Evidence-Based Dentistry Update on Silver Diamine Fluoride

This manuscript presents evidence-based guidance on the use of 38 percent silver diamine fluoride (SDF) for dental caries management in children and adolescents, including those with special health care needs. A guideline workgroup formed by the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry developed guidance and an evidence-based recommendation regarding the application of 38 percent SDF to arrest cavitated caries lesions in primary teeth.The basis of the guideline's recommendation is evidence from an existing systematic review "Clinical trials of silver diamine fluoride in arresting caries among children: A systematic review." (JDR Clin Transl Res 2016;1[3]:201-10). A systematic search was conducted in PubMed®/MEDLINE, Embase®, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and gray literature databases to identify randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews reporting on the effect of silver diamine fluoride and address peripheral issues such as adverse effects and cost. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to assess the quality of the evidence and the evidence-to-decision framework was employed to formulate a recommendation.The panel made a conditional recommendation regarding the use of 38 percent SDF for the arrest of cavitated caries lesions in primary teeth as part of a comprehensive caries management program. After taking into consideration the low cost of the treatment and the disease burden of caries, panel members were confident that the benefits of SDF application in the target populations outweigh its possible undesirable effects. Per GRADE, this is a conditional recommendation based on low-quality evidence. Conclusions and practical implications: The guideline intends to inform the clinical practices involving the application of 38 percent SDF to enhance dental caries management outcomes in children and adolescents, including those with special health care needs. These recommended practices are based upon the best available evidence to-date. A 38 percent SDF protocol is included in Appendix II.

Background: Dental caries is a prevalent dental problem affecting primary and permanent teeth. Early demineralization of enamel lesions can be reversed through remineralization. Many studies have focused on caries prevention and disease progression arrest using silver diamine fluoride (SDF). No in vitro studies have compared the remineralization effects of different 38% SDF solutions on artificially demineralized enamel lesions. This study aimed to compare the remineralization potential of three commercial 38% silver diamine fluoride formulations on artificial enamel lesions in primary teeth using a pH cycling model. The hypothesis was as follows: different commercial SDF formulations would exhibit varying remineralization effects, as measured by surface microhardness, due to potential differences in their compositions. Materials and Methods: In this study, 75 primary molars were randomized into five groups (N = 15): I: baseline, II: SDF Riva Star Aqua® 38%, III: Riva Star® 38%, IV: SDF Advantage Arrest® 38%, and V: control. Artificial caries were created by submerging teeth in 10 mL of demineralization solution (pH 4.5) for three days in a light-resistant container, ensuring distinct visual changes in the enamel as per the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS level 2). After pH cycling, all samples underwent a standardized Vickers microhardness test (VMHT) with a 50 g load for 15 s. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test, with a significance level set at p ≤ 0.05. Results: The one-way ANOVA test indicated a significant difference in microhardness among the groups (SDF Riva Star Aqua, SDF Riva Star, and SDF Advantage Arrest), with an F-value of 167.73 and p < 0.001. The post hoc Scheffé test showed that SDF Riva Star Aqua and SDF Riva Star were not significantly different (p = 0.388). However, SDF Advantage Arrest had a significantly higher mean microhardness compared to both groups (p < 0.001). Overall, these results show that SDF Advantage Arrest leads to greater microhardness than SDF Riva Star Aqua or SDF Riva Star. Conclusions: SDF Advantage Arrest showed superior performance among the SDF-treated groups, significantly increasing microhardness compared to SDF Riva Star Aqua and SDF Riva Star. This suggests that SDF Advantage Arrest offers enhanced remineralization and structural strengthening, making it the most effective option for managing demineralized primary teeth. Future research should investigate the long-term performance and mechanisms of these treatments to optimize clinical protocols for preserving primary tooth integrity.

The aim of this 2-arm, parallel-group, 12-mo randomized clinical trial was to compare the effectiveness of semiannual application of 38% silver diamine fluoride (SDF) versus restorative treatment (RT) to manage cavitated caries lesions in primary teeth in a diverse population of children in Michigan. Children aged 2 to 10 y with at least 1 soft cavitated lesion (International Caries Detection and Assessment System 5 or 6) with no pain or signs/symptoms of irreversible pulpitis were recruited and randomly assigned to 2 intervention groups. One random lesion per child received 38% SDF (twice, at a 6-mo interval) or RT. All interventions and assessments were done by calibrated dentists. Primary outcome measures were clinical failure rates: minor (e.g., reversible pulpitis, active/soft lesion or progression, restoration loss or need for replacement/repair, secondary caries) and major (e.g., irreversible pulpitis, abscess, extraction). Parent, child, and provider acceptability was also assessed. Ninety-eight children were enrolled and randomized, with a mean (SD) age of 4.8 y (1.8); 46% were female and their mean dmft + DMFT was 6.3 (3.9). Sixty-nine children were assessed at 12 mo (sample was within the planned 30% attrition rate). There were significantly more teeth with minor failures (SDF = 65%, RT = 23%, P ≤ 0.001) and major failures (SDF = 13%, RT = 3%, P ≤ 0.001) in the SDF group than the RT group; 74% of SDF-treated lesions were hard at 12 mo vs. 57% at 6 mo. Providers stated that SDF was easier, faster, and more preferable than RT (P ≤ 0.001). No significant differences were found in parental satisfaction and acceptability. At 12 mo, children in the RT arm felt significantly (P < 0.05) happier with their tooth appearance and stated that their visit to the dentist hurt less. At 12 mo, SDF-treated lesions had significantly more minor and major failures than RT, suggesting that SDF-treated teeth need to be closely monitored in a population at high caries risk (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02601833). The results of this study can be used by clinicians when deciding whether to restore or apply silver diamine fluoride to cavitated lesions in primary teeth. Information on treatment outcomes and parent, child, and provider acceptability can help guide appropriate treatment decisions and need for monitoring.

The use of silver diamine fluoride (SDF) as a nonsurgical caries management product is growing. Evidence suggests that SDF is very successful in arresting caries. However, a common concern with SDF treatment is the unaesthetic black staining. The purpose of this qualitative study was to determine parents' views following their children's treatment with SDF to manage severe early childhood caries (ECC). Parents were interviewed as part of a mixed-method study of SDF to arrest severe ECC. Children with caries lesions in primary teeth were treated with 2 applications of 38% SDF, followed by fluoride varnish. Semistructured in-person and phone interviews were conducted with 19 parents of children in the study. Data were transcribed verbatim and manually coded and uploaded to NVivo 12 for further coding analysis. None of the parents had previously heard about SDF, and they learned about it from the study dentist. Although parents trusted the dentist's information on SDF, they welcomed additional evidence, especially relating to product safety and effectiveness. Some parents were minimally concerned with the black staining caused by SDF treatment. It was more important that SDF arrested caries progression, minimized pain and sensitivity, and prevented dental infection. However, some parents expressed concerns related to the unaesthetic black staining. Interestingly, many parents indicated that their children were not overly concerned with the black staining. A majority of parents said that they would recommend the treatment to others. This is the first qualitative study involving parents of children who were treated with SDF. Most parents were accepting of SDF as a nonsurgical treatment to arrest caries and minimize dentinal sensitivity secondary to caries, although some expressed concern about the black staining in anterior teeth. It is important to adequately inform parents of the negative aesthetic consequences and obtain informed consent before treatment. This qualitative study revealed that many parents of children with severe ECC are accepting of SDF as a nonrestorative caries management option, despite the black staining of caries lesions. Dental professionals need to be aware of these parental concerns and obtain written informed consent prior to treatment. Parents also requested more information and resources on SDF on its benefits, effectiveness, and any associated risks.

BackgroundUsing silver diamine fluoride (SDF) for caries management has raised dentists’ interests in Southeast Asia (SEA). However, information about the teaching of SDF in dental schools in SEA is limited. Therefore, this survey aimed to describe the extent to which SDF had been introduced into the education of undergraduate students in the dental schools in SEA.MethodsAn online questionnaire survey was conducted on the duration, method, contents, and barriers regarding the teaching of SDF. Teachers in charge of undergraduate program in pediatric dentistry and those in community dentistry in all the 90 dental schools in SEA were approached and we required each department to reply once only. Descriptive statistics and Chi-square test were used to describe and assess the differences between the two departments in the teaching of SDF.ResultsA total of 81 responses from the departments of 49 schools were received, giving a school-level response rate of 54% (49/90). SDF was taught in the undergraduate program in 86% (42/49) of the respondent schools, and 50% (21/42) of these schools had included SDF in the teaching for five or more years. Almost all (98%) of the departments taught SDF through lectures. Furthermore, 55% of them adopted SDF in clinical practice. Regarding the teaching content, the use of SDF for arresting cavitated caries lesion was the most commonly covered (82–97%), followed by for arresting early noncavitated lesions (69–82%), for preventing new caries development (66–79%) and for treating dental hypersensitivity (77%). There were variations in the post-treatment instruction taught. For the departments not teaching SDF, the most common reason (10/19, 53%) was that SDF was not available.ConclusionSDF is covered in the undergraduate program in most of the dental schools in SEA. The use of SDF to arrest cavitated caries lesions in primary teeth is usually taught. However, other applications of SDF, such as for prevention of caries and treatment of dental hypersensitivity, are less commonly mentioned in the teaching.

Objective The aims of this study were to investigate the antibacterial and cytotoxic effects of silver diamine fluoride (SDF) on periodontal pathogens and human skin constructs, respectively. Background SDF has been proven to have bactericidal effects on cariogenic bacteria. No studies to date evaluated the bactericidal effects of SDF on periodontal pathogens nor its effect on epithelium and fibroblasts. Methods Streptococcus mutans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans were cultured in monospecies biofilms, exposed to increasing concentrations of SDF and inoculated on agar plates to assess viability. Human gingival fibroblasts in 2D cultures were exposed to 1 μL of 0.394% of SDF and viewed using real-time imaging. Finally, SDF was applied to human, 3D tissue scaffolds of fibroblasts and keratinocytes, and termed human skin equivalents (HSE). A clinical dose of 38% SDF was applied, and HSE were cultured for 12 hours, 1, 3, 5, and 10 days. The tissue was observed clinically and histologically with hematoxylin and eosin staining and TUNEL. Results S. mutans and A. actinomycetemcomitans growth was completely inhibited using all dilutions of SDF, whereas P. gingivalis was still viable with 0.197% and 0.098% of SDF. Single-layer fibroblasts experienced immediate necrosis upon contact with SDF. Application of SDF to HSE showed maturation of a whitish lesion within 24 hours, followed by pigmented, crusted tissue after 3 days. Histological evaluation of treated tissues showed apoptotic cells in the epithelium and upper half of the connective tissue. Conclusion Our data suggest that SDF has bactericidal properties against two periodontal pathogens: P. gingivalis and A. actinomycetemcomitans. SDF caused immediate necrosis of monolayer fibroblasts, but does not extend to the full extent of layered fibroblasts in HSE.

ABSTRACTBackground:Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) has emerged as an effective, noninvasive treatment for arresting dental caries. While its use has been extensively studied in pediatric populations, there is limited evidence regarding its effectiveness in adults.Materials and Methods:This prospective study was conducted on 100 adult patients aged 25–60 years with active caries lesions in posterior teeth. Participants were randomly divided into two groups: the experimental group received a single application of 38% SDF, while the control group received standard fluoride varnish. Caries arrest was assessed using visual-tactile examination and scored using the International Caries Detection and Assessment System criteria at baseline, 1 month, and 6 months. Patient satisfaction and side effects were also documented. Statistical analysis was performed using paired t-tests and Chi-square tests, with a significance level set at P < 0.05.Results:After 6 months, 85% of caries lesions in the SDF group were arrested, compared to 45% in the fluoride varnish group (P < 0.001). Patient satisfaction scores were significantly higher in the SDF group, with a mean score of 4.7 compared to 3.5 in the control group. Minor side effects, such as temporary staining, were observed in 90% of SDF-treated teeth but were deemed acceptable by patients.Conclusion:The application of 38% SDF is highly effective in arresting caries in adult patients and provides a promising, minimally invasive treatment option. Although tooth staining remains a common side effect, its clinical benefits outweigh aesthetic concerns, making it a valuable tool in caries management.

Silver Diamine Fluoride Staining With Potassium Iodide: A Prospective Cohort Study

Compared with CR, there were lower numbers of failures with HT and SE in the primary dentition, and with SE and SW in the permanent dentition. Most studies showed high risk of bias and limited precision of estimates due to small sample size and typically limited numbers of failures, resulting in assessments of low or very low certainty of evidence for most comparisons.

Controlling caries in exposed root surfaces with silver diamine fluoride: A systematic review with meta-analysis

To identify the effect of silver diamine fluoride in adhesion and microleakage of a pit and fissure sealant to tooth enamel. An in vitro study including 120 human molars without caries, and caries grade 1 was performed. Molars were randomly divided into four groups. Occlusal surfaces of groups 2 and 4 were sealed. In groups 1 and 3 silver diamine fluoride (SDF) was placed in the occlusal surface and then molars were sealed according to manufacturer's instructions. Afterwards, all groups were submitted to the adhesion test. Groups 1 and 2 were placed in a forming cylinder and their roots were submerged in polymethyl methacrylate after that they were stored in deionised water (37°C ± 1). Subsequently, they were tested by applying a tractional load (Instron machine, speed cross of 1mm/min). Sealant adhesion was evaluated through: Resistance to the detachment (MPa), residues of sealant area (mm2) and adhesive remaining index (ARI) (0-3 interval). Microleakage test: Groups 3 and 4 were placed in a plastic container and subjected to 2000 cycles at different temperatures one at 6°C ± 1 and the other at 60°C ± 1. Later the occlusal surface was immersed for 24h in 1% toluidine blue. Microleakage was observed by optical microscopy (10×) and was interpreted in micrometres. Of the samples without SDF 18.1 and 23.0% of the sealant remaining and of the samples with SDF present 100% of sealant remaining on enamel. Samples with SDF obtained an average in the test of detachment of 6.89 ± 3.09MPa, whereas in the group without SDF the average obtained was 6.42 ± 3.35MPa. Differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.579). Most of the samples not treated with SDF (81.6%) showed microleakage than those treated with SDF in which 47% presented microleakage. There is an improvement in the retention properties of a fissure sealant applied after treatment with silver diamine fluoride. The application of fissure sealant to improve the aesthetics of teeth treated with SDF is recommended.

Silver diamine fluoride is a topical technique licensed for sensitivity but which can be used for caries arrest off label. There is a long history of its use internationally, but relatively recent licensing arrangements in North America and Europe have led to a renewed interest and an evolving evidence base. This includes evidence of its efficacy in the arrest of caries in primary teeth and root caries in permanent teeth. These updates have implications for clinical indications and techniques employed when using SDF. SDF is listed as a World Health Organization essential medicine. It was recently included in the Scottish Dental Clinical Effectiveness Programme guideline on caries management and prevention in children. CPD/Clinical Relevance: This article gives an overview of the updated evidence base for silver diamine fluoride.

Caries-arresting effects of silver diamine fluoride and sodium fluoride on dentine caries lesions

BackgroundTooth decay is a significant public health problem globally. The caries-arrest effectiveness of 38% silver diamine fluoride (SDF) has been well documented. However, information on the caries-preventive effect of SDF on primary teeth is insufficient.ObjectiveThe aim of this trial is to investigate the effectiveness of semiannual application of 38% SDF and that of 5% sodium fluoride (NaF) varnish when compared with placebo control for preventing occlusal caries in the primary molars of preschool children over 30 months.MethodsThis 3-arm, parallel design, double-blind, randomized controlled trial involves 791 preschool children. Children are randomly allocated to receive 1 of 3 interventions as follows: Group 1, 38% SDF; Group 2, 5% NaF varnish; and Group 3, placebo control (tonic water). The intervention and dental examination will be carried out every 6 months. A parent-administered questionnaire, including the children’s demographic background and oral health–related behaviors, has been collected at baseline. Follow-up examinations to detect new caries development will be conducted every 6 months by a masked examiner. Caries development will be diagnosed at the cavitation level. Chi-square tests and logistic regression analyses will be adopted. A 2-level logistic regression analysis will be performed to investigate the effects of the study interventions and other potential confounding factors on the development of occlusal caries.ResultsThis study was started on September 1, 2020, and the recruitment process ended on September 30, 2021. At present, a total of 791 children are participating in the study. This 30-month clinical trial is expected to be completed in March 2024.ConclusionsIf SDF application is more effective than NaF varnish for preventing caries on occlusal surfaces of primary teeth, it can be a preferred choice for caries prevention in a kindergarten-based program. Results of this trial will provide valuable clinical evidence for the development of oral health strategies and policies on the promotion of child oral health.Trial RegistrationHKU Clinical Registry HKUCTR-2844, https://tinyurl.com/bdhz9yuk; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05084001, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05084001International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)DERR1-10.2196/35145

Antibacterial effects of silver diamine fluoride, potassium iodide and nanosilver fluoride on dual-species biofilm