• Home
  • Search
  • Exploring local search in winner determination problem
  • https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-007-0033-7Copy DOI Icon

Exploring local search in winner determination problem

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

In Combinatorial Auctions, multiple goods (items) are available for auction simultaneously, and bidders bid for combinations of goods called bundles. In the single unit combinatorial auction problem, there is only single unit of each item present and the items are considered to be indivisible. This forms the supply side constraint resulting in a need by the seller to decide on which bundles to allocate for maximizing the revenue. Determining these winning bundles is an NP-complete problem and is known by the name of Winner Determination Problem (WDP) in literature. Combinatorial auction mechanism has a wide range of practical applications such as allocation of railroads, auction of adjacent pieces of real estate, auction of airport landing slots, distributed job shop scheduling etc. The optimal heuristic search algorithms like CASS and CABOB proposed for solving the WDP take a lot of CPU time for solving large problem instances. Though these algorithms give optimal solutions, they would be useful only in scenarios where time is not at all a constraint, and the bidding is a one time affair. This poses a limitation in conducting combinatorial auctions with multiple rounds of bidding and hence hinders the widespread use of combinatorial auctions on the patterns of traditional English auction and internet auctions. Thus faster solution of WDP holds the key to widespread use and popularity of combinatorial auctions. This paper attempts to address the above issue, and proposes a simple local search technique LSWDP (Local Search for Winner Determination Problem) that runs very fast and provides solutions quite close to optimal for a number of applications. It also outputs optimal solutions in many instances taking only a fraction of the CPU time taken by CASS. In addition LSWDP was found to outperform the anytime algorithm CASS given a time cutoff. This paper also presents an enhancement called LSCN (Local Search using Complimentary Neighborhood) that provides still better solutions in terms of close to optimal behavior and achieves a much better strike rate in hitting optimal solutions. LSCN runs slower than LSWDP but still takes only a fraction of the CPU time taken by CASS thus encouraging the use of local search for combinatorial auctions. Finally, an extension to multi-partition search has been proposed and analyzed.

Similar Papers
  • Research Article

Exploring new patterns and mechanisms for advanced information technology and systems in the internet-era: introduction to the WITS’05 special issue

  • Oct 24, 2007
  • Information Technology and Management
  • Taedong Han +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Exact Algorithms for the Matrix Bid Auction

  • Jan 01, 2007
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Dries Goossens +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations3

English

  • Jan 01, 2010
  • İBrahim Cereci +1
  • PDF
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations1

Parallelisation and Application of AD 3 as a Method for Solving Large Scale Combinatorial Auctions

  • Jan 01, 2015
  • Francisco Cruz-Mencia +4
  • Conference Article
  • Citations2

Solving the Winner Determination Problem by a distributed genetic algorithm

  • Mar 01, 2012
  • Terje Kristensen +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations23

A Fast Graph Neural Network-Based Method for Winner Determination in Multi-Unit Combinatorial Auctions

  • Dec 23, 2020
  • IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing
  • Mengyuan Lee +4
  • Research Article

Adaptive bidding in combinatorial auctions in dynamic markets

  • Jul 14, 2011
  • Evolving Systems
  • Xin Sui +1
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations4

A Brokering Algorithm for Cost & QoS-Based Winner Determination in Combinatorial Auctions

  • Jan 01, 2000
  • Aneurin M Easwaran +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations1

A combinatorial auctions perspective on min-sum scheduling problems

  • Aug 01, 2013
  • Yunpeng Pan
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations2

An Immune Partheno-Genetic Algorithm for Winner Determination in Combinatorial Auctions

  • Jan 01, 2005
  • Jiancong Bai +2
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations10

Solving the winner determination problem with discounted bids in transportation auctions

  • Jun 29, 2023
  • Annals of Operations Research
  • Chefi Triki +2
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations2

Cloud Resource Combinatorial Double Auction Algorithm Based on Genetic Algorithm and Simulated Annealing

  • Jan 01, 2017
  • Lecture notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering
  • Bing Hu +3
  • Conference Article
  • Citations7

How to strike a balance between local search and global search in multiobjective memetic algorithms for multiobjective 0/1 knapsack problems

  • Jun 01, 2013
  • Hisao Ishibuchi +3
  • Conference Article
  • Citations6

An Equilibrium-Based Approach for Determining Winners in Combinatorial Auctions

  • May 01, 2011
  • Chenkun Tsung +2
  • Book Chapter

Solids - A Combinatorial Auction for a Housing Corporation

  • Jan 01, 2012
  • Lecture notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering
  • Dries R Goossens +2
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.