• Home
  • Search
  • Exploring the tradeoff between data privacy and utility with a clinical data analysis use case
  • Cite Icon11
  • https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-024-02545-9Copy DOI Icon

Exploring the tradeoff between data privacy and utility with a clinical data analysis use case

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Highlights & Summary
  • PDF
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

BackgroundSecuring adequate data privacy is critical for the productive utilization of data. De-identification, involving masking or replacing specific values in a dataset, could damage the dataset’s utility. However, finding a reasonable balance between data privacy and utility is not straightforward. Nonetheless, few studies investigated how data de-identification efforts affect data analysis results. This study aimed to demonstrate the effect of different de-identification methods on a dataset’s utility with a clinical analytic use case and assess the feasibility of finding a workable tradeoff between data privacy and utility.MethodsPredictive modeling of emergency department length of stay was used as a data analysis use case. A logistic regression model was developed with 1155 patient cases extracted from a clinical data warehouse of an academic medical center located in Seoul, South Korea. Nineteen de-identified datasets were generated based on various de-identification configurations using ARX, an open-source software for anonymizing sensitive personal data. The variable distributions and prediction results were compared between the de-identified datasets and the original dataset. We examined the association between data privacy and utility to determine whether it is feasible to identify a viable tradeoff between the two.ResultsAll 19 de-identification scenarios significantly decreased re-identification risk. Nevertheless, the de-identification processes resulted in record suppression and complete masking of variables used as predictors, thereby compromising dataset utility. A significant correlation was observed only between the re-identification reduction rates and the ARX utility scores.ConclusionsAs the importance of health data analysis increases, so does the need for effective privacy protection methods. While existing guidelines provide a basis for de-identifying datasets, achieving a balance between high privacy and utility is a complex task that requires understanding the data’s intended use and involving input from data users. This approach could help find a suitable compromise between data privacy and utility.

Loading PDF

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Towards an Integrated Approach for Preserving Data Utility, Privacy and Fairness

  • Dec 30, 2022
  • 2018 International Conference on Multidisciplinary Research
  • Mortaza S Bargh +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Vietnam: Data Privacy in a Communist ASEAN State

  • Apr 20, 2021
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Graham Greenleaf
  • Research Article
  • Citations26

Personal big data pricing method based on differential privacy

  • Nov 01, 2021
  • Computers & Security
  • Yuncheng Shen +7
  • Conference Article

Sensitivity Support in Data Privacy Algorithms

  • Aug 26, 2022
  • Geocey Shejy +1
  • Discussion
  • Citations1

Big Data, Big Expectations, and Big Judgements.

  • Oct 01, 2022
  • Canadian Journal of Cardiology
  • James M Brophy
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations18

Limits of data anonymity: lack of public awareness risks trust in health system activities

  • Jul 26, 2021
  • Life Sciences, Society and Policy
  • Felix Gille +1
  • Research Article

ADT

  • Jul 01, 2021
  • International Journal of Information Security and Privacy
  • Vartika Puri +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations5

Efficient perturbation techniques for preserving privacy of multivariate sensitive data

  • Oct 06, 2023
  • Array
  • Mahbubur Rahman +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations18

A classification module in data masking framework for Business Intelligence platform in healthcare

  • Oct 01, 2016
  • Osama Ali +1
  • Research Article

Modified Algorithm for Privacy Preservation of Gathered Data

  • Oct 16, 2023
  • Tuijin Jishu/Journal of Propulsion Technology
  • Sachin Sharma, Navodit Nain, Kunal Tewatia, Jatin Kumar
  • Research Article
  • Citations18

Medication for Opioid Use Disorder During Pregnancy — Maternal and Infant Network to Understand Outcomes Associated with Use of Medication for Opioid Use Disorder During Pregnancy (MAT-LINK), 2014–2021

  • May 05, 2023
  • MMWR Surveillance Summaries
  • Kathryn Miele +24
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Decentralized Privacy-Preserving Platform for Clinical Data Sharing and Analysis.

  • Jan 01, 2019
  • Studies in health technology and informatics
  • Sui Jun Tong +4
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations5

Designing Contracts for Trading Private and Heterogeneous Data Using a Biased Differentially Private Algorithm

  • Jan 01, 2021
  • IEEE Access
  • Mohammad Mahdi Khalili +2
  • PDF
  • Discussion
  • Citations2

Security Concerns to Be Considered When Downloading Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Sexually Transmitted Disease Related Smartphone Applications

  • Oct 07, 2013
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Savita Lorreta Brito-Mutunayagam +1
  • Research Article

Raising the Stakes: Creating an International Sanction to Generate Corporate Compliance with Data Privacy Laws

  • May 01, 2019
  • Columbia Business Law Review
  • Jonathan Trebble-Greening
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.