• Home
  • Search
  • Evaluation of MicroTally Mitts for Detecting Foodborne Pathogens During Broiler Processing.
  • https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfp.2026.100740Copy DOI Icon

Evaluation of MicroTally Mitts for Detecting Foodborne Pathogens During Broiler Processing.

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Consumption of poultry products continues to rise in the United States, highlighting the importance of mitigating foodborne pathogens during poultry processing. Developing new methodologies to improve the detection of pathogens within processing plants is essential to protect food safety. Growing demand for a more representative sample and desire to improve bacterial detection at low levels have led to the evaluation of new sample collection tools. Our objective was to evaluate one such tool, the MicroTally® Mitt, a polymer fabric that has shown improved microbial recovery in beef trim and turkey carcasses, by comparing it to the traditional carcass or parts rinse method for detecting total aerobic microorganisms (rapid aerobic count; RAC), Enterobacteriaceae (EB), Campylobacter, and Salmonella before and after antimicrobial interventions. Additionally, the mitt was tested for its utility in collecting a composite sample (multi-carcass mitt). Three commercial broiler processing establishments were visited twice. Whole carcass samples were collected at hot rehang (n=150) and post-chill (n=150). Wing samples were collected before and after antimicrobial application (n=136 and n=147, respectively). A total of 233 whole carcass rinses (WCRs), 233 single-carcass mitts (SC-mitts), and 117 multi-carcass mitts (MC-mitts) were collected. As expected, recovery was greatest at hot rehang for all microbial counts (RAC, EB, Campylobacter, and Salmonella) and lowest post-chill. Deep serotyping of Salmonella culture-positive samples (n=100) from hot rehang showed multiple serovars were detected in 53% (20/38) WCR, 58% (22/38) single-carcass mitt, and 50% (12/24) of multi-carcass mitt samples. For all microbial counts, the single-carcass mitt had comparable bacterial recovery to rinses in hot rehang samples. Low bacterial recovery following antimicrobial interventions prevented further sample type comparisons at other processing stages but showed processing intervention efficacy.

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations42

Comparison of neck skin excision and whole carcass rinse sampling methods for microbiological evaluation of broiler carcasses before and after immersion chilling.

  • May 01, 2010
  • Journal of Food Protection
  • N.A Cox +9
  • Research Article
  • Citations30

Temperature and Nutrient Effects on Campylobacter jejuni Attachment on Multispecies Biofilms on Stainless Steel

  • Feb 01, 2008
  • Journal of Food Protection
  • Sheriase Q Sanders +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Numbers ofSalmonella recovered by sponge or low volume whole carcass rinse sampling of inoculated commercial turkey carcasses

  • Jul 16, 2012
  • Poultry Science
  • D.P Smith
  • Research Article
  • Citations23

Ground beef microbiome changes with antimicrobial decontamination interventions and product storage

  • Jun 05, 2019
  • PLoS ONE
  • Margaret D Weinroth +7
  • Research Article
  • Citations56

Effectiveness of Sampling Methods for Salmonella Detection on Processed Broilers

  • May 01, 1978
  • Journal of Food Protection
  • N.A Cox +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations450

From the Cover: Correlation of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157 prevalence in feces, hides, and carcasses of beef cattle during processing

  • Mar 21, 2000
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • R O Elder
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

Efficacy of Antimicrobial Interventions Used in Meat Processing Plants against Antimicrobial Tolerant Non–Antibiotic-Resistant and Antibiotic-Resistant Salmonella on Fresh Beef

  • Aug 01, 2022
  • Journal of Food Protection
  • Norasak Kalchayanand +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations22

Evaluation of Salmonella Biofilm Cell Transfer from Common Food Contact Surfaces to Beef Products

  • Apr 01, 2022
  • Journal of Food Protection
  • Rong Wang +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations53

Efficacy of an Herbal Extract on the Microbiological Quality of Broiler Carcasses During a Simulated Chill

  • Aug 01, 2000
  • Poultry Science
  • J.A Dickens +2
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations11

Genomic Comparison of Eight Closed Genomes of Multidrug-Resistant Salmonella enterica Strains Isolated From Broiler Farms and Processing Plants in Trinidad and Tobago.

  • May 10, 2022
  • Frontiers in Microbiology
  • Meghan Maguire +4
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations29

Listeria Occurrence and Potential Control Strategies in Alternative and Conventional Poultry Processing and Retail

  • May 08, 2019
  • Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
  • Michael J Rothrock +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Use of a Mobile Methodology for the Bio-Mapping of Microbial Indicators and RT-PCR-Based Pathogen Quantification in Commercial Broiler Processing Facilities in Honduras

  • Sep 24, 2024
  • Poultry
  • Gabriela K Betancourt-Barszcz +9
  • PDF
  • Research Article

The diversity of Campylobacter spp. throughout the poultry processing plant

  • May 20, 2021
  • Zoonoses and Public Health
  • Hamdin Abasher A Mohamed +2
  • Dissertation

Contamination of campylobacter isolates from broilers during slaughtering process

  • Jan 01, 2015
  • Suthida Muangnoicharoen
  • Research Article
  • Citations14

Microbial- and Plant-Derived Bioactive Peptides and Their Applications against Foodborne Pathogens: Current Status and Future Prospects.

  • Jan 01, 2024
  • International Journal of Microbiology
  • Anowar Khasru Parvez +8
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.