Feasibility and Accuracy of Thoracolumbar Pedicle Screw Placement Using an Augmented Reality Head Mounted Device

Augmented reality-mediated spine surgery (ARMSS) is a minimally invasive novel technology that has the potential to increase the efficiency, accuracy, and safety of conventional percutaneous pedicle screw insertion methods. Visual 3D spinal anatomical and 2D navigation images are directly projected onto the operator's retina and superimposed over the surgical field, eliminating field of vision and attention shift to a remote display. The objective of this cadaveric study was to assess the accuracy and precision of percutaneous ARMSS pedicle implant insertion. Instrumentation was placed in 5 cadaveric torsos via ARMSS with the xvision augmented reality head-mounted display (AR-HMD) platform at levels ranging from T5 to S1 for a total of 113 total implants (93 pedicle screws and 20 Jamshidi needles). Postprocedural CT scans were graded by two independent neuroradiologists using the Gertzbein-Robbins scale (grades A-E) for clinical accuracy. Technical precision was calculated using superimposition analysis employing the Medical Image Interaction Toolkit to yield angular trajectory (°) and linear screw tip (mm) deviation from the virtual pedicle screw position compared with the actual pedicle screw position on postprocedural CT imaging. The overall implant insertion clinical accuracy achieved was 99.1%. Lumbosacral and thoracic clinical accuracies were 100% and 98.2%, respectively. Specifically, among all implants inserted, 112 were noted to be Gertzbein-Robbins grade A or B (99.12%), with only 1 medial Gertzbein-Robbins grade C breach (> 2-mm pedicle breach) in a thoracic pedicle at T9. Precision analysis of the inserted pedicle screws yielded a mean screw tip linear deviation of 1.98 mm (99% CI 1.74-2.22 mm) and a mean angular error of 1.29° (99% CI 1.11°-1.46°) from the projected trajectory. These data compare favorably with data from existing navigation platforms and regulatory precision requirements mandating that linear and angular deviation be less than 3 mm (p < 0.01) and 3° (p < 0.01), respectively. Percutaneous ARMSS pedicle implant insertion is a technically feasible, accurate, and highly precise method.

P120. Augmented reality navigation for percutaneous thoracolumbar pedicle screws: a prospective clinical study

2:26 Safety of thoracic pedicle screw insertion with and without computer assistance: a cadaveric study

Placement of zygomatic implants in the most optimal prosthetic position is considered challenging due to limited bone mass of the zygoma, limited visibility, length of the drilling path and proximity to critical anatomical structures. Augmented reality (AR) navigation can eliminate some of the disadvantages of surgical guides and conventional surgical navigation, while potentially improving accuracy. In this human cadaver study, we evaluated a developed AR navigation approach for placement of zygomatic implants after total maxillectomy. The developed AR navigation interface connects a commercial navigation system with the Microsoft HoloLens. AR navigated surgery was performed to place 20 zygomatic implants using five human cadaver skulls after total maxillectomy. To determine accuracy, postoperative scans were virtually matched with preoperative three-dimensional virtual surgical planning, and distances in mm from entry-exit points and angular deviations were calculated as outcome measures. Results were compared with a previously conducted study in which zygomatic implants were positioned with 3D printed surgical guides. The mean entry point deviation was 2.43 ± 1.33 mm and a 3D angle deviation of 5.80 ± 4.12° (range 1.39-19.16°). The mean exit point deviation was 3.28 mm (±2.17). The abutment height deviation was on average 2.20 ± 1.35 mm. The accuracy of the abutment in the occlusal plane was 4.13 ± 2.53 mm. Surgical guides perform significantly better for the entry-point (P = 0.012) and 3D angle (P = 0.05); however, there is no significant difference in accuracy for the exit-point (P = 0.143) when using 3D printed drill guides or AR navigated surgery. Despite the higher precision of surgical guides, AR navigation demonstrated acceptable accuracy, with potential for improvement and specialized applications. The study highlights the feasibility of AR navigation for zygomatic implant placement, offering an alternative to conventional methods.

What's New in Spine Surgery.

The authors sought to compare radiation exposure, surgical time, and accuracy of screw placement when using either standard fluoroscopy or virtual fluoroscopy for the placement of C1-2 transarticular screws. Twenty-two C1-2 transarticular screws were placed in 11 cadavers in a randomized and alternating order by using either standard fluoroscopy or virtual fluoroscopy (fluoronavigation). The radiation time, procedure time, and accuracy of screw placement were recorded and statistically compared. A small but statistically significant reduction in fluoroscopy time was noted with the virtual fluoroscopy technique but the surgical times were similar between the two techniques. The incidence of noncritical and critical breaches (those at risk of causing a neurovascular injury) was not significantly different between the two groups. Careful analysis of the C1-2 anatomy in these specimens underscored the importance of placing the screw path in a maximally dorsal and medial portion of the C-2 isthmus to avoid injury to the vertebral artery and to maximize the bone purchase of the C-1 lateral mass. Although virtual fluoroscopy may represent a useful tool for transarticular screw placement, it does not supplant traditional surgical techniques and does not appear to lower the incidence of bone breaches that can occur when performing this demanding procedure.

To compare the effectiveness of O-arm navigation and C-arm navigation for guiding percutaneous long sacroiliac screws in treatment of Denis type Ⅱ sacral fractures. A retrospective study was conducted on clinical data of the 46 patients with Denis type Ⅱ sacral fractures between April 2021 and October 2022. Among them, 19 patients underwent O-arm navigation assisted percutaneous long sacroiliac screw fixation (O-arm navigation group), and 27 patients underwent C-arm navigation assisted percutaneous long sacroiliac screw fixation (C-arm navigation group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, causes of injuries, Tile classification of pelvic fractures, combined injury, the interval from injury to operation between the two groups ( P>0.05). The intraoperative preparation time, the placement time of each screw, the fluoroscopy time of each screw during placement, screw position accuracy, the quality of fracture reduction, and fracture healing time were recorded and compared, postoperative complications were observed. Pelvic function was evaluated by Majeed score at last follow-up. All operations were completed successfully, and all incisions healed by first intention. Compared to the C-arm navigation group, the O-arm navigation group had shorter intraoperative preparation time, placement time of each screw, and fluoroscopy time, with significant differences ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in screw position accuracy and the quality of fracture reduction ( P>0.05). There was no nerve or vascular injury during screw placed in the two groups. All patients in both groups were followed up, with the follow-up time of 6-21 months (mean, 12.0 months). Imaging re-examination showed that both groups achieved bony healing, and there was no significant difference in fracture healing time between the two groups ( P>0.05). During follow-up, there was no postoperative complications, such as screw loosening and breaking or loss of fracture reduction. At last follow-up, there was no significant difference in pelvic function between the two groups ( P>0.05). Compared with the C-arm navigation, the O-arm navigation assisted percutaneous long sacroiliac screws for the treatment of Denis typeⅡsacral fractures can significantly shorten the intraoperative preparation time, screw placement time, and fluoroscopy time, improve the accuracy of screw placement, and obtain clearer navigation images.

Thoracic pedicle screws were stimulated electrically while recording electromyography (EMG) activity in associated muscle groups intraoperatively. Screw position was then evaluated after surgery using computed tomography (CT). The CT results were compared with evoked EMG threshold values. To report our experience with pedicle screw stimulation in thoracic vertebrae in 22 patients who underwent thoracic level spinal instrumentation from May 1999 to March 2001. Pedicle screw stimulation for intraoperative assessment of screw placement has been reported in lumbosacral spinal procedures. Evoked EMG thresholds >10 or 11 mA are associated with increased probability of vertebral cortex violation and postoperative complications. Thresholds >15 mA provide a 98% confidence of accurate screw positioning on postoperative CT scans. Evoked EMG activity was recorded from ulnar carpal flexors, intercostals, or abdominal muscle groups, depending on the level of screw placement. Postoperative CT scans were read by a staff orthopedic spine surgeon, a senior resident in orthopedics, and a musculoskeletal radiologist. Results of 87 screws are reported. Five screws (5.7%) showed penetration on postoperative CT scans. Six screws (6.9%) had stimulation thresholds < or =11 mA, of which three showed cortical breakthrough. Of the 81 screws with thresholds >11 mA, 79 (97.5%) were within the vertebra. No postoperative neurologic complications were noted in any of the 22 patients. These results are consistent with previous studies of lumbosacral pedicle screws. In this series, stimulation thresholds >11 mA have a 97.5% negative predictive value, suggesting that cortical violation is highly unlikely. Although judgment of screw placement should not depend solely on stimulation thresholds, pedicle screw stimulation may provide rapid and useful intraoperative information on screw placement during procedures involving the use of thoracic pedicle screws.

The aims of this study were to present the rationale for and the evolution of a staged, two-procedure paradigm for spinal surgery requiring pedicle screw instrumentation, and to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of the technique. The rationale for the new algorithm is presented for consideration in the form of unproven hypotheses subject to verification by subsequent studies. The first stage of the two-staged algorithm, performed in an interventional radiology (IR) setting, involves percutaneous placement of either headless pedicle screws or K-wire fragment placeholders of the trajectory for pedicle screws. The second stage, performed days or weeks later, involves open surgical completion of instrumentation placement and other surgical objectives. The techniques for IR percutaneous K-wire fragment and percutaneous screw placement evolved over the duration of the study. Instrumentation was placed in 126 pedicles in 25 patients. Efficacy was equated to the accuracy of screw placement, which was evaluated using computed tomography (CT). Algorithms incorporating correction for metal artifact were developed to determine deviation of the screws and K-wire fragments from proper position. Over 1500 measurements were made to evaluate K-wire fragment and screw position in the 116 instrumented pedicles for which CT data were available. Accuracy of placement (relative to both cortical and pedicle breaches or to only pedicle breaches) was 98 to 100% for K-wire fragments, 96 to 98% for screws following K-wire fragments, and 100% for percutaneous screws. The only adverse consequence of pedicle screw placement by this method was one infection that occurred 8 months postoperatively. The staged, two-procedure paradigm for pedicle screw placement proved, within the limits of this study, to be feasible, safe, and effective; therefore, the unproven rationale behind the new paradigm merits further evaluation in a larger cohort of patients with randomized, matched controls.

Accuracy of robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement comparing junior surgeons with expert surgeons: Can junior surgeons place pedicle screws as accurately as expert surgeons?

This study aimed to compare screw placement accuracy and clinical aspects between Augmented Reality Surgical Navigation (ARSN) and free-hand (FH) technique. Twenty patients underwent spine surgery with screw placement using ARSN and were matched retrospectively to a cohort of 20 FH technique cases for comparison. All ARSN and FH cases were performed by the same surgeon. Matching was based on clinical diagnosis and similar proportions of screws placed in the thoracic and lumbosacral vertebrae in both groups. Accuracy of screw placement was assessed on postoperative scans according to the Gertzbein scale and grades 0 and 1 were considered accurate. Procedure time, blood loss and length of hospital stay, were collected as secondary endpoints. A total of 262 and 288 screws were assessed in the ARSN and FH groups, respectively. The share of clinically accurate screws was significantly higher in the ARSN vs FH group (93.9% vs 89.6%, p < 0.05). The proportion of screws placed without a cortical breach was twice as high in the ARSN group compared to the FH group (63.4% vs 30.6%, p < 0.0001). No statistical difference was observed for the secondary endpoints between both groups. This matched-control study demonstrated that ARSN provided higher screw placement accuracy compared to free-hand.

The medial cortical pedicle screw—a new technique for cervical pedicle screw placement with partial drilling of medial cortex

ObjectiveThe authors performed a retrospective study to assess the accuracy and clinical benefits of a navigation coupled with O-arm® system guided method in the thoracic and lumbar spines by comparing with a C-arm fluoroscopy-guided method.MethodsUnder the navigation guidance, 106 pedicle screws inserted from T7 to S1 in 24 patients, and using the fluoroscopy guidance, 204 pedicle screws from T5 to S1 in 45 patients. The position of screws within the pedicle was classified into four groups, from grade 0 (no violation cortex) to 3 (more than 4 mm violation). The location of violated pedicle cortex was also assessed. Intra-operative parameters including time required for preparation of screwing procedure, times for screwing and the number of X-ray shot were assessed in each group.ResultsGrade 0 was observed in 186 (91.2%) screws of the fluoroscopy-guided group, and 99 (93.4%) of the navigation-guided group. Mean time required for inserting a screw was 3.8 minutes in the fluoroscopy-guided group, and 4.5 minutes in the navigation-guided group. Mean time required for preparation of screw placement was 4 minutes in the fluoroscopy-guided group, and 19 minutes in the navigation-guided group. The fluoroscopy-guided group required mean 8.9 times of X-ray shot for each screw placement.ConclusionThe screw placement under the navigation-guidance coupled with O-arm® system appears to be more accurate and safer than that under the fluoroscopy guidance, although the preparation and screwing time for the navigation-guided surgery is longer than that for the fluoroscopy-guided surgery.

OBJECTIVE The standard approach for dorsal transpedicular fixation in lumbar spine instability requires extensive exposure of the vertebral column. This increases the risk of potential complications and possibly destabilizes healthy neighboring segments because of the dissection and denervation of paravertebral muscles. The majority of spinal disorders are currently treated successfully via limited and tailored approaches. Accordingly, a keyhole approach for dorsal fusion of the lumbar spine was developed on the basis of an anatomic study. METHODS The new endoscopic technique entails the transmuscular insertion of a pedicle screw-rod fixation device via a rigid operating sheath. As a prerequisite, the endoscopic microanatomy of the target area, as visible through the operating sheath, was first evaluated on lumbar bone specimens. To localize the exact screw entry point into the pedicle, we identified the bony and ligamentous landmarks on partly macerated specimens. To determine the course of the pedicle screws, we deduced the corresponding angles of convergence from transparent polyester casting models of average vertebrae from T12 to S1. These angles were transferred into the operative situation and measured on-line with an inclinometer. The approach was finally tested on 12 cadavers for clinical feasibility and accuracy of screw placement and then successfully implemented in patients. RESULTS After extracutaneous localization of the pedicles at lateral fluoroscopy, paramedian skin incisions were made above the pedicles of the motion segment to be stabilized. The operative windows were exposed by use of a rigid operating sheath (length, 50 mm; diameter, 15 mm), which was inserted transmuscularly in the pedicle axis. The screw entry point into the pedicles was localized by endoscopic dissection of the mamilloaccessory ligament, bridging the mamilloaccessory notch. The pilot holes were created via insertion of a blunt-tipped pedicle probe. The adequate angles of convergence were constantly controlled during hollowing of the pedicles by an inclinometer mounted to the pedicle probe handle. The pedicle screws were then inserted through the operating sheaths. After removal of the operating sheaths, the connecting rods were inserted transmuscularly and anchored in the pedicle screw heads. Posterior bone grafting was performed after completion of the dorsal instrumentation. The dorsal fusion site was exposed by reinserting the operating sheath and tilting it medially. CONCLUSION This new approach significantly reduces surgical traumatization and destabilization of adjacent motion segments. An endoscopic operating sheath, adopted from thoracoscopic surgery, creates space for visualization and surgical manipulations. The newly defined anatomic landmarks provide guidance to the screw entry point into the pedicle in the center of the exposure. Observation of the exact corresponding angles of convergence during screw insertion by an inclinometer facilitates correct screw placement. In accordance with the initial anatomic studies, this approach was successfully performed on 12 cadavers and then used in six patients. Two illustrative cases are presented.

Percutaneous pedicle screw placement under single dimensional fluoroscopy with a designed pedicle finder—a technical note and case series