• Home
  • Search
  • Fast and accurate phylogeny reconstruction algorithms based on the minimum-evolution principle.
  • Open Access IconOpen Access
  • Cite Icon532
  • https://doi.org/10.1089/106652702761034136Copy DOI Icon

Fast and accurate phylogeny reconstruction algorithms based on the minimum-evolution principle.

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

The Minimum Evolution (ME) approach to phylogeny estimation has been shown to be statistically consistent when it is used in conjunction with ordinary least-squares (OLS) fitting of a metric to a tree structure. The traditional approach to using ME has been to start with the Neighbor Joining (NJ) topology for a given matrix and then do a topological search from that starting point. The first stage requires O(n(3)) time, where n is the number of taxa, while the current implementations of the second are in O(p n(3)) or more, where p is the number of swaps performed by the program. In this paper, we examine a greedy approach to minimum evolution which produces a starting topology in O(n(2)) time. Moreover, we provide an algorithm that searches for the best topology using nearest neighbor interchanges (NNIs), where the cost of doing p NNIs is O(n(2) + p n), i.e., O(n(2)) in practice because p is always much smaller than n. The Greedy Minimum Evolution (GME) algorithm, when used in combination with NNIs, produces trees which are fairly close to NJ trees in terms of topological accuracy. We also examine ME under a balanced weighting scheme, where sibling subtrees have equal weight, as opposed to the standard "unweighted" OLS, where all taxa have the same weight so that the weight of a subtree is equal to the number of its taxa. The balanced minimum evolution scheme (BME) runs slower than the OLS version, requiring O(n(2) x diam(T)) operations to build the starting tree and O(p n x diam(T)) to perform the NNIs, where diam(T) is the topological diameter of the output tree. In the usual Yule-Harding distribution on phylogenetic trees, the diameter expectation is in log(n), so our algorithms are in practice faster that NJ. Moreover, this BME scheme yields a very significant improvement over NJ and other distance-based algorithms, especially with large trees, in terms of topological accuracy.

Similar Papers
  • Discussion
  • Citations78

A note on Sattath and Tversky's, Saitou and Nei's, and Studier and Keppler's algorithms for inferring phylogenies from evolutionary distances.

  • Nov 01, 1994
  • Molecular biology and evolution
  • Olivier Gascuel
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations26

Computing nearest neighbour interchange distances between ranked phylogenetic trees

  • Jan 01, 2021
  • Journal of Mathematical Biology
  • Lena Collienne +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations7

Molecular characterization of an almond isolate of Prune dwarf virus in Tunisia: putative recombination breakpoints in the partial sequences of the coat protein-encoding gene in isolates from different geographic origin

  • Jan 01, 2009
  • Phytopathologia Mediterranea
  • Moncef Boulila
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations2

An Enhanced Algorithm for Reconstructing a Phylogenetic Tree Based on the Tree Rearrangement and Maximum Likelihood Method

  • Jan 01, 2015
  • Sun-Yuan Hsieh +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations65

Molecular phylogeny in Indian Citrus L. (Rutaceae) inferred through PCR-RFLP and trnL-trnF sequence data of chloroplast DNA

  • Oct 15, 2008
  • Scientia Horticulturae
  • Satya Narayan Jena +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

DNA barcoding of black cherry aphid Myzus cerasi (Fabricus, 1775) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) populations collected from Prunus avium and Prunus cerasus

  • Mar 04, 2020
  • TURKISH JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY
  • Burcu İnal +1
  • Research Article

Heuristics for unrooted, unranked, and ranked anomaly zones under birth-death models

  • Apr 06, 2021
  • Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
  • Anastasiia Kim +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations5

Neighborhoods of Phylogenetic Trees: Exact and Asymptotic Counts

  • Jan 01, 2016
  • SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics
  • J V De Jong +2
  • Peer Review Report

Decision letter: Taxonium, a web-based tool for exploring large phylogenetic trees

  • Oct 18, 2022
  • Richard A Neher +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations7

A note on the relaxation time of two Markov chains on rooted phylogenetic tree spaces

  • Oct 29, 2013
  • Statistics & Probability Letters
  • David A Spade +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations33

Statistical Tests of DNA Phylogenies

  • Mar 01, 1995
  • Systematic Biology
  • Wen-Hsiung Li +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

Phylogenetic Relationships of Flounders from the Family Pleuronectidae (Ostichties: Pleuronectiformes) Based on 16S rRNA Gene

  • Mar 01, 2021
  • Russian Journal of Genetics
  • A D Redin +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations74

Constructing Phylogenies in the Presence Of Intra-Individual Site Polymorphisms (2ISPs) with a Focus on the Nuclear Ribosomal Cistron

  • Oct 08, 2013
  • Systematic Biology
  • Alastair J Potts +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

Phylogenetic and secondary RNA structure analysis of monogenean gill ectoparasites(Dactylogyrus spp.) parasitizing certain freshwater fishes.

  • Aug 19, 2019
  • Polish Journal of Veterinary Sciences
  • Q.M.K Koyee +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

The Applicability of Ordinary Least Squares to Consistently Short Distances between Taxa in Phylogenetic Tree Construction and the Normal Distribution Test Consequences

  • Jan 07, 2009
  • Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
  • C Z Roux
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.