Femoral Component Alignment Boundaries for Tibia First Gap Balancing using Digital Tensioning Tool

Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score and knee society score for the minimal clinically important differences after cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: Two-year follow up.

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate improvement in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) in comparison with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in cohorts over age 60 matched by pre-operative age, gender, body mass index (BMI), hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA), KOOS sub-scores, and osteoarthritis (OA) grade. Propensity score matching was performed between 162 HTO patients and 134 TKA patients. When calculating the propensity score by multivariate logistic regression analysis, the following pre-operative confounders were included: age, gender, BMI, HKAA, KOOS sub-scores, and OA grade. Consequently, a total of 55 patients were included in each group. The Student's t-test was used to analyse differences in the post-operative KOOS sub-scores between groups. After propensity score matching, all matched pre-operative valuables were identical, with no significant differences between the HTO and TKA groups. None of the post-operative KOOS sub-scores at 1 year after surgery showed a significant difference between the HTO and TKA groups. Both groups demonstrated significant and comparable post-operative improvement in every KOOS sub-score. In patients over age 60, there was no significant difference in short-term pain relief and improvements in activity and quality of life between HTO and TKA after propensity score matching including pre-operative age, KOOS sub-scores, and OA grade. HTO is a joint preservation procedure that is valid for knee OA even in individuals over age 60.

Background:Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is highly recommended in patients with ACL deficiency who must perform at a high physical level. A combination of functional and psychological outcome measures is necessary to provide a comprehensive evaluation of functional status after successful return to sport after ACLR.Purpose:To identify factors associated with higher functional outcomes among soccer players who had returned to full sports participation after ACLR.Study Design:Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:A total of 168 out of 231 patients who underwent primary unilateral arthroscopic anatomic single-bundle ACLR were available at follow-up. Postoperatively, knee function, generic health outcomes, and psychological impact were assessed using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, the 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), and the ACL–Return to Sport after Injury scale.Results:After a mean follow-up of 35.5 ± 22.6 months, 85% of soccer players returned to performance. Midfielder position was associated with a better SF-12 Physical Component Summary (PCS) score (P = .013), IKDC (P = .003), total KOOS (P < .001), KOOS Symptoms (P = .004), KOOS Pain (P = .029), KOOS Activities of Daily Living (ADL) (P = .044), KOOS Sport and Recreation (Sport/Rec) (P = .001), KOOS Quality of Life (QoL) (P < .001), and Lysholm score (P = .008). Playing only on natural grass was associated with lower SF-12 PCS scores (P = .003), total KOOS (P = .001), and KOOS Sport/Rec (P = .011). Playing only on artificial turf was associated with lower Lysholm score (P = .018) and total KOOS (P = .014). The contact mechanism was associated with higher IKDC (P = .044) and KOOS QoL (P = .048), and injury affecting the dominant limb was associated with lower SF-12 Mental Component Summary scores (P = .012). Playing at a nonprofessional level was associated with lower total KOOS (P = .028), KOOS Symptoms (P = .002), KOOS ADL (P = .033), and KOOS Sport/Rec (P = .016).Conclusion:Professional soccer players and the midfielder position are associated with better functional scores upon returning to the sport. A history of noncontact ACL injury and playing on a single type of surface are associated with lower functional outcomes upon returning to the sport. Lower mental health scores can be expected after injury of the dominant limb.

Can Machine Learning Methods Produce Accurate and Easy-to-Use Preoperative Prediction Models of One-Year Improvements in Pain and Functioning After Knee Arthroplasty?

BackgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the patient-reported relevance, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness for each of the five KOOS subscales in patients with lateral tibial plateau fractures.MethodsAdult patients with surgically treated lateral tibial plateau fractures (AO 41B) were included. The primary outcome measure was the KOOS subscales: Pain, Symptoms, Activity of Daily Living (ADL), Sport and Recreational Activities (Sport/rec), and kne-related Quality of Life (QOL). The KOOS was repeated at 14 and 15 days, six weeks, and 6 and 12 months. Content validity was partly evaluated by patients ranking the relevance of all the items in the KOOS, test-retest reliability by an interclass correlation coefficient, and responsiveness by effect size and based on 3 pre-defined hypotheses related the the global rating of change.ResultsForty-one patients with a mean age of 54.8 years (ranging from 21 to 81 years) were included. The results showed an acceptable relevance of all the KOOS subscales. The test-retest reliability was moderate to high for all five subscales, with an interclass-correlation coefficient ranging from 0.6 to 0.9. At the 6- and 12-month follow-ups, the responsiveness showed large effect sizes for all the KOOS subscales, ranging from 0.9 to 2.1. Moderate to high correlations (r ≥ 0.4)was observed for the predefine hypotheses.ConclusionThe KOOS questionnaire showed acceptable relevance, high test-retest reliability and acceptable responsivness within one year following a lateral tibial plateau fracture. More research is needed for further validation of psychometric properties of KOOS for patients with lateral tibial plateau fractures.

Background: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent degenerative joint disease characterized by the degeneration of joint cartilage. Knee OA leads to pain, stiffness, swelling, and decreased mobility, significantly impacting the quality of life of affected people. Advanced-stage osteoarthritis often necessitates surgical intervention due to poor response to conventional treatments, such as intra-articular hyaluronic acid (HA). Carboxymethyl-chitosan (CM-C), an emerging therapeutic agent, has shown potential in reducing inflammation, improving lubrication, and enhancing joint function. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy of CM-C injections in patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis, non-responders to HA. Methods: This retrospective study included 16 patients (mean age: 79.56 years) with Kellgren-Lawrence grade 3-4 knee OA treated with a single intra-articular injection of CM-C. Pain and functional outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) at baseline (T0), one month (T1), three months (T2), six months (T3), and twelve months (T4). Results: Significant pain reduction was observed at early follow up, (VAS: T1 p = 0.0002, T2 p = 0.0265; KOOS Pain: T1 p = 0.0014). However, pain partially returned by T3 and T4. KOOS activities of daily living (p = 0.0005), QoL (p = 0.0396), and Sport and Free Time (p = 0.0367) subscales showed significant improvement at T1, though worsening trends were observed in subsequent follow up with raw values suggesting persistent benefits. Strong negative correlations were found between VAS and KOOS subscales at various follow ups. Conclusions: A single CM-C injection demonstrated early pain relief and functional improvement in advanced knee OA for non-responders to HA. However, the long-term effects may diminish over time, necessitating a careful consideration of re-treatment strategies or combined therapies.

Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): systematic review and meta-analysis of measurement properties

Background: Several studies have examined changes in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, but no studies to date have prospectively evaluated changes from preinjury baseline through injury and follow-up among ACL-injured patients compared to the baseline and follow-up changes of uninjured patients. Purpose: To examine changes in PROMs over time from preinjury baseline to at least 2 years after ACL reconstruction and to compare these changes with those of an uninjured control group having similar physical activity requirements. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: The authors conducted a prospective cohort study with a nested case-control analysis at a US service academy. All incoming first year students were recruited to participate in this study. Consenting participants completed a baseline questionnaire that included the KOOS (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score), WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index), and MARS (Marx Activity Rating Scale). Participants who sustained a subsequent ACL injury completed assessments at the time of surgery and at 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Healthy participants were recruited to repeat the baseline assessments within 1 year of graduation. Inter- and intragroup differences at these time points were evaluated with dependent and independent t tests, respectively. We also compared these results with established minimum clinically important difference (MCID) values. Results: Of 1268 first year students entering the academy, 1005 with no previous injuries consented to participate in this study (82% male, mean ± SD age 19 ± 1 years). Of those enrolled, 30 suffered an ACL injury and met the inclusion criteria for this study. Ninety uninjured control students who met the inclusion criteria completed follow-up assessments. There were statistically significant differences across all KOOS and WOMAC subscales between ACL-injured group and uninjured group at the time of the final follow-up assessment. Four KOOS subscales (Pain, Symptoms, Sports and Recreation Function, and Knee-Related Quality of Life) and the WOMAC Stiffness subscale demonstrated >8-point differences between groups, which exceeded the established MCID for these instruments. There were no significant differences between the ACL-injured group and uninjured groups noted for the MARS (P = .635). At the time of final follow-up, the ACL-injured group also reported significant deficits on the WOMAC Stiffness subscale (P = .032), the MARS (P = .030), and all KOOS subscales, with the exception of Functional Activities of Daily Living, as compared with their preinjury baseline scores. These deficits exceeded the established MCID values for 3 KOOS subscales and the MARS. Conclusion: Patients with ACL injuries reported significant deficits on PROMs at least 2 years after surgical reconstruction in relation to preinjury baseline scores and an uninjured control group. Many of these deficits exceeded established MCID values.

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Portuguese version of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)

BackgroundThe FINE total knee was developed in Japan and clinical use began in 2001. It has unique design features, including an oblique 3o femorotibial joint line that reproduces anatomical geometry. Although 20 years have passed since the FINE knee was clinically used for the first time in Japan, a formal clinical evaluation including patient-reported and radiographic outcomes has not been undertaken.MethodsA total of 175 consecutive primary cruciate-retaining (CR)-FINE total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) at our hospital between February 2015 and March 2017 were included in this study. Three years postoperatively, range of motion (ROM), Knee Society Score (KSS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) were recorded and compared with preoperative scores. Radiographic analyses including mechanical alignment, component alignment, and incidence of radiolucent lines also were undertaken based on the radiographs 3 years postoperatively.ResultsOne-hundred twenty-two knees (70%) were available for 3-year follow-up data using KOOS, except for the sports subscale. Postoperative KOOS-symptom, −pain and -ADL were > 85 points, but KOOS-sports, −QOL and FJS were less satisfactory. ROM, KSS and all the subscales of KOOS were significantly improved compared with preoperative scores. Postoperative mean FJS was 66 and was significantly correlated with all the subscales of KOOS, but not with postoperative ROM. Radiolucent lines ≧1 mm wide were detected in five knees (4.1%). There were no major complications needing revision surgeries.ConclusionsPatient-reported outcomes (PROs) for symptoms, pain and ADL after the CR-FINE TKA were generally improved, but those for sports, QOL and FJS were improved less. The incidence of radiolucent lines was rare but detected around the femoral components. With the mid- to long-term follow-up, improvements of surgical technique will be necessary to achieve better PROs from patients receiving the FINE knee.

Minimal clinically important differences in short-term postoperative Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) after total knee arthroplasty: A prospective cohort study

Validation of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Pain and Function Subscales for Use in Total Hip Replacement and Total Knee Replacement Clinical Trials

IntroductionPersistent post-operative pain (PPOP) has detracted from some otherwise successful knee arthroplasties. This study investigated medial abrasion syndrome (MAS) as a cause of PPOP after knee arthroplasty. The surgical techniques and outcomes of incorporating this concept into the management of both primary arthroplasty cases and patients suffering from unknown causes of PPOP after arthroplasties were presented.Materials and methodsIn a 1-year period, the author performed unicompartmental or total knee arthroplasty (the UKA or TKA group) that also eliminated medial abrasion phenomenon (MAP) on 196 knees of 150 patients at advanced stages of knee osteoarthritis (OA). During the same year, 16 knees of 16 patients with unknown causes of PPOP after knee arthroplasties were referred to the author for the arthroscopic medial release procedure (the AMR group) after being diagnosed as MAS. Subjective satisfaction, Knee Society Score (KSS), and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) evaluations were used for outcome study.ResultsAll 166 patients were followed for more than 3 years (mean 3.7 years, 3.1–4.2) for the outcome study. All knees receiving arthroplasty showed medial plicae with MAP at the time of surgery. Only 2 of them suffered from PPOP: one was a neglected tibial plateau fracture with residual varus deformity after UKA, and the other was a late infection after TKA and received revision. The satisfactory rate was 98.8% in the UKA group, 99.1% in the TKA group, and 100% in the AMR group. The Knee Society Scores and all subscales of KOOS were statistically improved in all groups.ConclusionsMAS is a cause of pain in patients who have received knee arthroplasties, and MAP should be eliminated to ensure a successful knee arthroplasty. PPOP after knee arthroplasty can be caused by MAS, which can be managed by AMR.

Background and purpose — There are many techniques for placing the femoral component in correct rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but only a few have been tested against the supposed gold standard, rotation determined by postoperative computed tomography (CT). We evaluated the accuracy and variability of a new method, the clinical rotational axis (CRA) method, and assessed the association between the CRA and knee function.Patients and methods — The CRA is a line derived from clinical judgement of information from the surgical transepicondylar axis, the anteroposterior axis, and the posterior condylar line. The CRA was used to guide the rotational positioning of the femoral component in 80 knees (46 female). At 3 years follow-up, the rotation of the femoral component was compared with the CT-derived surgical transepicondylar axis (CTsTEA) by 3 observers. Functional outcome was assessed with the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and patient satisfaction (VAS).Results — The mean (95% CI) rotational deviation of the femoral component from the CTsTEA was 0.2° (–0.15°–0.55°). The standard deviation (95% CI) was 1.58° (1.36°–1.85°) and the range was from 3.7° internal rotation to 3.7° external rotation. No statistically significant association was found between femoral component rotation and KOOS, OKS, or VAS.Interpretation — The CRA method was found to be accurate with a low grade of variability.

Impact of Component Alignment and Soft Tissue Release on 2-Year Outcomes in Total Knee Arthroplasty