• Open Access IconOpen Access
  • https://doi.org/10.2172/1026473Copy DOI Icon

Final Report - Summer Visit 2010

  • Sep 12, 2011
  • R Bank
Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

During my visit to LLNL during the summer of 2010, I worked on algebraic multilevel solvers for large sparse systems of linear equations arising from discretizations of partial differential equations. The particular solver of interest is based on ILU decomposition. The setup phase for this AMG solve is just the single ILU decomposition, and its corresponding error matrix. Because the ILU uses a minimum degree or similar sparse matrix ordering, most of the fill-in, and hence most of the error, is concentrated in the lower right corner of the factored matrix. All of the major multigrid components - the smoother, the coarse level correction matrices, and the fine-to-coarse and coarse-to-fine rectangular transfer matrices, are defined in terms of various blocks of the ILU factorization. Although such a strategy is not likely to be optimal in terms of convergence properties, it has a relatively low setup cost, and therefore is useful in situations where setup costs for more traditional AMG approaches cannot be amortized over the solution of many linear systems using the same matrix. Such a situation arises in adaptive methods, where often just one linear system is solved at each step of an adaptive feedback loop, or in solving nonlinear equations by approximate Newton methods, where the approximate Jacobian might change substantially from iteration to iteration. In general terms, coarse levels are defined in terms of successively smaller lower right blocks of the matrix, typically decreasing geometrically in order. The most difficult issue was the coarse grid correction matrix. The preconditioner/smoother for a given level is just the corresponding lower right blocks of the ILU factorization. The coarse level matrix itself is just the Schur complement; this matrix is not known exactly using just the ILU decomposition in the setup phase. Thus we approximate this matrix using various combinations of the preconditioning matrix and the error matrix. During my visit, several approximations of this type were implemented and tested. While some improved the convergence rate of the overall method, these gains had to be balanced against the additional costs involved in creating and applying these matrices. By this more stringent criterion, none of the improved approximations could be characterized as an unqualified success.

Similar Papers
  • Single Report

Solving large-scale sparse eigenvalue problems and linear systems of equations for accelerator modeling

  • Mar 30, 2009
  • Gene Golub +1
  • Supplementary Content
  • Citations1

Solution of Large-scale Structured Optimization Problems with Schur-complement and Augmented Lagrangian Decomposition Methods

  • Aug 02, 2019
  • Figshare
  • Jose S Rodriguez
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations8

Multigrid Methods forFEMandBEMApplications

  • Aug 15, 2004
  • Wolfgang Hackbusch
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Abhängigkeit der Homogenität vom Radionuklid bei SPECT: Methoden der Überprüfung

  • Jan 01, 2004
  • Zeitschrift fuer Medizinische Physik
  • Heiko Kalnischke +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations45

Bias Correction for Polarimetric Phased-Array Radar With Idealized Aperture and Patch Antenna Elements

  • Jan 01, 2013
  • IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
  • Lei Lei +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations8

Colour error reduction in video systems

  • Mar 01, 1990
  • IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting
  • R.J Green +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations124

Cyclic Reduction Tridiagonal Solvers on GPUs Applied to Mixed-Precision Multigrid

  • Jan 01, 2011
  • IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems
  • Dominik Goddeke +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations126

Recent advances in direct methods for solving unsymmetric sparse systems of linear equations

  • Sep 01, 2002
  • ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software
  • Anshul Gupta
  • Research Article
  • Citations54

A projection method for solving nonsymmetric linear systems on multiprocessors

  • Feb 01, 1989
  • Parallel Computing
  • Chandrika Kamath +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations22

Parallel frontal solvers for large sparse linear systems

  • Dec 01, 2003
  • ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software
  • Jennifer A Scott
  • Research Article
  • Citations7

Low-rank updates of balanced incomplete factorization preconditioners

  • Jun 17, 2016
  • Numerical Algorithms
  • J Cerdán +2
  • Research Article

Parallel Implementation of the Coordinates-partitioning Based Aggregation-type Algebraic Multigrid Preconditioners

  • Mar 07, 2018
  • DEStech Transactions on Computer Science and Engineering
  • Jian-Ping Wu +2
  • Conference Article

A Multigrid Method using Explicit Approximate Inverses for the Numerical Solution of Two-Dimensional Time-Dependent Problems

  • Aug 20, 2012
  • Civil-comp proceedings
  • C.K Filelis-Papadopoulos +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations11

Factored sparse approximate inverse of block tridiagonal and block pentadiagonal matricies

  • Sep 05, 2006
  • Applied Mathematics and Computation
  • Mohammad H Koulaei +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

Scalable line and plane relaxation in a parallel structured multigrid solver

  • Oct 20, 2020
  • Parallel Computing
  • Andrew Reisner +3
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.