Extending the global reliability sensitivity analysis to the systems under double-stochastic uncertainty

The aim of this article is to study the reliability analysis, parametric reliability sensitivity analysis and global reliability sensitivity analysis of structures with extremely rare failure events. First, the global reliability sensitivity indices are restudied, and we show that the total effect index can also be interpreted as the effect of randomly copying each individual input variable on the failure surface. Second, a new method, denoted as Active learning Kriging Markov Chain Monte Carlo (AK-MCMC), is developed for adaptively approximating the failure surface with active learning Kriging surrogate model as well as dynamically updated Monte Carlo or Markov chain Monte Carlo populations. Third, the AK-MCMC procedure combined with the quasi-optimal importance sampling procedure is extended for estimating the failure probability and the parametric reliability sensitivity and global reliability sensitivity indices. For estimating the global reliability sensitivity indices, two new importance sampling estimators are derived. The AK-MCMC procedure can be regarded as a combination of the classical Monte Carlo Simulation (AK-MCS) and subset simulation procedures, but it is much more effective when applied to extremely rare failure events. Results of test examples show that the proposed method can accurately and robustly estimate the extremely small failure probability (e.g. 1e–9) as well as the related parametric reliability sensitivity and global reliability sensitivity indices with several dozens of function calls.

A novel method for global reliability sensitivity analysis by adaptive bivariate multiplicative dimensional reduction integral

Efficient sampling methods for global reliability sensitivity analysis

The importance sampling method is an extensively used numerical simulation method in reliability analysis. In this paper, a modification to the importance sampling method (ISM) is proposed, and the modified ISM divides the sample set of input variables into different subsets based on the contributive weight of the importance sample defined in this paper and the maximum super-sphere denoted by β-sphere in the safe domain defined by the truncated ISM. By this proposed modification, only samples with large contributive weight and locating outside of the β-sphere need to call the limit state function. This amelioration remarkably reduces the number of limit state function evaluations required in the simulation procedure, and it doesn’t sacrifice the precision of the results by controlling the level of relative error. Based on this modified ISM and the space-partition idea in variance-based sensitivity analysis, the global reliability sensitivity indices can be estimated as byproducts, which is especially useful for reliability-based design optimization. This process of estimating the global reliability sensitivity indices only needs the sample points used in reliability analysis and is independent of the dimensionality of input variables. A roof truss structure and a composite cantilever beam structure are analyzed by the modified ISM. The results demonstrate the efficiency, accuracy, and robustness of the proposed method.

Copula-based methods for global sensitivity analysis with correlated random variables and stochastic processes under incomplete probability information

ABSTRACTPROSAIL is a combination of the leaf optical properties spectra (PROSPECT) model and the scattering by arbitrarily inclined leaves (SAIL) canopy bidirectional reflectance model. When modelling forest canopy reflectance using the PROSAIL radiative transfer model, the sensitivities of parameters can affect the modelling accuracy. Traditionally, sensitivities have been assessed using local sensitivity analysis (LSA); however, drawbacks to this approach include a lack of consideration for coupled effects between different parameters. In this study, parameter sensitivities in the PROSAIL model were calculated using two global sensitivity analysis (GSA) methods (the Extended Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Test (EFAST) method and the Morris method), field measurements, and Landsat 5 Thematic Mapper (TM) data for a Moso bamboo forest. The results of GSA were compared with those of LSA in order to identify the key parameters impacting the Moso bamboo forest canopy reflectance, and to provide a reference for model optimization and vegetation canopy inversion improvement. The results showed that: (1) the sensitivities of six major input parameters of the PROSAIL model were generally consistent with the sorting orders of the two GSA methods, but were not in accordance with those from the LSA method, especially in the mid-infrared band; (2) coupled effects among parameters acting on reflectance simulation in visible light bands were greater than those in infrared bands; (3) the simulated canopy reflectance was evaluated using Landsat 5 TM data, and the results simulated based on LSA analysis showed higher error than those based on GSA analysis, because the LSA method ignored the influence of some parameters on canopy reflectance, e.g. leaf mesophyll structure (N), average leaf angle (ALA), leaf water content (Cw), and leaf dry matter content (Cm). However, GSA was able to fully consider the coupled effects among parameters, and thus identified the sensitive parameters impacting on reflectance more accurately.

Sensitivity analysis is used to find the key variables which have significant effect on system reliability. For a product in early design stage, it is impossible to collect sufficient samples. Thus, the probabilistic-based reliability sensitivity analysis methods are difficult to use due to the requirement of probability distribution. As an alternative, interval can be used because it only requires few samples. In this study, an effective global non-probabilistic sensitivity analysis based on adaptive Kriging model is proposed. The global accuracy Kriging model is constructed to reduce overall computational cost. Subsequently, the global non-probabilistic sensitivity analysis method is developed. Compared to existing non-probabilistic sensitivity analysis methods, the proposed method is a global non-probabilistic reliability sensitivity analysis method. The proposed method is easy to use and does not require probability distribution of the input variables. The applicability of proposed method is demonstrated via two examples.

Identifying sensitive sources and key control handles for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from wastewater treatment

Global Sensitivity Analysis of Arrhythmic Risk Biomarkers in Cardiac Single Cell Models

Global sensitivity analysis and uncertainty quantification of soot formation in an n-dodecane spray flame

Despite being a common procedure, abdominal hernia treatments still require improvement due to the number of relapses and other postoperative issues. In silico testing can be employed to predict the behavior of the complex abdominal wall and implant systems. Here, uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis are required in order to optimize the parameters of hernia repair models. This paper concerns the modeling of an abdominal wall and implant using the finite element method. A Gasser-Ogden-Holzapfel (GOH) material model is used for the abdominal wall and an orthotropic material model for the implant. The parameters of the GOH model and the orientation of the implant are assumed to be uncertain. Regression-based polynomial chaos expansion is used as a meta-modeling method for uncertainty propagation and global sensitivity analysis. The maximum force in the connection between the implant and native tissue is considered as the quantity of interest. A failure risk criterion is also defined and presented. It has been found that the significance of the material parameters depends on the type of implant that is analyzed. Likewise, the risk of connection failure varies considerably depending on the implant used. Models with different types of implant produce very diverse results. Moreover, these differences also appear in the global sensitivity index and the risk of connection failure. This would indicate that specific implant designs and material properties are crucial to the success of hernia repair surgery.

Intelligent sensitivity analysis framework based on machine learning for spacecraft thermal design

Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of cooling and heating loads for building energy planning

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models describe the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of chemicals. Probabilistic PBPK models can be used to produce distributional estimates of human equivalent doses (HEDs), which are external measures of human exposure predicted to result in a target internal dose, generated with Monte Carlo sampling and reverse dosimetry calculations. Very low HED percentiles represent individuals that are more sensitive to possible adverse effects of chemical exposures and are therefore frequently used in risk evaluation. Details of the parameter distributions used in probabilistic PBPK models impact HED distributions, but obtaining precise distributional estimates for all the parameters would be challenging. Therefore, we sought to determine methods that can identify the extent of model parameter influence on extreme HED percentiles. We first analyzed published PBPK models for dichloromethane and chloroform (for inhalation and oral exposures given 3 internal target levels each) by identifying the overall relative importance of parameters using global sensitivity analysis (GSA) methods. Then, we used a novel yet computationally expensive method to analyze the stability and sensitivity of extreme HED percentiles to input parameter distributions. Applying the traditional GSA methods allowed us to identify subsets of parameters most influential for accurately determining 1st and 99th percentiles, but the specific parameters included in those subsets varied for different models and exposure scenarios. Our results demonstrate that better characterizing PBPK model uncertainty by using precise distributional details for influential parameters informed by GSA methods may improve confidence in estimates of extreme percentiles of HEDs.

To overcome the limitations of existing variance-based methods for Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis (PSA) in design under uncertainty, a new PSA approach based on the concept of relative entropy is proposed. The relative entropy based method evaluates the impact of a random variable by measuring the divergence between two probability density functions of a response. The method can be applied both globally over the whole distribution of a performance response (called global response probabilistic sensitivity analysis–GRPSA) and in any regional range of a response distribution (called regional response probabilistic sensitivity analysis–RRPSA). The former is the most useful for studying variable impact on robust design objective, while the latter provides insight into reliability constraints. The proposed method is applicable to both the prior-design and post-design stages, for variable screening and uncertainty reduction, respectively. The proposed method is verified by numerical examples and industrial design cases.