We give a characterization of k-dimensional (k > 1) Menger manifolds admitting boundaries in the sense of Chapman and Siebenmann.In [5] Chapman and Siebenmann considered the problem of putting a boundary on a Hilbert cube manifold (similar problems in the cases of smooth and piecewise linear manifolds were considered in [2,14]; a parametrical version of the above problem was considered in [13]).It was proved there that if a Q-manifold M satisfies certain minimal necessary homotopy-theoretic conditions (finite type and tameness at oo ), then there are two obstructions o0O(M) and Too(M) to M having a boundary.The first one is an element of the group lim{J?67ri(M -A) : A c M compact}, where %nx is the projective class group functor.If Ooo(M) = 0, then the second obstruction can be defined as an element of the first derived limit of the inverse system lim {W hnx (M -A) : A M compact} , where Whnx is the Whitehead group functor.Further, it was proved in [5] that the different boundaries that can be put on M constitute a whole shape class and that a classification of all possible ways of putting boundaries on M can be done in terms of the group lim {Whnx (M -A) : Ac.M compact}.In the present paper we carry out a similar program for the problem of putting boundaries on pn+x -manifolds, where pn+x denotes the (n + 1 )-dimensional universal Menger compactum (a p"+x -manifold M admits a boundary if there exists a compact p"+x-manifold N such that M = N-Z , where Z is a Z-set in N ; in this case we shall say that N is a compactification of M corresponding to the boundary Z , and conversely, Z is a boundary of M corresponding to the compactification N. We recall also that a closed subset Z of a space X is said to be a Z-set if for each open cover ^ e cov(X) there is a map f:X-*X-Z ^-close to the identity map of X ).Having in mind a deep analogy between the theories of pn+x -manifolds and Q-manifolds [1,[6][7][8][9] it is not surprising that the corresponding results are valid in the case of pn+xmanifolds as well.However, it should be observed that the situation in the last case is much simpler.For example, the analogies of the above-described