group test. AcrySof IQ ReSTOR SN6AD3 intraocular lens has negative spherical aberration by an aspherical design in front surface, which makes it could counteract the positive spherical aberration of cornea. Consequently, IQ ReSTOR IOL gave good high-contrast visual acuity at distance, near and intermediate visual acuity.

Background: Prescribing magnification is typically based on distance or near visual acuity. This presumes a constant minimum angle of visual resolution with working distance and therefore enlargement of an object moved to a shorter working distance (relative distance enlargement). This study examines this premise in a visually impaired population.Methods: Distance letter visual acuity was measured prospectively for 380 low vision patients (distance visual acuity between 0.3 and 2.1 logMAR) over the age of 57 years, along with near word visual acuity at an appropriate distance for near lens additions from +4 D to +20 D. Demographic information, the disease causing low vision, contrast sensitivity, visual field and psychological status were also recorded.Results: Distance letter acuity was significantly related to (r = 0.84) but on average 0.1 ' 0.2 logMAR better (1 ' 2 lines on a logMAR chart) than near word acuity at 25 cm with a +4 D lens addition. In 39.8 per cent of patients, near word acuity was more than 0.1 logMAR worse than distance letter acuity. In 11.0 per cent of subjects, near visual acuity was more than 0.1 logMAR better than distance letter acuity. The group with near word acuity worse than distance letter acuity also had lower contrast sensitivity. The group with near word acuity better than distance letter aculty was less likely to have age‐related macular degeneration. Smaller print size could be read by reducing working distance (achieved by using higher near lens additions) in 86.1 per cent, although not by as much as predicted by geometric progression in 14.5 per cent.Discussion: Although distance letter and near word acuity are highly related, they are on average 1 logMAR line different and this varies significantly between individuals. Near word acuity did not increase linearly with relative distance enlargement in approximately one in seven visually impaired, suggesting that the measurement of visual resolution over a range of working distances will assist appropriate prescribing of magnification aids.

To study the relationship between visual acuity (VA) and the eye's optical quality in subjects with normal and excellent spatial vision. VA ranged from decimal values of 1.0 (20/20) to 2.0 (20/10) when defocus and astigmatism were carefully corrected. In 60 eyes of young subjects, visual and optical performance with the natural pupil were measured. A forced-choice procedure was used to measure tumbling-E high-contrast VA (HCVA) and low-contrast VA (LCVA). Wavefront aberration (WA) was measured using a Hartmann-Shack sensor. The associated point-spread function (PSF) and modulation transfer function (MTF) were also estimated. High-order aberrations (HOA) and several image quality parameters were represented as a function of VA. Subjects were classified into three groups according to their VA, and average optical parameters were calculated. Coma and trefoil vary between 0 and 0.5 mum, and spherical aberration ranges from -0.40 mum to +0.45 mum, with an average value of approximately zero. LCVA is not correlated with any of the aberration terms. Coma and spherical aberration are not correlated with HCVA. However, eyes with trefoil equal to or higher than 0.25 mum have an HCVA less than 1.5. The average optical quality in eyes with HCVA greater than 1.4 is slightly better than in eyes with normal VA. However, some eyes had relatively poor image quality and excellent VA. No significant correlations were found between VA measurements and the optical quality of the eye in young subjects with normal or excellent spatial vision. Some subjects with normal degrees of aberrations attained excellent VA.

Presbyopia occurs when the lens of the eyes loses its elasticity leading to loss of accommodation. The lens may also progress to develop cataract, affecting visual acuity and contrast sensitivity. One option of care for individuals with presbyopia and cataract is the use of multifocal or extended depth of focus intraocular lens (IOL) after cataract surgery. Although trifocal and bifocal IOLs are designed to restore three and two focal points respectively, trifocal lens may be preferable because it restores near, intermediate, and far vision, and may also provide a greater range of useful vision and allow for greater spectacle independence in individuals with presbyopia. To assess the effectiveness and safety of implantation with trifocal versus bifocal IOLs during cataract surgery among participants with presbyopia. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register) (2019, Issue 9); Ovid MEDLINE; Embase.com; PubMed; ClinicalTrials.gov; and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic search for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 26 September 2019. We searched the reference lists of the retrieved articles and the abstracts from the Annual Meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) for the years 2005 to 2015. We included randomized controlled trials that compared trifocal and bifocal IOLs among participants 30 years or older with presbyopia undergoing cataract surgery. We used standard Cochrane methodology. We identified five studies conducted in Europe with a total of 175 participants. All five studies assessed uncorrected distance visual acuity (primary outcome of the review), while some also examined our secondary outcomes including uncorrected near, intermediate, and best-corrected distance visual acuity, as well as contrast sensitivity. Study characteristics All participants had bilateral cataracts with no pre-existing ocular pathologies or ocular surgery. Participants' mean age ranged from 58 to 64 years. Only one study reported on gender of participants, and they were mostly women. We assessed all the included studies as being at unclear risk of bias for most domains. Two studies received financial support from manufacturers of lenses evaluated in this review, and at least one author of another study reported receiving payments for delivering lectures with lens manufacturers. Findings All studies compared trifocal versus bifocal IOL implantation on visual acuity outcomes measured on a LogMAR scale. At one year, trifocal IOL showed no evidence of effect on uncorrected distance visual acuity (mean difference (MD) 0.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.04 to 0.04; I2 = 0%; 2 studies, 107 participants; low-certainty evidence) and uncorrected near visual acuity (MD 0.01, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.06; I2 = 0%; 2 studies, 107 participants; low-certainty evidence). Trifocal IOL implantation may improve uncorrected intermediate visual acuity at one year (MD -0.16, 95% CI -0.22 to -0.10; I2= 0%; 2 studies, 107 participants; low-certainty evidence), but showed no evidence of effect on best-corrected distance visual acuity at one year (MD 0.00, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.04; I2= 0%; 2 studies, 107 participants; low-certainty evidence). No study reported on contrast sensitivity or quality of life at one-year follow-up. Data from one study at three months suggest that contrast sensitivity did not differ between groups under photopic conditions, but may be worse in the trifocal group in one of the four frequencies under mesopic conditions (MD -0.19, 95% CI -0.33 to -0.05; 1 study; I2 = 0%, 25 participants; low-certainty evidence). In two studies, the investigators observed that participants' satisfaction or spectacle independence may be higher in the trifocal group at six months, although another study found no evidence of a difference in participant satisfaction or spectacle independence between groups. Adverse events Adverse events reporting varied among studies. Two studies reported information on adverse events at one year. One study reported that participants showed no intraoperative or postoperative complications, while the other study reported that four eyes (11.4%) in the bifocal and three eyes (7.5%) in the trifocal group developed significant posterior capsular opacification requiring YAG capsulotomy. The certainty of the evidence was low. There is low-certainty of evidence that compared to bifocal IOL, implantation of trifocal IOL may improve uncorrected intermediate visual acuity at one year. However, there is no evidence of a difference between trifocal and bifocal IOL for uncorrected distance visual acuity, uncorrected near visual acuity, and best-corrected visual acuity at one year. Future research should include the comparison of both trifocal IOL and specific bifocal IOLs that correct intermediate visual acuity to evaluate important outcomes such as contrast sensitivity and quality of life.

PurposeTo investigate the postoperative course of patients who explanted a diffractive bifocal intraocular lens (IOL) due to waxy vision and implanted with an extended depth of focus IOL.MethodsThis study evaluated 29 eyes of 25 patients who underwent diffractive bifocal IOL explantation followed by TECNIS Symfony® implantation because of dissatisfaction due to waxy vision at the Takabatake West Eye Clinic between January 2018 and November 2019. The indication criteria for this surgery were patients with uncorrected distance visual acuity of 0.05 logMAR or better, without eye diseases that may affect visual function, and no dissatisfactions about photic phenomena. We investigated patient demographics, uncorrected and corrected visual acuity, manifest refraction, contrast sensitivity, subjective symptoms, time to IOL explantation, explanted IOL type, and spectacle independence.ResultsThe time to the IOL exchange after the initial IOL implantation was 55.3 ± 50.4 days (range: 14–196 days). The logMAR corrected distance visual acuity before and after IOL exchange were −0.13 ± 0.06 and −0.14 ± 0.06, respectively (p = 0.273). After IOL exchange surgery, the area under log contrast sensitivity function increased significantly from 1.07 ± 0.12 to 1.21 ± 0.12 (p < 0.001), and the waxy vision symptoms improved. The spectacle independence rate at the last visit was 88.0%.ConclusionFor patients who complain of waxy vision despite good visual acuity after diffractive bifocal IOL implantation, exchange to extended depth of focus IOL was considered one of the useful surgical options.