Frequency Estimation Mechanisms Under ϵδ-Utility-Optimized Local Differential Privacy

SummaryIn big data mining, the K‐prototypes has become a popular clustering method for mixed data owing to its simplicity and efficiency. However, the data clustering process of the K‐prototypes method will cause the risk of user privacy leakage because user data usually contain sensitive information. To address this issue, general solutions introduce a trusted third‐party model for privacy protection in clustering analysis, but it is difficult to find a fully trusted entity in reality. In this article, we propose a local differential privacy K‐prototypes (LDPK) mechanism, which does not require any trusted third party to perform privacy preprocessing on user data. Our mechanism first uses local differential privacy to disturb user data, then completes the clustering through the interaction between server and user. Furthermore, we propose a privacy protection enhancement mechanism (ELDPK) by extending the LDPK mechanism, which disturbs the user's clustering information in each iteration to protect user privacy further. Theoretical analysis proves the privacy and feasibility of our proposed scheme, and the experimental results prove that our proposed scheme can guarantee the quality of the clustering results under the premise of satisfying the local differential privacy.

Top-k frequent items detection is a fundamental task in data stream mining. Many promising solutions are proposed to improve memory efficiency while still maintaining high accuracy for detecting the Top-k items. Despite the memory efficiency concern, the users could suffer from privacy loss if participating in the task without proper protection, since their contributed local data streams may continually leak sensitive individual information. However, most existing works solely focus on addressing either the memory-efficiency problem or the privacy concerns but seldom jointly, which cannot achieve a satisfactory tradeoff between memory efficiency, privacy protection, and detection accuracy. In this paper, we present a novel framework HG-LDP to achieve accurate Top-k item detection at bounded memory expense, while providing rigorous local differential privacy (LDP) protection. Specifically, we identify two key challenges naturally arising in the task, which reveal that directly applying existing LDP techniques will lead to an inferior "accuracy-privacy-memory efficiency" tradeoff. Therefore, we instantiate three advanced schemes under the framework by designing novel LDP randomization methods, which address the hurdles caused by the large size of the item domain and by the limited space of the memory. We conduct comprehensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets to show that the proposed advanced schemes achieve a superior "accuracy-privacy-memory efficiency" tradeoff, saving 2300× memory over baseline methods when the item domain size is 41,270. Our code is anonymously open-sourced via the link.

Distributed K-Means clustering guaranteeing local differential privacy

Local differential privacy (LDP) provides a way for an untrusted data collector to aggregate users' data without violating their privacy. Various privacy-preserving data analysis tasks have been studied under the protection of LDP, such as frequency estimation, frequent itemset mining, and machine learning. Despite its privacy-preserving properties, recent research has demonstrated the vulnerability of certain LDP protocols to data poisoning attacks. However, existing data poisoning attacks are focused on basic statistics under LDP, such as frequency estimation and mean/variance estimation. As an important data analysis task, the security of LDP frequent itemset mining has yet to be thoroughly examined. In this paper, we aim to address this issue by presenting novel and practical data poisoning attacks against LDP frequent itemset mining protocols. By introducing a unified attack framework with composable attack operations, our data poisoning attack can successfully manipulate the state-of-the-art LDP frequent itemset mining protocols and has the potential to be adapted to other protocols with similar structures. We conduct extensive experiments on three datasets to compare the proposed attack with four baseline attacks. The results demonstrate the severity of the threat and the effectiveness of the proposed attack.

Local Differential Privacy (LDP) has been widely recognized as a powerful tool for providing a strong theoretical guarantee of data privacy to data contributors against an untrusted data collector. Under a typical LDP scheme, each data contributor independently randomly perturbs their data before submitting them to the data collector, which in turn infers valuable statistics about the original data from received perturbed data. Common to existing LDP mechanisms is an inherent trade-off between the level of privacy protection and data utility in the sense that strong data privacy often comes at the cost of reduced data utility. Frequency estimation based on Randomized Response (RR) is a fundamental building block of many LDP mechanisms. In this paper, we propose a novel Joint Randomized Response (JRR) mechanism based on correlated data perturbations to achieve locally differentially private frequency estimation. JRR divides data contributors into disjoint groups of two members and lets those in the same group jointly perturb their binary data to improve frequency-estimation accuracy and achieve the same level of data privacy by hiding the group membership information in contrast to the classical RR mechanism. Theoretical analysis and detailed simulation studies using both real and synthetic datasets show that JRR achieves the same level of data privacy as the classical RR mechanism while improving the frequency-estimation accuracy in the overwhelming majority of the cases by up to two orders of magnitude.

Opening data of plenty valuable information as public dataset provides great potential treasure to academy or industry. Despite of de-identification process that most of data owner will take before releasing those data, however, the more datasets are opened to public, the more likely personal privacy exposed will be. Previous studies have shown that personal identity and sensitive information might be re-identified by joining two or more de-identified data table with common attributes. According to previous real case studies, even though the personally identifiable information have been de-identified, sensitive personal information still could be uncovered by heterogeneous or cross-domain data joining operation. This kind of privacy re-identification are usually too complicated or obscure to be realized by data owner, not to mention that this problem will be more severe as the scale of data goes large. For the purpose of preventing damage of sensitive information leakage, this paper shows how to use a novel open data de-identification visualization analysis tool (ODD Visualizer) to verify whether there exists sensitive information leakage problem in the target datasets. The high effectiveness, that ODD Visualizer can provide, mainly comes from implementing scalable computing platform as well as developing efficient data visualization technique. Demonstration proves that ODD Visualizer indeed uncovered one real vulnerability of record linkage attack among open datasets available on the internet.

Many real-world social networks are decentralized in nature, and the only way to analyze such a network is to collect local views of the social graph from individual participants. Since local views may contain sensitive information, it is often desirable to apply differential privacy in the data collection process, which provides strong and rigorous privacy guarantees. In many practical situations, the local view of a participant contains not only her own connections, but also those of her neighbors, which are private and sensitive for the neighbors, but not directly so for the participant herself. We call such information beyond direct connections an extended local view (ELV), and study two fundamental problems related to ELVs: first, how do we correctly enforce differential privacy for all participants in the presence of ELVs? Second, how can the data collector utilize ELVs to obtain accurate estimates of global graph properties? This paper points out that when collecting ELVs, it is insufficient to apply a straightforward adaptation of local differential privacy (LDP), a commonly used scheme in practice, to protect the privacy of all network participants. The main problem is that an adversarial data collector can accumulate private information on a specific victim from multiple neighbors of the victim; even though the data collected from each neighbor is perturbed under LDP, their aggregate can still violate the victim's privacy. To prevent this attack, we formulate a novel decentralized differential privacy (DDP) scheme, which requires that each participant consider not only her own privacy, but also that of her neighbors involved in her ELV. The stringent privacy requirement of DDP, however, makes it challenging to design an effective mechanism for data collection. Towards this goal, we design a novel multi-phase framework under DDP that enables an analyst to accurately estimate subgraph counts, an important property of social graphs. The main idea is that instead of collecting subgraph counts directly, which would require excessively noise, the analyst first asks individuals about their respective minimum noise scale, which is private information since it depends on the local graph structure, and, thus, must be performed under DDP. For some types of subgraphs, this process is applied recursively, i.e., the analyst asks about the necessary noise to be injected into the private information on the minimum local noise scale required to protect subgraph counts under DDP. As case studies, we instantiate the proposed framework for three common subgraph patterns: triangles, three-hop paths, and k-cliques. Extensive experiments using real data demonstrate that the proposed scheme leads to accurate estimates of global subgraph counts, whereas baseline solutions fail to obtain meaningful result utility.

With the advent of the era of big data, privacy issues have been becoming a hot topic in public. Local differential privacy (LDP) is a state-of-the-art privacy preservation technique that allows to perform big data analysis (e.g., statistical estimation, statistical learning, and data mining) while guaranteeing each individual participant’s privacy. In this paper, we present a comprehensive survey of LDP. We first give an overview on the fundamental knowledge of LDP and its frameworks. We then introduce the mainstream privatization mechanisms and methods in detail from the perspective of frequency oracle and give insights into recent studied on private basic statistical estimation (e.g., frequency estimation and mean estimation) and complex statistical estimation (e.g., multivariate distribution estimation and private estimation over complex data) under LDP. Furthermore, we present current research circumstances on LDP including the private statistical learning/inferencing, private statistical data analysis, privacy amplification techniques for LDP, and some application fields under LDP. Finally, we identify future research directions and open challenges for LDP. This survey can serve as a good reference source for the research of LDP to deal with various privacy-related scenarios to be encountered in practice.

Federated learning (FL) allows to train a massive amount of data privately due to its decentralized structure. Stochastic gradient descent (SGD) is commonly used for FL due to its good empirical performance, but sensitive user information can still be inferred from weight updates shared during FL iterations. We consider Gaussian mechanisms to preserve local differential privacy (LDP) of user data in the FL model with SGD. The trade-offs between user privacy, global utility, and transmission rate are proved by defining appropriate metrics for FL with LDP. Compared to existing results, the query sensitivity used in LDP is defined as a variable, and a tighter privacy accounting method is applied. The proposed utility bound allows heterogeneous parameters over all users. Our bounds characterize how much utility decreases and transmission rate increases if a stronger privacy regime is targeted. Furthermore, given a target privacy level, our results guarantee a significantly larger utility and a smaller transmission rate as compared to existing privacy accounting methods.

When collecting information, local differential privacy (LDP) alleviates privacy concerns of users because their private information is randomized before being sent it to the central aggregator. LDP imposes large amount of noise as each user executes the randomization independently. To address this issue, recent work introduced an intermediate server with the assumption that this intermediate server does not collude with the aggregator. Under this assumption, less noise can be added to achieve the same privacy guarantee as LDP, thus improving utility for the data collection task. This paper investigates this multiple-party setting of LDP. We analyze the system model and identify potential adversaries. We then make two improvements: a new algorithm that achieves a better privacy-utility tradeoff; and a novel protocol that provides better protection against various attacks. Finally, we perform experiments to compare different methods and demonstrate the benefits of using our proposed method.

Trajectory data collection is a common task with many applications in our daily lives. Analyzing trajectory data enables service providers to enhance their services, which ultimately benefits users. However, directly collecting trajectory data may give rise to privacy-related issues that cannot be ignored. Local differential privacy (LDP), as the de facto privacy protection standard in a decentralized setting, enables users to perturb their trajectories locally and provides a provable privacy guarantee. Existing approaches to private trajectory data collection in a local setting typically use relaxed versions of LDP, which cannot provide a strict privacy guarantee, or require some external knowledge that is impractical to obtain and update in a timely manner. To tackle these problems, we propose a novel trajectory perturbation mechanism that relies solely on an underlying location set and satisfies pure ε-LDP to provide a stringent privacy guarantee. In the proposed mechanism, each point's adjacent direction information in the trajectory is used in its perturbation process. Such information serves as an effective clue to connect neighboring points and can be used to restrict the possible region of a perturbed point in order to enhance utility. To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first to use direction information for trajectory perturbation under LDP. Furthermore, based on this mechanism, we present an anchor-based method that adaptively restricts the region of each perturbed trajectory, thereby significantly boosting performance without violating the privacy constraint. Extensive experiments on both real-world and synthetic datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed mechanisms.

Spam phone calls have been rapidly growing from nuisance to an increasingly effective scam delivery tool. To counter this increasingly successful attack vector, a number of commercial smartphone apps that promise to block spam phone calls have appeared on app stores, and are now used by hundreds of thousands or even millions of users. However, following a business model similar to some online social network services, these apps often collect call records or other potentially sensitive information from users' phones with little or no formal privacy guarantees. In this paper, we study whether it is possible to build a practical collaborative phone blacklisting system that makes use of local differential privacy (LDP) mechanisms to provide clear privacy guarantees. We analyze the challenges and trade-offs related to using LDP, evaluate our LDP-based system on real-world user-reported call records collected by the FTC, and show that it is possible to learn a phone blacklist using a reasonable overall privacy budget and at the same time preserve users' privacy while maintaining utility for the learned blacklist.

Truth discovery has emerged as an effective tool to mitigate data inconsistency in crowdsensing by prioritizing data from high-quality responders. While local differential privacy (LDP) has emerged as a crucial privacy-preserving paradigm, existing studies under LDP rarely explore a worker's participation in specific tasks for sparse scenarios, which may also reveal sensitive information such as individual preferences and behaviors. Existing LDP mechanisms, when applied to truth discovery in sparse settings, may create undesirable dense distributions, provide insufficient privacy protection, and introduce excessive noise, compromising the efficacy of subsequent non-private truth discovery. Additionally, the interplay between noise injection and truth discovery remains insufficiently explored in the current literature. To address these issues, we propose a lOcally differentially private truth diSCovery approach for spArse cRowdsensing, namely OSCAR. The main idea is to use advanced optimization techniques to reconstruct the sparse data distribution and re-formalize truth discovery by considering the statistical characteristics of injected Laplacian noise while protecting the privacy of both the tasks being completed and the corresponding sensory data. Specifically, to address the data density concerns while alleviating noise, we design a randomized response based Bernoulli matrix factorization method BerRR. To recover the sparse structures from densified, perturbed data, we formalize a 0-1 integer programming problem and develop a sparse recovery solving method SpaIE based on implicit enumeration. We further devise a Laplacian-sensitive truth discovery method LapCRH that leverages maximum likelihood estimation to re-formalize truth discovery by measuring differences between noisy values and truths based on the statistical characteristic of Laplacian noise. Our comprehensive theoretical analysis establishes OSCAR's privacy guarantees, utility bounds, and computational complexity. Experimental results show that OSCAR surpasses the state-of-the-arts by at least 30% in accuracy improvement.

Local Differential Privacy (LDP) provides a formal guarantee of privacy that enables the collection and analysis of sensitive data without revealing any individual's data. While LDP methods have been extensively studied, there is a lack of a systematic and empirical comparison of LDP methods for descriptive statistics. In this paper, we first provide a systematization of LDP methods for descriptive statistics, comparing their properties and requirements. We demonstrate that several mean estimation methods based on sampling from a Bernoulli distribution are equivalent in the one-dimensional case and introduce methods for variance estimation. We then empirically compare methods for mean, variance, and frequency estimation. Finally, we provide recommendations for the use of LDP methods for descriptive statistics and discuss their limitations and open questions.

Local differential privacy (LDP) is a promising privacy model for data collection that protects sensitive information of individuals. However, applying LDP to top-<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$k$</tex-math></inline-formula> estimation in set-valued data (e.g., identifying most frequent <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$k$</tex-math></inline-formula> items) may yield poor results for small and sparse datasets due to high sensitivity and heavy perturbation. To address this, we propose an adaptive approach that frames the problem as a multi-armed bandit (MAB) problem, in which the decision-maker selects actions based on information collected from previous rounds to maximize the total reward over time. Inspired by this, we present two adaptive sampling schemes based on MAB: <b>ARBS</b> for identifying top-<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$k$</tex-math></inline-formula> items and <b>ARBSF</b> for both top-<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$k$</tex-math></inline-formula> item discovery and frequency estimation on these items. Furthermore, to address the potential long delay of multi-round collection, we propose an optimization technique to reduce the time complexity. Both theoretical and empirical results show that our adaptive sampling schemes significantly outperform existing alternatives.