Evolutionary algorithm with parallel evaluation strategy using constrained penalty-based boundary intersection

Constrained multiobjective optimization problems (CMOPs) widely exist in real-world applications, and they are challenging for conventional evolutionary algorithms (EAs) due to the existence of multiple constraints and objectives. When the number of objectives or decision variables is scaled up in CMOPs, the performance of EAs may degenerate dramatically and may fail to obtain any feasible solutions. To address this issue, we propose a paired offspring generation-based multiobjective EA for constrained large-scale optimization. The general idea is to emphasize the role of offspring generation in reproducing some promising feasible or useful infeasible offspring solutions. We first adopt a small set of reference vectors for constructing several subpopulations with a fixed number of neighborhood solutions. Then, a pairing strategy is adopted to determine some pairwise parent solutions for offspring generation. Consequently, the pairwise parent solutions, which could be infeasible, may guide the generation of well-converged solutions to cross the infeasible region(s) effectively. The proposed algorithm is evaluated on CMOPs with up to 1000 decision variables and ten objectives. Moreover, each component in the proposed algorithm is examined in terms of its effect on the overall algorithmic performance. Experimental results on a variety of existing and our tailored test problems demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm in constrained large-scale multiobjective optimization.

MOEA/UE: A novel multi-objective evolutionary algorithm using a uniformly evolving scheme

A multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for steady-state constrained multi-objective optimization problems

A multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) approach for multi-objective economic load dispatch problem in power system is presented in this paper. The economic load dispatch problem is a non-linear constrained multi-objective optimization problem. The proposed MOPSO approach handles the problem as a multi-objective problem with competing and non-commensurable fuel cost, emission and system loss objectives and has a diversity-preserving mechanism using an external memory (call “repository”) and a geographically-based approach to find widely different Pareto-optimal solutions. In addition, fuzzy set theory is employed to extract the best compromise solution. Several optimization runs of the proposed MOPSO approach were carried out on the standard IEEE 30-bus test system. The results revealed the capabilities of the proposed MOPSO approach to generate well-distributed Pareto-optimal non-dominated solutions of multi-objective economic load dispatch. Comparison with Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithm (MOEA) showed the superiority of the proposed MOPSO approach and confirmed its potential for solving multi-objective economic load dispatch.

An Enhanced multi-objective evolutionary optimization algorithm based on decomposition (E-MOEA-D) proposed for optimal placement of Distributed Generation (DG) and Electric Vehicle (EV) Fast Charging Station (FCS) in distribution system. The diversity of the evolutionary algorithm improves the convergence and diverse solution in the process of evolutionary optimization. The proposed algorithm is improved using enhanced diversity algorithm, which yield diverse candidate solutions in population. The optimal placement of DGs and FCS are formulated using three objective functions as i) Active power loss ii) Voltage deviation iii) DG cost. The proposed algorithm is simulated on IEEE-33 bus distribution system. The proposed algorithm is compared with other competitive multi-objective evolutionary algorithms such as decomposition based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA-D) and Non-dominated sorting multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (NSGA-II).

The two primary goals of a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA) for solving multi-objective optimization problems are to search as much non-dominated solutions as possible towards the true Pareto front and to maintain diversity of Pareto optimal solutions along tradeoff curves. This study presents a new hybrid MOEA, the niched Pareto tabu search combined with genetic algorithm (NPTSGA), to find Pareto-optimal solutions to multi-objective optimization problems. The NPTSGA is developed on the thoughts of integrating genetic algorithm (GA) with the improved tabu search (TS) based MOEA, niched Pareto tabu search (NPTS). The proposed NPTSGA is then tested through a simple test example and compared with other two techniques, NPTS and niched Pareto genetic algorithm (NPGA). Computational results indicate that the proposed NPTSGA is an efficient and effective method for solving multi-objective problems, while keeping the balance between the intensification of non-domination to the true Pareto-optimal solutions (TPS) and the diversification of the near Pareto-optimal solutions (NPS) along the tradeoff curves.

Push and pull search embedded in an M2M framework for solving constrained multi-objective optimization problems

This paper proposes an improved epsilon constraint-handling mechanism, and combines it with a decomposition-based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA/D) to solve constrained multi-objective optimization problems (CMOPs). The proposed constrained multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (CMOEA) is named MOEA/D-IEpsilon. It adjusts the epsilon level dynamically according to the ratio of feasible to total solutions (RFS) in the current population. In order to evaluate the performance of MOEA/D-IEpsilon, a new set of CMOPs with two and three objectives is designed, having large infeasible regions (relative to the feasible regions), and they are called LIR-CMOPs. Then the fourteen benchmarks, including LIR-CMOP1-14, are used to test MOEA/D-IEpsilon and four other decomposition-based CMOEAs, including MOEA/D-Epsilon, MOEA/D-SR, MOEA/D-CDP and C-MOEA/D. The experimental results indicate that MOEA/D-IEpsilon is significantly better than the other four CMOEAs on all of the test instances, which shows that MOEA/D-IEpsilon is more suitable for solving CMOPs with large infeasible regions. Furthermore, a real-world problem, namely the robot gripper optimization problem, is used to test the five CMOEAs. The experimental results demonstrate that MOEA/D-IEpsilon also outperforms the other four CMOEAs on this problem.

In this paper, we design a set of multi-objective constrained optimization problems (MCOPs) and propose a new repair operator to address them. The proposed repair operator is used to fix the solutions that violate the box constraints. More specifically, it employs a reversed correction strategy that can effectively avoid the population falling into local optimum. In addition, we integrate the proposed repair operator into two classical multi-objective evolutionary algorithms MOEA/D and NSGA-II. The proposed repair operator is compared with other two kinds of commonly used repair operators on benchmark problems CTPs and MCOPs. The experiment results demonstrate that our proposed approach is very effective in terms of convergence and diversity.

Generally, constraint-handling techniques are designed for evolutionary algorithms to solve Constrained Multiobjective Optimization Problems (CMOPs). Most Multiojective Particle Swarm Optimization (MOPSO) designs adopt these existing constraint-handling techniques to deal with CMOPs. In this chapter, the authors present a constrained MOPSO in which the information related to particles' infeasibility and feasibility status is utilized effectively to guide the particles to search for feasible solutions and to improve the quality of the optimal solution found. The updating of personal best archive is based on the particles' Pareto ranks and their constraint violations. The infeasible global best archive is adopted to store infeasible nondominated solutions. The acceleration constants are adjusted depending on the personal bests' and selected global bests' infeasibility and feasibility statuses. The personal bests' feasibility statuses are integrated to estimate the mutation rate in the mutation procedure. The simulation results indicate that the proposed constrained MOPSO is highly competitive in solving selected benchmark problems.

Highly constrained multiobjective optimization problems (HCMOPs) refer to constrained multiobjective optimization problems (CMOPs) with complex constraints and small feasible regions, which are commonly encountered in many real-world applications. Current constraint-handling techniques will face two difficulties when dealing with HCMOPs: 1) feasible solution is hard to be found and too much search effort is spent in locating the feasible region and 2) since the total feasible region of an HCMOP can consist of several disconnected subregions, the search process might be stuck in the comparatively larger feasible subregion, which does not contain the whole Pareto front (PF). To address these two issues, an evolutionary algorithm with constraint relaxation strategy based on differential evolution algorithm, that is, CRS-DE, is proposed in this article. In each generation, the CRS-DE relaxes the constraints by dividing the infeasible solutions into two subpopulations based on total constraint violation, that is, the ``semifeasible'' subpopulation (SF) and ``infeasible'' subpopulation (IF), respectively. The SF provides information on the promising regions of finding the feasible solution and is the driving force for convergence toward the PF, while the IF focuses on global exploration for new promising regions. Corresponding reproduction and selection strategies are devised for the SF, IF, and feasible subpopulations, which create a clear division of labor with cooperation to facilitate the search for feasible solutions. To leverage the influence of CRS and prevent the population from premature convergence, a mobility restriction mechanism is developed to restrict the individuals in the SF and IF from entering the feasible subpopulation and enhance the diversity of the whole population. Comprehensive experiments on a series of benchmark test problems and a real-world CMOP demonstrate the competitiveness of our method compared with other representative algorithms in terms of effectiveness and reliability in finding a set of well-distributed optimal solutions for HCMOPs.

A dual-population algorithm based on alternative evolution and degeneration for solving constrained multi-objective optimization problems

In this paper, a special nonlinear bilevel programming problem (nonlinear BLPP) is transformed into an equivalent single objective nonlinear programming problem. To solve the equivalent problem effectively, we first construct a specific optimization problem with two objectives. By solving the specific problem, we can decrease the leader's objective value, identify the quality of any feasible solution from infeasible solutions and the quality of two feasible solutions for the equivalent single objective optimization problem, force the infeasible solutions moving toward the feasible region, and improve the feasible solutions gradually. We then propose a new constraint-handling scheme and a specific-design crossover operator. The new constraint-handling scheme can make the individuals satisfy all linear constraints exactly and the nonlinear constraints approximately. The crossover operator can generate high quality potential offspring. Based on the constraint-handling scheme and the crossover operator, we propose a new evolutionary algorithm and prove its global convergence. A distinguishing feature of the algorithm is that it can be used to handle nonlinear BLPPs with nondifferentiable leader's objective functions. Finally, simulations on 31 benchmark problems, 12 of which have nondifferentiable leader's objective functions, are made and the results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm.

Handling constraints in evolutionary algorithms (EAs) is a challenging issue, since an EA does not handle constraints directly. Thus, developing a heuristic that can guide the search toward feasible and good-performing solutions has become a topic of considerable interest in the field of evolutionary computation in recent years. If a heuristic is applied that is not appropriate or properly fine-tuned, the EA may converge on infeasible solutions, or on feasible solutions with poor objective function values. This paper presents a new constraint-handling technique based on stochastic tournament selection (STS). The performance of this technique is compared to various other constraint-handling techniques applied to a genetic algorithm(GA-) based irrigation canal management problem. The problem involves finding an efficient strategy of irrigation canal network operations that can minimize the total water consumed while preventing problems such as water shortage and flooding. The most common way to handle constraints in EAs is to incorporate penalty functions into the fitness criterion to degrade the fitness of solutions that violate one or more constraints. Alternative techniques have also been reported in the literature, including multiobjective optimization techniques that treat the constraints in single objective problems as additional objectives and stochastic techniques. This paper investigates the performance of five constraint-handling techniques (four techniques from the literature, and the new proposed STS technique). Three scenarios of the case study, with different levels of difficulty and different numbers of constraints, are tested. A comparison of the performances is made to help provide guidelines for the most promising constraint-handling techniques for EA-based management of water supply and irrigation canal operations, based on the level of difficulty of the problem. Copyright ASCE 2006 World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2006 2

Broad learning approach to Surrogate-Assisted Multi-Objective evolutionary fuzzy clustering algorithm based on reference points for color image segmentation