Mapping Myocardial Salvage Index by Extracellular Volume Fraction: Are We There Yet?
HomeCirculation: Cardiovascular ImagingVol. 10, No. 7Mapping Myocardial Salvage Index by Extracellular Volume Fraction Free AccessEditorialPDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toFree AccessEditorialPDF/EPUBMapping Myocardial Salvage Index by Extracellular Volume FractionAre We There Yet? Heerajnarain Bulluck, PhD and Derek J. Hausenloy, MBChB, PhD Heerajnarain BulluckHeerajnarain Bulluck From the The Hatter Cardiovascular Institute, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, United Kingdom (H.B., D.J.H.); The National Institute of Health Research, Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospitals, United Kingdom (H.B., D.J.H.); Papworth Hospital NHS Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom (H.B.); Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom (D.J.H.); National Heart Research Institute Singapore, National Heart Centre, Singapore (D.J.H.); Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disorders Program, Duke-National University of Singapore (D.J.H.); and Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore (D.J.H.). and Derek J. HausenloyDerek J. Hausenloy From the The Hatter Cardiovascular Institute, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, United Kingdom (H.B., D.J.H.); The National Institute of Health Research, Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospitals, United Kingdom (H.B., D.J.H.); Papworth Hospital NHS Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom (H.B.); Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom (D.J.H.); National Heart Research Institute Singapore, National Heart Centre, Singapore (D.J.H.); Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disorders Program, Duke-National University of Singapore (D.J.H.); and Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore (D.J.H.). Originally published3 Jul 2017https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.006680Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2017;10:e006680In ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI), the myocardial salvage index (MSI) provides a more sensitive measure for assessing the efficacy of novel cardioprotective therapies, than an absolute reduction in myocardial infarct (MI) size. Knowledge of the MI size and the size of the area at risk (AAR) are prerequisites for measuring the MSI, and both may be obtained by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in reperfused STEMI patients, with the MSI shown to predict clinical outcomes after PPCI.1 CMR is considered the gold standard imaging modality for quantifying MI size, and it can also delineate the edema-based AAR, with T2- and T1-mapping CMR emerging as the most robust techniques,2 although no consensus has yet been reached.See Article by Garg et alIn this issue of Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging, Garg et al3 report on a potentially novel approach for quantifying the AAR, chronic MI size, and MSI in a study of 50 STEMI patients reperfused by PPCI, based on extracellular volume fraction (ECV) maps from an acute CMR scan. The study derived specific ECV cutoff values on an acute CMR scan (performed at a median of 48 hours post-PPCI) in a subset of 10 patients, to delineate the AAR (when compared with T2-STIR imaging), and chronic MI size (when compared with late gadolinium enhancement [LGE]) on a follow-up scan performed at 3 months post-PPCI). Using acute ECV cutoff values of >33% to delineate the AAR and >46% to delineate chronic MI size, they concluded that acute ECV maps could be used to reliably quantify AAR, chronic MI size, and MSI. Being able to accurately quantify MI size using a pixel-wise acute ECV map would be appealing and could be potentially easily implemented in clinical practice with the wider availability of in-line, automated ECV map generation from the scanner, to improve workflow.4 However, there are several potential limitations to consider concerning the use of acute ECV maps to detect the AAR, chronic MI size, and MSI in reperfused STEMI patients.First, the study did not specifically compare the performance of ECV-derived MSI with conventional MSI (from LGE and T2-STIR), and whether acute ECV maps can be used to estimate the MSI remains to be demonstrated. The authors could have considered using the reference standard of manual delineation of AAR and MI size by experienced operators, rather than semiautomated thresholding methods, which are known to have their limitations.5,6 The presence of microvascular obstruction (MVO) on the acute CMR scan is known to pseudonormalize the ECV,5,7 because of failure of the gadolinium chelate to penetrate areas of MVO, which could have affected MI size regression, thereby making it challenging to estimate chronic MI size from the acute ECV in patients with MVO. Finally, the study used ≤75% transmural MI on the follow-up CMR scan to define viable myocardium, instead of the conventionally accepted definitions of ≤50% for viability on CMR.8 In addition, the study defined an increase of ≥15% in left ventricular (LV) end-systolic volume to define adverse LV remodeling, instead of the conventional definition of ≥20% increase in LV end-diastolic volume for adverse LV remodeling on echocardiography.9 In this regard, we have recently proposed CMR-based definitions for assessing adverse LV remodeling after STEMI, which may be helpful for future CMR studies.10 The study findings are also thought-provoking and raise some interesting questions for the field.Can Acute ECV Maps Be Used to Accurately Delineate the Chronic MI Size Given the Pathological Differences That Exist Between Acute and Chronic MI?It is well recognized that acute MI size is dynamic, and acutely reduces in size within the first week,11,12 and more chronically reduces over the first few months.5,11 The regression in MI size represents the gradual resolution of myocardial edema, intramyocardial hemorrhage and MVO, and the gradual replacement of necrotic tissue with fibrosis in the chronic infarct.11 Furthermore, LV remodeling leads to thinning of the infarcted territory and compensatory LV hypertrophy of the adjacent and remote myocardium, resulting in the overall reduction in LGE mass observed in the chronic phase. The overestimation of acute MI size by LGE on the acute CMR scan can be minimized by acquiring LGE images at least 15 minutes after contrast injection and undertaking the acute CMR scan at day 7.13 In addition, acute MI size has recently been shown to be prognostic14 and may help to reduce sample size in clinical cardioprotection studies in reperfused STEMI patients, thereby obviating the need to measure chronic MI size, which can be challenging to perform in clinical cardioprotection studies.6 Therefore, the differences between the pathologies underlying acute and chronic MI, may in part, have impacted on the study findings and may have contributed to the substantial variability observed between acute MI size by ECV and chronic MI size by LGE, with the Bland–Altman analysis showing a bias of 1.9% and wide limits of agreement of ±10.5%. This suggests that acute ECV maps may not yet be ready to reliably predict chronic MI size after STEMI.Can Acute ECV Maps Be Used to Accurately Delineate the AAR Given That Edema in Salvaged Myocardium Can Be Both Intracellular and Interstitial After STEMI?During acute myocardial ischemia, interruption of the blood supply to the myocardium disrupts cardiomyocyte Na+/K+ channel function, leading to increased transmembrane Na+ gradients and intracellular edema. Prolonged periods of ischemia can result in cardiomyocyte cell membrane rupture, thereby adding to the intracellular edema. Alterations in capillary permeability can promote interstitial edema, resulting in both intracellular and interstitial edema during acute myocardial ischemia. Furthermore, reperfusion can exacerbate both interstitial and intracellular edema and may also lead to extravasation of red blood cells.15 Native T1-mapping, T2-mapping, or T2-STIR CMR imaging detect both intracellular and interstitial edema, whereas acute ECV can only detect edema in the latter compartment,16 and, therefore, areas of intracellular edema in the salvaged myocardium may be overlooked by acute ECV.It may also be challenging for acute ECV maps to reliably differentiate salvaged myocardium within the AAR from remote myocardium outside the AAR, given that there can be overlap in acute ECV values between the salvaged and remote myocardium after STEMI. In this regard, Hammer-Hansen et al17 have recently reported an overlap in acute ECV values between salvaged versus remote myocardium (95% of the acute ECV values were 18%–30% in the remote, and 28%–51% in the salvaged myocardium) after STEMI. An overlap in acute ECV values between the salvaged and remote myocardium may also have affected the study by Garg et al,3 with areas of acute ECV >33% observed in the remote myocardium (Figure 3, case 1). Furthermore, a previous study by the same research group had reported an acute ECV of 29±6% in the remote myocardium,18 confirming the potential for overlap in acute ECV values between salvaged and remote myocardium. Again, this may explain, in part, the wide limits of agreement (±10.4%) observed in this study, indicating a large variability in the observed values between acute ECV AAR and T2-STIR AAR.3 In a previous study, we had observed limits of agreement of ±5.1% when comparing T1 and T2 mapping to detect the AAR in reperfused STEMI patients,2 and limits of agreement of ±10.4% observed with acute ECV maps for delineating T2-weighted AAR may be too wide for clinical application. This suggests that acute ECV maps may not yet be ready to measure AAR after STEMI.In summary, performing a comprehensive CMR study in acutely reperfused STEMI patients can be very challenging, and Garg et al3 should be congratulated on their study investigating the potential role of acute ECV mapping for assessing AAR, chronic MI size, and MSI. Multiparametric CMR mapping has provided valuable insights into the changes occurring in areas of MI, MVO, intramyocardial hemorrhage, and salvaged/remote myocardium following STEMI.7,19,20 However, more validation work is needed before acute ECV mapping, can be used to reliably assess AAR, MI size, and MSI in reperfused STEMI patients.Sources of FundingDr Hausenloy is supported by the British Heart Foundation (FS/10/039/28270), Duke-National University Singapore Medical School, and the National Institute for Health Research, Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospitals. This research is supported by the Singapore Ministry of Health's National Medical Research Council under its Clinician Scientist-Senior Investigator scheme (NMRC/CSA-SI/0011/2017) and Collaborative Centre Grant scheme (NMRC/CGAug16C006). This research is supported by the Singapore Ministry of Education Academic Research Fund Tier 2 (MOE2016-T2-2–021).DisclosuresNone.FootnotesThe opinions expressed in this article are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Heart Association.Correspondence to Derek J. Hausenloy, MBChB, PhD, Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases Program, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School Singapore, 8 College Rd, Singapore 169857. E-mail [email protected]
Read more