Extended versus limited pelvic lymph node dissection and long-term outcomes in high-risk prostate cancer before radiotherapy.

Standard versus limited pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer in patients with a predicted probability of nodal metastasis greater than 1%: Touijer K, Rabbani F, Otero JR, Secin FP, Eastham JA, Scardino PT, Guillonneau B, Sidney Kimmel Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

• To assess, in a risk/benefit analysis, the additional risk for complications and benefits of extending the indications and anatomical limits of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). • In total, 971 consecutive patients with clinically localized prostate cancer underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy from 2003-2007. • Before 1 February 2005, patients with a nomogram probability of lymph node invasion (LNI) <2% did not undergo PLND (No PLND group), whereas those with a LNI ≥ 2% had a PLND limited to the external iliac nodal group (limited PLND group). • After 1 February 2005, all patients underwent a standard PLND including the external iliac, hypogastric and obturator fossa nodal groups (standard PLND group). • The risk parameters were PLND-related complications and operating time. Complications were graded using a modified Clavien classification. The benefit was the detection of nodal metastases. • In the subgroup of patients with a LNI ≥ 2%, standard PLND was a superior operation than the limited PLND in detecting nodal metastases (14.3% vs 4.5%, respectively; P = 0.003). • The risk/benefit of standard vs limited PLND would be one additional grade 3 complication per 20 additional patients with nodal metastases. In the subgroup of patients with LNI <2%, three patients (1.0%) had positive nodes after a standard PLND. • The risk/benefit of standard PLND vs no PLND would be one additional grade 3 complication per three or four additional patients with nodal metastasis. The no PLND group was associated with the lowest risk of grade 1, 2 and 3 complications compared to either the limited or standard PLND groups (P < 0.001). • In patients with LNI ≥ 2%, standard PLND detects more nodal metastasis. PLND is associated with higher but non-prohibitive complications rate. • The present study found no evidence that the incidence of complications would be reduced by a limited PLND.

RADICAL CYSTECTOMY: EXTENDING THE LIMITS OF PELVIC LYMPH NODE DISSECTION IMPROVES SURVIVAL FOR PATIENTS WITH BLADDER CANCER CONFINED TO THE BLADDER WALL

To identify which high-risk patients with prostate cancer may harbour favourable pathological outcomes at radical prostatectomy (RP). We evaluated 810 patients with high-risk prostate cancer, defined as having one or more of the following: PSA level of >20ng/mL, Gleason score ≥8, clinical stage ≥T2c. Patients underwent robot-assisted RP (RARP) with pelvic lymph node dissection, between 2003 and 2012, in one centre. Only 1.6% (13/810) of patients received any adjuvant treatment. Favourable pathological outcome was defined as specimen-confined disease (SCD; pT2-T3a, node negative, and negative surgical margins) at RARP-specimen. Logistic regression models were used to test the relationship among all available predicators and harbouring SCD. A logistic regression coefficient-based nomogram was constructed and internally validated using 200 bootstrap resamples. Kaplan-Meier method estimated biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free and cancer-specific mortality (CSM)-free survival rates, after stratification according to pathological disease status. Overall, 55.2% patients harboured SCD at RARP. At multivariable analysis, PSA level, clinical stage, primary/secondary Gleason scores, and maximum percentage tumour quartiles were all independent predictors of SCD (all P < 0.04). A nomogram based on these variables showed 76% discrimination accuracy in predicting SCD, and very favourable calibration characteristics. Patients with SCD had significantly higher 8-year BCR- (72.7% vs 31.7%, P < 0.001) and CSM-free survival rates (100% vs 86.9%, P < 0.001) than patients with non-SCD. We developed a novel nomogram predicting SCD at RARP. Patients with SCD achieved favourable long-term BCR- and CSM-free survival rates after RARP. The nomogram may be used to support clinical decision-making, and aid in selection of patients with high-risk prostate cancer most likely to benefit from RARP.

We tested relationship between pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) status at the time of radical prostatectomy (RP) and survival in prostate cancer (PCa) patients. Overall, 127,824 PCa patients treated with RP between 1988 and 2006 were included. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate the impact of PLND status (pN0 vs. pNx vs. pN1) on cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and overall mortality (OM) rates. In pT2 patients, the 5-, 10-, and 15-year CSM rates were: 0.4%, 1.7%, and 3.9% for pN0, 0.6%, 2.5%, and 4.7% for pNx, 2.7%, 11.9%, and 20.6% for pN1 patients (all P < 0.001). The 5-, 10-, and 15-year OM rates were: 5.4%, 16.3%, and 34.5% for pN0, 6.1%, 18.2%, and 35.3% for pNx, 11.5%, 32.7%, and 53.4% for pN1 (all P < 0.001). In multivariable analyses, pNx and pN1 stage increased CSM rate, respectively by 1.3- and 3.8-fold (both P < 0.001) relative to pN0. Similarly, pNx and pN1 increased OM rate respectively by 1.1- and 1.6-fold (both P < 0.001) relative to pN0. In pT3 patients, pNx stage did not significantly increase CSM or OM rates relative to pN0 (both P > 0.05). Patients with localized PCa treated with RP without a PLND (pNx) have less favorable survival rate than their counterparts that do not harbor lymph node invasion at PLND. However, the difference is modest (0.8% at 10 years). In consequence, the related costs and benefits of this procedure should be weighted carefully. In addition, the survival benefit of PLND was not observed in locally advanced PCa patients.

5088 Background: To assess the predictive value of pre-operative PSMA-PET staging for biochemical recurrence (BCR) free-survival (BCR-FS) in patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) with intermediate-risk (IR) to high-risk (HR) prostate cancer (PCa) included in the prospective trial used for the FDA approval of 68Ga-PSMA-11. Methods: This is a post-hoc follow-up study of the efficacy analysis cohort included in the multicenter prospective phase 3 imaging trial (n = 764; NCT03368547, NCT02611882, NCT02919111) which assessed the diagnostic accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET for pelvic nodal metastasis detection prior to RP and PLND in patients with IR and HR PCa. Each PSMA-PET scan was read by three blinded independent readers. Readers assessed the presence of PCa (positive vs negative) by region: prostate bed (T), pelvic lymph nodes (N), extra-pelvic lymph nodes (M1a) bone (M1b) and visceral (M1c). A centralized per-region majority rule was used in case of disagreement. The surgical pathology report was used to assess the presence of pelvic lymph node metastasis by histopathology (pN0 vs pN1). The patients were followed up for biochemical progression after RP by the local investigators using electronic medical records. BCR was defined by a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level &gt; 0.2 ng/ml after RP or an initiation of PCa specific adjuvant/salvage therapy. Pairwise comparisons using Log-Rank test was performed to evaluate BCR-FS between the pre-operative PSMA scan reads (N0M0 vs. N+ and/or M+) and the histopathology status (pN0 vs. pN1). Results: From December 2015 to December 2019, a total of 764 patients were enrolled in the trial. 277/764 (36%) underwent RP after PSMA-PET. Clinical follow-up was obtained in 240/277 (87%) patients. The median age was 67 years (interquartile range, 61-71 years). The median follow-up time from RP was 21.4 months (IQR: 8.80 - 31.53). One hundred BCR events (41%) were observed, and 98/240 patients underwent salvage therapy or other treatment (40.6%). The BCR-FS was 24.3 (IQR: 7.8 - 48.8) in the whole cohort. 160/240 (66%), 28/240 (11.6%), 39/240 (16%), 13/240 (5.4%) patients were pN0/PSMA- (N0 and M0), pN+/PSMA+ (N+ and/or M+), pN+/PSMA-, and pN0/PSMA+, respectively. BCR-FS was higher in PSMA- than in PSMA+ patients (33 vs 7.3 months; p &lt; 0.0001). BCR-FS was higher in pN0/PSMA- than in patients pN+/PSMA-, pN0/PSMA+ and pN+/PSMA+: 46 months vs 12.3, 11.7, and 3, respectively (p &lt; 0.001). BCR-FS did not significantly differ between pN0/PSMA+ and pN+/PSMA- (11.7 vs 12.3; p = 0.64). Conclusions: PSMA PET staging information is predictive of BCR-FS after RP. Patients with extra-prostatic disease detected by pre-operative PSMA-PET scan have a high risk of biochemical relapse. Clinical trial information: NCT03368547.

Oncologic Outcome after Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: 10 Years of Experience

How Many Prostate Cancer–bearing Lymph Nodes Did We Miss in the Past?

Avoiding Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Men With High-risk Prostate Cancer: The Role of Radical Prostatectomy as Initial Treatment

MP56-06 ASSOCIATION BETWEEN PROVIDER-LEVEL FACTORS AND LYMPH NODE DISSECTION OUTCOMES DURING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: A NATIONAL CANCER DATABASE ANALYSIS

Comparison of oncological outcomes between extended and no pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with high- or very high-risk prostate cancer: a multi-institutional study

Adverse Features and Competing Risk Mortality in Patients With High-Risk Prostate Cancer

PEARLS: Is Our Use of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography Meaningful for Our Patients?

For decades, pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) has been performed at the time of radical prostatectomy (RP) as a lymph node (LN) staging procedure in prostate cancer (PCa) patients. However, growing evidence suggests that PLND might not be an accurate tool for predicting lymph node invasion (LNI). Recently, Mattei and colleagues examined the primary prostate lymphatic drainage sites in PCa patients.1 In their report, they defined “limited PLND” as the removal of LNs along the external iliac vein and obturator nerve; they reported that this dissection missed up to 62% of the primary LNs. Similarly, the extended PLND area, which also included LNs medial and lateral to the internal iliac vein, missed up to 37% of the primary LNs. The authors suggested a new “super extended” PLND area, which additionally includes the LNs along the common iliac vessels up to the ureteric crossing. However, the authors found that even this “super extended” PLND missed 25% of the primary LNs.1 Consequently, the authors concluded that the removal of all primary LNs is not feasible in all or even most patients because of cost, time, extent of surgery and risk of complications. It is noteworthy that the complication rate after PLND may be up to 51%;2 the complication rate appears to be associated with increasing the extent of the dissection.3,4 These findings question the usefulness of PLND as a staging procedure in PCa patients. Moreover, these findings indicate the need to develop more accurate and, possibly less invasive, staging tools.

Outcomes of Primary Lymph Node Staging of Intermediate and High Risk Prostate Cancer with 68Ga-PSMA Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography Compared to Histological Correlation of Pelvic Lymph Node Pathology.