Eye movement-invariant representations in the human visual system

This chapter reviews the functional anatomical bases of visual perception in the retina, the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) in the visual thalamus, the primary visual cortex (area V1, also called the striate cortex, and Brodmann area 17), and the extrastriate visual cortical areas of the dorsal and ventral pathways. The sections dedicated to the retina and LGN review the basic anatomical and laminar organization of these two areas, as well as their retinotopic organization and receptive field structure. We also describe the anatomical and functional differ- ences among the magnocellular, parvocelullar and koniocellular pathways. The section dedicated to area V1 reviews the functional maps in this area (retino- topic map, ocular dominance map, orientation selectivity map), as well as their anatomical relationship to each other. Special attention is given to the modular columnar organization of area V1, and to the various receptive field classes in V1 neurons. The section dedicated to extrastriate cortical visual areas describes the "where" and "what" pathways in the dorsal and ventral visual streams, and their respective physiological functions. The temporal dynamics of neurons throughout the visual pathway are critical to understanding visibility and neural information processing. We discuss the role of lateral inhibition circuits in processing spatiotemporal edges, corners, and in the temporal dynamics of vision. We also discuss the effects of eye movements on visual physiology and percep- tion in early visual areas. Our visual and oculomotor systems must achieve a very delicate balance: insufficient eye movements lead to adaptation and visual fading, whereas excessive motion of the eyes produces blurring and unstable vision during fixation. These issues are very important for neural prosthetics, in which electrodes are stabilized on the substrate.

The projections of the superficial layers of the superior colliculus to the pulvinar nucleus in Tupaia were reexamined by injecting WGA-HRP into the tectum. The main result was finding two different patterns of terminations in the pulvinar nucleus: a zone remote from the lateral geniculate nucleus, which occupies the dorsomedial and caudal poles of the pulvinar nucleus, was almost entirely filled with terminals in every case irrespective of the location of the injection site; and a second division of the pulvinar nucleus, adjacent to the lateral geniculate nucleus, contained irregular patches--much more densely populated--and the distribution of patches varied from case to case. We call the first projection "diffuse" and the patchy projection "specific." Next we injected several divisions of the extrastriate visual cortex to find the cortical target of each pathway. The diffuse path terminates in the ventral temporal area (Tv). The specific path terminates in the dorsal temporal area (Td) and area 18. We speculated about the significance of the two pathways: the specific path may be responsible for the preservation of vision after removal of the striate cortex; the diffuse path may have an important place in the evolution of the visual areas of the temporal and occipital lobe. We argued that the target of the diffuse path is in a position to relate limbic and visual impulses and relay the product of such integration to the other visual areas, striate as well as extrastriate cortex.

This study gives a detailed account of the cyto-architectonic features of the cortex of a tammar wallaby, a member of the Macropodidae, a family of Australian metatherian mammals. With the aid of the physiological data and data from pathway studies, six different cortical regions - frontal, parietal, temporal, occipital, insular and cingulate - were identified based on their eutherian homologues. Each region is distinguished by its individual cyto-architectonic properties. The frontal region consists of six layers throughout. Layer I is extremely thick, and an agranular region was not seen. The parietal region contains six layers of which layer IV is very prominent due to its great thickness and high cell density. Layer V is also thick and is present throughout this region. The temporal region consists of two areas: a dorsal area, physiologically defined as auditory, and a ventral temporal area. The cyto-architectonic features of the dorsal temporal area are similar to those of the parietal region, but the thickness of the neocortical mantle is narrower than that in the parietal region. In the ventral temporal area, layer VI has a speckled appearance and the cells are arranged in horizontal rows. In the occipital region, layers III and IV are very thick and well differentiated, giving a striated appearance to this region. The insular region was identified ventral to the frontal region and consists of both agranular and granular areas. The cingulate region, mostly situated in the medial part of the cortex, lacks a layer IV. Midway along its rostrocaudal extent, cells in layer III stain deeply and are tightly packed, forming a band separating layers I and II from layers V and VI. Layer VI has a speckled appearance and its cells are oriented in horizontal rows. Most of the cortical cyto-architectonic features in wallabies are comparable to those in eutherian mammals. The cortex of the tammar apparently lacks the agranular region described within the motor cortex of a number of eutherian mammals. Nonetheless, the cyto-architectonic features of the tammar are otherwise comparable to those of contemporary eutherian mammals.

THINGS-data reflects three large-scale neuroimaging and behavioral datasets of object processing in humans, comprising densely sampled functional MRI and magnetoencephalographic recordings, as well as 4.70 million similarity judgments in response to thousands of photographic images for up to 1854 objects.

Perception Matches Selectivity in the Human Anterior Color Center

Frontal eye field (FEF) projections to posterior cortical areas were mapped by autoradiography of tritiated amino acids (Leu, Pro) in six macaque monkeys. In three monkeys, the large saccade part of the FEF (IFEF) was identified by microstimulation and injected with tracers. In a fourth monkey, the small saccade part of the FEF (sFEF) was identified by microstimulation and injected with tracer. Tracer injections were placed into the sFEF region of two other monkeys using anatomical landmarks. The IFEF and sFEF generally had distinct and largely segregated projections to posterior cortical areas, and the overall pattern of labeling in visual areas with established topology indicates that IFEF neurons preferentially project to areas having large and eccentric receptive fields, whereas sFEF neurons project to areas having smaller, more centrally located fields. The terminal fields from the sFEF were more widespread than those from IFEF. Projections from sFEF terminated in the lateral intraparietal area (LIP), the ventral intraparietal area (VIP), and the parietal part of visual area V3A, in the fundus of the superior temporal visual area (FST), the middle temporal area (MT), the medial superior temporal area (MST), the temporal part of visual area V4, the inferior temporal area (IT), and the temporal-occipital area (TEO) and in occipital visual areas V2, V3, and V4. Projections from IFEF terminated in parietal areas 7a, LIP, and VIP and the medial part of parietal area PE; in temporal areas MST and the superior temporal polysensory area (STP); and in occipital area V2 and posterior cingulate area 23b. Projections from IFEF and sFEF appeared to terminate in different parts of common target areas in MST, LIP, and V2. The topography of IFEF and sFEF projections to LIP suggests that this posterior eye field may also be organized by saccade amplitude. Most terminal labeling from FEF injections was bilaminar to layers I and V/VI, but labeling in area LIP, area MT, the medial part of area PE, and area 23b was columnar-form to all layers.

The visual system employs a sophisticated balance of attentional mechanisms: salient stimuli are prioritized for visual processing, yet observers can also ignore such stimuli when their goals require directing attention elsewhere. A powerful determinant of visual salience is local feature contrast: if a local region differs from its immediate surround along one or more feature dimensions, it will appear more salient. We used high-resolution functional MRI (fMRI) at 7T to characterize the modulatory effects of bottom-up salience and top-down voluntary attention within multiple sites along the early visual pathway, including visual areas V1-V4 and the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN). Observers viewed arrays of spatially distributed gratings, where one of the gratings immediately to the left or right of fixation differed from all other items in orientation or motion direction, making it salient. To investigate the effects of directed attention, observers were cued to attend to the grating to the left or right of fixation, which was either salient or nonsalient. Results revealed reliable additive effects of top-down attention and stimulus-driven salience throughout visual areas V1-hV4. In comparison, the LGN exhibited significant attentional enhancement but was not reliably modulated by orientation- or motion-defined salience. Our findings indicate that top-down effects of spatial attention can influence visual processing at the earliest possible site along the visual pathway, including the LGN, whereas the processing of orientation- and motion-driven salience primarily involves feature-selective interactions that take place in early cortical visual areas.NEW & NOTEWORTHY While spatial attention allows for specific, goal-driven enhancement of stimuli, salient items outside of the current focus of attention must also be prioritized. We used 7T fMRI to compare salience and spatial attentional enhancement along the early visual hierarchy. We report additive effects of attention and bottom-up salience in early visual areas, suggesting that salience enhancement is not contingent on the observer's attentional state.

1. Luis H. Ospina, MD* 1. *Assistant Professor, Pediatric Ophthalmology and Neuro-ophthalmology, Ste-Justine Hospital, University de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada After completing this article, readers should be able to: 1. Recognize cortical visual impairment (CVI) as an important cause of pediatric visual loss. 2. Identify the most frequent causes of pediatric CVI and, more specifically, understand the role of hypoxia as a cause of central visual damage. 3. Describe the different patterns and implications for future vision of hypoxic central visual damage occurring in preterm compared with term babies. 4. Know the clinical signs suggestive of CVI in children. 5. Discuss the involvement of visual functions other than visual acuity (ie, cognitive visual aspects) in CVI and correlate them with the likely affected neuroanatomic substrates. 6. Explain the value of using a multidisciplinary approach in rehabilitating children who have CVI early in their development. Vision loss caused by central nervous system damage often is referred to as CVI but also may be referred to as cerebral visual impairment or neurologic visual impairment. These terms refer to the fact that the primary defect may not necessarily be limited to the striate (primary visual) cortex and may affect other areas subserving vision, such as the visual associative cortex, optic radiations, and visual attention pathways. Although it is not yet certain which of these three terms best describes the visual deficit, it is clear that use of the label cortical blindness must be abandoned. That term not only evokes negative connotations for the child and the family but is inaccurate because in almost every instance, some degree of residual vision remains, and visual improvement can occur. CVI has become the greatest cause of pediatric visual impairment in developed countries (1)(2)(3)(4)(5) and is becoming increasingly prevalent in developing nations. CVI is a problem of increasing frequency for two primary reasons. First, the progress in neonatal care has resulted in improved survival of …

The origins and terminations of the amygdaloid connections with the modality-specific visual cortical areas TEa (anterior TE area), TEp (posterior TE area), TEO, V4, V2, MST (medial superior temporal visual area), MT (middle temporal visual area), and V1 were studied in macaques. These were compared with the amygdaloid connections of a vision-related polysensory area TG by making cortical injections of horseradish peroxidase (HRP) and incubating the sections with tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) as the chromogen. Both areas TEa and TEp receive a major projection from the lateral basal nucleus and a minor one from the accessory basal nucleus of the amygdaloid complex, whereas these areas send a major projection to the lateral nucleus and a minor one to the lateral basal nucleus. Areas TEO, V4, V2, MST, MT, and V1 receive projections only from the lateral basal nucleus; none of them project to any amygdaloid nucleus. Thus, the amygdalofugal projections are more widespread and more complex than the amygdalopetal projections. These findings indicate that the connections between the amygdaloid nuclei and the visual areas are generally nonreciprocal and underlie the importance of a feedback mechanism from the amygdala to the visual cortical areas in visual information processing. There appears to be a caudorostral (occipitotemporal) gradient in the distribution and density of the amygdaloid projections, which become progressively more widespread and heavier among the progressively more rostral visual areas (from area V1 to area TEa). The amygdaloid connections with area TG are distinctly different from the connections with the visual areas. Area TG is reciprocally connected mainly with the periamygdaloid cortex, and with the lateral, accessory basal, and medial basal nuclei of the amygdala as well.

Sustained gamma band synchronization in early visual areas reflects the level of selective attention

When dissimilar images are presented to the two eyes, binocular rivalry (BR) occurs, and perception alternates spontaneously between the images. Although neural correlates of the oscillating perception during BR have been found in multiple sites along the visual pathway, the source of BR dynamics is unclear. Psychophysical and modeling studies suggest that both low- and high-level cortical processes underlie BR dynamics. Previous neuroimaging studies have demonstrated the involvement of high-level regions by showing that frontal and parietal cortices responded time locked to spontaneous perceptual alternation in BR. However, a potential contribution of early visual areas to BR dynamics has been overlooked, because these areas also responded to the physical stimulus alternation mimicking BR. In the present study, instead of focusing on activity during perceptual switches, we highlighted brain activity during suppression periods to investigate a potential link between activity in human early visual areas and BR dynamics. We used a strong interocular suppression paradigm called continuous flash suppression to suppress and fluctuate the visibility of a probe stimulus and measured retinotopic responses to the onset of the invisible probe using functional MRI. There were ∼130-fold differences in the median suppression durations across 12 subjects. The individual differences in suppression durations could be predicted by the amplitudes of the retinotopic activity in extrastriate visual areas (V3 and V4v) evoked by the invisible probe. Weaker responses were associated with longer suppression durations. These results demonstrate that retinotopic representations in early visual areas play a role in the dynamics of perceptual alternations during BR.

The existence of a third visual area, V3, along the outer margin of V2 was originally proposed for primates on the basis of projections from V1. The evidence for V3 was never totally convincing because investigators failed to demonstrate V1 projections to ventral V3, and projections to dorsal V3 could be attributed to the dorsomedial visual area (DM). We have reexamined the issue by placing large injections into both dorsal and ventral portions of V1 and subsequently processing flattened cortex for myelin and cytochrome oxidase so that borders of V1 and V2 could be determined accurately. The injections were in small-brained marmosets, where ventral V1 was most accessible and cortex could be flattened easily. The results indicate that dorsal V1 (representing the lower visual quadrant) projects to a narrow "dorsal V3" located between DM and dorsal V2, whereas ventral V1 (representing the upper visual quadrant) projects to a narrow "ventral V3." Architectonic borders for these dorsal and ventral strips were clearly apparent. In addition, all parts of V1 project to DM, whereas ventral V1 connections indicate that the dorsolateral area (DL) extends more ventral than has been established previously. We also placed injections within dorsal V2, dorsal and ventral DM, and dorsal, central, and ventral middle temporal (MT) area. Results from these injections were consistent with the proposed retinotopic organizations of V3, DM, and DL. We provide compelling evidence for the existence of areas V3, DM, and DL in marmosets and suggest that these areas are likely to be found in all primates.

Cortical connections were investigated by restricting injections of WGA-HRP to different parts of the middle temporal visual area, MT, in squirrel monkeys, owl monkeys, marmosets, and galagos. Cortex was flattened and sectioned tangentially to facilitate an analysis of the areal patterns of connections. In the experimental cases, brain sections reacted for cytochrome oxidase (CO) or stained for myelin were used to delimit visual areas of occipital and temporal cortex and visuomotor areas of the frontal lobe. Major findings are as follows: (1) The architectonic analysis suggests that in addition to the commonly recognized visual fields, area 17 (V-I), area 18 (V-II), and MT, all three New World monkeys and prosimian galagos have visual areas DL, DI, DM, MST, and FST. (2) Measurements of the size of these areas indicate that about a third of the neocortex in these primates is occupied by the eight visual areas, but they occupy a somewhat larger proportion of neocortex in the diurnal marmosets and squirrel monkeys than the nocturnal owl monkeys and galagos. The diurnal primates also have proportionally more neocortex devoted to areas 17, 18, and DL and less to MT. These differences are compatible with the view that diurnal primates are more specialized for detailed object and color vision. (3) In all four primates, restricted locations in MT receive major inputs from short meandering rows of neurons in area 17 and several bands of neurons in area 18. (4) Major feedforward projections of MT are to two visual areas adjoining the rostral half of MT, areas MST and FST. Other ipsilateral connections are with DL, DI, and in some cases DM, parts of inferotemporal (IT) cortex, and posterior parietal cortex. (5) In squirrel monkeys, where injection sites varied from caudal to rostral MT, caudal parts of MT representing central vision connect more densely to DL and IT than other parts. Both DL and IT cortex emphasize central vision. (6) In the frontal lobe, MT has dense connections with the frontal ventral area (FV), but not with the frontal eye field (FEF). (7) Callosal connections of MT are most dense with matched locations in MT of the other hemisphere, rather than with the outer boundary of MT representing the vertical meridian. Targets of sparser callosal connections include FST, MST, and DL.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

The visual system encompasses about 20% of the cerebral cortex1 and plays a pivotal role in higher-order cognitive processes such as attention and working memory. Cognitive impairments constitute a central role in neuropsychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia (SZ). Impairments are described in visual perceptual processes including contrast, and emotion discrimination as well as in the ability to identify visual irregularities and in higher-order cognition like visual attention and working memory. Furthermore, perceptual and higher-order cognitive processes are part of the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) project that aims to develop dimensional and transdiagnostic constructs with defined links to specific brain circuits.Therefore, the detailed study of the visual system using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is essential to understand the processes in healthy individuals but also in populations with neuropsychiatric disorders. Visual mapping techniques include functional localizer tasks to map functionally defined regions like the fusiform face area (FFA), retinotopic mapping to map specific brain regions that are retinotopically organized in full, and visual-field localizer paradigms to define circumscribed areas within retinotopically organized areas.Thus, the latter allow studying local information processing in early visual areas. Despite advances in neuroimaging techniques, analyses of fMRI data at the group-level are impeded by interindividual macroanatomical variability. This reduces the reliability to accurately define visual areas particularly at the group-level and decreases statistical power. Single-subject based solutions for this problem are not appropriate. Analyses after volume-based alignment (VBA) and primary surface-based analyses without macroanatomical alignment do not increase macroanatomical correspondence sufficiently. Cortex-based alignment (CBA) approaches are recommended as an alternative technique to address this obstacle. However, CBA has not been evaluated for visual-field localizer paradigms. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate potential benefits of CBA for an attention-enhanced visual field localizer paradigm that maps circumscribed regions in retinotopically organized visual areas. Since previous studies solely compared surface-based data before and after CBA, we aimed to compare all three techniques: (1) a volume-based alignment (VBA), (2) a surface-based data set without (SBAV) and (3) a surface- based data set with macroanatomical alignment (CBA). Furthermore, we sought to define regions of interest (ROI) that subsequently can be used for the study of higher-order cognitive processes. Also, we aimed to investigate whether CBA facilitates the study of functional asymmetries in early visual areas as these were described in previous studies. Healthy volunteers (n=50) underwent fMRI in a 3- Tesla Siemens Trio scanner while performing an attention-enhanced visual field localizer paradigm. Our task consisted of a series of flickering, black-and white colored checkerboard stimuli that randomly appeared at one of four locations comprising the participants’ visual quadrants. In 25% of the trials the centrally located squares briefly changed their color to yellow (target trial). Participants had to indicate detection of a target by button press. Data analysis was conducted using Brain Voyager 20.6. Our approach for macroanatomical alignment included a high-resolution, multiscale curvature driven alignment procedure minimizing interindividual macroanatomical variability. Here, each folding pattern was aligned to a dynamically updated group average. Thus, we counteracted a possible confounding effect of a suboptimal selection of an individual target brain with a folding pattern deviating considerably from the cohort average. Group ROIs after CBA showed increased spatial consistency, vertical symmetry, and an increase of size. This was corroborated by an increase in the probability of activation overlap of up to 86%. CBA increased macroanatomical correspondence and thus ameliorated results of multi-subject ROI analyses. Functional differences in the form of a downward bias in visual hemifields were measured with increased reliability. In summary, our findings provide clear evidence for the superiority of CBA for the study of local information processing in early visual cortex at the group-level. This approach is of relevance for the study of visual dysfunction in neuropsychiatric disorders including schizophrenia as they show impaired visual processing that in turn impacts higher-order cognitive processes and in consequence functional outcome. In addition, our attention-enhanced visual field localizer paradigm will be useful for machine learning approaches such as multivariate pattern analysis decoding local information processes and connectivity patterns.

Transorbital alternating current stimulation modifies BOLD activity in healthy subjects and in a stroke patient with hemianopia: A 7 Tesla fMRI feasibility study