Michel Foucault shows a profound interest in a minor text by Immanuel Kant, ist die (What is Enlightenment?).1 In Foucault's view, with this text Kant opens up a new form of philosophically critical problematization which was be further developed by very different authors such as Hegel, Nietzsche, Weber, Frankfurt School, and Foucault himself. Kant raises philosophical question of present day in a specific way. For first time in ist die philosophy directly addresses question of what is contemporaneous: is not seeking understand present on basis of a totality or of a future achievement. He is looking for a difference: What difference does today introduce with respect yesterday?2 What is this in which we are inserted and that defines context in which philosopher writes? Kant's question, Was ist die Aufklarung? is essentially a historical question aiming at identification of an essential aspect of present which questioning philosopher belongs: a problematization of discursive actuality emerges, a problematization of our belonging a specific, social context, i.e., to a cultural context characteristic of one's own actuality.3 Now, if we want ask a question of present day, our question might be: what is capitalism? is a religion. This is surprising answer given by Walter Benjamin in a brief, but extremely dense, fragment written in 1921. The sociologist Dirk Baecker, who has recently edited a collected work on this subject, also affirms that now more than ever it is legitimate conceive capitalism as a religion.4 Once socialist alternative has disappeared, it seems hard even think of possibility of a non-capitalistic society, and capitalistic values acquire religious overtones. Moreover, Giorgio Agamben's recent essay In Praise of Profanation, inspired by Benjamin's fragment, further develops thesis of religious character of present phase of capitalism.5 To begin, I want consider Benjamin's dense fragment. In Benjamin's view capitalism is not merely, as Max Weber believed, a religiously conditioned construction, but an essentially religious phenomenon which serves satisfy same worries, anguish, and disquiet formerly answered by so-called religion.6 Benjamin therefore describes capitalism in light of four different characteristics: 1) In first place, capitalism is a cultic religion without any specific form of theology or body of dogma. Capitalism is apure religious cult, perhaps most extreme there ever was. Within it everything only has meaning in direct relation cult.7 2) The celebration of cult is without any solution of continuity: Capitalism is celebration of cult sans reve et sans merci (without dream or mercy). Here there is no 'weekday,' no day that would not be a holy day in terrible sense of exhibiting all sacred pomp.8 This cult therefore should be celebrated without any interruption: it does not allow pauses. 3) The capitalist cult does not expiate, but creates guilt. Benjamin says it is a verschuldender Kultus It is important emphasize the demoniac ambiguity of verb verschulden in German, which refers at same time both debt and guilt.9 is a movement of Verschuldung, which aims at becoming universal. is attempt make Schuld (debt and guilt) universal, to hammer it into consciousness.10 Its process of assimilation does not have any limit. Its objective is include God in system of guilt: The nature of religious movement which is capitalism entails endurance right end, point where God, too, finally takes on entire burden of guilt, point where universe has been taken over by that despair which is actually its secret hope. is entirely without precedent, in that it is a religion which offers not reform of existence, but its complete destruction. …
Read more